Article (Scientific journals)
Precise Orbit Determination of Spire CubeSats Constellation Using the Raw Observation Approach
SHAFIEI, Parisa; Bemtgen, Jean; TABIBI, Sajad
2025In Advances in Space Research
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
1-s2.0-S0273117725006544-main.pdf
Author preprint (31.86 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
GNSS; LEO; Spire; CubeSats; Precise orbit determination; Raw observation approach
Abstract :
[en] CubeSats, a widely used class of nanosatellites, have made significant contributions to both geodetic and non-geodetic applications by offering low-cost, lightweight, and energy-efficient solutions. Spire Global Inc. has deployed over 120 3U CubeSats into various orbits, each equipped with a STRATOS GNSS receiver, a zenith-looking POD antenna, one or two RO antennas, and an attitude determination and control system. These features make Spire's LEMUR CubeSats ideal candidates for precise orbit determination (POD) and geodetic research. This study presents the first application of the raw observation approach for POD of commercial 3U CubeSats, focusing on 10 Spire GNSS-RO CubeSats with diverse orbital characteristics. The POD algorithm includes essential steps, such as the determination of a priori orbits and inertial quaternions for the Spire LEMUR CubeSats. Precise orbits are determined through both kinematic and reduced dynamic orbit solutions for the year 2020. In-flight calibrated antenna center variations (ACVs) are derived from the POD processing, revealing significant deviations from ground-based calibrations. Moreover, the calibrated ACVs vary among Flight Modules (FMs) with similar satellite buses and orbital characteristics, highlighting the necessity for independent in-flight calibration for each FM. To further enhance accuracy, azimuth- and elevation-dependent accuracy maps are generated from observation residuals and incorporated into the POD processing. The agreement between the reduced dynamic and kinematic orbits results in a 3D RMS difference of less than 5 cm. External validation further supports the reliability of the POD solutions. Comparisons with AIUB solutions for FM099 and FM103 in June 2020 show 3D RMS position agreements of 7.76 cm and 8.92 cm, and velocity agreements of 0.08 mm/s and 0.08 mm/s, respectively. Over the entire year, comparisons between the University of Luxembourg reduced dynamic orbits and Spire official L1B solutions achieve a 3D RMS of 22-29 cm in position and 0.25-1.04 mm/s in velocity. These results demonstrate the robustness of the raw observation approach for CubeSat POD and its potential to advance geodetic applications, such as the recovery of Earth's gravity field.
Disciplines :
Space science, astronomy & astrophysics
Earth sciences & physical geography
Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Engineering, computing & technology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Aerospace & aeronautics engineering
Author, co-author :
SHAFIEI, Parisa ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
Bemtgen, Jean
TABIBI, Sajad  ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
Precise Orbit Determination of Spire CubeSats Constellation Using the Raw Observation Approach
Publication date :
June 2025
Journal title :
Advances in Space Research
ISSN :
0273-1177
eISSN :
1879-1948
Publisher :
Elsevier BV
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Focus Area :
Computational Sciences
Development Goals :
9. Industry, innovation and infrastructure
13. Climate action
FnR Project :
FNR15740886 - CSGR - Cubesats For Gravity Recovery, 2021 (01/02/2022-31/01/2026) - Parisa Shafiei
Funders :
FNR
Available on ORBilu :
since 20 June 2025

Statistics


Number of views
167 (6 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
1 (1 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
1
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu