Back
  1. Home
  2. Profile of Emil WEYDERT (Unilu)
Profil

WEYDERT Emil

University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Computer Science (DCS)

Main Referenced Co-authors
VAN DER TORRE, Leon  (2)
Kaci, S. (1)
KACI, Souhila  (1)
KALISKI, Adam  (1)
Main Referenced Keywords
Argumentation (3); Nonmonotonic reasoning (3); Logic (2); Nonmonotonic inference (2); Abstract Argumentation (1);
Main Referenced Disciplines
Computer science (15)
Mathematics (1)

Publications (total 16)

The most downloaded
136 downloads
WEYDERT, E. (2015). A Multiverse Axiom Induction Framework. In Symposium on the Theoretical Foundations of Mathematics III. https://hdl.handle.net/10993/25593

The most cited

8 citations (Scopus®)

KACI, S., VAN DER TORRE, L., & WEYDERT, E. (2007). On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments. In Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 9th European Conference, ECSQARU 2007, Hammamet, Tunisia, October 31 – November 2, 2007, Proceedings (pp. 247–258). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_24 https://hdl.handle.net/10993/25082

KALISKI, A., & WEYDERT, E. (18 August 2022). Interactions Between Defaults and Roles in Defeasible Description Logics [Paper presentation]. Cognition and Ontologies, Jonkoping, Sweden.

WEYDERT, E. (2021). On the Strength of Defeasible Inference Trees [Paper presentation]. Third Workshop on Argument Strength, Hagen, Germany.

WEYDERT, E. (2021). The Delights of Discrimination - On the Multiple Faces of Defeasible Conditional Relationships [Paper presentation]. DELIGHT Kickoff Meeting, Esch sur Alzette, Luxembourg.

WEYDERT, E. (27 February 2019). Kurt Gödel and the Foundations of Set Theory [Paper presentation]. Workshop "Kurt Gödel: Philosophical Views", Berlin, Germany.

WEYDERT, E. (12 February 2019). On the Nature of Nonmonotonic Reasoning - Some formal clarifications [Paper presentation]. The Role of Nonmonotonic Reasoning in Future Development of AI - Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 19072.

WEYDERT, E. (15 January 2019). Revelations on Reasoning with and about Defaults [Paper presentation]. Conditional Logics and Conditional reasoning - New Joint Perspectives - Dagstuhl Seminar 19032.

WEYDERT, E. (2018). ABCDE Tutorial LuxLogAI 2018 - Default entailment course [Paper presentation]. ABCDE Tutorial LuxLogAI 2018.

WEYDERT, E. (2018). Conditional Inference Trees - Proxies for real-world arguments [Paper presentation]. Bridging the gap between formal argumentation & actual human reasoning, Bochum, Germany.

WEYDERT, E. (2018). What is an argument? Nature and necessity of generalized arguments [Paper presentation]. COMMA-Workshop - ArgPhil 2018.

WEYDERT, E. (2018). A walk through a hidden zoo - Semantics for argument and attack strength [Paper presentation]. AMANDE - Argument Strength, Toulouse, France.

WEYDERT, E. (2015). A Multiverse Axiom Induction Framework. In Symposium on the Theoretical Foundations of Mathematics III.
Peer reviewed

WEYDERT, E. (2014). A Plausibility Semantics for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. In S. Konieczny & H. Tompits (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2014). Arxiv.
Peer reviewed

WEYDERT, E. (2013). On the plausibility of abstract arguments. In L. van der Gaag (Ed.), Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (pp. 522-534). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
Peer reviewed

WEYDERT, E. (2012). Conditional Ranking Revision - Iterated Revision with Sets of Conditionals. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41 (1), 237-271. doi:10.1007/s10992-011-9204-4
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

KACI, S., VAN DER TORRE, L., & WEYDERT, E. (2007). On the Acceptability of Incompatible Arguments. In Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, 9th European Conference, ECSQARU 2007, Hammamet, Tunisia, October 31 – November 2, 2007, Proceedings (pp. 247–258). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75256-1_24
Peer reviewed

Kaci, S., VAN DER TORRE, L., & WEYDERT, E. (2006). Acyclic Argumentation: Attack = Conflict + Preference. In Acyclic Argumentation: Attack = Conflict + Preference (pp. 725–726). IOS Press.
Peer reviewed

Contact ORBilu