Article (Scientific journals)
Evaluating needle-free connectors associated backflow in Midline and peripherally inserted central catheters: A top bench study
PRIVITERA, Daniele; Giustivi, Davide; Nardin, Elisa et al.
2025In Journal of Vascular Access
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
privitera-et-al-2025-evaluating-needle-free-connectors-associated-backflow-in-midline-and-peripherally-inserted-central.pdf
Author postprint (196.05 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
blood; blood coagulation; needle-free connector; occlusion; Vascular access devices
Abstract :
[en] Background: Needle-free connectors (NFCs) are closure systems for vascular catheters largely used because effectively reduce needlestick incidents. They are classified based on their impact on the fluid column within the catheter as positive (fluid displacement into the vein), negative (fluid displacement back from the vein into the catheter), neutral (minimal displacement), or anti-reflux (equipped with additional anti-reflux valve). Each category has specific usage and clamping procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the backflow volume (BV) when different NFC categories and clamping sequences are used with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) and a Midline catheter (MC). Methods: In this bench study, four types of NFCs with different flow displacement behavior were studied. Each NFC was evaluated using two different catheters: a 4 Fr × 60 cm single-lumen catheter (PICC), and a 4 Fr × 25 cm single-lumen catheter (MC). The experimental model simulated the physiological blood pressure of the superior vena cava. Three operators performed specific sealing sequences for each combination of NFC and catheter. After that, the BV (mm3) inside the catheter for every NFC was assessed. Results: None of the four NFCs was able to avoid the BV into the catheter. Positive NFC showed a lower BV as compared to the other three NFCs when tested with PICC: 0.83 [0.76–0.95] mm3 versus 1.14 [0.95–1.53] mm3 of Q-SYTE, versus 1.27 [1.02–1.59] mm3 of Neutron, versus 1.24 [0.95–1.84] mm3 of Bionector, whereas no differences were observed when tested with Midline. No differences were observed between different clamping sequences when used with neutral and anti-reflux NFCs. Conclusion: This study examined the performance of various NFC technologies with PICC and Midline. While no device eliminates BV, positive displacement NFCs showed lower flow reflux compared to the others when used with PICC. No difference between clamping sequences was observed for neutral and anti-reflux NFCs. © The Author(s) 2025.
Disciplines :
Nursing Science
Author, co-author :
PRIVITERA, Daniele  ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Life Sciences and Medicine (DLSM) > Medical Education ; Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, San Luca Hospital, Milan, Italy ; Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
Giustivi, Davide;  Post Anesthesia Care Unit, Vascular Access Team ASST Lodi, Lombardy, Lodi, Italy
Nardin, Elisa;  Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, San Luca Hospital, Milan, Italy
Gianfranceschi, Enrico;  Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, San Luca Hospital, Milan, Italy
Fiorini, Stefania;  Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, San Luca Hospital, Milan, Italy
Fiorina, Elisabetta;  Department of Nephrology, University Maggiore della Carità Hospital, Novara, Italy
Revere, Silvia;  Department of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, San Luca Hospital, Milan, Italy
Capsoni, Nicolò;  Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy ; Department of Emergency Medicine, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
Evaluating needle-free connectors associated backflow in Midline and peripherally inserted central catheters: A top bench study
Publication date :
2025
Journal title :
Journal of Vascular Access
ISSN :
1129-7298
eISSN :
1724-6032
Publisher :
SAGE Publications Ltd
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBilu :
since 26 November 2025

Statistics


Number of views
2 (0 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu