[en] Judgment aggregation is a formal theory reasoning about
how a group of agents can aggregate individual judgments on connected
propositions into a collective judgment on the same propositions. Three
procedures for successfully aggregating judgments sets are: premise-based
procedure, conclusion-based procedure and distance-based merging. The
conclusion-based procedure has been little investigated because it pro-
vides a way to aggregate the conclusions, but not the premises, thus it
outputs an incomplete judgment set. The goal of this paper is to present
a conclusion-based procedure outputting complete judgment sets.
Disciplines :
Sciences informatiques
Identifiants :
UNILU:UL-CONFERENCE-2009-264
Auteur, co-auteur :
PIGOZZI, Gabriella ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
SLAVKOVIK, Marija ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
VAN DER TORRE, Leon ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Conclusion-based procedure for judgment aggregation satisfying premise independence
Date de publication/diffusion :
2008
Nom de la manifestation :
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory, LOFT 2008
Date de la manifestation :
July 3–5 2008
Manifestation à portée :
International
Titre du périodique :
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory, LOFT 2008
