Reference : Just Google It
Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book
Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science
Arts & humanities : History
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/18913
Just Google It
English
Kemman, Max mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE)]
Kleppe, Martijn [> >]
Scagliola, Stef [> >]
2014
Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012
Mills, Clare
Pidd, Michael
Ward, Esther
HRI Online Publications
No
International
Sheffield, UK
Digital Humanities Congress 2012
06-09-2012 to 08-09-2012
Sheffield
UK
[en] The transition from analogue to digital archives and the recent explosion of online content offers researchers novel ways of engaging with data. The crucial question for ensuring a balance between the supply and demand-side of data is whether this trend connects to existing scholarly practices and to the average search skills of researchers. To gain insight into this process we conducted a survey among nearly three hundred (N= 288) humanities scholars in the Netherlands and Belgium with the aim of finding answers to the following questions: 1) To what extent are digital databases and archives used? 2) What are the preferences in search functionalities 3) Are there differences in search strategies between novices and experts of information retrieval? Our results show that while scholars actively engage in research online they mainly search for text and images. General search systems such as Google and JSTOR are predominant, while large-scale collections such as Europeana are rarely consulted. Searching with keywords is the dominant search strategy and advanced search options are rarely used. When comparing novice and more experienced searchers, the first tend to have a more narrow selection of search engines, and mostly use keywords. Our overall findings indicate that Google is the key player among available search engines. This dominant use illustrates the paradoxical attitude of scholars toward Google: while provenance and context are deemed key academic requirements, the workings of the Google algorithm remain unclear. We conclude that Google introduces a black box into digital scholarly practices, indicating scholars will become increasingly dependent on such black boxed algorithms. This calls for a reconsideration of the academic principles of provenance and context.
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/18913
http://www.hrionline.ac.uk/openbook/chapter/dhc2012-kemman
FP7 ; 269980 - AXES - AXES - Access to Audiovisual Archives

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Kemman, Kleppe, Scagliola - 2014 - Just Google It.pdfPublisher postprint1.21 MBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.