LUTI models; Europe; city delineation; Urbansim; Theoretical simulation
Abstract :
[en] This paper stresses the lack of attention paid to the geographical definitions of cities in LUTI models as one key detrimental aspect to transferring and generalising LUTI results. First, the argumentation develops from a meta-analysis of peer-reviewed publications about LUTI applications in European cities. We show that most authors do not assess findings against potential geographical biases. Second, theoretical simulations are conducted with UrbanSim applied to a synthetic urban area. By varying the geographical limits of the system and population endowments, our simulations confirm that the absence of control on city delineation weakens the results. Finally, the paper suggests methodological guidelines to improve the comparability of LUTI applications and push forward their theoretical agenda.
Disciplines :
Human geography & demography
Author, co-author :
Thomas, Isabelle; Université Catholique de Louvain - UCL > CORE
Jones, Jonathan; Université Catholique de Louvain - UCL > CORE
CARUSO, Geoffrey ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE)
Gerber, Philippe; Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research - LISER > Urban Development and Mobility
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
City delineation in European applications of LUTI models: review and tests
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Abdel-Rahman, H. M., & Anas, A., (2004). Theories of systems of cities. In J. V., Henderson, & J. F., Thisse (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics. Volume 4 cities and geography (pp. 2293–2340). North-Holland: Elsevier.
Acheampong, R. A., & Silva, E. A., (2015). Land use-transpirt interaction modeling: A review of the literature and future research directions. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 8(3), 11–38.
Alonso. (1964). Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
*Anas, A., (2013a). A summary of the applications to date of RELU-TRAN, a microeconomic urban computable general equilibrium model. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(6), 959–970. doi: 10.1068/b38206
Anas, A., (2013b). A response to the guest editorial: Economics as the science for urban modelling. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40, 955–958. doi: 10.1068/b4006c
*Anderstig, C., & Mattsson, L.-G., (1992). Appraising large-scale investments in a metropolitan transportation system. Transportation, 19(3), 267–283. doi: 10.1007/BF01099981
Arauzo-Carod, J. M., & Manjón-Antolín, M., (2004). Firm size and geographical aggregation: An empirical appraisal in industrial location. Small Business Economics, 22(3-4), 299–312. doi: 10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000022216.09083.76
de la Barra, T., (1989). Integrated land use and transport modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Batty, M., (2005). Cities and complexity: Understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Batty, M., (2008). The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science, 319, 769–771. doi: 10.1126/science.1151419
*Batty, M., Vargas, C., Smith, D., Serras, J., Reades, J., & Johansson, A., (2013). SIMU-LACRA: Fast land-use-transportation models for the rapid assessment of urban futures. Environment and Planning Part, 40B(6), 987–1002.
Berry, B. J., & Lamb, R. F., (1974). The delineation of urban spheres of influence: Evaluation of an interaction model. Regional Studies, 8(2), 185–190. doi: 10.1080/09595237400185171
Bertaud, A., & Malpezzi, S., (2003). The spatial distribution of population in 48 world cities: Implications for economies in transition. Center for Urban Land Economics Research, University of Wisconsin. Retrieved from http://www2.lawrence.edu/fast/finklerm/Complete%20Spatial%20Distribution%20of%20Population%20in%2050%20World%20Ci.pdf
Bierlaire, M., de Palma, A., Hurtubia, R., & Waddell, P., (Eds.). (2015). Integrated transport & land use modelling for sustainable cities. Lausanne: EPFL Press.
*Bonin, O., & Tomasoni, L., (2015). Evaluation of a transit-oriented development scenario in a medium-sized French city by simulation models. International Journal of Transportation, 3(1), 91–112. doi: 10.14257/ijt.2015.3.1.07
Bosredon, M., Doson, A. C., & Simmonds, D., (2009). Transport/economic/land-use model of Scotland: Land-use modeling with DELTA. In Proceedings of the 11th International conference on computers in urban planning and urban management, Hong Kong.
Brueckner, J. K., (2001). Urban sprawl: Lessons from urban economics. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 2001(1), 65–97. doi: 10.1353/urb.2001.0003
Brueckner, J. K., Thisse, J. F., & Zenou, Y., (1999). Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory. European Economic Review, 43(1), 91–107. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00019-1
te Brömmelstroët, M., Pelzer, P., & Geertman, S., (2014). Commentary. Forty years after Lee’s requiem: Are we beyond the seven sins. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41, 381–387. doi: 10.1068/b4103c
*Burgos, J., (1994). Integrated land-use and transport models in the basque country. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21(5), 603–610. doi: 10.1068/b210603
Cabrita, I., Gayda, S., Hurtubia, R., Efthymiou, D., Thomas, I., Peeters, D., … Roder, D., (2015). Integrated land use and transport microsimulation for Brussels. In M., Bierlaire, A., de Palma, R., Hurtubia, & P., Waddell (Eds.), Integrated transport and land use modelling for sustainable cities (pp. 373–412). Lausanne: Routledge/EPFL Press.
Caruso, G., Peeters, D., Cavailhès, J., & Rounsevell, M., (2007). Spatial configurations in a Periurban city. A cellular automata based micro economic model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 542–567. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2007.01.005
Caruso, G., Vuidel, G., Cavailhès, J., Frankhauser, P., Peeters, D., & Thomas, I., (2011). Morphological similarities between DBM and a microeconomic model of sprawl. Journal of Geographical Systems, 13(1), 31–48. doi: 10.1007/s10109-010-0131-7
Cervero, R., (2002). Built environments and mode choice: Towards a normative framework. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 7(4), 265–284. doi: 10.1016/S1361-9209(01)00024-4
Chakraborty, A., Wilson, B., & bin Kashem, S., (2015). The pitfalls of regional delineations in land use modeling: Implications for Mumbai region and its planners. Cities, 45, 91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.008
Cheshire, P. C., & Gornostaeve, G., (2002). Villes et regions urbaines: Des comparaisons fiables doivent reposer sur des territories comparables. Les Cahiers de l’IAURIF, 135, 13–32.
Coombes, M., (2014). From city-region concept to boundaries for governance: The English case. Urban Studies, 51(11), 2426–2443. doi: 10.1177/0042098013493482
*Coppola, P., Ibeas, A., dell’Olio, L., & Cordera, R., (2013). LUTI model for the metropolitan area of Santander. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 139(3), 153–165. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000146
Cörvers, F., Hensen, M., & Bongaerts, D., (2009). Delimitation and coherence of functional and administrative regions. Regional Studies, 43(1), 19–31. doi: 10.1080/00343400701654103
De Borger, B., Proost, S., & Van Dender, K., (2008). Private port pricing and public investment in port and hinterland capacity. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 42(3), 527–561.
Derycke, P. H., Huriot, J. M., & Pumain, D., (Eds.). (1996). Penser la ville. Théorie et modèles. Paris: Anthropos.
*Di Zio, S., Montanari, A., & Staniscia, B., (2010). Simulation of urban development in the city of Rome: Framework methodology and problem solving. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3(2), 85–105.
Dujardin, C., Thomas, I., & Tulkens, H., (2007). Quelles frontières pour Bruxelles? Une mise à jour. Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, 46(2–3), 155–176. doi: 10.3917/rpve.462.0155
*Echenique, M., Flowerdew, A., Hunt, J., Mayo, T., Skidmore, I., & Simmonds, D., (1990). The MEPLAN models of bilbao, leeds and dortmund. Transport Reviews, 10(4), 309–322. doi: 10.1080/01441649008716764
*Eradus, P., Shoemakers, A., & van der Hoorn, T., (2002). Four applications of the TIGRIS model in the netherlands. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(2), 111–121. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00004-2
Farmer, C., & Fotheringham, A. S., (2011). Network-based functional regions. Environment and Planning A, 43, 2723–2741. doi: 10.1068/a44136
Federal Register. (2000). Standards for defining metropolitan and micropolitian statistical areas. Federal Register 65.
Federal Register. (2002). Qualifying urban areas for Census 2000: Notices. Federal Register 67.
Fotheringham, A. S., & Wong, D. W., (1991). The modifiable areal unit problem in multivariate statistical analysis. Environment and Planning A, 23(7), 1025–1044. doi: 10.1068/a231025
Griffith, D. A., (1983). The boundary value problem in spatial statistical analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 23(3), 377–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1983.tb00996.x
*Guzman, L., de la Hoz, D., & Circella, G., (2015). Evaluations of synergies from transportation policy packages using a social welfare maximization approach: A case study for Madrid, Spain. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 3, 99–110. doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2014.07.004
Hall, P., (2007). Delineating urban territories. Is this a relevant issue? Cities and Networks in Europe: A Critical Approach of Polycentrism, Paris: John Libbey Eurotext, 3–14.
Handy, S. L., Boarnet, M. G., Ewing, R., & Killingsworth, R. E., (2002). How the built environment affects physical activity: Views from urban planning. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(2), 64–73. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00475-0
Hohenberg, P. M., & Lees, L. H., (1986). The making of urban Europe 1000—1950. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
*Hunt, J., (1994). Calibrating the Naples land-use and transport model. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 21(5), 569–590. doi: 10.1068/b210569
Hunt, J. D., Miller, E. J., & Kriger, D. S., (2005). Current operational urban land-use transport modelling frameworks. Transport Reviews, 25(3), 329–376. doi: 10.1080/0144164052000336470
Hunt, J. D., & Simmonds, D. C., (1993). Theory and application of an integrated land use and transport modelling framework. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(2), 221–244. doi: 10.1068/b200221
Jones, J., Peeters, D., & Thomas, I., (2015a). Is cities delineations a prerequisite for urban modelling? The example of land price determinants in Brussels. Cybergeo: Revue Européenne de Géographie, Retrieved from https://cybergeo.revues.org/26899
Jones, J., Thomas, I., & Peeters, D., (2015b). Forecasting employment location choices by discrete choice models: A sensitivity analysis to scale and implications for LUTI models. REGION, 2(1), 67–93. doi: 10.18335/region.v2i1.63
Jones, J., (2016). Spatial bias in LUTI models (Doctoral thesis). Presse Universitaire de Louvain. 283p.
Kwan, M. P., (2012). The uncertain geographic context problem. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(5), 958–968. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.687349
Lee, JrD. B., (1973). Requiem for large-scale models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 39(3), 163–178. doi: 10.1080/01944367308977851
Lord, S., Frémond, M., Biltgen, R., & Gerber, P., (2015). Urban growth and land management in a context of sustainable development: Questioning the planning policies and scenarios beyond the rules. Planning Theory and Practice, 16(3), 385–406. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2015.1061140
Lowry, I., (1964). A model of metropolis (Technical Report RM-4035-RC). The RAND Corporation, California: Santa Monica.
*Mackett, R., (1990). The systematic application of lilt model to Dortmund, Leeds and Tokyo. Transport Reviews, 10(4), 323–338. doi: 10.1080/01441649008716765
*May, A., Shepherd, S., Emberger, G., Ash, A., Zhang, X., & Paulley, N., (2005). Optimal land use transport strategies: Methodology and application to European cities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1924, 129–138. doi: 10.3141/1924-17
Nagel, K., Grether, D., Beuck, U., Chen, Y., Riser, M., & K, A., (2008). Multi-agent transport simulations and economic evaluation. Journal of Economic and Statistics, 228(2+3), 173–194.
Nguyen-Luong, D., (2008). An integrated land use-transport model for the Paris region (SIMAURIF): Ten lessons learned after four years of development. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/11.521/proj08/readings/D_Mes_documentsDNLpredit3ERSA_2008article_SIMAURIF_10_lessons.pdf
Nicolai, T., & Nagel, K., (2015). Integration of agent-based transport and land use models. In M., Bierlaire, A., de Palma, R., Hurtubia, & P., Waddell (Eds.), Integrated transport & land use modelling for sustainable cities (pp. 333–353). Lausanne: EPFL Press.
Noth, M., Borning, A., & Waddell, P., (2003). An extensible modular architecture for simulating urban development, transportation and environmental impact. Computer, Environment and Urban Systems, 27, 181–203. doi: 10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00030-8
NUREC–Network on Urban Research in the European Union. (1994). Atlas of agglomerations in the European Union, Volumes I–III. Duisburg: NUREC Edition.
Openshaw, S., (1984). Ecological fallacies and the analysis of areal census data. Environment and Planning A, 16(1), 17–31. doi: 10.1068/a160017
de Palma, A., Picard, N., & Motamedi, K., (2015). Application of UrbanSim in Paris (Ile-de-France) case study. In M., Bierlaire, A., de Palma, R., Hurtu- bia, & P., Waddell (Eds.), Integrated transport and land use modelling for sustainable cities (pp. 413–460). Lausanne: Routledge/EPFL Press.
Parr, J. B., (2007). Spatial definition of the city: Four perspectives. Urban Studies, 44(2), 381–392. doi: 10.1080/00420980601075059
*Patterson, Z., & Bierlaire, M., (2010). Development of prototypes UrbanSim models. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(2), 344–366. doi: 10.1068/b35107
*Patterson, Z., Kryvobokov, M., Marchal, F., & Bierlaire, M., (2010). Disaggregate models with aggregate data: Two UrbanSim applications. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 3(2), 5–37.
Paulley, N. J., & Webster, F. V., (1991). Overview of an international study to compare models and evaluate land use and transport policies. Transport Reviews, 11(3), 197–222. doi: 10.1080/01441649108716785
*Pozoukidou, G., (2014). Land use and transport interaction models: Application perspectives for the city of Thessaloniki. Spatium International Review, 32, 7–14. doi: 10.2298/SPAT1432007P
Pumain, D., (Eds.). (2006). Hierarchy in natural and social sciences. Dordrecht: Springer.
Raciti, S. M., Hutyra, L. R., Rao, P., & Finzi, A. C., (2012). Inconsistent definitions of “urban” result in different conclusions about the size of urban carbon and nitrogen stocks. Ecological Applications, 22(3), 1015–1035. doi: 10.1890/11-1250.1
Saujot, M., de Lapparent, M., Arnaud, E., & Prados, E., (2016). Making land use–transport models operational tools for planning: From a top-down to an end-user approach. Transport Policy, 49, 20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.03.005
Schirmer, P., Zollig Renner, C., Mülcer, K., & Axhausen, K., (2015). Land use and transport microsimulation in the canton of Zurich using UrbanSim. In M., Bierlaire, A., de Palma, R., Hurtubia, & P., Waddell (Eds.), Integrated transport and land use modelling for sustainable cities (pp. 485–536). Lausanne: Routledge/EPFL Press.
Simmonds, D., Waddell, P., & Wegener, M., (2013). Equilibrium versus dynamics in urban modeling. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40, 1051–1070. doi: 10.1068/b38208
Slocum, T. A., McMaster, R. B., Kessler, F. C., & Howard, H. H., (2005). Thematic cartography and geographic visualization (2nd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Series in Geographic Information Science.
Tannier, C., & Thomas, I., (2013). Defining and characterising urban boundaries: A fractal analysis of theoretical and real Belgian cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 41, 234–248. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.07.003
Thomas, I., Cotteels, C., Jones, J., & Peeters, D., (2013). “Revisiting the Extension of the Brussels Urban Agglomeration: New Methods, New Data … New Results?” Belgeo [online] 1–2. Retrieved from: http://belgeo.revues.org/6074.
*Vold, A., (2005). Optimal land use transport planning for the greater Oslo area. Transportation Research Part A, 39(6), 548–565.
Waddell, P., (2000). A behavioural simulation model for metropolitan policy analysis and planning: Residential location and housing market components of UrbanSim. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27, 247–263. doi: 10.1068/b2627
Waddell, P., (2011). Integrated land use and transportation planning and modelling: Addressing challenges in research and practice. Transport Reviews, 31(2), 209–229. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2010.525671
Waddell, P., Borning, A., Noth, M., Freier, N., Becke, M., & Ulfarsson, G., (2003). Microsimulation of urban development and location choices: Design and implementation of UrbanSim. Networks and Spatial Economics, 3(1), 43–67. doi: 10.1023/A:1022049000877
*Wagner, P., & Wegener, M., (2007). Urban land use, transport and environment models: Experience with an integrated microscopic approach. disP, 170(3), 45–56.
*Wang, Y., Monzon, A., & Di Ciommo, F., (2015). Assessing the accessibility impact of transport policy by land-use and transport interaction mode - the case of Madrid. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.03.005
Webster, F. V., & Dasgupta, M., (1991). Land Use and Transport Interactions: Report of the ISGLUTI Study. CONTRACTOR REPORT, 295, ISSN: 0266-7045;, (295).
Wegener, M., (2011). From macro to micro: How much micro is too much? Transport Reviews, 31(2), 161–177. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2010.532883
Wegener, M., Gand, F., & Vannahme, M., (1986). The time scale of urban change. In B., Hutchinson, & M., Batty (Eds.), Advance in urban system modeling (pp. 175–197). North-Holland: Amsterdam.
*Wegener, M., Mackett, R., & Simmonds, D., (1991). One city, three models: Comparison of land-use/transport policy simulation models for Dortmund. Transport Reviews, 11, 107–129. doi: 10.1080/01441649108716778
*Zondag, B., Bok, M., Geurs, K., & Molenwijk, E., (2015). Accessibility modeling and evaluation: The TIGRIS XL land-use and transport interaction model for the netherlands. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.06.001
Note: the papers reviewed in the meta-analysis are preceded by an asterisk (*)
