Article (Scientific journals)
Flow generators for helmet CPAP: Which to prefer? A bench study
PRIVITERA, Daniele; Capsoni, Nicolò; Zadek, Francesco et al.
2023In Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 74
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
1-s2.0-S0964339722001471-main.pdf
Author postprint (2.44 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Continuous positive airway pressure; Emergency department; Filter; Helmet; Noise; Non-invasive ventilation; Respiratory insufficiency; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Humans; human; noise; positive end expiratory pressure ventilation
Abstract :
[en] Objective: To assess the different effect of filters’ application during helmet-CPAP delivered with three different flow generators on the delivered fresh gas flow, FiO2, and the noise level inside and outside the helmet. Methods: In a bench study, three flow generators (air-oxygen blender, turbine ventilator and Venturi system) were used to generate two different gas flows (60 L/min and 80 L/min), with a fixed FiO2 at 0.6, to perform a helmet-CPAP on a manikin. Three different fixed PEEP valves (7.5, 10, and 12.5 cmH2O) were applied at the expiratory port. Gas flow, FiO2 and noise were recorded for each Flow-generator/Flow/PEEP combination, first without filter interposition and then after positioning a heat and moister exchanger filter (HMEF) at the helmet inlet port. Results: The application of the HMEF lead to a significant difference in the flow variation among the three flow generators (p < 0.001). Compared to baseline, the highest flow reduction was observed with the VENTURI (−13.4 ± 1.2 %, p < 0.001), a slight increase with the BLENDER (1.2 ± 0.5 %, p < 0.001), whereas no difference was recorded with the TURBINE (0.1 ± 0.6 %, p = 0.12). After HMEF was interposed, a significant FiO2 variation was observed only with VENTURI (11.3 ± 1.8 %, p < 0.001). As for the noise, the TURBINE was the least noisy system, both with and without the filter interposition. Conclusions: Flow generators used to deliver helmet-CPAP have different characteristics and responses to HMEF interposition. Users should be aware of the effects on FiO2 and flow of the different devices in order to make a precise setup of the circuit. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd
Disciplines :
Nursing Science
Author, co-author :
PRIVITERA, Daniele  ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Life Sciences and Medicine (DLSM) > Medical Education ; Department of Emergency Medicine, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
Capsoni, Nicolò;  Department of Emergency Medicine, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
Zadek, Francesco;  Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy ; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milan, Italy
Mazzone, Annamaria;  Department of Emergency Medicine, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
Bellone, Andrea;  Department of Emergency Medicine, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
Fumagalli, Roberto;  Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy ; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milan, Italy
Langer, Thomas;  Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy ; Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Niguarda Ca’ Granda, Milan, Italy
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
Flow generators for helmet CPAP: Which to prefer? A bench study
Publication date :
2023
Journal title :
Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
ISSN :
0964-3397
eISSN :
1532-4036
Publisher :
Churchill Livingstone
Volume :
74
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBilu :
since 26 November 2025

Statistics


Number of views
2 (0 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
8
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
4
OpenCitations
 
7
OpenAlex citations
 
8

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu