Abstract :
[en] The pervasiveness of manipulative designs — i.e. dark patterns — in everyday applications and their impact on users is raising concerns among policymakers and scholars. These designs use techniques to nudge users to make decisions that they would not make if fully informed, causing them various types of harm. Yet, the ubiquitous mechanisms used are intertwined with other platform affordances, which makes it hard for users to perceive the manipulation. While understanding the effects of manipulative designs on users is key to the design of protective countermeasures, the academic community faces several methodological challenges. How can we investigate the effects of what is often not perceived by the users? In this paper, we reflect on the challenges inherent to the study of manipulative designs through three case studies. We describe key challenges and discuss methodological insights relevant to the empirical study of manipulative designs.
Funding text :
This research is funded by the Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR, grant no. IS/14717072 Deceptive Patterns Online (Decepticon)). We thank the anonymous reviewers for their detailed constructive feedback.
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0