S Trechsel and SJ Summers, Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings (Oxford University Press, 2005) 291
L Bachmaier Winter, ‘Transnational Criminal Proceedings, Witness Evidence and Confrontation: Lessons from the ECtHR’s Case Law’ (2013) 9 Utrecht Law Review 127
S Maffei, The Right to Confrontation in Europe (Europa Law Publishing, 2012)
S Lonati, ‘Anonymous Witness Evidence before the European Court of Human Rights: Is It Still Possible to Speak of “Fair Trial”?’ (2018) 1 European Criminal Law Review 116
SJ Summers, Fair Trials: The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights (Hart Publishing, 2007)
S Field, ‘Fair Trials and Procedural Tradition in Europe’ (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 365.
M Langer, ‘The Long Shadow of the Adversarial and Inquisitorial Categories’ in M Dubber and T Hornle, The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2014) 273.
T Brooks (ed), The Right to a Fair Trial (Routledge, 2009).
S Mirandola, ‘The Right to Examine Witnesses in Europe: A Progressively Fading Guarantee?’ in S Allegrezza and V Covolo (eds), EU Fair Trial Rights in Criminal Justice (Hart Publishing, forthcoming).
E Widder, ‘The Right to Challenge Witnesses-An Application of Strasbourg’s Flexible “Sole and Decisive” Rule to Other Human Rights’ (2014) 3 Cambridge International Law Journal 1084
JD Jackson, ‘Common Law Evidence and the Common Law of Human Rights: Towards a Harmonic Convergence?’ (2019) 27 William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 689
L Hoyano, ‘What is Balanced on the Scales of Justice? In Search of the Essence of the Right to a Fair Trial’ (2014) Criminal Law Review 4
B de Wilde, ‘A Fundamental Review of the ECHR Right to Examine Witnesses in Criminal Cases’ (2013) 17 The International Journal of Evidence and Proof 168
M Biral, ‘The Right to Examine or Have Examined Witnesses as a Minimum Right for a Fair Trial’ (2014) 22 European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law, and Criminal Justice 331
A Balsamo, ‘La Corte di Strasburgo e i testimoni assenti: gli sviluppi del “nuovo corso” avviato dalla sentenza Al-Khawaja’ (2013) 53 Cassazione Penale 2837.
JD Jackson and SJ Summers, The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence: Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions (Cambridge University Press, 2012) 30.
S Field, ‘Fair Trials and Procedural Tradition in Europe’ (2009) 29 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 365
M Delmas-Marty, Proces penal et droits de Vhomme. Vers une conscience europeenne (Presses Universitaires de France, 1992)
M Delmas-Marty, (ed), Procedures penales d’Europe (Presses Universitaires de France, 1995).
M Langer, ‘The Long Shadow of the Adversarial and Inquisitorial Categories’ in MD Dubber and T Hornle (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2014) 887
M Langer, ‘In The Beginning Was Fortescue: On The Intellectual Origins of the Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems and Common and Civil Law in Comparative Criminal Procedure’ in B Ackerman et al (eds), Liber Amicorum in Honor of Professor Damaska (Duncker & Humblot, 2016) 347.
JAE Vervaele, ‘Lawful and Fair Use of Evidence from a European Human Rights Perspective’ in F Giuffrida and K Ligeti (eds), Admissibility of OLAF Final Reports as Evidence in Criminal Proceedings (University of Luxembourg, 2019) 56.
L Bachmaier Winter, ‘Mutual Admissibility of Evidence and Electronic Evidence in the EU: A New Try for European Minimum Rules in Criminal Proceedings?’ (2023) Eucrim 223.
L Bay Larsen, ‘Recent Jurisprudence of the CJEU on Judicial Independence and the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant’ in Eurojust, 20 years of Eurojust: EU Judicial Cooperation in the Making. A Collection of Anniversary Essays (The Hague, 2023) 87.
S Allegrezza, ‘A European Public Prosecutor Office to Protect the EU Financial Interests’ in K Ambos and P Rackow (eds), The Cambridge Companion to European Criminal Law (Cambridge University Press, 2023) 413
S Allegrezza and A Mosna, ‘Cross-Border Criminal Evidence and the Future European Public Prosecutor. One Step Back on Mutual Recognition?’ in L Bachmaier Winter (ed), The European Public Prosecutor's Office. The Challenges Ahead (Springer, 2018) 141.
A Weyembergh, ‘L’harmonisation des procedures penales au sein de l’Union Europeenne’ (2004) 26(1) Archives de politique criminelle 37
EU Commission, ‘Study on Cross-Border Use of Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. Final Report’ (March 2023) https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2815b94e-9165-11ed-b508-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-291553958, accessed 3 March 2024.
J Oberg, ‘Exit, Voice and Consensus-A Legal and Political Analysis of the Emergency Brake in EU Criminal Policy’ (European Law Blog, 11 October 2021) https://europeanlawblog.eu/2021/10/11/exit-voice-and-consensus-a-legal-and-political-analysis-of-the-emergency-brake-in-eu-criminal-policy/, accessed 3 March 2024.
S Allegrezza, ‘Commento all’articolo 48’ in R Mastroianni et al (eds), Carta dei Diritti Fondamentali dell’Unione Europea (Giuffre, 2016) 946
S Allegrezza, ‘Toward a European Constitutional Framework for Defence Rights’ in S Allegrezza and V Covolo (eds), Effective Defence Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A European Comparative Study on Judicial Remedies (Wolters Kluwer-Cedam, 2018) 31-33.
T Tridimas, ‘Proportionality’ in T Tridimas, The General Principles of EU Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2009) 591
G de Burca, ‘The Principle of Proportionality and its Application in EC Law’ (1993) 13 Yearbook of European Law 105
N Emiliou, The Principle of Proportionality in European Law: A Comparative Study (Kluwer Law International, 1996).
S Mirandola, ‘Uso probatorio delle dichiarazioni di testi assenti e giurisprudenza europea: variazioni sul tema “Al-Khawaja”’ (2017) Cassazione Penale 368
L Bernardini and G Ancona, ‘HYA and Others: Reshaping Participation at Criminal Trials in Europe’ (2023) 30 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 312.
P Craig, ‘EU Accession to the ECHR: Competence, Procedure and Substance’ (2013) 36 Fordham International Law Journal 1115
S Allegrezza, ‘Towards a European Public Prosecutor’ in K Ligeti (ed), The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights (Hart Publishing, 2012) 905
L Bay Larsen, ‘Beskyttelsen af fundamentale rettigheder i EU og samspillet med. Den Europiske Menneskerettighedskonvention set i lyset af Domstolens udtalelse i Avis 2/13’ in E Ersboll (ed), EUs Charter: i et menneskeretligt krydsfelt (Jurist-og 0konomforbundets Forlag, 2016) 41.
L Bernardini, ‘Turning Labels-A sound interpretation of the right to be informed in criminal proceedings that still holds some drawbacks’ (EU Law Live, 29 November 2023), https://eulawlive.com/op-ed-turning-labels-a-sound-interpretation-of-the-right-to-be-informed-in-criminal-proceedings-that-still-holds-some-drawbacks-bk-case-c-175-22-by-lorenzo-bernardini/, accessed 29 April 2024.
A Cabiale, ‘Absent Witnesses and EU Law: A Groundbreaking Ruling by the CJEU’ (2023) European Papers 55, 66.
JR Spencer, ‘Evidence’ in JR Spencer and M Delmas-Marty (eds), European Criminal Procedures (Cambridge University Press, 2002) 618
