[en] Judgment aggregation is a formal theory reasoning about how a group of agents can aggregate individual judgments on connected propositions into a collective judgment on the same propositions. Three procedures for successfully aggregating judgments sets are: premise-based procedure, conclusion-based procedure and distance-based merging. The conclusion-based procedure has been little investigated because it provides a way to aggregate the conclusions, but not the premises, thus it outputs an incomplete judgment set. The goal of this paper is to present a conclusion-based procedure outputting complete judgment sets.
Disciplines :
Sciences informatiques
Identifiants :
UNILU:UL-CONFERENCE-2010-111
Auteur, co-auteur :
PIGOZZI, Gabriella ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
SLAVKOVIK, Marija ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
VAN DER TORRE, Leon ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
Co-auteurs externes :
no
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
A complete conclusion-based procedure for judgment aggregation
Date de publication/diffusion :
2009
Nom de la manifestation :
Proceedings of the First International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT)
Date de la manifestation :
10 2009
Manifestation à portée :
International
Titre de l'ouvrage principal :
Proceedings of the First International Conference on Algorithmic Decision Theory (ADT)
Bovens, L., Rabinowicz, W.: Democratic answers to complex questions. an epistemic perspective. Synthese 150, 131-153 (2006)
Brams, S., Kilgour, D., Sanver, M.: A minimax procedure for negotiating multilateral treaties. In: Wiberg, M. (ed.) Reasoned Choices: Essays in Honor of Hannu Nurmi, pp. 265-282. Finnish Political Science Association (2004)
Dietrich, F., List, C.: Judgment aggregation by quota rules: majority voting generalized. Journal of Theoretical Politics 19(4), 391-424 (2007)
Dietrich, F., Mongin, P.: The premiss-based approach to judgment aggregation. Research memoranda. METEOR, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization, Maastricht (2008)
Everaere, P., Konieczny, S., Marquis, P.: The strategy-proofness landscape of merging. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 28, 49-105 (2007)
Konieczny, S., Pino-Perez, R.: Merging information under constraints: a logical framework. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(5), 773-808 (2002)
Kornhauser, L., Sager, L.: Unpacking the court. Yale Law Journal 96, 82-117 (1986)
Kornhauser, L., Sager, L.: The one and the many: Adjudication in collegial courts. California Law Review 81, 1-51 (1993)
List, C.: A model of path-dependence in decisions over multiple propositions. American Political Science Review 98(3), 495-513 (2004)
List, C.: Judgment aggregation - a bibliography on the discursive dilemma, the doctrinal paradox and decisions on multiple propositions (2007), http://personal.lse.ac.uk/LIST/doctrinalparadox.htm
List, C., Puppe, C.: Judgment aggregation: A survey. In: Anand, P., Puppe, C., Pattanaik, P. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming)
Mongin, P.: Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation. Journal of Economic Theory 141(1), 100-113 (2008)
Nash, J.R.: A context-sensitive voting protocol paradigm for multimember courts. Stanford Law Review 56, 75-159 (2003)
Nehring, K.: The (im)possibility of a Paretian rational. Economics working papers,Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science (November 2005)
Pettit, P.: Deliberative democracy and the discursive dilemma. Philosophical Issues 11, 268-299 (2001)
Pigozzi, G.: Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation. Synthese 152(2), 285-298 (2006)
Pigozzi, G., Slavkovik, M., van der Torre, L.: A complete conclusion-based procedure for judgment aggregation. University of Luxembourg (July 2009) ISBN number: 978-2-87971-028-0
Pigozzi, G., Slavkovik, M., van der Torre, L.: Conclusion-based procedure for judgment aggregation satisfying premise independence. In: van der Hoek,W., Bonanno, G., Lowe, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory, LOFT 2008, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p. 35 (2008)
