[en] This paper presents a comparison of design methodologies and process models from nine disciplines. The evolutionary development of the approaches, which can be traced back to similar roots, lead to process models which are now adapted to specific design disciplines but still have many similarities. Most of the established approaches have not been adapted to many of the challenges of current design practice and represent isolated views on the design process. This comparison is intended to provide a basis for consolidation and reformation of design methodology.
Disciplines :
Ingénierie, informatique & technologie: Multidisciplinaire, généralités & autres Ingénierie mécanique
Identifiants :
UNILU:UL-CONFERENCE-2012-140
Auteur, co-auteur :
GERICKE, Kilian ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit
BLESSING, Lucienne ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Engineering Research Unit
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
AN ANALYSIS OF DESIGN PROCESS MODELS ACROSS DISCIPLINES
Date de publication/diffusion :
2012
Nom de la manifestation :
12th International Design Conference DESIGN 2012
Lieu de la manifestation :
Cavtat, Croatie
Date de la manifestation :
from 21-05-2012 to 24-05-2012
Manifestation à portée :
International
Titre de l'ouvrage principal :
Proceedings of the 12th International Design Conference - DESIGN 2012
Birkhofer, H., "Summary - Holistic Ways to Supply, Extend or Replace Design Methodology", The Future of Design Methodology, Herbert Birkhofer (Ed.), Springer, London, 2011 b, pp. 211-217.
Birkhofer, H., "Introduction", The Future of Design Methodology, Herbert Birkhofer (Ed.), Springer, London, 2011 a, pp. 1-18.
Blessing, L., "Comparison of design models proposed in prescriptive literature", Proceedings of COST A3/COST A4 International research workshop, Social Sciences Series Vol. 5, J. Perrin, D. Vinck (Eds.), Lyon, 1996.
Eisenbart, B., Gericke, K., Blessing, L., "A Framework for Comparing Design Modelling Approaches Across Disciplines", Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design ICED'11. Copenhagen. Technical University of Denmark: Design Society, 2011, pp. 344-355.
Gericke, K., Blessing, L., "Comparisons of Design Methodologies and Process Models Across Disciplines: A Literature Review" Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design ICED'11. Copenhagen. Technical University of Denmark: Design Society, 2011, pp. 393-404.
Gericke, K., Maier, A., "Scenarios for coupling Design Thinking with Systematic Engineering Design in NPD", Proceedings of 1st Cambridge Academic Design Management Conference, Cambridge, 2011.
Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., Dekoninck, E., "Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature", Design Studies 29 (4), 2008, pp. 160-180.
Kim, Kwang-Jae, Meiren, Thomas, "New Service Development Process", Introduction to service engineering, Gavriel Salvendy, Waldemar Karwowski (Eds.), Wiley, Hoboken NJ, 2010, pp. 253-267.
Macmillan, S., Steele, J., Kirby, P., Spence, R., Austin, S., "Mapping the design process during the conceptual phase of building projects", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 9 (3), 2002, pp. 1-7.
Maffin, D., "Engineering Design Models: context, theory and practice", Journal of Engineering Design, 9 (4), 1998, pp. 315-327.
Maier, A., Störrle, H., "What are characteristics of engineering design processes?", Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design ICED'11. Copenhagen. Technical University of Denmark: Design Society, 2011, pp. 188-198.
Möhringer, S., "Entwicklungsmethodik für mechatronische Systeme", Univ., Habil.-thesis., Universität Paderborn, Heinz Nixdorf Institut, Paderborn, 2004.
Ogot, M. M., "Engineering design. A practical guide", Trafford, Victoria B.C, 2004.
Roth, K., "Konstruieren mit Konstruktionskatalogen", Springer, Berlin, 1982.
Wynn, D., Clarkson, P. J., "Models of designing", Design Process Improvement A review of current practice, P. J. Clarkson, C. M. Eckert (Eds.), Springer, London, 2005, pp. 34-59.
