CO2footprint; Geosynthetic encased column; Geosynthetics; Stone columns; CO 2 emission; Condition; Embankment height; Soft subsoil; Soils improvement; Stone column; Civil and Structural Engineering; Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Abstract :
[en] The design engineers' responsibility is not limited to finding a safe solution but includes considering the environmental impact of the suggested design. In many cases a soil improvement becomes necessary when constructing an embankment on soft subsoil conditions. One of the alternative soil improvement methods is installing stone columns. A more recent alternative is installing Geosynthetic Encased Columns (GEC). In this study a comparison was made on the environmental impact both methods will create. As the measure of the environmental impact, the equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2eq.) emissions was taken. For this purpose, a soft subsoil condition was considered with three different levels of weakness and three different embankment heights. In the comparison, transportation distances of geosynthetic products and granular column materials have been estimated. Since GECs can use any granular material as fill, only one hauling distance was estimated. Stone columns necessitate a more specific granular fill; hence four different hauling distances were taken into consideration. It was determined that the GEC alternative produces a much smaller CO2 footprint than the stone column alternative. Furthermore, it was seen that the advantage of GEC solution becomes more efficient in terms of reducing the CO2 emission with increasing embankment height.
Disciplines :
Civil engineering
Author, co-author :
Erten, D.; Sustainable Buildings, Ankara University, Turkey
Alamgir, M., Miura, N., Poorooshasb, H. & Madhav, M. V. (1996). Deformation analysis of soft ground reinforced by columnar inclusions. Computers and Geotechnics, 18, No. 4, 267-290.
Alexiew, D., Köster, V. & Assinder, P. (2011). An introduction to ground improvement using geotextile encased columns (GEC). In Proceedings of the Fifteenth African Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Maputo
Mozambique. Ali, K., Shahu, J. T., & Sharma, K. G. (2014). Model tests on single and groups of stone columns with different geosynthetic reinforcement arrangement. Geosynthetics International, 21(2), 103-118.
Alkhorshid, N. R., Araujo, G. L., Palmeira, E. M. & Zornberg, J. G. (2019). Large-scale load capacity tests on a geosynthetic encased column. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 47, No. 5, 632-641.
Almeida, M. S. S., Hosseinpour, I. & Riccio, M. (2013). Performance of a geosynthetic-encased column (GEC) in soft ground: Numerical and analytical studies. Geosynthetics International, 20, No. 4, 252-262.
Bayati, H. & Bagheripour, M. H. (2019). Shaking table study on liquefaction behaviour of different saturated sands reinforced by stone columns. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 37, No. 7, 801-815.
Bunieski, S., Boyd, G. & Isenegger, N. (2023). Methodology to calculate and compare embodied carbon associated with ground improvement techniques. In Proceedings of GeoSaskatoon 2023. Saskatoon, Canada.
Cengiz, C. & Göler, E. (2018a). Seismic behavior of geosynthetic encased columns and ordinary stone columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 46, No. 1, 40-51.
Cengiz, C. & Göler, E. (2018b). Shaking table tests on geosynthetic encased columns in soft clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 46, No. 6, 748-758.
Cengiz, C. & Göler, E. (2020). Load bearing and settlement characteristics of geosynthetic encased columns under seismic loads. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 136, 106244.
Cengiz, C. & Göler, E. (2021). Effects of geosynthetic encased column installation on the seismic response of soft clay beds. In Proceedings of EuroGeo7, the 7th European Geosynthetics Conference. Warsaw, Poland.
Damians, I. P., Bathurst, R. J., Adroguer, E. G., Josa, A. & Lloret, A. (2017). Environmental assessment of earth retaining wall structures. Environmental Geotechnics, 4, No. 6, 415-431.
Damians, I. P., Bathurst, R. J., Adroguer, E. G., Josa, A. & Lloret, A. (2018). Sustainability assessment of earth-retaining wall structures. Environmental Geotechnics, 5, No. 4, 187-203.
Das, A. K. & Deb, K. (2019). Response of stone column-improved ground under c-? soil embankment. Soils and Foundations, 59, No. 3, 617-632.
DIN 1054 (2010). Baugrund - Sicherheitsnachweise im Erd-und Grundbau - Ergänzende Regelungen zu DIN EN 1997-1, Deutsches Institut för Normung, Berlin, Germany.
EBGEO (2011). Recommendation for design and analysis of earth structures using geosynthetic reinforcements, DGGT - Deutsche Gesellschaft för Geotechnik, Essen. Ernst & Sohn, Berlin.
EC7 (2004). EN 1997-1: Eurocode 7: geotechnical design - part 1: general rules, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
EN 15804 (2012). Sustainability of construction works: environmental product declarations - core rules for the product category of construction products, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
Fattah, M. Y. & Majeed, Q. G. (2012a). Finite element analysis of geogrid-encased stone columns. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 30, No. 4, 713-726.
Fattah, M. Y. & Majeed, Q. G. (2012b). A study on the behaviour of geogrid-encased capped stone columns by the finite element method. International Journal of Geomate, 3, No. 1, 343-350.
Gniel, J. & Bouazza, A. (2009). Improvement of soft soils using geogrid-encased stone columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27, No. 3, 167-175.
Grizi, A., Al-Ani, W. & Wanatowski, D. (2022). Numerical analysis of the settlement behavior of soft soil improved with stone columns. Applied Sciences, 12, No. 11, 5293.
Gu, M., Zhao, M., Zhang, L. & Han, J. (2016). Effects of geogrid encasement on lateral and vertical deformations of stone columns in model tests. Geosynthetics International, 23, No. 2, 100-112.
Gu, M., Cui, J., Wu, Y., Yuan, J. & Li, Y. (2022). Effects of geogrid encasement on behavior of stone column-improved soft clay. In Advances in Transportation Geotechnics IV: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Transportation Geotechnics Volume 2. Springer, pp. 559-573.
Hasan, M. & Samadhiya, N. K. (2018). Soft soils improvement by granular piles reinforced with horizontal geogrid strips. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 12, No. 1, 101-108.
ISO 14040 (2006). Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO 14044 (2006). Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirements and guidelines, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO 21930 (2017). Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works: core rules for environmental product declarations of construction products and services. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
Jefferson, I., Gaterell, M. & Thomas, A. M. (2010). Emissions assessment related to vibro stone columns. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement, 163, No. 1, 71-80.
Khabbazian, M., Kaliakin, V. N. & Meehan, C. L. (2015). Column supported embankments with geosynthetic encased columns: validity of the unit cell concept. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 33, No. 3, 425-442.
Lee, M. & Basu, D. (2025). Environmental impacts of mechanically stabilised earth walls. Geosynthetics International, 1-20, https:// doi.org/10.1680/jgein.24.00046.
Liu, M., Wang, K., Niu, J. & Ouyang, F. (2023). Static and dynamic load transfer behaviors of the composite foundation reinforced by the geosynthetic-encased stone column. Sustainability, 15, No. 2, 1108.
Lo, S., Zhang, R. & Mak, J. (2010). Geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft clay: A numerical study. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28, No. 3, 292-302.
McKenna, J., Eyre, W. & Wolstenholme, D. (1975). Performance of an embankment supported by stone columns in soft ground. Geotechnique, 25, No. 1, 51-59.
Miranda, M. & Da Costa, A. (2016). Laboratory analysis of encased stone columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 44, No. 3, 269-277.
Moncada, A., Damians, A. P., Olivella, S. & Bathurst, R. J. (2024). Study of environmental impact from geosynthetic reinforced soil walls. E3S Web of Conferences, 569, 13001.
Munfakh, G. A., Sarkar, S. K. & Castelli, R. J. (1984). Performance of a test embankment founded on stone columns. In Piling and Ground Treatment, Thomas Telford Publishing, pp. 259-265.
Murugesan, S. & Rajagopal, K. (2007). Model tests on geosyntheticencased stone columns. Geosynthetics International, 14, No. 6, 346-354.
Murugesan, S. & Rajagopal, K. (2010). Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136, No. 1, 129-139.
Muzammil, S. P., Varghese, R. M. & Joseph, J. (2018). Numerical simulation of the response of geosynthetic encased stone columns under oil storage tank. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 4, No. 1.
Priebe, H. J. (1995). The design of vibro replacement. Ground Engineering, Dec., 31-37.
Raithel, M. (1999). Zum trag-und verformungsverhalten von geokunststoffummantelten sandsäulen. Schriftenreihe Geotechnik, Heft 6, Universität Kassel.
Raithel, M., & Kempfert, H.-G. (2000). Calculation models for dam foundations with geotextile coated sand columns. In ISRM International Symposium, p. ISRM-IS-2000-2298.
Raithel, M., Kempfert, H.-G. & Kirchner, A. (2002). Geotextileencased columns (GEC) for foundation of a dike on very soft soils. In 7th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Vol. 3, Nice, France.
Raithel, M., Köster, & Alexiew, D. (2013). 20 Jahre Gröndungssysteme mit geokunststoffummantelten Säulen. Geotechnik, 36, No. 4, 205-217.
Raja, J., Dixon, N., Fowmes, G., Frost, M. & Assinder, P. (2015). Obtaining reliable embodied carbon values for geosynthetics. Geosynthetics International, 22, No. 5, 393-401.
Ranjan, G. (1989). Ground treated with granular piles and its response under load. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 19, No. 1, 1-86.
Schnaid, F., Winter, D., Silva, A. E. F., Alexiew, D., & Köster, V. (2017). Geotextile encased columns (GEC) used as pressurerelief system: instrumented bridge abutment case study on soft soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 45, No. 3, 227-236.
Shillaber, G. M., Mitchell, J. K., & Dove, J. E. (2015). Energy and carbon assessment of ground improvement works: definitions and background. ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 142, No. 3, 04015083.
Sonderman, W., Raju, V. R., Daramalinggam, J. & Yohannes, M. (2016). Practical design of vibro stone columns. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Seminar, Geotechnical Division, The Hong Kong Institution of Engineers, Hong Kong.
Tandel, Y., Jamal, M., Solanki, C., Desai, A. & Patel, J. (2017). Performance of small group of geosynthetic-reinforced granular piles. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 35, No. 4, 504-511.
Wehr, J. & Herle, I. (2006). Exercise on calculation of stone columns: Priebe method and FEM. In Proceedings of 6th European Conference on Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 773-776.
Yoo, C. (2010). Performance of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in embankment construction: Numerical investigation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136(8), 1148-1160.
Yoo, C. (2023). Geosynthetic solutions for sustainable transportation infrastructure development. Sustainability, 15, No. 22, 15772.
Yoo, C. & Abbas, Q. (2019). Performance of geosynthetic-encased stone column-improved soft clay under vertical cyclic loading. Soils and Foundations, 59, No. 6, 1875-1890.
Yu, Y., Bathurst, R. J., & Damians, I. P. (2016). Modified unit cell approach for modelling geosynthetic-reinforced column-supported embankments. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 44, No. 3, 332-343.
Zhou, Y., & Kong, G. (2019). Deformation analysis of geosyntheticencased stone column-supported embankment considering radial bulging. International Journal of Geomechanics, 19, No. 6, 04019057.
