[en] While the proliferation of civil drones has led to increasingly diverse designs, research on Human-Drone Interaction (HDI) has largely focused on rotorcraft, but interacting with flapping-wing drones remain underexplored. To address this gap, we present the first study to investigate how humans experience a bioinspired flapping-wing drone compared to a similar-sized quadcopter. We conducted a mixed-methods study (N = 56) using a within-subject 2×2×2 factorial design to examine the effects of drone design, proxemic distance, and human posture on perceptions of safety, pleasure, discomfort, and unexpectedness. Participants had mixed feelings about the bioinspired flapper, finding it newfangled, entertaining, and inspiring, but also unsafe and unclear in its potential use cases. They also associated the flapper with animals ranging from insects to birds to bats. Our findings have important implications for HDI and future bioinspired drone development, including scaling the drone's physical dimensions to its context and purpose, enhancing control and stability, and aligning its form with familiar species archetypes, which in turn should be guided by its context and role.
Disciplines :
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Wang, Ziming ; University of Luxembourg ; Chalmers University of Technology
Loerakker, Meagan; TU Wien
Wu, Yiqian; Chalmers University of Technology
Yang, Shiwei; University of Gothenburg
Pons, Arion; Chalmers University of Technology
CHUAI, Yuwei ; University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > IRiSC
Sirkin, David; SU - Stanford University
Fjeld, Morten; Chalmers University of Technology ; UiB - University of Bergen
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
In a Flap: Experiences with a Bioinspired Flying Robot
Publication date :
03 September 2025
Journal title :
Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
eISSN :
2474-9567
Publisher :
Association for Computing Machinery, New York, United States - New York
Parastoo Abtahi, David Y Zhao, Jane L E, and James A Landay. 2017. Drone near me: Exploring touch-based human-drone interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3, Article 34 (9 2017), 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130899
Enrico Ajanic, Mir Feroskhan, Stefano Mintchev, Flavio Noca, and Dario Floreano. 2020. Bioinspired wing and tail morphing extends drone flight capabilities. Science Robotics 5, 47 (Oct. 2020), eabc2897. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abc2897
Neziha Akalin, Annica Kristoffersson, and Amy Loutfi. 2019. Evaluating the sense of safety and security in human–robot interaction with older people. In Oliver Korn (ed.), Social Robots: Technological, Societal and Ethical Aspects of Human-Robot Interaction. Springer, 237–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17107-0_12
John D Anderson, Jr. 1998. A history of aerodynamics: and its impact on flying machines. Number 8. Cambridge University Press.
Riley Andrade, Kelli L. Larson, Janet Franklin, Susannah B. Lerman, Heather L. Bateman, and Paige S. Warren. 2022. Species traits explain public perceptions of human–bird interactions. Ecological Applications 32, 8 (Dec. 2022), e2676. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2676
Jonas Auda, Martin Weigel, Jessica R Cauchard, and Stefan Schneegass. 2021. Understanding drone landing on the human body. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction. 1–13.
Anja Austermann, Seiji Yamada, Kotaro Funakoshi, and Mikio Nakano. 2010. How do users interact with a pet-robot and a humanoid. In CHI’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI EA 2010). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3727–3732. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754046
Shrutarv Awasthi, Miguel Fernandez-Cortizas, Christopher Reining, Pedro Ariasp, Marco Luna, David Perez-Saura, Moritz Roidl, Nils Gramse, Patrick Klokowski, and Pascual Campoy. 2023. Micro UAV Swarm for industrial applications in indoor environment – A Systematic Literature Review (11 ed.). Bundesvereinigung Logistik (BVL) e.V., DE. https://doi.org/10.23773/2023_11
Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. 2009. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International journal of social robotics 1 (2009), 71–81.
Mehmet Aydin Baytas, Damla Çay, Yuchong Zhang, Mohammad Obaid, Asim Evren Yantaç, and Morten Fjeld. 2019. The Design of Social Drones: A Review of Studies on Autonomous Flyers in Inhabited Environments. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland, UK) (CHI’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300480
Ann Blandford, Dominic Furniss, and Stephann Makri. 2016. Qualitative HCI research: Going behind the scenes. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 9, 1 (4 2016), 115 pages. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00706ED1V01Y201602HCI034
James E. Bluman, Chang-Kwon Kang, and Yuri Shtessel. 2018. Control of a Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicle: Sliding-Mode Approach. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 41, 5 (May 2018), 1223–1226. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003160
Àlex Boso, Boris Álvarez, Beatriz Pérez, Juan Carlos Imio, Adison Altamirano, and Fulgencio Lisón. 2021. Understanding human attitudes towards bats and the role of information and aesthetics to boost a positive response as a conservation tool. Animal Conservation 24, 6 (Dec. 2021), 937–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12692
Roland Bretin, Emily Cross, and Mohamed Khamis. 2024. Co-existing with Drones: A Virtual Exploration of Proxemic Behaviours and Users’ Insights on Social Drones. International Journal of Social Robotics 16 (2024), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-024-01111-7
Robin Bretin, Mohamed Khamis, and Emily Cross. 2023. “Do I Run Away?”: Proximity, Stress and Discomfort in Human-Drone Interaction in Real and Virtual Environments. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 525–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42283-6_29
Jessica R. Cauchard, Jane L. E, Kevin Y. Zhai, and James A. Landay. 2015. Drone & me: an exploration into natural human-drone interaction. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (Osaka, Japan) (UbiComp ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2805823
Linfeng Chen, Kazuki Takashima, Kazuyuki Fujita, and Yoshifumi Kitamura. 2021. PinpointFly: An egocentric position-control drone interface using mobile AR. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 150, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445110
Guido de Croon. 2020. Flapping wing drones show off their skills. Science Robotics 5, 44 (2020), eabd0233. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.abd0233
Maartje MA De Graaf and Somaya Ben Allouch. 2013. Exploring influencing variables for the acceptance of social robots. Robotics and autonomous systems 61, 12 (2013), 1476–1486.
Maartje MA de Graaf, Somaya Ben Allouch, and Jan AGM Van Dijk. 2019. Why would I use this in my home? A model of domestic social robot acceptance. Human–Computer Interaction 34, 2 (2019), 115–173.
Marco Debiasi, Zhenbo Lu, Quoc Viet Nguyen, and Woei Leong Chan. 2020. Low-Noise Flapping Wings with Tensed Membrane. AIAA Journal 58, 6 (June 2020), 2388–2397. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058900
Jane L E, Ilene L E, James A Landay, and Jessica R Cauchard. 2017. Drone & Wo: Cultural influences on human-drone interaction techniques. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6794–6799. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025755
E. Farrell Helbling and Robert J. Wood. 2018. A Review of Propulsion, Power, and Control Architectures for Insect-Scale Flapping-Wing Vehicles. Applied Mechanics Reviews 70, 1 (Jan. 2018), 010801. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038795
Dario Floreano and Robert J. Wood. 2015. Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. ature 521, 7553 (May 2015), 460–466. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14542
Jonas Foehr and Claas Christian Germelmann. 2020. Alexa, can I trust you? Exploring consumer paths to trust in smart voice-interaction technologies. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 5, 2 (2020), 181–205.
Guillermo Gonzalez, Guido C. H. E. De Croon, Diana Olejnik, and Matěj Karásek. 2022. Position Controller for a Flapping-Wing Drone Using UWB. Unmanned Systems 10, 04 (Oct. 2022), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2301385022410059
Benjamin J Goodheart. 2011. Tracing the history of the ornithopter: Past, present, and future. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research 21, 1 (2011), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.15394/jaaer.2011.1344
Saul Greenberg, Nicolai Marquardt, Till Ballendat, Rob Diaz-Marino, and Miaosen Wang. 2011. Proxemic interactions: The new ubicomp? interactions 18, 1 (2011), 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1897239.1897250
Márta Gácsi, Anna Kis, Tamás Faragó, Mariusz Janiak, Robert Muszyński, and Ádám Miklósi. 2016. Humans attribute emotions to a robot that shows simple behavioural patterns borrowed from dog behaviour. Computers in Human Behavior 59 (June 2016), 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.043
Edmund T Hall. 1990. The hidden dimension. Vol. 609. Anchor Books.
Robert M. Jones, Donglei Sun, Gabriel Barsi Haberfeld, Arun Lakshmanan, Thiago Marinho, and Naira Hovakimyan. 2017. Design and Control of a Small Aerial Manipulator for Indoor Environments. In AIAA Information Systems-AIAA Infotech @ Aerospace. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Grapevine, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-1374
Trevor Jones, Shaun Lawson, and Daniel Mills. 2008. Interaction with a zoomorphic robot that exhibits canid mechanisms of behaviour. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, Pasadena, CA, USA, 2128–2133. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2008.4543521
Matthew Keennon, Karl Klingebiel, and Henry Won. 2012. Development of the Nano Hummingbird: A Tailless Flapping Wing Micro Air Vehicle. In 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the ew Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nashville, Tennessee. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-588
Stephen R. Kellert. 1993. Values and Perceptions of Invertebrates. Conservation Biology 7, 4 (Dec. 1993), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740845.x
Hyun Young Kim, Bomyeong Kim, and Jinwoo Kim. 2016. The Naughty Drone: A Qualitative Research on Drone as Companion Device (IMCOM’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 91, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2857546.2857639
Youngwook Kim and Bilge Mutlu. 2014. How social distance shapes human–robot interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72, 12 (2014), 783–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.05.005
Andrew J. Knight. 2008. “Bats, snakes and spiders, Oh my!” How aesthetic and negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species protection. Journal of Environmental Psychology 28, 1 (March 2008), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.001
Frank Krueger, Kelsey C. Mitchell, Gopikrishna Deshpande, and Jeffrey S. Katz. 2021. Human–dog relationships as a working framework for exploring human–robot attachment: a multidisciplinary review. Animal Cognition 24, 2 (March 2021), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-021-01472-w
Anastasia Kuzminykh, Jenny Sun, Nivetha Govindaraju, Jeff Avery, and Edward Lank. 2020. Genie in the Bottle: Anthropomorphized Perceptions of Conversational Agents. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI 2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376665
Raynald Harvey Lemelin, Jason Dampier, Rick Harper, Robert Bowles, and Debbie Balika. 2017. Perceptions of Insects. Society & Animals 25, 6 (Oct. 2017), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-12341469
Raynald H Lemelin, Rick W Harper, Jason Dampier, Robert Bowles, and Debbie Balika. 2016. Humans, insects and their interaction: A multi-faceted analysis. Animal Studies Journal 5, 1 (2016), 65–79.
Hao Liu, Sridhar Ravi, Dmitry Kolomenskiy, and Hiroto Tanaka. 2016. Biomechanics and biomimetics in insect-inspired flight systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 371, 1704 (Sept. 2016), 20150390. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0390
Silvie Lišková and Daniel Frynta. 2013. What Determines Bird Beauty in Human Eyes? Anthrozoös 26, 1 (March 2013), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303713X13534238631399
Zhenbo Lu, Marco Debiasi, Quoc-Viet Nguyen, and Woei-Leong Chan. 2018. Bioinspired Low-Noise Wing Design for a Two-Winged Flapping-Wing Micro Air Vehicle. AIAA Journal 56, 12 (Dec. 2018), 4697–4705. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056293
Diana Löffler, Judith Dörrenbächer, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2020. The Uncanny Valley Effect in Zoomorphic Robots: The U-Shaped Relation Between Animal Likeness and Likeability. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. ACM, Cambridge United Kingdom, 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374788
Dana Mackenzie. 2012. A Flapping of Wings. Science 335, 6075 (March 2012), 1430–1433. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.335.6075.1430
B. Y. McCabe, H. Hamledari, A. Shahi, P. Zangeneh, and E. Rezazadeh Azar. 2017. Roles, Benefits, and Challenges of Using UAVs for Indoor Smart Construction Applications. In Computing in Civil Engineering 2017. American Society of Civil Engineers, Seattle, Washington, 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480830.043
Gail F. Melson, Peter H. Kahn, Alan M. Beck, Batya Friedman, Trace Roberts, and Erik Garrett. 2005. Robots as dogs?: children’s interactions with the robotic dog AIBO and a live australian shepherd. In CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Portland OR USA, 1649–1652. https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1056988
Ádám Miklósi, Péter Korondi, Vicente Matellán, and Márta Gácsi. 2017. Ethorobotics: A New Approach to Human-Robot Relationship. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (June 2017), 958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00958
Constantin Mircioiu and Jeffrey Atkinson. 2017. A Comparison of Parametric and Non-Parametric Methods Applied to a Likert Scale. Pharmacy 5, 2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy5020026
A. Ndoye, J. J. Castillo-Zamora, S. Samorah-Laki, R. Miot, E. Van Ruymbeke, and F. Ruffier. 2023. Vector Field Aided Trajectory Tracking by a 10-gram Flapping-Wing Micro Aerial Vehicle. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, London, United Kingdom, 5379–5385. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA48891.2023.10160976
Khanh Nguyen, Loan Thi Kim Au, Hoang-Vu Phan, and Hoon Cheol Park. 2021. Comparative dynamic flight stability of insect-inspired flapping-wing micro air vehicles in hover: Longitudinal and lateral motions. Aerospace Science and Technology 119 (Dec. 2021), 107085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.107085
Khanh Nguyen, Loan Thi Kim Au, Hoang-Vu Phan, Soo Hyung Park, and Hoon Cheol Park. 2021. Effects of wing kinematics, corrugation, and clap-and-fling on aerodynamic efficiency of a hovering insect-inspired flapping-wing micro air vehicle. Aerospace Science and Technology 118 (Nov. 2021), 106990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106990
Mohammad Obaid, Eduardo B. Sandoval, Jakub Zlotowski, Elena Moltchanova, Christina A. Basedow, and Christoph Bartneck. 2016. Stop! That is close enough. How body postures influence human-robot proximity. In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MA). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2016.7745155
Diana A. Olejnik, Sunyi Wang, Julien Dupeyroux, Stein Stroobants, Matej Karasek, Christophe De Wagter, and Guido De Croon. 2022. An Experimental Study of Wind Resistance and Power Consumption in MAVs with a Low-Speed Multi-Fan Wind System. In 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2989–2994. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA46639.2022.9811834
Y. Pan, S. Guo, J. Whidborne, and X. Huang. 2024. Aerodynamic performance of a flyable flapping wing rotor with dragonfly-like flexible wings. Aerospace Science and Technology 148 (May 2024), 109090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.109090
Hoang Vu Phan and Hoon Cheol Park. 2020. Mimicking nature’s flyers: a review of insect-inspired flying robots. Current Opinion in Insect Science 42 (Dec. 2020), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2020.09.008
Paige L. Reiter and Talia Y. Moore. 2024. Humans prefer interacting with slow, less realistic butterfly simulations. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2404.16985 Version Number: 1.
Ran Ren. 2023. Ahead of His Time: Leonardo da Vinci’s Contributions to Engineering. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences 21 (2023), 18–25.
SM Bhagya P Samarakoon, MA Viraj J Muthugala, and AG Buddhika P Jayasekara. 2022. A review on human–robot proxemics. Electronics 11, 16 (2022), 2490. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11162490
Mariah Schrum, Muyleng Ghuy, Erin Hedlund-botti, Manisha Natarajan, Michael Johnson, and Matthew Gombolay. 2023. Concerning Trends in Likert Scale Usage in Human-robot Interaction: Towards Improving Best Practices. ACM Trans. Hum.-Robot Interact. 12, 3, Article 33 (April 2023), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3572784
Nathan J. Shipley and Robert D. Bixler. 2017. Beautiful Bugs, Bothersome Bugs, and FUN Bugs: Examining Human Interactions with Insects and Other Arthropods. Anthrozoös 30, 3 (July 2017), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2017.1335083
Gail M Sullivan and Anthony R Artino Jr. 2013. Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of graduate medical education 5, 4 (2013), 541–542.
Haithem E. Taha, Muhammad R. Hajj, and Ali H. Nayfeh. 2012. Flight dynamics and control of flapping-wing MAVs: a review. onlinear Dynamics 70, 2 (Oct. 2012), 907–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-012-0529-5
Liang Wang, Bifeng Song, Zhongchao Sun, and Xiaojun Yang. 2023. Review on ultra-lightweight flapping-wing nano air vehicles: Artificial muscles, flight control mechanism, and biomimetic wings. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 36, 6 (June 2023), 63–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2023.03.031
Ziming Wang, Ned Barker, Yiqian Wu, and Morten Fjeld. 2023. Substituting Animals with Biohybrid Robots: Speculative Interactions with Animal-Robot Hybrids. In Companion Publication of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (DIS’23 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563703.3596641
Ziming Wang, Ziyi Hu, Yemao Man, and Morten Fjeld. 2022. A Collaborative System of Flying and Ground Robots with Universal Physical Coupling Interface (PCI), and the Potential Interactive Applications. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 460, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519766
Ziming Wang, Ziyi Hu, Björn Rohles, Sara Ljungblad, Vincent Koenig, and Morten Fjeld. 2023. The Effects of Natural Sounds and Proxemic Distances on the Perception of a Noisy Domestic Flying Robot. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 12, 4, Article 50 (dec 2023), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579859
Ziming Wang, Yiqian Wu, Shiwei Yang, Xiaowei Chen, Björn Rohles, and Morten Fjeld. 2024. Exploring Intended Functions of Indoor Flying Robots Interacting With Humans in Proximity. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 264, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642791
Anna Wojciechowska, Jeremy Frey, Esther Mandelblum, Yair Amichai-Hamburger, and Jessica R. Cauchard. 2019. Designing Drones: Factors and Characteristics Influencing the Perception of Flying Robots. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3, 3, Article 111 (Sept. 2019), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351269
Anna Wojciechowska, Jeremy Frey, Sarit Sass, Roy Shafir, and Jessica R. Cauchard. 2020. Collocated human-drone interaction: methodology and approach strategy. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Daegu, Republic of Korea) (HRI’19). IEEE Press, 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673127
Robert J Wood, Srinath Avadhanula, Manas Menon, and Ronald S Fearing. 2003. Microrobotics using composite materials: The micromechanical flying insect thorax. In 2003 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (Cat. o. 03CH37422), Vol. 2. IEEE, 1842–1849. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2003.1241863
Paweł W. Woźniak, Jakob Karolus, Florian Lang, Caroline Eckerth, Johannes Schöning, Yvonne Rogers, and Jasmin Niess. 2021. Creepy technology: What is it and how do you measure it?. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 719, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445299
Alexander Yeh, Photchara Ratsamee, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, Yuki Uranishi, Tomohiro Mashita, Haruo Takemura, Morten Fjeld, and Mohammad Obaid. 2017. Exploring proxemics for human-drone interaction. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction (Bielefeld, Germany) (HAI 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125739.3125773
C Zhang and C Rossi. 2017. A review of compliant transmission mechanisms for bio-inspired flapping-wing micro air vehicles. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 12, 2 (Feb. 2017), 025005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/aa58d3
Liang Zhang, Xiuyu He, Wei He, Sujie Zhang, Min Zhao, and Hongxue Zhao. 2024. High maneuverability of the falcon flying robot. Journal of Field Robotics 41, 3 (May 2024), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.22277
Howe Yuan Zhu, Eirene Margaret Magsino, Sanjid Mahmood Hamim, Chin-Teng Lin, and Hsiang-Ting Chen. 2021. A drone nearly hit me! A reflection on the human factors of drone collisions. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 210, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451614
Marius Zimmermann, Ivan Toni, and Floris P de Lange. 2013. Body posture modulates action perception. Journal of euroscience 33, 14 (2013), 5930–5938.
