Article (Scientific journals)
The odd-even effect in multiplication: parity rule or familiarity with even numbers?
LOCHY, Aliette; Seron, X.; Delazer, M. et al.
2000In Memory and Cognition, 28 (3), p. 358-65
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
Lochy Seron et al._2000_MemCog_parity.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.12 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Adolescent; Adult; Female; Humans; Logic; Male; Mathematics; Memory; Models, Psychological; Problem Solving; Psycholinguistics
Abstract :
[en] This study questions the evidence that a parity rule is used during the verification of multiplication. Previous studies reported that products are rejected faster when they violate the expected parity, which was attributed to the use of a rule (Krueger, 1986; Lemaire & Fayol, 1995). This experiment tested an alternative explanation of this effect: the familiarity hypothesis. Fifty subjects participated in a verification task with contrasting types of problems (even x even, odd x odd, mixed). Some aspects of our results constitute evidence against the use of the parity rule: False even answers were rejected slowly, even when the two operands were odd. We suggest that the odd-even effect in verification of multiplication could not be due to the use of the parity rule, but rather to a familiarity with even numbers (three quarters of products are indeed even).
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & behavior
Author, co-author :
LOCHY, Aliette  ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS)
Seron, X.
Delazer, M.
Butterworth, B.
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
The odd-even effect in multiplication: parity rule or familiarity with even numbers?
Publication date :
2000
Journal title :
Memory and Cognition
ISSN :
0090-502X
Volume :
28
Issue :
3
Pages :
358-65
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Available on ORBilu :
since 05 October 2018

Statistics


Number of views
130 (3 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
35
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
28
OpenAlex citations
 
38
WoS citations
 
35

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu