Teacher Guidance and On-the-Fly Scaffolding in Primary School Students' Inquiry Learning

control of variables strategy; inquiry learning; instructional design; primary science education; responsive teaching; scaffolding; teacher guidance; Education

Abstract :

[en] In primary science education, inquiry-based science instruction stands out as an optimal learning environment for fostering domain-specific content and procedural knowledge. Recognizing the effectiveness of different forms of teacher guidance, there is an ongoing debate about the planning of high (structured inquiry) and low (guided inquiry) guidance and their optimal sequencing. This debate revolves around balancing the level of autonomy and the amount of conceptual information given to students. Furthermore, the complete understanding of the impact of responsive teaching, which encompasses a broad range of practices, including on-the-fly scaffolding such as Promoting Participation, Focusing, and Problematizing, remains elusive. To address this gap, this study examines the relationship between planned teacher guidance and specific instances of responsive teaching, particularly on-the-fly scaffolding in the inquiry-based science classroom. A pre-posttest design was employed, involving 164 primary school students (M = 9.9 years, SD = 0.66, 57% female) and one female experimenter. Domain-specific content knowledge contained science concepts of thermal insulation, whereas procedural knowledge comprised the application of the control-of-variables strategy. The sequential order of planned teacher guidance, structured inquiry, and guided inquiry, was systematically varied, and the experimenter was allowed to provide spontaneous on-the-fly scaffolding. The study assesses the influence of planned teacher guidance and specific instances of responsive teaching, particularly on-the-fly scaffolding on students' conceptual and procedural knowledge. Results indicate no differential learning effects based on the order of planned guidance. However, when planned guided inquiry was provided second, the teacher gave less on-the-fly scaffolding. Additionally, Problematizing had a positive effect, while Focusing had a negative effect on students' procedural knowledge learning.

Disciplines :

Education & instruction

Author, co-author :

Sasse, Heide ; RPTU, Landau, Germany

WEBER, Anke Maria ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) > Lifespan Development, Family and Culture

Reuter, Timo ; RPTU, Landau, Germany

Leuchter, Miriam ; RPTU, Landau, Germany

External co-authors :

yes

Language :

English

Title :

Teacher Guidance and On-the-Fly Scaffolding in Primary School Students' Inquiry Learning

Publication date :

March 2025

Journal title :

Science Education

ISSN :

0036-8326

eISSN :

1098-237X

Publisher :

John Wiley and Sons Inc

Volume :

109

Issue :

Pages :

579 - 604

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Focus Area :

Educational Sciences

Development Goals :

4. Quality education

Additional URL :

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sce.21921

Available on ORBilu :

since 10 July 2025

Statistics

Number of views

87 (0 by Unilu)

Number of downloads

72 (0 by Unilu)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

WoS citations^™

Bibliography

Ainley, J., and M. Luntley. 2007. “The Role of Attention in Expert Classroom Practice.” Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 10: 3–22.
Aleven, V. A., and K. R. Koedinger. 2002. “An Effective Metacognitive Strategy: Learning By Doing and Explaining With a Computer-Based Cognitive Tutor.” Cognitive Science 26 2: 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2602_1.
Alfieri, L., P. J. Brooks, N. J. Aldrich, and H. R. Tenenbaum. 2011. “Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?.” Journal of Educational Psychology 103: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017.
Amato-Zech, N. A., K. E. Hoff, and K. J. Doepke. 2006. “Increasing On-Task Behavior in the Classroom: Extension of Self-Monitoring Strategies.” Psychology in the Schools 43, no. 2: 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20137.
Ashman, G., S. Kalyuga, and J. Sweller. 2020. “Problem-Solving or Explicit Instruction: Which Should Go First When Element Interactivity Is High.” Educational Psychology Review 32: 229–247.
Baur, A., and M. Emden. 2020. “How to Open Inquiry Teaching? An Alternative Teaching Scaffold to Foster Students' Inquiry Skills.” Chemistry Teacher International 3, no. 1: 20190013.
Berthold, K., T. H. S. Eysink, and A. Renkl. 2009. “Assisting Self-Explanation Prompts Are More Effective Than Open Prompts When Learning With Multiple Representations.” Instructional Science 37: 345–363.
Betts, J., J. Mckay, P. Maruff, and V. Anderson. 2006. “The Development of Sustained Attention in Children: The Effect of Age and Task Load.” Child Neuropsychology 12, no. 3: 205–221.
Bihler, L. M., A. Agache, K. Schneller, J. A. Willard, and B. Leyendecker. 2018. “Expressive Morphological Skills of Dual Language Learning and Monolingual German Children: Exploring Links to Duration of Preschool Attendance, Classroom Quality, and Classroom Composition.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 888. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00888.
Blanchard, M. R., S. A. Southerland, and E. M. Granger. 2009. “No Silver Bullet for Inquiry: Making Sense of Teacher Change Following an Inquiry-Based Research Experience for Teachers.” Science Education 93, no. 2: 322–360.
Bos, W. 2012. TIMSS 2011 Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Kompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich [TIMSS 2011 Mathematical and Scientific Competencies of Primary School Children in Germany in International Comparison]. Waxmann Verlag.
Buehl, M. M., and J. S. Beck. 2015. “The Relationship between Teachers' Beliefs and Teachers' Practices.” In International Handbook of Research on Teachers' Beliefs, edited by In. H. Fives and M. G. Gill, 67–84. Routledge.
Calleja, J., C. Foster, and J. Hodgen. 2023. “Teachers' Structuring of Mathematical Inquiry Lessons: Shifting From “Task-First” to “Scaffolded Inquiry.” Research in Mathematics Education. Published ahead of print, February 28, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2023.2176915.
Cameron, J., and W. D. Pierce. 1994. “Reinforcement, Reward, and Intrinsic Motivation: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 64, no. 3: 363–423. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064003363.
Chase, C. C., and D. Klahr. 2017. “Invention Versus Direct Instruction: For Some Content, It'sa Tie.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 26: 582–596.
Chen, O., S. Kalyuga, and J. Sweller. 2017. “The Expertise Reversal Effect Is a Variant of the More General Element Interactivity Effect.” Educational Psychology Review 29: 393–405.
Chen, Z., and D. Klahr. 1999. “All Other Things Being Equal: Acquisition and Transfer of the Control of Variables Strategy.” Child Development 70, no. 5: 1098–1120.
Chiu, M. M. 2004. “Adapting Teacher Interventions to Student Needs During Cooperative Learning: How to Improve Student Problem Solving and Time On-Task.” American Educational Research Journal 41, no. 2: 365–399. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002365.
Coffman, T. 2017. Inquiry-Based Learning: Designing Instruction to Promote Higher Level Thinking. Rowman & Littlefield.
Cooper, G., and J. Sweller. 1987. “Effects of Schema Acquisition and Rule Automation on Mathematical Problem-Solving Transfer.” Journal of Educational Psychology 79, no. 4: 347–362.
Corbalan, G., F. Paas, and H. Cuypers. 2010. “Computer-Based Feedback in Linear Algebra: Effects on Transfer Performance and Motivation.” Computers & Education 55, no. 2: 692–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.002.
Corno, L. 2008. “On Teaching Adaptively.” Educational Psychologist 43, no. 3: 161–173.
Costley, J., A. Gorbunova, M. Courtney, O. Chen, and C. Lange. 2023. “Problem-Solving Support and Instructional Sequence: Impact on Cognitive Load and Student Performance.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 39: 1817–1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-023-00757-7.
Croker, S., and H. Buchanan. 2011. “Scientific Reasoning in a Real-World Context: The Effect of Prior Belief and Outcome on Children's Hypothesis-Testing Strategies.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 29, no. 3: 409–424.
Dean, D. Jr., and D. Kuhn. 2007. “Direct Instruction vs. Discovery: The Long View.” Science Education 91: 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20194.
Deci, E. L., R. Koestner, and R. M. Ryan. 1999. “The Undermining Effect Is a Reality After All—Extrinsic Rewards, Task Interest, and Self-Determination: Reply to Eisenberger, Pierce, and Cameron (1999) and Lepper, Henderlong, and Gingras (1999).” Psychological Bulletin 125, no. 6: 692–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.692.
De Jong, T., A. W. Lazonder, C. A. Chinn, et al. 2023. “Let's Talk Evidence–The Case for Combining Inquiry-Based and Direct Instruction.” Educational Research Review 39: 100536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100536.
Doyle, W. 2013. “Ecological Approaches to Classroom Management.” In Handbook of Classroom Management, edited by In. C. M. Carolyn and C. S. Weinstein, 107–136. New York: Routledge.
Drews, R., G. Tani, P. Lopes Cardozo, and S. Chiviacowsky. 2020. “Positive Feedback Praising Good Performance Does Not Alter the Learning of an Intrinsically Motivating Task in 10-Year-Old Children.” European Journal of Human Movement 45: 46–54. https://doi.org/10.21134/eurjhm.2020.45.5.
Edelsbrunner, P. A., L. Schalk, R. Schumacher, and E. Stern. 2018. “Variable Control and Conceptual Change: A Large-Scale Quantitative Study in Elementary School.” Learning and Individual Differences 66: 38–53.
Eid, M., M. Gollwitzer, and M. Schmitt. 2015. Statistik und Forschungsmethoden. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.
English, L. D., and D. King. 2019. “Stem Integration in Sixth Grade: Desligning and Constructing Paper Bridges.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 17, no. 5: 863–884. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9912-0.
Freitag, H.-W., and A. Schulz. 2018. Der sozioökonomische Status der Schülerinnen und Schüler [The socio-economic status of pupils]. Berlin: Data report 2018. https://www.bpb.de/nachschlagen/datenreport-2018/bildung/277991/der-soziooekonomische-status-der-schuelerinnen-und-schueler.
Furtak, E. M. 2006. “The Problem With Answers: An Exploration of Guided Scientific Inquiry Teaching.” Science Education 90, no. 3: 453–467.
Furtak, E. M., T. Seidel, H. Iverson, and D. C. Briggs. 2012. “Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 82, no. 3: 300–329.
Gettinger, M., and K. M. Kohler. 2013. “Process-Outcome Approaches to Classroom Management and Effective Teaching.” In Handbook of Classroom Management, edited by C. M. Evertson and C. S. Weinstein, 83–106. New York: Routledge.
Guerrero-Rosada, P., C. Weiland, M. McCormick, et al. 2021. “Null Relations Between Class Scores and Gains in Children's Language, Math, and Executive Function Skills: A Replication and Extension Study.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 54: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.07.009.
Hammer, D., F. Goldberg, and S. Fargason. 2012. “Responsive Teaching and the Beginnings of Energy in a Third Grade Classroom.” Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education 6, no. 1: 51–72. https://doi.org/10.26220/rev.1694.
Heemsoth, T., and A. Heinze. 2016. “Secondary School Students Learning From Reflections on the Rationale Behind Self-Made Errors: A Field Experiment.” The Journal of Experimental Education 84, no. 1: 98–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.963215.
Hill, H. C., C. Y. Charalambous, and M. A. Kraft. 2012. “When Rater Reliability Is Not Enough: Teacher Observation Systems and a Case for the Generalizability Study.” Educational Researcher 41, no. 2: 56–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12437203.
Hoffman, J. V., and G. G. Duffy. 2016. “Does Thoughtfully Adaptive Teaching Actually Exist? A Challenge to Teacher Educators.” Theory Into Practice 55, no. 3: 172–179.
Hsin, C.-T., and H.-K. Wu. 2011. Using Scaffolding Strategies to Promote Young Children's Scientific Understandings of Floating and Sinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology 20, no. 5: 656–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9310-7.
Hsu, C.-Y., S. Kalyuga, and J. Sweller. 2015. “When Should Guidance Be Presented in Physics Instruction?.” Archives of Scientific Psychology 3, no. 1: 37–53.
Hume, A. 2009. “Authentic Scientific Inquiry and School Science.” Teaching Science 55, no. 2: 35–41.
Jaber, L. Z. 2021. “He Got a Glimpse of the Joys of Understanding”—The Role of Epistemic Empathy in Teacher Learning.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 30, no. 3: 433–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.
Kaiser, I., and J. Mayer. 2019. “The Long-Term Benefit of Video Modeling Examples for Guided Inquiry.” Frontiers in Education 4: 104. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00104.
Kalyuga, S. 2007. “Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction.” Educational Psychology Review 19, no. 4: 509–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3.
Kalyuga, S., P. Chandler, J. Tuovinen, and J. Sweller. 2001. “When Problem Solving Is Superior to Studying Worked Examples.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93, no. 3: 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.579.
Kapur, M. 2008. “Productive Failure.” Cognition and Instruction 26, no. 3: 379–424.
Kapur, M. 2016. “Examining Productive Failure, Productive Success, Unproductive Failure, and Unproductive Success in Learning.” Educational Psychologist 51, no. 2: 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457.
Kind, P., and J. Osborne. 2017. “Styles of Scientific Reasoning: A Cultural Rationale for Science Education?.” Science Education 101, no. 1: 8–31.
Kirschner, P. A., J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark. 2006. “Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching.” Educational Psychologist 41, no. 2: 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
Klahr, D., and J. Li. 2005. “Cognitive Research and Elementary Science Instruction: From the Laboratory, to the Classroom, and Back.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 14: 217–238.
Klahr, D., and M. Nigam. 2004. “The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction: Effects of Direct Instruction and Discovery Learning.” Psychological Science 15, no. 10: 661–667.
Kleickmann, T. 2012. Kognitiv aktivieren und inhaltlich strukturieren im naturwissenschaftlichen Sachunterricht. Kiel: IPN Leibniz-Institut f. d. Pädagogik d. Naturwissenschaften an d. Universität Kiel.
Klika, D., and S. Abels. 2016. “Scaffolding Guided Inquiry-Based Chemistry Education at an Inclusive School.” In Science Education Research: Engaging Learners From a Sustainable Future, Proceedings of ESERA 2015, Helsinki, edited by J. Lavonen, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto and K. Hahl (Hrsg.), 1030–1037.
Koerber, S., D. Mayer, C. Osterhaus, K. Schwippert, and B. Sodian. 2015. “The Development of Scientific Thinking in Elementary School: A Comprehensive Inventory.” Child Development 86, no. 1: 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12298.
Koerber, S., and C. Osterhaus. 2019. “Individual Differences in Early Scientific Thinking: Assessment, Cognitive Influences, and Their Relevance for Science Learning.” Journal of Cognition and Development 20, no. 4: 510–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2019.1620232.
Lamb, R. L., L. Annetta, J. Meldrum, and D. Vallett. 2012. “Measuring Science Interest: Rasch Validation of the Science Interest Survey.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10: 643–668.
Lazonder, A. W., and R. Harmsen. 2016. “Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning: Effects of Guidance.” Review of Educational Research 86, no. 3: 681–718.
Lazonder, A. W., N. Janssen, H. Gijlers, and A. Walraven. 2021. “Patterns of Development in Children's Scientific Reasoning: Results From a Three-Year Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Cognition and Development 22, no. 1: 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2020.1814293.
Leuchter, M., and B. Naber. 2019. “Studying Children's Knowledge Base of One-Sided Levers As Force Amplifiers.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56, no. 1: 91–112.
Leuchter, M., and H. Saalbach. 2014. “Verbale Unterstützungsmaßnahmen im Rahmen eines naturwissenschaftlichen Lernangebots in Kindergarten und Grundschule [Verbal Support Measures in the Context of a Science Learning Program in Kindergarten and Elementary School].” Unterrichtswissenschaft 42, no. 2: 117–131.
Limón, M. 2001. “On the Cognitive Conflict As an Instructional Strategy for Conceptual Change: A Critical Appraisal.” Learning and Instruction 11, no. 4–5: 357–380.
Martella, A. M., D. Klahr, and W. Li. 2020. “The Relative Effectiveness of Different Active Learning Implementations in Teaching Elementary School Students How to Design Simple Experiments.” Journal of Educational Psychology 112, no. 8: 1582–1596.
Martin, N. D., C. Dornfeld Tissenbaum, D. Gnesdilow, and S. Puntambekar. 2019. “Fading Distributed Scaffolds: The Importance of Complementarity Between Teacher and Material Scaffolds.” Instructional Science 47: 69–98.
Marzano, R. J., B. B. Gaddy, and C. Dean. 2000. What Works in Classroom Instruction. Aurora: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL).
Maskiewicz, A. C. 2015. “Navigating the Challenges of Teaching Responsively: An Insider's Perspective.” In Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics, edited by A. D. Robertson, R. E. Scherr and D. Hammer, 123–143. New York: Routledge.
Matlen, B. J., and D. Klahr. 2013. “Sequential Effects of High and Low Instructional Guidance on Children's Acquisition of Experimentation Skills: Is It All in the Timing.” Instructional Science 41: 621–634.
Metz, K. E. 2011. “Disentangling Robust Developmental Constraints From the Instructionally Mutable: Young Children's Epistemic Reasoning About a Study of Their Own Design.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 20, no. 1: 50–110.
Miller-Cotto, D., J. L. Booth, and N. S. Newcombe. 2022. “Sketching and Verbal Self-Explanation: Do They Help Middle School Children Solve Science Problems.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 36, no. 4: 919–935. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3980.
Mirkovic, J., A. Aggarwal, D. Weinman, P. Lepe, J. Mache, and R. Weiss. 2020. “Using Terminal Histories to Monitor Student Progress on Hands-on Exercises.” Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Portland, OR, USA. 866–872. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366935.
Mulder, Y. G., A. W. Lazonder, and T. de Jong. 2014 February. “Using Heuristic Worked Examples to Promote Inquiry-Based Learning.” Learning and Instruction 29: 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.08.001.
Munshi, A., G. Biswas, E. Davalos, O. Logan, and M. Rushdy. 2022. “Adaptive Scaffolding to Support Strategic Learning in an Open-Ended Learning Environment [Full Paper].” In The 30th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 150–156.
Nakagawa, S., and H. Schielzeth. 2013. “A General and Simple Method for Obtaining R2 From Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4, no. 2: 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x.
NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. National Washington, DC: Academies Press.
Piekny, J., and C. Maehler. 2013. “Scientific Reasoning in Early and Middle Childhood: The Development of Domain-General Evidence Evaluation, Experimentation, and Hypothesis Generation Skills.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 31, no. 2: 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2012.02082.x.
Praetorius, A.-K., C. Pauli, K. Reusser, K. Rakoczy, and E. Klieme. 2014. “One Lesson Is All You Need? Stability of Instructional Quality Across Lessons.” Learning and Instruction 31: 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.002.
R Core Team. 2023. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
Radoff, J., A. D. Robertson, S. Fargason, and F. Goldberg. 2018. “Responsive Teaching and High-Stakes Testing.” Science and Children 55, no. 9: 88–91.
Reiser, B. J. 2004. “Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 13, no. 3: 273–304. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2.
Richards, J., A. Elby, M. J. Luna, A. D. Robertson, D. M. Levin, and C. G. Nyeggen. 2020. “Reframing the Responsiveness Challenge: A Framing-Anchored Explanatory Framework to Account for Irregularity in Novice Teachers' Attention and Responsiveness to Student Thinking.” Cognition and Instruction 38, no. 2: 116–152.
Rights, J. D., and S. K. Sterba. 2021. “Effect Size Measures for Longitudinal Growth Analyses: Extending a Framework of Multilevel Model R-Squareds to Accommodate Heteroscedasticity, Autocorrelation, Nonlinearity, and Alternative Centering Strategies.” New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2021, no. 175: 65–110.
Rittle-Johnson, B., and J. R. Star. 2007. “Does Comparing Solution Methods Facilitate Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge? An Experimental Study on Learning to Solve Equations.” Journal of Educational Psychology 99, no. 3: 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.561.
Rittle-Johnson, B., and J. R. Star. 2009. “Compared With What? The Effects of Different Comparisons on Conceptual Knowledge and Procedural Flexibility for Equation Solving.” Journal of Educational Psychology 101, no. 3: 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014224.
Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R. E., and Hammer, D., eds. 2016. Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics (1–35). New York: Routledge.
Robinson, E., and B. J. Fraser. 2013. “Kindergarten Students' and Parents' Perceptions of Science Classroom Environments: Achievement and Attitudes.” Learning Environments Research 16: 151–167.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., and S. M. Brookhart. 2017. Using Feedback to Improve Learning. Routledge.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., and E. M. Furtak. 2006. “Informal Formative Assessment and Scientific Inquiry: Exploring Teachers' Practices and Student Learning.” Educational Assessment 11, no. (3–4): 237–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2006.9652991.
Ruzaman, N. K., and D. I. Rosli. 2020. “Inquiry-Based Education: Innovation in Participatory Inquiry Paradigm.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 15, no. 10: 4–15.
Ryan, R. M., and E. L. Deci. 2000. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, no. 1: 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
Schalk, L., P. A. Edelsbrunner, A. Deiglmayr, R. Schumacher, and E. Stern. 2019. “Improved Application of the Control-of-Variables Strategy As a Collateral Benefit of Inquiry-Based Physics Education in Elementary School.” Learning and Instruction 59: 34–45.
Schwartz, D. L., C. C. Chase, M. A. Oppezzo, and D. B. Chin. 2011. “Practicing Versus Inventing With Contrasting Cases: The Effects of Telling First on Learning and Transfer.” Journal of Educational Psychology 103: 759–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025140.
Schwarz, C. V., M. Braaten, C. Haverly, and E. X. de los Santos. 2021. “Using Sense-Making Moments to Understand How Elementary Teachers' Interactions Expand, Maintain, or Shut Down Sense-Making in Science.” Cognition and Instruction 39, no. 2: 113–148.
Settlage, J., and S. A. Southerland. 2007. Teaching Science to all Children: Using Culture as a Starting Point. New York: Routledge.
Shanab, M. E., D. Peterson, S. Dargahi, and P. Deroian. 1981. “The Effects of Positive and Negative Verbal Feedback on the Intrinsic Motivation of Male and Female Subjects.” The Journal of Social Psychology 115, no. 2: 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1981.9711659.
Siegler, R. S., ed. 2013. “The Origins of Scientific Reasoning.” In Children's Thinking, 109–150. New York: Psychology Press.
Simons, K. D., and J. D. Klein. 2007. “The Impact of Scaffolding and Student Achievement Levels in a Problem-Based Learning Environment.” Instructional Science 35, no. 1: 41–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9002-5.
Siverling, E. A., T. J. Moore, E. Suazo-Flores, C. A. Mathis, and S. S. Guzey. 2021. “What Initiates Evidence-Based Reasoning?: Situations That Prompt Students to Support Their Design Ideas and Decisions.” Journal of Engineering Education 110, no. 2: 294–317.
Slot, P. L., D. Bleses, L. M. Justice, J. Markussen-Brown, and A. Højen. 2018. “Structural and Process Quality of Danish Preschools: Direct and Indirect Associations With Children's Growth in Language and Preliteracy Skills.” Early Education and Development 29, no. 4: 581–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2018.1452494.
Sodian, B., D. Zaitchik, and S. Carey. 1991. “Young Children's Differentiation of Hypothetical Beliefs From Evidence.” Child Development 62, no. 4: 753–766.
Soncini, A., M. C. Matteucci, and F. Butera. 2021. “Error Handling in the Classroom: An Experimental Study of Teachers' Strategies to Foster Positive Error Climate.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 36, no. 3: 719–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00494-1.
Soncini, A., E. P. Visintin, M. C. Matteucci, C. Tomasetto, and F. Butera. 2022. “Positive Error Climate Promotes Learning Outcomes Through Students' Adaptive Reactions Towards Errors.” Learning and Instruction 80: 101627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101627.
Strand-Cary, M., and D. Klahr. 2008. “Developing Elementary Science Skills: Instructional Effectiveness and Path Independence.” Cognitive Development 23, no. 4: 488–511.
Studhalter, U. T., M. Leuchter, A. Tettenborn, A. Elmer, P. A. Edelsbrunner, and H. Saalbach. 2021. “Early Science Learning: The Effects of Teacher Talk.” Learning and Instruction 71: 101371.
Sweller, J. 1988. “Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning.” Cognitive Science 12, no. 2: 257–285.
Sweller, J. 2006. “The Worked Example Effect and Human Cognition.” Learning and Instruction 16, no. 2: 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.005.
Sweller, J., P. A. Kirschner, and R. E. Clark. 2007. “Why Minimally Guided Teaching Techniques Do Not Work: A Reply to Commentaries.” Educational Psychologist 42, no. 2: 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263426.
Sweller, J., L. Zhang, G. Ashman, W. Cobern, and P. A. Kirschner. 2024. “Response to De Jong et al.'s (2023) Paper “Let's Talk Evidence—The Case for Combining Inquiry-based and Direct Instruction”.” Educational Research Review 42: 100584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100584.
Van de Pol, J., M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen. 2010. “Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research.” Educational Psychology Review 22: 271–296.
Van Leeuwen, A., and J. Janssen. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Teacher Guidance During Collaborative Learning in Primary and Secondary Education.” Educational Research Review 27: 71–89.
Van Schijndel, T. J. P., B. R. J. Jansen, and M. E. J. Raijmakers. 2018. “Do Individual Differences in Children's Curiosity Relate to Their Inquiry-Based Learning?.” International Journal of Science Education 40, no. 9: 996–1015.
Van Vo, D., B. Csapó, and S. Greiff. 2023. “Development of the Control of Variables Strategy in Physics Among Secondary School Students.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 49: 101371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101371.
Vorholzer, A., and C. von Aufschnaiter. 2019. “Guidance in Inquiry-Based Instruction—An Attempt to Disentangle a Manifold Construct.” International Journal of Science Education 41, no. 11: 1562–1577.
Weber, A. M., and M. Leuchter. 2022. “Fostering Children's Block Building Self-Concepts and Stability Knowledge Through Construction Play.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 80: 101400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101400.
West, S. G., J. F. Finch, and P. J. Curran (1995). Structural Equation Models With Nonnormal Variables: Problems and Remedies.
Wittwer, J., and A. Renkl. 2008. “Why Instructional Explanations Often Do Not Work: A Framework for Understanding the Effectiveness of Instructional Explanations.” Educational Psychologist 43, no. 1: 49–64.
Zhang, L. 2016. “Is Inquiry-Based Science Teaching Worth the Effort? Some Thoughts Worth Considering.” Science & Education 25: 897–915.
Zhang, L., P. A. Kirschner, W. W. Cobern, and J. Sweller. 2022. “There Is an Evidence Crisis in Science Educational Policy.” Educational Psychology Review 34, no. 2: 1157–1176.