A complete conclusion-based procedure for judgment aggregation

Pigozzi, Gabriella; Slavkovik, Marija; van der Torre, Leon

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_1

Download

Paper published in a book (Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings)

A complete conclusion-based procedure for judgment aggregation

Pigozzi, Gabriella; Slavkovik, Marija; van der Torre, Leon

2009 • In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT)

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10993/24958

DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-04428-1_1

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

09e4150c5e55441461000000.pdf

Publisher postprint (171.54 kB)

Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Conclusion-Based Procedure; Judgment Aggregation

Abstract :

[en] Judgment aggregation is a formal theory reasoning about how a group of agents can aggregate individual judgments on connected propositions into a collective judgment on the same propositions. Three procedures for successfully aggregating judgments sets are: premise-based procedure, conclusion-based procedure and distance-based merging. The conclusion-based procedure has been little investigated because it provides a way to aggregate the conclusions, but not the premises, thus it outputs an incomplete judgment set. The goal of this paper is to present a conclusion-based procedure outputting complete judgment sets.

Disciplines :

Computer science

Identifiers :

UNILU:UL-CONFERENCE-2010-111

Author, co-author :

Pigozzi, Gabriella ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)

Slavkovik, Marija ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)

van der Torre, Leon ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)

External co-authors :

Language :

English

Title :

A complete conclusion-based procedure for judgment aggregation

Publication date :

2009

Event name :

Proceedings of the First International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT)

Event date :

10 2009

Audience :

International

Main work title :

Proceedings of the First International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT)

Publisher :

Springer Verlag

ISBN/EAN :

978-3-642-04428-1

Collection name :

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 5783

Pages :

1–13

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Additional URL :

http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-04428-1_1

Commentary :

5783

Available on ORBilu :

since 26 February 2016

Statistics

Number of views

72 (0 by Unilu)

Number of downloads

118 (0 by Unilu)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Bovens, L., Rabinowicz, W.: Democratic answers to complex questions. an epistemic perspective. Synthese 150, 131-153 (2006)
Brams, S., Kilgour, D., Sanver, M.: A minimax procedure for negotiating multilateral treaties. In: Wiberg, M. (ed.) Reasoned Choices: Essays in Honor of Hannu Nurmi, pp. 265-282. Finnish Political Science Association (2004)
Chapman, B.: Rational aggregation. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1(3), 337-354 (2002)
Dietrich, F., List, C.: Judgment aggregation by quota rules: majority voting generalized. Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(4), 391-424 (2007)
Dietrich, F., Mongin, P.: The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation. Research memoranda. METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization, Maastricht (2008)
Everaere, P., Konieczny, S., Marquis, P.: The strategy-proofness landscape of merging. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 28, 49-105 (2007)
Konieczny, S., Lang, J., Marquis, P.: Da2 merging operators. Artificial Intelligence 157, 49-79 (2004)
Konieczny, S., Pino-Perez, R.: Merging information under constraints: a logical framework. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(5), 773-808 (2002)
Kornhauser, L., Sager, L.: Unpacking the court. Yale Law Journal 96, 82-117 (1986)
Kornhauser, L., Sager, L.: The one and the many: Adjudication in collegial courts. California Law Review 81, 1-51 (1993)
List, C.: A model of path-dependence in decisions over multiple propositions. American Political Science Review 98(3), 495-513 (2004)
List, C.: Judgment aggregation - a bibliography on the discursive dilemma, the doctrinal paradox and decisions on multiple propositions (2007), http://personal.lse.ac.uk/LIST/doctrinalparadox.htm
List, C., Puppe, C.: Judgment aggregation: A survey. In: Anand, P., Puppe, C., Pattanaik, P. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming)
Mongin, P.: Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation. Journal of Economic Theory 141(1), 100-113 (2008)
Nash, J.R.: A context-sensitive voting protocol paradigm for multimember courts. Stanford Law Review 56, 75-159 (2003)
Nehring, K.: The (im)possibility of a Paretian rational. Economics working papers,Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science (November 2005)
Pettit, P.: Deliberative democracy and the discursive dilemma. Philosophical Issues 11, 268-299 (2001)
Pigozzi, G.: Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation. Synthese 152(2), 285-298 (2006)
Pigozzi, G., Slavkovik, M., van der Torre, L.: A complete conclusion-based procedure for judgment aggregation. University of Luxembourg (July 2009) ISBN number: 978-2-87971-028-0
Pigozzi, G., Slavkovik, M., van der Torre, L.: Conclusion-based procedure for judgment aggregation satisfying premise independence. In: van der Hoek,W., Bonanno, G., Lowe, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory, LOFT 2008, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p. 35 (2008)