Article (Scientific journals)
Supporting parents by combatting social inequalities in health: a realist evaluation.
PIERRON, Annabelle; Fond-Harmant, Laurence; Alla, François
2021In BMC Public Health, 21 (1), p. 1252
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
s12889-021-11237-2.pdf
Author postprint (2.18 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Complexity; Health status disparities; Intervention research; Parenting; Social determinants of health; Theory; Child; Child, Preschool; Europe; Female; Humans; Mothers; Socioeconomic Factors; Health Status Disparities; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: To reduce social inequities in health, the World Health Organization's Commission on Social Determinants of Health recommends acting as soon as life begins. In this context, parenting support is promoted as a major lever. The objective of the present research was to develop an intervention theory establishing the conditions for the success of interventions, policies, and organizations supporting parenting in terms of reducing or preventing social inequalities in health for both mother and child in the perinatal period. METHODS: To meet these objectives, we conducted a realist evaluation based on a multiple-case study. The study evaluated two border towns in Europe. We collected data from three sources: documentary reviews, focus groups and interviews with professionals, and parental questionnaires. RESULTS: The main results concerning the fight against social inequalities in health show a true willingness on the part of those involved to carry out universal actions, coordinated between professionals and institutions, in response to the demands of parents; however, the reality on the ground shows the complexity of their implementation and the multiplicity of results. Our middle-range theory showed that to be effective in tackling social inequalities in health, actions must address structural determinants at the macro-systemic level. However, the field of realist evaluation shows that it is first and foremost the actions focused on individual behavior that are implemented. While there is a general political desire to combat social inequalities in health in early childhood, the results show that the strategies in place are potentially not the most effective. Effective support actions would respond to individual strategies; however, current approaches target parents' behavior, aiming to empower them but without giving them the means to do so. CONCLUSIONS: This research constitutes a body of knowledge gathered for reflection and action. In particular, any perinatal policy should clearly state among its objectives the intention to reduce social inequalities in health. The policy should also state that it will be evaluated according to the criteria of proportionate universalism, interprofessional coordination, and actions based on the diversity of parents' needs.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services
Author, co-author :
PIERRON, Annabelle  ;  University of Luxembourg ; Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, UMR 1219, Méthodes pour la recherche interventionnelle en santé des populations, Université de Bordeaux, 33000, , 1 rue Jean Burguet, Bordeaux, France. annabelle.pierron@u-bordeaux.fr
Fond-Harmant, Laurence;  Directrice de Recherche. ACSAL Agence pour la Coopération Scientifique, LEPS UR 3412-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Afrique, Luxembourg
Alla, François;  Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, CHU INSERM, UMR 1219 CIC-EC 1401, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Supporting parents by combatting social inequalities in health: a realist evaluation.
Publication date :
29 June 2021
Journal title :
BMC Public Health
eISSN :
1471-2458
Publisher :
NLM (Medline), England
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Pages :
1252
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBilu :
since 09 October 2025

Statistics


Number of views
7 (0 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
4 (0 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
2
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
2
OpenCitations
 
2
OpenAlex citations
 
6
WoS citations
 
3

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu