European Central Bank; European Parliament; accountability; transparency; mandate; independence
Résumé :
[en] After over a decade of crisis, the ECB’s functions have expanded considerably. The ECB’s activities during the eurozone crisis, new debates on the ECB’s role in supporting political goals like the fight against climate change, and its participation in geopolitical stand-offs have overcome the fiction of a technocratic role that can be allocated to an independent institution with few constraints to democracy. We highlight how the ECB’s mandate has been (re)interpreted while eschewing the impact of this change on its independence. Drawing on the contributions to this thematic issue, we also argue that the limited legal and political accountability does not match the evolving mandate. In particular, we contrast the voluntary mechanisms of accountability created in the past years and the judicial endorsement of the expansion of the ECB’s mandate.
Disciplines :
Droit européen & international Sciences politiques, administration publique & relations internationales
Auteur, co-auteur :
HÖGENAUER, Anna-Lena ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Social Sciences (DSOC) > Political Science
MENDES, Joana ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Law (DL)
Co-auteurs externes :
no
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
The ECB’s Evolving Mandate and High Independence: An Undemocratic Mix
Argyroulis, D., & Vagdoutis, N. (2025). Revisiting ECB’s technocratic legitimacy: No longer fit‐for‐purpose? Politics and Governance, 13, Article 9094. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.9094
Beukers, T. (2013). The new ECB and its relationship with the eurozone member states: Between central bank independence and central bank intervention. Common Market Law Review, 50, 1579–1620.
Dawson, M., & Bobić, A. (2019). Quantitative easing at the Court of Justice—Doing whatever it takes to save the euro: Weiss and others. Common Market Law Review, 56, 1005–1040.
Dawson, M., & Bobić, A. (2025). Unpacking legal accountability: The case of the European Central Bank. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8907. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8907
de Boer, N., & van ‘t Klooster, J. (2020). The ECB, the Courts and the issue of democratic legitimacy after Weiss. Common Market Law Review, 57, 1689–1724.
de Boer, N., & van ‘t Klooster, J. (2022). What to do with the ECB’s secondary mandate. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(3), 730–746.
de Haan, J. (2025). No way back? ECB’s forward guidance and policy normalisation. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8953. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8953
Dermine, P., & Markakis, M. (2025). Hybrid governance structures and monetary policy: The legal and institutional position of national central banks in the Eurosystem. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8943. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8943
Diessner, S., & Genschel, P. (2025). Monetary‐fiscal interactions and the problem of outdated commitments: Eurozone crisis versus Covid‐19. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8960. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag. 8960
Donnelly, S. (2025). Policy‐maker of last resort? Drivers of discretion at the European Central Bank. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8958. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8958
European Central Bank. (2021). An overview of the ECB’s monetary policy strategy. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/home/search/review/pdf/ecb.strategyreview_monpol_strategy_overview.en.pdf
European Commission of the European Communities v. European Central Bank, Case C‐11/00, ECLI:EU:C: 2003:395 (2003).
Friedman, M. (1962). Should there be an independent monetary authority? In. L. B. Yeager (Ed.), In search of a monetary constitution (pp. 219–243). Harvard University Press.
Gauweiler and Others v. Deutscher Bundestag, Case C‐62/14 EU:C:2015:400 (2015). https://eur‐lex.europa. eu/legal‐content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62014CJ0062&qid=1733141114187
Goldmann, M. (2014). Adjudicating economics? Central bank independence and the appropriate standard of judicial review. German Law Journal, 25, 265–280.
Heldt, E., & Müller, T. (2021). Bringing independence and accountability together: Mission impossible for the European Central Bank? Journal of European Integration, 44(6), 837–853.
Höflmayr, M. (2021). ECB monetary policy: Strategic review (PE 698.050). European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/698050/EPRS_BRI(2021) 698050_EN.pdf
Högenauer, A.‐L. (2019). The politicisation of the European Central Bank and the Bundestag. Politics and Governance, 7(3), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i3.2214
Högenauer, A.‐L., & Howarth, D. (2019). The democratic deficit and European Central Bank crisis monetary policies. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 26(1), 81–93.
Högenauer, A.‐L., & Mendes, J. (2025). Maastricht overcome: An evolving disconnect between the ECB’s power and independence. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 9810. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.9810
Ioannidis, M. (2020). The European Central Bank. In F. Amtenbrink & C. Hermann (Eds.), The EU law of the economic & monetary union (pp. 353–389). Oxford University Press.
Issing, O. (2021). Central banks—Independent or almighty? (Policy Letter No. 92). SAFE. https://safe‐frankfurt. de/fileadmin/user_upload/editor_common/Policy_Center/SAFE_Policy_Letter_92_fin.pdf
Kreppel, A., & Tomasi, C. (2025). Oversight, accountability, or influence? Understanding the use of monetary dialogues in the European Parliament. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8941. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8941
Matos Rosa, S. (2025). Green monetary policy measures and central bank mandates: A comparative political economy analysis. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8919. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8919
Mersch, Y. (2018). Central bank independence revisited. ERA Forum, 18, 627–645. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12027‐018‐0491‐x
Petit, C. A. (2019). Balancing independence with accountability: A third‐metre waltz? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 26(1), 17–34.
Quaglia, L., & Verdun, A. (2025). The European Central Bank: From a price stability paradigm to a multidimensional stability paradigm. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8920. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8920
Rehm, M., & Ulrich, M. (2025). The end justifies the means? The impact of the ECB’s unconventional monetary policy on citizens’ trust. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8928. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8928
Spielberger, L. (2025). No longer neutral: The ECB’s geopoliticization of the international role of the euro. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8877. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8877
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) of 13 December 2007, Consolidated Version, 2007.
van der Sluis, M. (2019). Similar, therefore different: Judicial review of another unconventional monetary policy in Weiss (C‐493/17). Legal Issues of European Integration, 46(3), 263–284.
van ‘t Klooster, J. (2018). Democracy and the European Central Bank’s emergency powers. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 42, 270–293.
Vermeiren, M. (2025). Defining price stability: Public accountability of the European Central Bank’s goal independence. Politics and Governance, 13, Article 8961. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8961
Wachtel, P., & Blejer, M. (2020). A fresh look at central bank independence. Cato Journal, 40(1), 105–132.
Weber, C. S., & Forschner, B. (2014). ECB: Independence at risk? Intereconomics, 1, 45–50.
Weiss and Others, Case C‐493/17, ECLI:EU:C:2018:1000 (2018). https://eur‐lex.europa.eu/legal‐content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:62017CJ0493
Wendel, M. (2014). Exceeding judicial competence in the name of democracy: The German Constitutional Court’s OMT reference. European Constitutional Law Review, 10(2), 263–307.
Wendel, M. (2021). Paradoxes of ultra‐vires review: A critical review of the PSPP decision and its initial reception. German Law Journal, 21, 979–994.
Zilioli, C., & Ioannidis, M. (2022). Climate change and the mandate of the ECB: Potential and limits of monetary contribution to European green policies. Common Market Law Review, 59, 363–394.
