Transformation of International Investment Law and Its Principles: Indirect Expropriation and Fair and Equitable Treatment

ÜNÜVAR, Günes

doi:10.1007/978-3-032-01110-7

No full text

Book published as author, translator, etc. (Books)

Transformation of International Investment Law and Its Principles: Indirect Expropriation and Fair and Equitable Treatment

ÜNÜVAR, Günes

2025 • Springer, Cham, Germany

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10993/65798

DOI
10.1007/978-3-032-01110-7

Files (0)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

No document available.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Abstract :

[en] This book explores how international investment law has evolved through the interpretation of key protection standards like Fair and Equitable Treatment and indirect expropriation. It examines how arbitral decisions have shaped, and been shaped by, state treaty-making practices - particularly in recent "new generation" agreements. The analysis reveals a broader trend toward greater clarity, specificity, and balance in the design of investment treaties.

Disciplines :

European & international law

Author, co-author :

ÜNÜVAR, Günes ; University of Luxembourg > Luxembourg Centre for European Law (LCEL) > LCEL Research

External co-authors :

Language :

English

Title :

Transformation of International Investment Law and Its Principles: Indirect Expropriation and Fair and Equitable Treatment

Publication date :

30 October 2025

Publisher :

Springer, Cham, Germany

ISBN/EAN :

3032011094

Edition :

Number of pages :

311

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Focus Area :

Law / European Law

Development Goals :

16. Peace, justice and strong institutions

Available on ORBilu :

since 14 September 2025

Statistics

Number of views

55 (10 by Unilu)

Number of downloads

0 (0 by Unilu)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Alexy R, Peczenik A (1990) The concept of coherence and its significance for discursive rationality. Ratio Juris 3:130–147
Brower CN, Blanchard S (2014) What’s in a Meme? The truth about investor-state arbitration: why it need not, and must not, be repossessed by states. Columbia J Transnatl Law 52:689–779
Chernykh Y (2022) Contract interpretation in investment treaty arbitration: a theory of the incidental issue. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden
Cotula L (2021) Public participation and investment treaties: towards a new settlement? In: De Brabandere E, Gazzini T, Kent A (eds) Public participation and foreign investment law. Brill, Leiden
De Mestral A (2015) Investor-state arbitration between developed democratic countries. Investor-State Arbitration Series, Paper no. 1
Deva S (2021) International investment agreements and human rights: assessing the role of the UN’s business and human rights regulatory initiatives. In: Chaisse J, Choukroune L, Jusoh S (eds) Handbook of international investment law and policy. Springer, Berlin
Deva S, Van Ho T (2023) Addressing (in)equality in redress: human rights-led reform of the investor-state dispute settlement mechanism. JWIT 24(3):398–436
Dolzer R, Bloch F (2003) Indirect expropriation: conceptual realignments? International Law FORUM du droit international 5:155–165
Dumberry P (2018) Fair and equitable treatment: its interaction with the minimum standard and its customary status. Brill, Leiden
Elcombe J (2010) Regulatory Powers vs. Investment Protection under NAFTA’s Chapter 1110: Metalclad, Methanex, and Glamis Gold. Univ Toronto Fac Law Rev 68:71–98
Fatouros A (1962) Government guarantees to foreign investors. Columbia University Press, New York
Gao H (2022) The investment chapter in the regional comprehensive economic partnership: enhanced rules without enforcement mechanism. In: Kimura F, Urata S, Thangavelu S, Narjoko D (eds) Dynamism of East Asia and RCEP: the framework for regional integration. ERIA, Jakarta, pp 201–222
Giannakopoulos C (2022) Manifestations of coherence and investor-state arbitration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gourgourinis A (2011) The distinction between interpretation and application of norms in international adjudication. JIDS 2(1):31–57
Guillaume G (2011) The use of precedent by international judges and arbitrators. JIDS 2:5–23
Heiskanen V (2007) The doctrine of indirect expropriation in the light of the practice of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. JWIT 8:215–232
Ho J, Sattorova M (2021) Investors’ international law. Bloomsbury, London
Howse R, Ünüvar G (2022) Sowing the seeds of an ISDS legitimacy crisis? The Notorious First Wave of NAFTA Chapter 11 Awards. In: Fabri HR, Stoppioni E (eds) International investment law: an analysis of the major decisions. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, pp 99–117
Hull W (1908) The two Hague conferences and their contributions to international law. Ginn and Co., Boston (reprinted in 1970 by Kraus Reprint Co, New York)
Kläger R (2011) ‘Fair and equitable treatment’ in international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Knahr C (2007) Indirect expropriation in recent investment arbitration. Austrian Rev Int Eur Law 12:85–102
Koskenniemi M (2010) What use for sovereignty today? Asian J Int Law 1:61–70
Krajewski M (2020) A nightmare or a noble dream? Establishing investor obligations through treaty-making and treaty-application. BHRJ 5(1):105–129
Küçüksu A, Ünüvar G (2023) Vulnerability theory as a paradigm shift in international investment law: reimagining the role of the state. BHRJ 8(3):309–328
Kulick A (2012) Global public interest in international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lam J, Ünüvar G (2019) Transparency and participatory aspects of investor-state dispute settlement in the EU ‘New Wave’ Trade Agreements. Leiden JIL 32(4):781–800
Lowenfeld AF (2008) International economic law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lugg A, Ganeson K, Elsig M, Chaisse J, Jusoh S (2024) Why is there no investor-state dispute settlement in RCEP? Bargaining and contestation in the investment regime. Bus Polit 26(4):449–476
Malik M (2011) The full protection and security standard comes of age: yet another challenge for states in investment treaty arbitration? IISD Best Practices Series. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/full_protection.pdf
Maupin J (2013) Transparency in international investment law: the good, the bad and the murky. In: Bianchi A, Peters A (eds) Transparency in international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 142–171
Miles K (2010) International investment law: origins, imperialism and conceptualizing the environment. Colorado JIL 21:1–47
Muchlinski P (2016) Negotiating new generation international investment agreements. In: Hindelang S, Krajewski M (eds) Shifting paradigms in international investment law: more balanced, less isolated, increasingly diversified. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 41–64
OECD (2005) Transparency and Third Party Participation in Investor-State Dispute Settlement Procedures (OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2005/1)
OECD (2024) Strengthening sustainable investment through international investment agreements. OECD Publishing, Paris
Paparinskis M (2013) The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Perrone N (2016) The international investment regime and local populations: are the weakest voices unheard? Transnatl Leg Theory 7(3):383–405
Reinisch A (2008) Legality of expropriations. In: Reinisch A (ed) Standards of investment protection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 171–204
Roberts A (2013) Clash of paradigms: actors and analogies shaping the investment treaty system. AJIL 107:45–94
Schill SW (2009) The multilateralization of international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schill SW (2011) Enhancing international law’s legitimacy: conceptual and methodological foundations of a new public law approach. Virginia JIL 52:57–102
Schill SW (2014) International investment law as international development law. In: Bjorklund A (ed) Yearbook on international investment law & policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 327–356
Schneiderman D, Van Harten G (eds) (2023) Rethinking investment law: perspectives & prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schreuer C (2005) Fair and equitable treatment in arbitral practice. J World Invest Trade 6:357–386
Schreuer C (2010) Full protection and security. J Int Dispute Settlement 1(2):353–369
Shaw MN (2012) International law, 5th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Skovgaard Poulsen LN (2015) Bounded rationality and economic diplomacy: the politics of investment treaties in developing countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sornarajah M (2010) The international law on foreign investment, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stern B (2011) The future of international investment law: a balance between the protection of investors and the states’ capacity to regulate. In: Alvarez JE, Sauvant KP (eds) The evolving international investment regime-expectations, realities, options. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 174–192
Szazi E (2012) NGOs: legitimate subjects of international law. Leiden University Press, Leiden
Titi C (2014) The right to regulate in international investment law. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Tudor I (2008) The fair and equitable treatment standard in the international law of foreign investment. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ünüvar G (2022) The ‘object and purpose’ and incrementalism of investment treaties: can international investment law reinvent its identity? In: Egan M, Raube K, Chaisse J (eds) Contestation and polarization in global governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 379–398
Van Harten G (2008) Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Van Harten G, Yılmaz Vastardis A (eds) (2023) Special Issue: Critiques of Investment Arbitration Reform 24(3)
Wandahl Mouyal L (2015) International investment law and the right to regulate: a human rights perspective. Routledge, London and New York
Živković V (2023) Fair and equitable treatment and the rule of law. Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Abi-Saab G (1962) The newly independent states and the rules of international law: an outline. Howard Int Law 8:95–121
Alschner W (2013) Americanization of the BIT universe: the influence of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation (FCN) treaties on modern investment treaty law. Göttingen J Int Law 5:455–486
Alvarez JE (2011) The public international law regime governing international investment. Brill, The Hague
Anderson C (2009) Law essentials: Roman law. Dundee University Press, Dundee
Anghie A (2004) Imperialism, sovereignty and the making of international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Anzola JE (2008) From gunboats to arbitration. Transnational Dispute Management (TDM) 5. https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1223
Aristotle (1998) Politics. English translation: Reeve CDC. Hackett, Indianapolis/Cambridge
Armstrong D (1993) Revolution and world order: the revolutionary state in international society. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Banifatemi Y (2009) The emerging jurisprudence on the most-favoured-nation treatment in investment arbitration. In: Bjorklund A, Laird I, Ripinsky S (eds) Investment treaty law: current issues III. British Institute of International and Comparative Law, pp 241–273
Banifatemi Y (2013) Consistency in the interpretation of substantive investment rules: is it achievable? In: Echandi R, Sauve P (eds) Prospects in international investment law and policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Been V, Beauvais JC (2003) The Global Fifth Amendment? NAFTA’s investment protections and the misguided quest for an international “regulatory takings” doctrine. NYU Law Rev 78(1):30–143. https://nyulawreview.org/issues/volume-78-number-1/the-global-fifth-amendment-naftas-investment-protections-and-the-misguided-quest-for-an-international-regulatory-takings-doctrine/
Bjorklund AK (2008) National treatment. In: Reinisch A (ed) Standards of investment protection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 29–58
Black’s Law Dictionary (2019), 11th edn. Thomson Reuters, St Paul
Bonnitcha J (2014) Substantive protection under investment treaties: a legal and economic analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Borchard E (1913) The diplomatic protection of citizens abroad. Am J Int Law 7:497–520
Borchard E (1930) “Responsibility of States” at The Hague Codification Conference. Am J Int Law 24:517–540
Borchard E (1940) Minimum standard of the treatment of aliens. Mich Law Rev 38:445–461
Broches A (1965) The convention on the settlement of investment disputes. Sect Int Comp Law Bull 9:11–15
Brown C (2013) Introduction: the development and importance of the model bilateral investment treaty. In: Brown C (ed) Commentaries on selected model investment treaties. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–15
Cantor L (ed) (1982) The English Medieval Landscape. Croom Helm, London
Chaudhary S (2008) Foreigners and foreign languages in India: a sociolinguistic history. Foundation Books, Delhi
Choukroune L (2014) National treatment in international investment law and arbitration: a relative standard for autonomous public regulation and sovereign development. In: Sanders AK (ed) The principle of national treatment in international economic law: trade, investment and intellectual property. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 183–222
Chung O (2007) The Lopsided international investment law regime and its effect on the future of investor-state arbitration. Va J Int Law 47:953–976
Cotula L (2016) Foreign investment, law and sustainable development. IIED, London
Crawford J (2012) Brownlie’s principles of public international law, 8th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cutler JW (1933) The treatment of foreigners in relation to the Draft Convention and Conference of 1929. Am J Int Law 27:225–246
Damjanovic I (2023) The European Union and international investment law reform. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
De Vattel E (1758) The law of nations or, principles of the law of nature, applied to the conduct and affairs of nations and sovereigns. Reprinted version: Chitty J (ed) (2011) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
De Vitoria F (2009) De Indis et de Ivre Belli Relectiones (Latin Edition, reprint). University of Michigan Library, Ann Arbor
Di Biase-Dyson C (2013) Foreigners and Egyptians in the Late Egyptian Stories. Brill, Leiden
Dimopoulou-Piliouni A (2008) Apeleutheroi: Metics or Foreigners? DIKE Rivista di storia del diritto Greco ed ellenistico 11:27–50
Dolzer R, Schreuer C (2012) Principles of international investment law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Endicott T (2000) Vagueness in law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Escarcena SL (2014) Indirect expropriation in international law (Leuven Global Governance Series). Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton
Ferguson N (2011) Civilization: the west and the rest. Penguin Books, New York
Fiezzoni KS (2012) Striking consistency and predictability in international investment law from the perspective of developing countries. Front Law China 7:521–552
Frank J (2004) Citizens, slaves, and foreigners: Aristotle on human nature. Am Polit Sci Rev 98:91–104
Gallagher J, Robinson R (1953) The imperialism of free trade. Econ Hist Rev 6:1–15
Geyikdağı N (2008) Osmanlı Devleti’nde Yabancı Sermaye 1854 - 1914. Hil Yayın, Istanbul
Gilbert F (1970) To the farewell address: ideas of early American foreign policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Gomez KF (2011) Latin America and ICSID: David versus Goliath? Law Bus Rev Am 17:195–230
Gordon K, Pohl J, Bouchard M (2014) Investment treaty law, sustainable development and responsible business conduct: a fact finding survey (OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2014/1). https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz0xvgx1zlt-en
Hagan KJ (1973) American Gunboat Diplomacy and the Old Navy 1877-1889. Greenwood Press, Westport and London
Hamilton A (1795) The Defence No. XIX. In: Syrett HC (ed) The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, vol 19 (July 1795-December 1795), pp 318–324. https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-19-02-0056
Herdegen M (2013) Principles of international economic law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hernandez R (1991) The internationalization of Francisco de Vitoria and Domingo de Soto. Fordham Int Law J 15:1031–1059
Hershey AS (1907) The Calvo and Drago Doctrines. Am J Int Law 1:26–45
Hoekman BM, Mavroidis PC (2016) World Trade Organization: law, economics, and politics. Routledge, London and New York
Hood M (1975) Gunboat Diplomacy 1895-1905: great power pressure in Venezuela. George W & J Mackay Limited, Chatham
Jackson JH (1997) The world trading system, 2nd edn. MIT University Press, Cambridge
James L, Leake E (eds) (2015) Decolonization and the cold war: negotiating independence. Bloomsburg Academic, London
Jennings RY (1961) State contracts in international law. In: Waldock H, Jennings RY (eds) The British Yearbook of International Law 1961. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 156–182
Kamen D (2013) Status in classical Athens. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Karadeniz Çelebican Ö (2014) Roma Hukuku, 17th edn. Turhan Kitabevi, Ankara
Keene D (2002) Emperor of Japan: Meiji and his world 1852-1912. Columbia University Press, New York
Kim K (2001) Aliens in Medieval law: the origins of modern citizenship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kläger R (2013) ‘Fair and equitable treatment’ in international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kuhn AK (1930) The International Conference on the Treatment of Foreigners. Am J Int Law 24:570–573
Lesaffer R (2015) Too much history: from war as sanction to the sanctioning of war. In: Weller M, Solomou A (eds) The Oxford handbook of the use of force in international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 35–55
Lipson C (1985) Standing guard: protecting foreign capital in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. University of California Press, Berkeley
Lowenfeld AF (2008) International economic law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Magna Carta (1215) National Archives and Records Administration (trans: Vincent N). https://www.archives.gov/press/press-kits/magna-carta/magna-carta-translation.pdf
Malanczuk P (2000) State-state and investor-state dispute settlement in the OECD Draft Multilateral Investment Agreement. J Int Econ Law 3:417–439
Manciaux S (2007) Bolivia’s withdrawal from ICSID. TDM 5. https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=1076
Mathijsen PSRF (2007) A guide to European Union law, 9th edn. Sweet and Maxwell, London
McLean D (1976) Finance and “Informal Empire” before the First World War. Econ Hist Rev 29:291–305
Miles K (2013) The origins of international investment law: empire, environment and the safeguarding of capital. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Miller S, Hicks GN (2015) Investor-State Dispute Settlement: a reality check (A Report of the CSIS Scholl Chair in International Relations). Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham
Milward AS (2005) Politics and economics in the history of the European Union. Routledge, London
Mitchell N (1999) The danger of dreams: German and American imperialism in Latin America. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill and London
Moore JB (1906) A digest of international law, vol 4. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C
Muchlinski P (1996) The Energy Charter Treaty: towards a new international order for trade and investment or a case of history repeating itself? In: Wälde T (ed) The energy charter treaty: an east-west gateway for investment & trade. Kluwer Law International, London, pp 205–225
Muchlinski P (2000) The rise and fall of the multilateral agreement on investment: where now? Int Lawyer 34(3):1033–1053
Murase S (1976) The most-favored-nation treatment in Japan’s treaty practice during the period 1854-1905. Am J Int Law 70:273–297
Newcombe A, Paradell L (2009) Law and practice of investment treaties. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn
Nicholson FJ (1965) The protection of foreign property under customary international law. Boston Coll Law Rev 6:391–415
Nikièma SH (2017) The most-favoured-nation clause in investment treaties. IISD Best Practices Series. mfn-most-favoured-nation-clause-best-practices-en.pdf
Nussbaum A (1950) Arbitration between the Lena Goldfields Ltd and the Soviet Government. Cornell Law Rev 36:31–53
Nwogugu EI (1965) The legal problems of foreign investment in developing countries. Manchester University Press, Manchester
O’Brien H (1833) Phoenician Ireland. R. M. Timms, M. Keene & Son and F. W. Wakeman, Dublin
OECD (2004) “Indirect expropriation” and the “right to regulate” in international investment law (OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2004/4)
Paine J, Sheargold E (2023) A climate change carve-out for investment treaties. J Int Econ Law 26(2):285–304
Paparinskis M (2013) The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Perrone NM, Schneiderman D (2019) Chapter 24: International Economic Law’s Wreckage: depoliticization, inequality, precarity. In: Christodoulidis E, Dukes R, Goldoni M (eds) Research handbook on critical legal theory. Edward Elgar, Chelthenham, pp 446–472
Philpott D (2001) Revolutions in sovereignty: how ideas shaped modern international relations. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Plato (2008) Menexenus. English translation: Jowett B. The Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1682/1682-h/1682-h.htm
Poscher R (2011) Ambiguity and vagueness in legal interpretation. In: Solan L, Tiersma P (eds) Oxford handbook on language and law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Richter DS (2011) Cosmopolis: imagining community in late classical Athens and the Early Roman Empire. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ripinsky S (2012) Venezuela’s withdrawal from ICSID: what is does and does not achieve. Investment Treaty News. https://www.iisd.org/itn/2012/04/13/venezuelas-withdrawal-from-icsid-what-it-does-and-does-not-achieve/
Roe T, Happold M (2011) Settlement of Investment Disputes under the Energy Charter Treaty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Root E (1910) The basis of protection to citizens residing abroad. Proc Am Soc Int Law Annu Meeting (1907-1917) 4, 16-27
Rosenne S (1998) Codification revisited after 50 years. In: Frowein J, Wolfrum R (eds) Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, vol 2. Kluwer Law International, London, pp 1–22
Roth AH (1949) The minimum standard of international law applied to Aliens. A. W. Sijthoff, Leiden
Schill SW (2009) The multilateralization of international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schmidt S (2011) To order the minds of scholars: the discourse of the peace of Westphalia in international relations. Int Stud Q 55:601–623
Schneiderman D (2011) Revisiting the depolicization of investment disputes. In: Sauvant KP (ed) Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2010-2011. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 693–714
Schreuer C (2013) International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). In: Peters A (ed) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (MPEPIL)
Schrijver N (1997) Sovereignty over natural resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Scott JB (1934) The Spanish origin of international law: Francisco de Vitoria and His Law of Nations. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Sexton J (2011) The Monroe Doctrine: empire and nation in nineteenth- century America. Hill and Wang, New York
Shan W (2007) From north-south divide to private-public debate: revival of the Calvo Doctrine and the changing landscape in international investment law. Northwest J Int Law Bus 27:631–664
Shea DR (1955) The Calvo Clause: a problem of Inter-American and international law and diplomacy. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Shihata IFI (1986) Towards greater depoliticization of investment disputes: the roles of ICSID and MIGA. ICSID Rev 1(1):1–25
Skovgaard Poulsen L (2016) Bounded rationality and economic diplomacy: the politics of investment treaties in developing countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Snyder E (1963) Foreign investment protection: a reasoned approach. Mich Law Rev 61:1087–1124
Sohn LB, Baxter RR (1961) Responsibility of states for injuries to the economic interests of Aliens: II. Draft convention on the international responsibility of states for injuries to Aliens. AJIL 55(3):548–584. https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/parties_publications/C8394/Claimants%27%20documents/CL%20-%20Exhibits/CL-0250%20%28with%20OCR%29.pdf
Thatcher OJ (ed) (1901) The library of original sources, Vol. III-The Roman World. University Research Extension Co, Milwaukee
Thucydides (1914) The History of the Peloponnesian War. English translation: Crawley R. The Internet Classics Archive, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd, London. http://classics.mit.edu/Thucydides/pelopwar.1.first.html
Tzouvala N (2020) Capitalism as civilisation: a history of international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
UNCTAD (2010) Most-Favored-Nation Treatment (UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II)
Ünüvar G (2023) The Mandate Conundrum: Reflections on the 46th Session of the UNCITRAL Working Group III on ISDS Reform. EJIL: Talk!. https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-mandate-conundrum-reflections-on-the-46th-session-of-the-uncitral-working-group-iii-on-isds-reform/
Ünüvar G, Lam J, Dothan S (eds) (2020) Permanent investment courts: the European experiment. Springer, Cham
Vadi V (2015) Analogies in international investment law and arbitration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Van Den Bossche P (2008) The law and policy of the World Trade Organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Van Harten G (2008) Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Vandevelde KJ (2010) A unified theory of fair and equitable treatment. Int Law Polit 43:43–106
Wandahl Mouyal L (2015) International investment law and the right to regulate: a human rights perspective. Routledge, London and New York
Whitaker AP (1948) The United States of America and South America: The Northern Republics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Whitehead D (1977) The Ideology of the Athenian Metic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wierzbicka A (2006) English: meaning and culture. Oxford University Press, New York
Yackee JW (2016) The First Investor-State Arbitration: The Suez Canal Company v Egypt (1864). J World Invest Trade 17(3):401–462
Yalkin T (2009) Ecuador Denounces ICSID: Much Ado About Nothing? EJIL: Talk! Blog. http://www.ejiltalk.org/ecuador-denounces-icsid-much-ado-about-nothing/
Yarrow D (2011) Law’s infidelity to its past: the failure to recognize indigenous jurisdiction in Australia and Canada. In: Knafla LA, Westra H (eds) Aboriginal title and indigenous peoples: Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. UBC Press, Vancouver
Alvarez JE (2011) The return of the state. Minn J In Law 20:223–264
Arato J (2019) The private law critique of international investment law. AJIL 113(1):1–53
Arcuri A, Tienhaara K, Pellegrini L (2024) Investment law v. Supply-side climate policies: insights from Rockhopper v. Italy and Lone Pine v. Canada. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 24:193–216
Asiedu E (2006) Foreign direct investment in Africa: the role of natural resources, market size, government policy, institutions and political instability. World Econ 29:63–77
Beharry CL, Kuritzky ME (2015) Going green: managing the environment through international investment arbitration. Am Univ Int Law Rev 30:383–429
Bellak C, Liebrecht M (2024) Do the new Brazilian Agreements on cooperation and facilitation of investment promote outward foreign direct investment? J World Invest Trade 25(4):535–563
Benhabib S (2016) The new sovereigntism and transnational law: legal utopianism, democratic scepticism and statist realism. Global Const 5:109–144
Berlant L (2007) Slow death (sovereignty, obesity, lateral agency). Crit Inq 33:754–780
Bernasconi-Osterwalder N, Hoffman RT (2013) The German nuclear phase-out put to the test in international investment arbitration? Background to the new dispute Vattenfall v. Germany (II). https://www.tni.org/files/download/vattenfall-icsid-case_oct2013.pdf
Bodin J (1992) On sovereignty: four chapters from the six books of the commonwealth (Julian H Franklin (editor and translator), Cambridge texts in the history of political thought). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bonnitcha J (2014) Substantive protection under investment treaties: a legal and economic analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brower CN, Blanchard S (2014) What’s in a Meme? The truth about investor-state arbitration: why it need not, and must not, be repossessed by states. Columbia J Transnatl Law 52:689–779
Brower CH II (2006) Why the FTC notes of interpretation constitute a partial amendment of NAFTA Article 1105. Va J Int Law 46:347–363
Brown JG (2013) International investment agreements: regulatory chill in the face of litigious heat? West J Leg Stud 3(1):1–25
Coe J, Rubins N (2005) Regulatory expropriation and the Tecmed Case: context and contributions. In: Weiler T (ed) International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. Cameron May, London, pp 597–668
De Mestral A (2015) Investor-state arbitration between developed democratic countries. Investor-State Arbitration Series, Paper no. 1
Demirkol B (2018) Judicial acts and investment treaty arbitration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dolzer R, Schreuer C (2012) Principles of international investment law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Douglas Z (2003) The hybrid foundations of investment arbitration. Br Yearb Int Law 74:151–289
Downes P (2015) Hobbes, sovereignty, and early American literature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Egger P, Pirotte A, Titi C (2022) International investment agreements and foreign direct investment: a survey. World Econ 46:1524–1565
Elkins Z, Guzman AT, Simmons B (2008) Competing for capital: the diffusion of bilateral investment treaties, 1960-2000. Univ Ill Law Rev 2008(1):265–304
Escarcena S (2013) Expropriations and other measures affecting property rights in the case law of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal. Wisconsin Int Law J 31:177–207
Footer ME (2009) BITs and pieces: social and environmental protection in the regulation of foreign investment. Mich State J Int Law 18:33–64
Heath B (2021) Eco Oro and the twilight of policy exceptionalism (Investment Treaty News, 20 December 2021). https://www.iisd.org/itn/en/2021/12/20/eco-oro-and-the-twilight-of-policy-exceptionalism/
Hobbes T (1651) Leviathan (reprinted in 1985). Penguin Books, London
Hossain K (2005) Jus Cogens and obligations under the UN Charter. Santa Clara J Int Law 3:72–98
Kerwin GJ (1983) The role of United Nations General Assembly Resolutions in determining principles of international law in United States Courts. Duke Law J 1983:876–899
Klabbers J (1998) Clinching the concept of sovereignty: Wimbledon Redux. Aust Rev Int Eur Law 3:345–367
Koskenniemi M (2010) What use for sovereignty today? Asian J Int Law 1:61–70
Krasner SD (1999) Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Krasner SD (2012) Problematic sovereignty. In: Krasner SD (ed) Problematic sovereignty: contested rules and political possibilities. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 1–23
Kriebaum U (2007) Regulatory takings: balancing the interests of the investor and the state. J World Invest Trade 8:717–744
Laudal Berge T, Berger A (2021) Do investor-state dispute settlement cases influence domestic environmental regulation? The role of respondent state bureaucratic capacity. J Int Dispute Settlement 12(1):1–41
Locke J (1690) Second treatise of government (Macpherson CB (ed), reprinted in 1980). Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis and Cambridge
Markert L (2011) The crucial question of future investment treaties: balancing investors’ rights and regulatory interests of host states. In: Bungenberg M, Griebel J, Hindelang S (eds) European yearbook of international economic law, special issue: international investment law and EU law. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 145–171
Marzal T (2023) Polluter Doesn’t Pay: The Rockhopper v Italy Award (EJIL: Talk! 19 January 2023). https://www.ejiltalk.org/polluter-doesnt-pay-the-rockhopper-v-italy-award/
Mazzotti P (2022) Rockhopper v. Italy and the Tension between ISDS and Climate Policy (Völkerrechtsblog, 21 December 2022). https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/de/rockhopper-v-italy-and-the-tension-between-isds-and-climate-policy/
Newcombe A (2013) Developments in IIA treaty-making. In: de Mestral A, Levesque C (eds) Improving international investment agreements. Routledge, London and New York, pp 15–24
Nikièma SH (2012) Best Practices Indirect Expropriation (IISD Best Practices Series). https://www.iisd.org/publications/guide/best-practices-indirect-expropriation
Paulsson J (1995) Arbitration without privity. ICSID Rev-Foreign Invest Law J 10:232–257
Peat D (2019) Comparative reasoning in international courts and tribunals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Perrone NM, de Cerqueira Cesar GR (2015) Brazil’s bilateral investment treaties: More than a new investment treaty model? (Columbia FDI Perspective, No. 159) available at https://ccsi.columbia.edu/content/no-159-brazils-bilateral-investment-treaties-more-new-investment-treaty-model-nicolas-m
Puig S, Shaffer G (2016) A breakthrough with the TPP: The Tobacco Carve-Out. Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics 16(2):327–333
Roberts A (2013) Clash of paradigms: actors and analogies shaping the investment treaty system. AJIL 107:45–94
Rubins N, Kinsella NS (2005) International investment, political risk and dispute resolution. Oceana Publications, Dobbs Ferry
Sachdev R (2006) Comparing the legal foundations of foreign direct investment in India and China: law and the rule of law in the Indian Foreign Direct Investment Context. Columbia Bus Law Rev 2006:167–214
Salacuse JW, Sullivan NP (2005) Do BITs really work? An evaluation of bilateral investment treaties and their grand bargain. Harv Int Law J 46:67–130
Sauvant KP, Sachs L (eds) (2009) The effect of treaties on foreign direct investments. Oxford University Press, New York
Schill SW (2011) Enhancing international law’s legitimacy: conceptual and methodological foundations of a new public law approach. Virginia JIL 52:57–102
Skovgaard Poulsen L (2016) Bounded rationality and economic diplomacy: the politics of investment treaties in developing countries. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Skovgaard Poulsen L; Bonnitcha J, Yackee JW (2013) Analytical framework for assessing costs and benefits of investment protection treaties (LSE Enterprise)
Sornarajah M (1986) The pursuit of nationalized property (Developments in International Law, No. 8). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden
Staats JL, Biglaiser G (2011) Foreign direct investment in Latin America: the importance of judicial strength and rule of law. Int Stud Q 56:193–202
Stone Sweet A (2010) Investor-state arbitration: proportionality’s new frontier. Law Ethics Hum Rights 4:47–76
Sweeney M (2010) Foreign direct investment in India and China: the creation of a balanced regime in globalized economy. Cornell Int Law J 43:207–248
Tienhaara K (2017) Regulatory chill in a warming world: the threat to climate policy posed by investor-state dispute settlement. Transnatl Environ Law 7(2):229–250
Timmers L (2013) The protection against expropriations in Venezuela: a right to property in theory? In: Baetens F (ed) Investment law within international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–163
Titi C (2024) Investment treaty arbitration caught in the public-private law divide. Mich J Int Law 45(3):441–486
Ünüvar G (2023a) A tale of policy carve-outs and general exceptions: Eco Oro v Colombia as a case study. J Int Dispute Settlement 14(4):517–533
Ünüvar G (2023b) The ‘object and purpose’ and incrementalism of investment treaties: can international investment law reinvent its identity? In: Egan M, Raube K, Wouters J, Chaisse J (eds) Contestation and polarization in global governance. Elgar, Cheltenham
Van Aaken A (2009) International investment law between commitment and flexibility: a contract theory analysis. J Int Econ Law 12:507–538
Van Harten G (2008) Investment treaty arbitration and public law. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Van Harten G, Loughlin M (2006) Investment treaty arbitration as a species of global administrative law. Eur J Int Law 17:121–150
Verheyen R (2012) The Coal-fired Power Plant Hamburg-Moorburg, ICSID Proceedings by Vattenfall under the Energy Charter Treaty and the result for environmental standards
Wälde T (1998) A Requiem for the “New International Economic Order” the rise and fall of paradigms in international economic law and a post-mortem with timeless significance. In: Rest A, Hafner G, Loibl G, Zemanek K, Sucharipa-Behrmann L (eds) Liber Amicorum Professor Ignaz Seidl-Hohenveldern. Brill, Leiden, pp 771–803
Wälde T (2010) Procedural challenges in investment arbitration under the shadow of the dual role of the state-asymmetries and tribunals’ duty to ensure, pro-actively, the equality of arms. Arbitr Int 26:2–42
Williamson J (2009) A short history of the Washington consensus. Law Bus Rev Am 15(1):7–24
Yackee JW (2008) Bilateral investment treaties, credible commitment, and the rule of (international) law: do BITs promote foreign direct investment? Law Soc Rev 42:805–832
Yackee JW (2014) Political risk and international investment law. Duke J Comp Int Law 24:477–500
Alschner W (2013) Americanization of the BIT Universe: the influence of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation (FCN) treaties on modern investment treaty law. Göttingen J Int Law 5:455–486
Alschner W (2022) Investment arbitration and state-driven reform: new treaties, old outcomes. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Alvarez JE, Khamsi K (2009) The Argentine crisis and foreign investors: a glimpse into the heart of the investment regime. In: Sauvant KP (ed) The yearbook on international investment law and policy 2008–2009. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 379–478
Andreotti N (2025) The Colombian Santurbán Páramo saga and its contribution to the development of international investment law and arbitration. Arbitr Int (Advance access): 1–15
Bernasconi-Osterwalder N (2013) Commentary to the Draft Investment Chapter of the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) IISD Report. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/commentary_investment_chapter_CETA.pdf
Brower CN, Blanchard S (2014) What’s in a Meme? The truth about investor-state arbitration: why it need not, and must not, be repossessed by states. Columbia J Transnatl Law 52:689–779
Brownlie I (2003) Public international law, 6th edn. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Brunetti M (2001) The Iran-United States claims tribunal, NAFTA Chapter 11, and the doctrine of indirect expropriation. Chic J Int Law 2:203–212
Bulut ÖE (2022) Drawing boundaries of police powers doctrine: a balanced framework for investors and states. J Int Dispute Settlement 13:583–607
Bungenberg M (2023) (Direct and Indirect) expropriation and the rule of law. In: Reinisch A, Schill SW (eds) Investment protection standards and the rule of law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 61–80
Coe J, Rubins N (2005) Regulatory expropriation and the Tecmed Case: context and contributions. In: Weiler T (ed) International investment law and arbitration: leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, bilateral treaties and customary international law. Cameron May, London, pp 597–668
Corey S (2012) But is it just? The inability for current adjudicatory standards to provide “just compensation” for creeping expropriations. Fordham Law Rev 81:973–1012
Cox JM (2019) Expropriation in investment treaty arbitration. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cremades B (2004) Disputes arising out of foreign direct investment in Latin America: a new look at the Calvo Doctrine and other jurisdictional issues. Dispute Resolut J 59:78
De Luca A (2014) Indirect expropriations and regulatory takings: what role for the “legitimate expectations” of foreign investors? In: Sacerdoti G, Acconci P, Valenti M, De Luca A (eds) General interests of host states in the application of investment treaties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 58–75
Demirkol B (2018) Judicial acts and investment treaty arbitration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dolzer R (2003) Indirect expropriations: new developments? NYU Environ Law J 11:64–93
Dolzer R, Bloch F (2003) Indirect expropriation: conceptual realignments? International Law FORUM du droit international 5:155–165
Dolzer R, Schreuer C (2012) Principles of international investment law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dumberry P (2001) Expropriation under NAFTA Chapter 11 investment dispute settlement mechanism: some comments on the latest case law. Int Arbitr Law Rev 4:96–104
Dupuy PM, Viñuales JE (2015) Human rights and investment disciplines: integration in progress. In: Bungenberg M, Griebel J, Hobe S, Reinisch A (eds) International investment law: a handbook. Nomos, Baden Baden, pp 1739–1767
Edsall RD (2006) Indirect expropriation under NAFTA and DR-CAFTA: potential inconsistencies in the treatment of state public welfare regulations. Boston Univ Law Rev 86:931–962
Escarcena SL (2014) Indirect expropriation in international law (Leuven Global Governance Series). Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton
Fahner JH (2022) Judicial deference in international adjudication: a comparative analysis. Bloomsbury, London
Fauchald OK (2006) International investment law and environmental protection. Yearb Int Environ Law 17:3–47
Firger DM, Gerrard MB (2012) Harmonizing climate change policy and international investment law: threats, challenges, and opportunities. In: Sauvant KP (ed) Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2010-2011. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 517–566
Fontanelli F, Bianco G (2014) Converging towards NAFTA: an analysis of FTA Investment Chapters in the European Union and the United States. Stanford J Int Law 50:211–246
Gazzini T (2010) Drawing the line between non-compensable regulatory powers and indirect expropriation of foreign investment-an economic analysis of law perspective. Manchester J Int Econ Law 7(3):36–51
Giannakopoulos C (2023) Manifestations of coherence and investor-state arbitration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Harbine J (2002) NAFTA Chapter 11 Arbitration: deciding the price of free trade. Ecol Law Q 29:371–394
Harris DJ (2010) Cases and materials on international law, 7th edn. Sweet & Maxwell, London
Heiskanen V (2007) The doctrine of indirect expropriation in the light of the practice of the Iran-United States claims tribunal. JWIT 8:215–232
Helgeson E (ed) (2001) Iran-US Claims Tribunal Reports, no. 31 1995. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Henckels C (2012) Indirect expropriation and the right to regulate: revisiting proportionality analysis and the standard of review in investor-state arbitration. J Int Econ Law 15:223–255
Hirsch M (2013) Investment tribunals and human rights treaties: a sociological perspective. In: Baetens F (ed) Investment law within international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 85–105
Hoffmann AK (2008) Indirect expropriation. In: Reinisch A (ed) Standards of investment protection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 151–170
Hoffmeister F, Ünüvar G (2013) From BITs and pieces towards European investment agreements. In: Bungenberg M, Reinisch A, Tietje C (eds) EU and investment agreements: open questions and remaining challenges. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 57–85
Howse R, Ünüvar G (2022) Sowing the seeds of an ISDS legitimacy crisis? The notorious first wave of NAFTA Chapter 11 Awards. In: Fabri HR, Stoppioni E (eds) International investment law: an analysis of the major decisions. Bloomsbury Publishing, London, pp 99–117
Kriebaum U (2007) Regulatory takings: balancing the interests of the investor and the state. J World Invest Trade 8:717–744
Kriebaum U (2014) FET and expropriation in the (invisible) EU Model BIT. J World Invest Trade 15:454–483
Kriebaum U (2018) Indirect expropriation: a comparative approach. In: Gattini A, Tanzi A, Fontanelli F (eds) General principles of law and international investment arbitration. Brill, Leiden, pp 429–453
Kriebaum U (2022) Art. 8.12 Expropriation. In: Bungenberg M, Reinisch A (eds) CETA investment law: article-by-article commentary. Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp 300–336
Kucik J, Puig S (2023) Towards an effective appellate mechanism for ISDS tribunals. World Trade Rev 22:562–583
Lauterpacht E, Greenwood CJ (1994) International law reports, vol 95. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://icsidfiles.worldbank.org/icsid/ICSIDBLOBS/OnlineAwards/C3004/CLA-056_Eng.pdf
Lavranos N (2013) In defence of Member States’ BITs Gold Standard: the Regulation 1219/2012 establishing a transitional regime for existing extra-EU BITs-a Member State’s perspective. Transnatl Dispute Manag 10(2):1–14
Leys D (2015) EU competence in foreign direct investment: will the EU Court of Justice end the controversy? Global Trade Customs J 10(7/8):267–272
Martinez EA (2012) Understanding the debate over necessity: unanswered questions and future implications on annulments in the Argentine gas cases. Duke J Comp Int Law 23:149–186
Mavromati C, Schubert A (2024) The EU model clauses for bilateral investment treaties of EU Member States with third countries. Eur Invest Law Arbitr Rev 9(2):193–216
Miles K (2013) The origins of international investment law: empire, environment and the safeguarding of capital. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Montanaro F, Paulini S (2018) United in Mixity? The future of the EU Common Commercial Policy in light of the CJEU’s recent case law (EJIL: Talk! 2 February 2018). https://www.ejiltalk.org/united-in-mixity-the-future-of-the-eu-common-commercial-policy-in-light-of-the-cjeus-recent-case-law/
Mostafa B (2008) The sole effects doctrine, police powers and indirect expropriation under international law. Aust Int Law J 15:267–296
Mouri A (1994) The international law of expropriation as reflected in the work of the Iran-US Claims Tribunal. Brill Nijhoff, Dordrecht
Nascimbene J (2024) Creeping expropriation. Jus Mundi. https://jusmundi.com/fr/document/publication/en-creeping-expropriation
Newcombe A (1999) Regulatory expropriation, investment protection and international law: when is government regulation expropriatory and when should compensation be paid? (LL.M. Thesis, Graduate Department of Faculty of Law, University of Toronto). https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/items/20b72958-a1a1-4f08-9695-305010302764
Newcombe A (2005) The boundaries of regulatory expropriation in international law. ICSID Rev 20:1–57
Nicholson FJ (1965) The protection of foreign property under customary international law. Boston Coll Law Rev 6:391–415
OECD (2004) “Indirect Expropriation” and the “Right to Regulate” in International Investment Law (OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2004/4)
OECD (2021) The Future of Investment Treaties (Track 2): The Notion of ‘Indirect Expropriation’ in Investment Treaties Concluded by 88 Jurisdictions: A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions. https://www.oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/oecd-future-investment-treaties-indirect-expropriation-meeting-background.pdf
OECD (2022) The Future of Investment Treaties (Track 2): Summary of Discussions of the Future of Investment Treaties Track 2-Meeting of 13 April 2022. https://www.oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/oecd-future-investment-treaties-discussion-summary-track2-april-2022.pdf
Perrone NM (2022) Local communities, extractivism and international investment law: the case of five Colombian communities. Globalizations 19(6):837–853
Rajput A (2018) Regulatory freedom and indirect expropriation in investment arbitration. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn
Reinisch A (2008) Legality of expropriations. In: Reinisch A (ed) Standards of investment protection. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 171–204
Reinisch A (2011) Necessity in investment arbitration. Neth Yearb Int Law 41:137–158
Reinisch A (2012) Expropriation. In: Muchlinski P, Ortino F, Schreuer C (eds) The Oxford handbook of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 408–456
Rubins N, Kinsella NS (2005) International investment, political risk and dispute resolution. Oceana Publications, Dobbs Ferry
Ruoppo R (2022) Common features of the right to property and international investments: evidence from the use of EctHR case law in investment tribunals’ decisions. Ital Rev Int Comp Law 2:347–369
Sauvant KP, Chiswick-Patterson M (eds) (2008) Appeals mechanism in international investment disputes. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schill SW (2007) Tearing down the Great Wall: the new generation investment treaties of the People’s Republic of China. Cardozo J Int Comp Law 15:73–118
Schreuer C (2008) Preliminary rulings in investment arbitration. In: Sauvant KP, Chiswick-Patterson M (eds) Appeals mechanism in international investment disputes. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 207–212
Shan W (2007) From north-south divide to private-public debate: revival of the Calvo Doctrine and the changing landscape in international investment law. Northwest J Int Law Bus 27:631–664
Shirlow E (2014) Deference and indirect expropriation analysis in international investment law: observations on current approaches and frameworks for future analysis. ICSID Rev 29:595–626
Shirlow E (2021) Judging at the interface: deference to state decision-making authority in international adjudication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sornarajah M (1994) The international law on foreign investment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stone Sweet A (2010) Investor-state arbitration: proportionality’s new frontier. Law Ethics Hum Rights 4:47–76
Subedi SP (2008) International investment law: reconciling policy and principle. Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland
Teo J, Richter J, Kadu S, Khaw T (2024) Rebalancing investment protection standards: analysing the effectiveness of new treaty language in preserving regulatory space for host states. J World Invest Trade 25(4):529–566
Titi C (2014) The right to regulate in international investment law. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Titi C (2018) Police powers doctrine and international investment law. In: Gattini A, Tanzi A, Fontanelli F (eds) General principles of law and international investment arbitration. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 323–343
Tung K-Y (2015) Investor-state dispute settlement under the trans-pacific partnership. Calif Int Law J 23:19–25
Ünüvar G (2023) A tale of policy carve-outs and general exceptions: Eco Oro v Colombia as a case study. J Int Dispute Settlement 14(4):517–533
Vandevelde KJ (2010) Bilateral investment treaties: history, policy, and interpretation. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Viñuales JE (2012) Foreign investment and the environment in international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Visser F (1988) The principle of permanent sovereignty over natural resources and the nationalisation of foreign interests. Comp Int Law J South Africa 21(1):76–91
Zarra G (2018) The issue of incoherence in investment arbitration: is there need for a systemic reform? Chin J Int Law 17(1):137–185
Alschner W (2013) Americanization of the BIT universe: the influence of friendship, commerce and navigation (FCN) treaties on modern investment treaty law. Göttingen J Int Law 5:455–486
Alschner W (2022) Investment arbitration and state-driven reform: new treaties, old outcomes. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Alvarez JE, Khamsi K (2009) The Argentine crisis and foreign investors: a glimpse into the heart of the investment regime. In: Sauvant KP (ed) The yearbook on international investment law and policy 2008–2009. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 379–478
Angelet N (2022) Fair and equitable treatment. Max Planck Encycl Int Law (MPIL), 1–30
Bernasconi-Osterwalder N (2013) Commentary to the Draft Investment Chapter of the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) IISD Report. https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/commentary_investment_chapter_CETA.pdf
Blomstrom M, Kokko A (1997) Regional Integration and Foreign Direct Investment: A Conceptual Framework and Three Cases. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 1750
Bonnitcha J (2014) Substantive protection under investment treaties: a legal and economic analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Borchard E (1940) Minimum standard of the treatment of aliens. Mich Law Rev 38:445–461
Brauch MD (2017) Exhaustion of Local Remedies in International Investment Law (IISD Best Practices Series-January 2017). https://www.iisd.org/system/files/publications/best-practices-exhaustion-local-remedies-law-investment-en.pdf
Bronfman MK (2005) Fair and equitable treatment: an evolving standard. Max Planck UNYB 10:609–680
Brower CH II (2006) Why the FTC notes of interpretation constitute a partial amendment of NAFTA article 1105. Va J Int Law 46:347–363
Burgstaller M, Galagan D (2024) Contributory fault in international investment arbitration. J Int Arbitr 41(4):397–438
Cole T (2012) The boundaries of Most Favored nation treatment in international investment law. Mich J Int Law 33:537–586
Dolzer R, Schreuer C (2012) Principles of international investment law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dolzer R, Stevens M (1995) Bilateral investment treaties. Martinus Hijhoff Publishers, The Hague
Dumberry P (2004) An empirical study of the fair and equitable treatment standard clause: how tribunals have examined its relationship with the minimum standard. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn
Dumberry P (2018) Fair and equitable treatment: its interaction with the minimum standard and its customary status. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden
Dumberry P (2023) The Cost of Inaction: Arbitral Practice in Respect of Earlier Generation FET Clauses and Current Approaches to FET Clauses. OECD: The Future of Investment Treaties (Track 2). https://oecd.org/investment/investment-policy/Expert-contribution-Prof-Dumberry-on-FET.pdf
Dumberry P (2024a) The ‘minimum standard of treatment’ in international investment law: the fascinating story of the emergence, decline and recent resurrection of a concept. In: Merkouris P, Kulick A, Álvarez-Zarate JM, Żenkiewicz M (eds) Custom and its interpretation in international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dumberry P (2024b) NAFTA’S FET clause is (practically) dead! Long live its legacy!: an empirical survey of how tribunals have interpreted FET clauses linked to the minimum standard of treatment. Eur Invest Law Arbitr Rev 9(2):277–308
Dworkin R (1986) Law’s empire. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Grigera A (2024) Necessity in Investment Arbitration: Boosting the ICSID System’s Legitimacy (The American Review of International Arbitration Blog, 25 March 2024). https://aria.law.columbia.edu/necessity-in-investment-arbitration-boosting-the-icsid-systems-legitimacy/
Islam R (2018) The fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard in international investment arbitration: developing countries in context. Singapore, Springer Nature
Jarrett M (2019) Contributory fault and investor misconduct in investment arbitration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kiguel M (2011) Argentina’s 2001 Economic and Financial Crisis: Lessons for Europe. Think Tank 20: Beyond Macroeconomic Policy Coordination Discussions in the G-20. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/11_argentina_kiguel.pdf.
Kill T (2008) Don’t cross the streams: past and present overstatement of customary international law in connection with conventional fair and equitable treatment obligations. Mich Law Rev 106:853–880
Kläger R (2011) ‘Fair and equitable treatment’ in international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Knottnerus R, Van Os R (2012) The Netherlands: A Gateway to ‘Treaty Shopping’ for Investment Protection (Investment Treaty News, 12 January 2012). https://www.iisd.org/itn/2012/01/12/the-netherlands-treaty-shopping/
Kriebaum U (2016) FET and Expropriation in the Comprehensive Economic Trade Agreement between the European Union and Canada (CETA). TDM 1—Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between the European Union and Canada (CETA). https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/article.asp?key=2320.
Kurtz J (2010) The paradoxical treatment of the ILC articles on state responsibility in investor-state arbitration. ICSID Rev 25:200–217
Laryea ET (2021) Legitimate expectations in investment treaty law: concept and scope of application. In: Chaisse J, Choukroune L, Jusoh S (eds) Handbook of international investment law and policy. Springer Nature, Singapore, pp 97–120
Lockwood JE (1948) Economic agreement of Bogota. Am J Int Law 42:611–620
Mann FA (1981) British treaties for the promotion and protection of investments. Br Yearb Int Law 52:241–254
Marcoux JM, Bjorklund AK (2020) Foreign investor’ responsibilities and contributory fault in investment arbitration. Int Comp Law Quart 69(4):877–905
Mola L (2016) International investment arbitration and serious economic crises: lessons learned in the Argentinean crisis of 2000-2001. In: Tanzi A, Asteriti A, Lazo Polanco R, Turrini P (eds) International investment law in Latin America/ Derecho Internacional de las Inversiones en América Latina. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 370–399
Newcombe A, Paradell L (2009) Law and practice of investment treaties. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen aan den Rijn
Nikièma SH (2017) The Most-Favoured-Nation Clause in Investment Treaties: IISD Best Practices Series
OECD (2004) Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law (OECD Working Papers on International Investment 2004/3). https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2004/09/fair-and-equitable-treatment-standard-in-international-investment-law_g17a166b/675702255435.pdf.
Paddeu F, Waibel M (2022) Necessity 20 years on: the limits of article 25. ICSID Rev 37(1–2):160–191
Paparinskis M (2013) The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Paulsson J (2005) Denial of justice in international law (Hersch Lauterpacht Memorial Lectures No. 17). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pinchis-Paulsen M (2014) The ancestry of ‘equitable treatment’ in trade: lessons from the league of nations during the inter-war period. J World Invest Trade 15:13–72
Pinchis-Paulsen M (2018) Resolving challenges to historical research: developing a project to define fair and equitable treatment. In: Schill SW, Tams CJ, Hofmann R (eds) International investment law and history. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 179–212
Porterfield MC (2013) A Distinction Without a Difference? The Interpretation of Fair and Equitable Treatment Under Customary International Law by Investment Tribunals (IISD, Investment Treaty News, 22 March 2013). https://www.iisd.org/itn/2013/03/22/a-distinction-without-a-difference-the-interpretation-of-fair-and-equitable-treatment-under-customary-international-law-by-investment-tribunals/
Potestà M (2013) Legitimate expectations in investment treaty law: understanding the roots and the limits of a controversial concept. ICSID Rev 28:88–122
Reinisch A, Tropper J (2022) The Argentinian crisis arbitrations. In: Ruiz Fabri H, Stoppioni E (eds) International investment law: an analysis of the major decisions. Hart Bloomsbury, London, pp 119–134
Ruttenberg VH (1987) The United States bilateral investment treaty program: variations on the model. J Int Law 9:121–143
Sarmiento F, Nikièma S (2022) Fair and Equitable Treatment: What it matters and what can be done https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2022-11/fair-equitable-treatment-en.pdf
Schill SW (2009) The multilateralization of international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schill SW (2022) Landmark cases on fair and equitable treatment: empowering and controlling arbitrators as law-makers. In: Ruiz Fabri H, Stoppioni E (eds) International investment law: an analysis of the major decisions. Hart Bloomsbury, London, pp 359–379
Schreuer C (2005) Fair and equitable treatment in arbitral practice. J World Invest Trade 6:357–386
Schreuer C (2009) Protection against arbitrary or discriminatory measures. In: Rogers CA, Alford PA (eds) The future of investment arbitration. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 183–198
Schreuer C, Kriebaum U (2009) At what time must legitimate expectations exist? In: Werner J, Ali AH (eds) A liber Amicorum: Thomas Wälde. Cameron May, London, pp 265–276
Stone J (2012) Arbitrariness, the fair and equitable treatment standard, and the international law of investment. Leiden J Int Law 25:77–107
Thirlway H (2010) The sources of international law. In: Evans MD (ed) International law, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 95–121
Toye R (2012) International trade organization. In: Daunton M, Narlikar A, Stern RM (eds) The Oxford handbook on the World Trade Organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 85–100
Tudor I (2008) The fair and equitable treatment standard in the international law of foreign investment. Oxford University Press, Oxford
UNCTAD (2012) Fair and Equitable Treatment (UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II). https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/unctaddiaeia2011d5_en.pdf
Ünüvar G (2020) Is CETA the promised breakthrough? Interpretation and evolution of fair and equitable treatment and (indirect) expropriation provisions. In: Andenas M, Pantaleo L, Happold M, Contartese C (eds) EU external action in international economic law. Springer, Berlin, pp 193–219
Ünüvar G (2022) The vague meaning of fair and equitable treatment principle in investment arbitration and new generation clarifications. In: Lam J, Kjær AL (eds) Language and legal interpretation in international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 271–292
Ünüvar G (2023) A tale of policy carve-outs and general exceptions: eco Oro v Colombia as a case study. J Int Disp Settlement 14(4):517–533
Vandevelde KJ (2010) A unified theory of fair and equitable treatment. Int Law Polit 43:43–106
Villegas-Ruiz JA (2020) Oil & gas International Dispute Resolution in context: the example of Exxon Mobil v. Venezuela AMDIPC No 2:495–527
Waibel M (2019) Fair and equitable treatment as boilerplate. Am Rev Int Arbitr 30(1):85–111. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3401770
Wälde T (2004) Investment arbitration under the energy charter treaty: an overview of selected key issues based on recent litigation experience. In: Horn N (ed) Arbitrating foreign investment disputes: procedural and substantive legal aspects. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp 193–236
Walker H Jr (1958) The post-war commercial treaty program of the United States. Polit Sci Quart 73:57–81
Weiler T (2013) The interpretation of international investment law: equality, discrimination and minimum standards of treatment in historical context. Leiden, Brill Nijhoff
Yu C (2024) International adjudication as interactional law-making: the incorporation of fair and equitable treatment elements in investment treaties. J Int Econ Law 27:259–277
Zeyl T (2011) Charting the wrong course: the doctrine of legitimate expectations in investment treaty law. Alberta Law Rev 49(1):203–235
Živković V (2023) Fair and equitable treatment and the rule of law. Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham