[en] Judgment aggregation is a formal theory reasoning about
how a group of agents can aggregate individual judgments on connected
propositions into a collective judgment on the same propositions. Three
procedures for successfully aggregating judgments sets are: premise-based
procedure, conclusion-based procedure and distance-based merging. The
conclusion-based procedure has been little investigated because it pro-
vides a way to aggregate the conclusions, but not the premises, thus it
outputs an incomplete judgment set. The goal of this paper is to present
a conclusion-based procedure outputting complete judgment sets.
Disciplines :
Computer science
Identifiers :
UNILU:UL-CONFERENCE-2009-264
Author, co-author :
Pigozzi, Gabriella ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
Slavkovik, Marija ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
van der Torre, Leon ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Conclusion-based procedure for judgment aggregation satisfying premise independence
Publication date :
2008
Event name :
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory, LOFT 2008
Event date :
July 3–5 2008
Audience :
International
Journal title :
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory, LOFT 2008
