Quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a comparative cross-sectional study of CICC ports and PICC-ports.

Soldani, Marco; PRIVITERA, Daniele; Caradonna, Chiara; Papagni, Giuseppe; Akyüz, Elif; Capsoni, Nicolò; Airoldi, Chiara; Giustivi, Davide

doi:10.1007/s12282-026-01843-6

Article (Scientific journals)

Quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a comparative cross-sectional study of CICC ports and PICC-ports.

Soldani, Marco; PRIVITERA, Daniele; Caradonna, Chiara et al.

2026 • In Breast Cancer

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10993/68097

DOI
10.1007/s12282-026-01843-6

PubMed
41849008

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

s12282-026-01843-6.pdf

Author postprint (871.32 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

PICC-ports; Port catheter; Quality of life; Vascular access ports

Disciplines :

Nursing Science

Author, co-author :

Soldani, Marco; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Vittorio Emanuele II Hospital, Bisceglie, Italy

PRIVITERA, Daniele ; University of Luxembourg

Caradonna, Chiara; Department of Medicine, Unit of Infectious Diseases, Vittorio Emanuele II Hospital, Bisceglie, Italy

Papagni, Giuseppe; Department of Medicine, Unit of Infectious Diseases, Vittorio Emanuele II Hospital, Bisceglie, Italy

Akyüz, Elif; Department of Nursing, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey

Capsoni, Nicolò; Department of Emergency Medicine, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy

Airoldi, Chiara; Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont Amedeo Avogadro, Novara, Italy

Giustivi, Davide; Post Anesthesia Care Unit, Vascular Access Team, ASST Lodi, Lodi, Italy

External co-authors :

Language :

English

Title :

Quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a comparative cross-sectional study of CICC ports and PICC-ports.

Publication date :

18 March 2026

Journal title :

Breast Cancer

ISSN :

1340-6868

eISSN :

1880-4233

Publisher :

Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Japan

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12282-026-01843-6.pdf

Available on ORBilu :

since 27 March 2026

Statistics

Number of views

28 (0 by Unilu)

Number of downloads

0 (0 by Unilu)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

WoS citations^™

Bibliography

World Health Organization. Breast cancer. 2025. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer
Gennari A André F Barrios CH et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer Ann Oncol 2021 32 12 1475 1495 1:STN:280:DC%2BB2cjjtFalsg%3D%3D 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.019 34678411
Loibl S André F Bachelot T et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann Oncol 2024 35 2 159 182 1:STN:280:DC%2BB1c7kslOnsw%3D%3D 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.016 38101773
Jiang M Li CL Pan CQ Yu L The risk of bloodstream infection associated with totally implantable venous access ports in cancer patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis Support Care Cancer 2020 28 1 361 72 10.1007/s00520-019-04809-x 31044308
van Rens MR van der Lee R Spencer TR et al. The NAVIGATE project: A GloVANet-WoCoVA position statement on the nomenclature for vascular access devices J Vasc Access 2025 26 5 1439 1446 10.1177/11297298241291248 39446461
Bertoglio S Cafiero F Meszaros P et al. PICC-PORT totally implantable vascular access device in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy J Vasc Access 2020 21 4 460 466 10.1177/1129729819884482 31674857
Ryan C Hesselgreaves H Wu O et al. Patient acceptability of three different central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy: a qualitative study BMJ Open 2019 9 7 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026077 31292176 6624052 e026077
Robinson A Souied O Bota AB et al. Optimal vascular access strategies for patients receiving chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018 171 3 607 620 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXht1yksLrO 10.1007/s10549-018-4868-x 29974358
Liu L Xia Z Chen Y Liu S OP143 association of different venous access device with health related quality of life among patients with breast cancer in China Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023 39 10.1017/S0266462323001447 11570139 S42
Moss JG Wu O Bodenham AR et al. Central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy (CAVA): a randomised controlled trial Lancet 2021 398 10298 403 415 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00766-2 34297997
Nickel B Gorski L Kleidon T et al. Infusion therapy standards of practice, 9th edition J Infus Nurs 2024 47 1S Suppl 1 S1 S285 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000532 38211609
von Elm E Altman DG Egger M et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies Lancet 2007 370 9596 1453 1457 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X
Pinelli F Barbani F Defilippo B et al. Quality of life in women with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison between PICC and PICC-port Breast Cancer 2024 31 5 945 954 10.1007/s12282-024-01608-z 38980572 11341727
Burbridge B Goyal K Quality-of-life assessment: arm TIVAD versus chest TIVAD J Vasc Access 2016 17 6 527 34 10.5301/jva.5000609 27768211
Calixtre LB Oliveira AB Alburquerque-Sendín F Armijo-Olivo S What is the minimal important difference of pain intensity, mandibular function, and headache impact in patients with temporomandibular disorders? Clinical significance analysis of a randomized controlled trial Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2020 46 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102108 31999615 102108
Olsen MF Bjerre E Hansen MD et al. Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain BMC Med 2017 15 1 10.1186/s12916-016-0775-3 28215182 5317055 35
Olsen MF Bjerre E Hansen MD Tendal B Hilden J Hróbjartsson A Minimum clinically important differences in chronic pain vary considerably by baseline pain and methodological factors: systematic review of empirical studies J Clin Epidemiol 2018 101 87 106.e2 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.007 29793007
Voci A Lee D Ho E Crane-Okada R DiNome M Impact of port site scar on perception of patients with breast cancer: patient-reported outcomes Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018 170 3 569 72 10.1007/s10549-018-4790-2 29693230
Song X Chen S Dai Y et al. A novel incision technique of a totally implanted venous access port in the upper arm for patients with breast cancer World J Surg Oncol 2023 21 1 10.1186/s12957-023-03043-4 37237419 10223836 162
Bertoglio S Annetta MG Brescia F et al. A multicenter retrospective study on 4480 implanted PICC-ports: a GAVeCeLT project J Vasc Access 2022 10.1177/11297298211067683 35533088
Lin L Li W Chen C Wei A Liu Y Peripherally inserted central catheters versus implantable port catheters for cancer patients: a meta-analysis Front Oncol 2023 13 10.3389/fonc.2023.1228092 37519803 10380996 1228092
Hammerton G Munafò MR Causal inference with observational data: the need for triangulation of evidence Psychol Med 2021 51 4 563 78 10.1017/S0033291720005127 33682654 8020490
Calvert M Blazeby J Altman DG et al. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension JAMA 2013 309 8 814 822 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXjsFCrsbY%3D 10.1001/jama.2013.879 23443445
Coughlin SS Recall bias in epidemiologic studies J Clin Epidemiol 1990 43 1 87 91 1:STN:280:DyaK3c3gtl2mug%3D%3D 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90060-3 2319285
Althubaiti A Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods J Multidiscip Healthc 2016 9 211 7 10.2147/JMDH.S104807 27217764 4862344