Article (Scientific journals)
Supporting parenting to address social inequalities in health: a synthesis of systematic reviews.
PIERRON, Annabelle; Fond-Harmant, Laurence; Laurent, Anne et al.
2018In BMC Public Health, 18 (1), p. 1087
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
s12889-018-5915-6.pdf
Author postprint (1.19 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Disparity; Health promotion; Health status disparities; Healthcare disparities; Parenting; Perinatology; Social determinants of health; Female; Humans; Infant; Mothers/psychology; Parenting/psychology; Review Literature as Topic; Social Determinants of Health; Socioeconomic Factors; Health Status Disparities; Social Support; Mothers; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: In 2009, the World Health Organization's Commission on Social Determinants of Health set out its recommendations for action, which included establishing equity from early childhood onwards by enabling all children and their mothers to benefit from a comprehensive package of quality programmes. In order to address social inequalities in health, it is recommended that action be taken from early childhood, and actions providing support for parenting are an effective lever in this respect. The aim of this review of systematic reviews is to analyse, on the one hand, the components and characteristics of effective interventions in parenting support and, on the other, the extent to which the reviews took into account social inequalities in health. METHODS: A total of 796 reviews were selected from peer-reviewed journals published between 2009 and 2016 in French or English. Of these, 21 reviews responding to the AMSTAR and selected ROBIS criteria were retained. These were analysed in relation to the consideration they gave to social inequalities in health according to PRISMA-equity. RESULTS: The reviews confirmed that parenting support programmes improved infants' sleep, increased mothers' self-esteem and reduced mothers' anger, anxiety and stress levels. The mainly authors noted that the contexts in which the interventions had taken place were described either scantly or not at all, making it difficult to evaluate them. Only half of the reviews had addressed the question of social inequalities in health. In particular, there had been little research conducted on the relational aspect and the social link. CONCLUSION: In terms of addressing social inequalities in perinatal health, the approach remains both modest and reductive. Understanding how, for whom and in what conditions interventions operate is one way of optimising their results. Further research is needed to study the interactions between the interventions and their contexts.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
PIERRON, Annabelle  ;  University of Luxembourg ; Université de Lorraine, EA4360 APEMAC, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France. annabelle.pierron@univ-lorraine.fr
Fond-Harmant, Laurence;  Luxembourg Institute of Health, Department of Population Health, 1 A-B Rue Thomas Edison, Strassen, 1445, Luxembourg
Laurent, Anne;  Société Française de Santé Publique, 1 rue de la forêt, Laxou, 54520, France
Alla, François;  CHU INSERM. Bordeaux Population Health Research Center. UMR 1219 CIC-EC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Supporting parenting to address social inequalities in health: a synthesis of systematic reviews.
Publication date :
31 August 2018
Journal title :
BMC Public Health
eISSN :
1471-2458
Publisher :
BioMed Central Ltd., England
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Pages :
1087
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
CIC EC INSERM de Bordeaux
Funding text :
study supported by the European Parliament research programmeproject supported by the Australian Research Council
Available on ORBilu :
since 09 October 2025

Statistics


Number of views
7 (0 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
2 (0 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
17
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
17
OpenCitations
 
17
OpenAlex citations
 
32
WoS citations
 
13

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu