Deliberative mini-publics as learning schools for democracy? Examining deliberation impact on dissatisfied and radical participants of a citizens’ assembly in Poland
Deliberative mini-publics as learning schools for democracy Examining deliberation impact on dissatisfied and radical participants of a citizens ass.pdf
Central and Eastern Europe; citizens’ assemblies; Deliberative democracy; Poland; polarization; political attitudes; Geography, Planning and Development; Political Science and International Relations
Résumé :
[en] In a global context of democratic challenges such as dissatisfaction and social polarization, research on Western European democracies suggests that deliberative democracy instruments like deliberative mini-publics (DMPs) may provide a solution with their positive impact on participants’ attitudes towards politics and democracy. Despite the proliferation of citizens’ assemblies, especially locally, little is known about DMPs in newer democracies in Central and Eastern Europe, and it is uncertain whether the findings about the virtues of deliberation would hold. This study assesses the impact of a mini-public in Poland, focusing on the Citizens’ Assembly on Energy Poverty, the country's first national-level deliberative initiative. Poland has faced heightened political dissatisfaction due to eight years of right-wing populist governance and the rise of radical ideologies, raising questions about deliberation's impact on dissatisfied and radical participants. Our results confirm the positive impact of deliberation on participants, improving their percepetion of knowledge, political interest, efficacy, and support for mini-publics. However, we find no significant differences of deliberation between dissatisfied, radical participants, and other groups highlighting the universal benefits of deliberation. These inconclusive findings may be due to a common recruitment bias in DMPs, specifically enrolling politically engaged citizens, thus limiting the potential for a learning curve.
Disciplines :
Sociologie & sciences sociales
Auteur, co-auteur :
PAULIS, Emilien ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Humanities (DHUM) > Philosophy
Pospieszna, Paulina ; Faculty for Political Science and Journalism, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Deliberative mini-publics as learning schools for democracy? Examining deliberation impact on dissatisfied and radical participants of a citizens’ assembly in Poland
André, Bächtiger, and Dryzek, John S. Deliberative Democracy for Diabolical Times. Confronting Populism, Extremism, Denial, and Authoritarianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024.
Bächtiger, André, and John, Parkinson. Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Bächtiger, André, John S., Dryzek, Jane, Mansbridge, and Mark, Warren. “Deliberative Democracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, 1–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Bächtiger, André, Maija, Setälä, and Kimmo, Grönlund. “Towards a New Era of Deliberative Mini-Publics.” In Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, edited by Bächtiger, André, Kimmo Gronlund, and Maija Setälä, 225–246. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2014.
Bernhard, M., “Democratic Backsliding in Poland and Hungary.” Slavic Review80, no. 3 (2021): 585–607.
Berning, Carl C., and Conrad, Ziller. “Social Trust and Radical Right-Wing Populist Party Preferences.” Acta Politica52 (2017): 198–217.
Boulianne, Shelley., “Building Faith in Democracy: Deliberative Events, Political Trust and Efficacy.” Political Studies67, no. 1 (2019): 4–30.
Bowler, S., T., Donovan, and J. A., Karp. “Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies.” Political Research Quarterly60, no. 3 (2007): 351–362.
Bustikova, Lenka, and Petra, Guasti. “The Illiberal Turn or Swerve in Central Europe?” Politics and Governance5, no. 4 (2017): 166–176.
Bustikova, Lenka., Extreme Reactions: Radical Right Mobilization in Eastern Europe.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Buzogány, Aron, Tamara, Ehs, Jana, Plöchl, and Patrick, Scherhaufer. “Evaluation Report of the Austrian Climate Citizens’ Assembly: Assessment of Input, Process, and Output.” 2022, 71.
Curato, Nicole, John S., Dryzek, Selen A., Ercan, Carolyn M., Hendriks, and Simon, Niemeyer. “Twelve key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research.” Daedalus146, no. 3 (2017): 28–38.
Dahlberg, Stefan, Jonas, Linde, and Sören, Holmberg. “Democratic Discontent in Old and New Democracies: Assessing the Importance of Democratic Input and Governmental Output.” Political Studies63, no. 1_suppl (2015): 18–37.
Dalton, Russell J., Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices: The Decline in Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Dryzek, John S., “Rhetoric in Democracy: A Systemic Appreciation.” Political Theory38, no. 3 (2010): 319–339.
Dryzek, John S., André, Bächtiger, Simone, Chambers, Joshua, Cohen, James N., Druckman, Andrea, Felicetti, James S., Fishkin, et al. “The Crisis of Democracy and the Science of Deliberation.” Science363, no. 6432 (2019): 1144–1146.
Elstub, Stephen, and Oliver, Escobar, eds. Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019.
Ferrín, Mónica, and Hanspeter, Kriesi, eds. 2016. How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fishkin, James S., “Deliberative Democracy and Constitutions.” Social Philosophy and Policy28, no. 1 (2011): 242–260.
Fishkin, James, Alice, Siu, Larry, Diamond, and Norman, Bradburn. “Is Deliberation an Antidote to Extreme Partisan Polarization? Reflections on “America in One Room”.” American Political Science Review115, no. 4 (2021): 1464–1481.
Fishkin, James., When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: OUP, 2009.
Foa, R. S., A., Kalssen, M., Slade, A., Rand, and R., Williams. The Global Satisfaction with Democracy Report 2020. Cambridge: Center for the Future of Democracy, 2020.
Fung, Archon., “Deliberative Democracy and International Labor Standards.” Governance16, no. 1 (2003): 51–71.
Fung, Archon, and Erik Olin, Wright. “Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance.” Politics & Society29, no. 1 (2001): 5–41.
Gastil Carson, L., J., Hartz-Karp, and R., Lubensky, eds. The Australian Citizens’ Parliament and the Future of Deliberative Democracy. University Park: Penn State University Press, 2013.
Gastil, J., E. P., Deess, P. J., Weiser, and C., Simmons. The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Gastil, John., “The Lessons and Limitations of Experiments in Democratic Deliberation.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science14 (2018): 271–291.
Geissel, Brigitte., “Democratic Innovations: Theoretical and Empirical Challenges of Evaluation.” In Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise?, edited by Brigitte, Geissel, and Kenneth, Newton. Milton Park: Routledge, 2012.
Gerwin, M., Citizens’ Assemblies: Guide to Democracy That Works. Kraków: Otwarty Plan, 2018.
Gherghina, Sergiu, Sorina, Soare, and Vincent, Jacquet. “Deliberative Democracy and Political Parties: Functions and Consequences.” European Political Science19, no. 2 (2020): 200–211.
Grönlund, Kimmo, Kaisa, Herne, and Maija, Setälä. “Does enclave deliberation polarize opinions?.” Political Behavior37 (2015): 995–1020.
Grönlund, Kimmo, Kaisa, Herne, Kim, Strandberg, and Peter, Söderlund. “Disagreement and Deliberation: Evidence from Three Deliberative Mini-Publics.” Political Behavior 45, no. 4 (2021): 1–23.
Grönlund, Kimmo, Maija, Setälä, and Kaisa, Herne. Deliberation and Civic Virtue: Lessons from a Citizen Deliberation ExperimentEuropean Political Science Review2, no. 1 (2010): 95–117.
Hanley, Seán, and Milada Anna, Vachudova. “Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic.” In Rethinking'Democratic Backsliding'in Central and Eastern Europe, 34–54. Milton Park: Routledge, 2020.
Hanley, Séan, and Milada Anna, Vachudova. “Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic.” East European Politics34, no. 3 (2018): 276–296.
Hansen, Ejvind., “Deliberation and Forgiveness in the Public Sphere.” Critical Horizons19, no. 1 (2018): 49–66.
Hendriks, F., “Democratic Innovation Beyond Deliberative Reflection: The Plebiscitary Rebound and the Advent of Action-Oriented Democracy.” Democratization26, no. 3 (2019): 444–464.
Himmelroos, Staffan, and Henrik Serup, Christensen. “Awareness of Opinion Change: Evidence from two Deliberative Mini-Publics.” Frontiers in Political Science5 (2024): 1300149.
Jacobs, Kristof., “Have a Little Faith in Deliberation? Examining the Effect of Participation in a Citizens’ Assembly on Populist Attitudes.” Contemporary Politics 30, no. 4 (2024): 1–22.
Jennings, Megan A., and Robert A., Cribbie. “Comparing Pre-Post Change Across Groups: Guidelines for Choosing Between Difference Scores, ANCOVA, and Residual Change Scores.” Journal of Data Science14, no. 2 (2016): 205–230.
Knobloch, Katherine R., and John, Gastil. “Civic (Re)socialisation: The Educative Effects of Deliberative Participation” Politics35, no. 2 (2015): 183–200.
Knobloch, Katherine R., Michael L., Barthel, and John, Gastil. “Emanating Effects: The Impact of the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review on Voters’ Political Efficacy.” Political Studies68, no. 2 (2020): 426–445.
Kotwas, Marta, and Jan, Kubik. “Symbolic thickening of public culture and the rise of right-wing populism in Poland.” East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures33, no. 2 (2019): 435–471.
Lafont, Cristina., “Deliberation, Participation, and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Mini-Publics Shape Public Policy?.” Journal of Political Philosophy23, no. 1 (2015): 40–63.
Landemore, Hélène, and Scott E., Page. “Deliberation and disagreement” Politics, Philosophy & Economics14, no. 3 (2015): 229–254.
Linde, Jonas, and Joakim, Ekman. “Satisfaction with Democracy: A Note on a Frequently Used Indicator in Comparative Politics.” European Journal of Political Research42 (2003): 391–408.
Lührmann, Anna, and Staffan I., Lindberg. “A Third Wave of Autocratization is Here: What is New About It?.” Democratization26, no. 7 (2019): 1095–1113.
Luskin, R. C., J. S., Fishkin, and R., Jowell. “Considered Opinions: Deliberative Polling in Britain.” British Journal of Political Science32 (2002): 455–487.
Luskin, Robert C., Ian, O’Flynn, James S., Fishkin, and Daniel, Russell. “Deliberating Across Deep Divides.” Political Studies62, no. 1 (2014): 116–135.
Merkel, Wolfgang, and Anna, Lührmann. “Resilience of Democracies: Responses to Illiberal and Authoritarian Challenges.” Democratization28, no. 5 (2021): 869–884.
Molnár, Virág., “Civil Society, Radicalism and the Rediscovery of Mythic Nationalism.” Nations and Nationalism22, no. 1 (2016): 165–185.
Mudde, Cas., Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 2007.
Muradova, Lala., “The Norm-Diffusing Potential of Minipublics.” Available at SSRN 3765176 (2020).
Neblo, Michael A., Kevin M, Esterling, Ryan P., Kennedy, David MJ, Lazer, and Anand E., Sokhey. “Who Wants to Deliberate—and why?” American Political Science Review104, no. 3 (2010): 566–583.
Opitz, C., “Democratic Innovations Beyond the Deliberative Paradigm: A Re-Conceptualization Based on Luhmann’s Systems Theory.” Democratization (2024): 1–24.
Newton, Kenneth, and Brigitte, Geissel, eds. EvaluatingDemocraticInnovations:CuringtheDemocraticMalaise?Milton Park: Routledge, 2012.
Niemeyer, Simon, and John S., Dryzek. “The Ends of Deliberation: Meta-Consensus and Inter-Subjective Rationality as Ideal Outcomes.” Swiss Political Science Review13, no. 4 (2007): 497–526.
Niemeyer, Simon., “Scaling up Deliberation to Mass Publics: Harnessing Mini-Publics in a Deliberative System.” In Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process, edited by Kimmo Grönlund, André Bächtiger, and Maija Setälä, 177–202. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2014.
Norris, Pippa, ed. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: OUP, 2019.
Nye Jr, Joseph S., “In Government we Don't Trust.” Foreign Policy 108 (1997): 99–111.
OECD. Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020.
Parkinson, John, and Jane, Mansbridge, eds. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Paulis, E., and E., Ognibene. “Satisfied Unlike Me? How the Perceived Difference with Close Network Contacts Prevents Radical and Protest Voting.” Acta Politica58 (2022): 237–265.
Paulis, E., R., Kies, and L., Verhasselt. Evaluation Report of the Luxembourg Climate Citizens’ Assembly - Klima Biergerrot (KBR). Luxembourg: University of Luxembourg/PLDP. doi:10.5281/zenodo.10720487, 2024.
Paulis, E., J.-B., Pilet, S., Rojon, and D., Vittori. “Fair Enough? Mini-Public Composition and Outcome Acceptance from the Maxi Public.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy 20, no. 1 (2024): 1–23.
Paulis, E., J. B., Pilet, S., Panel, D., Vittori, and C., Close. “The POLITICIZE dataset: an inventory of deliberative mini-publics (DMPs) in Europe.” European Political Science20 (2021): 521–542.
Pharr, Susan J., and Robert D., Putnam, eds., Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries?Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
Pilet, J.-B., et al. “Public support for deliberative citizens’ assemblies selected through sortition: Evidence from 15 countries.” European Journal of Political Research62 (2023): 873–902.
Podgórska-Rykała, J., Deliberative Democracy, Public Policy, and Local Government. Milton Park: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 2024.
Pospieszna, Paulina, and Dorota, Pietrzyk-Reeves. “Democratic Innovations as a Response to Shrinking Public Space.” In Activism in Hard Times in Central and Eastern Europe: People Power, edited by McMahon C. Patrice, Pickering M. Paula, and Pietrzyk-Reeves Dorota, 47. London: Routledge, 2024.
Prior, Markus., “You’ve Either got it or you Don’t? The Stability of Political Interest Over the Life Cycle.” The Journal of Politics72, no. 3 (2010): 747–766.
Pow, Jamie, Lisa, Van Dijk, and Sophie, Marien. “It’s Not Just the Taking Part That Counts: ‘Like Me’ Perceptions Connect the Wider Public to Minipublics.” Journal of Deliberative Democracy16, no. 2 (2020): 43–55.
Rojon, Sebastien, and Jean-Benoit, Pilet. “Engaged, Indifferent, Skeptical or Critical? Disentangling Attitudes Towards Local Deliberative Mini-Publics in Four Western European Democracies.” Sustainability13, no. 19 (2021): 10518.
Rose, Jonathan., “Institutionalizing Participation Through Citizens’ Assemblies.” In Activating the Citizen: Dilemmas of Participation in Europe and Canada, edited by J. DeBardeleben, and J. H. Pammett, 214–232. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009.
Smith, Graham, and Corinne, Wales. “The Theory and Practice of Citizens’ Juries.” Policy & Politics27, no. 3 (1999): 295–308.
Smith, Graham, and Maija, Setälä. “Mini-Publics and Deliberative Democracy.” In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, edited by Andre, Bächtiger, 300–314. Cambridge: Oxford Handbooks, 2018.
Smith, Graham., Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Smith, Graham., Can Democracy Safeguard the Future?Oxford: Wiley, 2021.
Suiter, J. M., D., Farrell, C., Harris, and P., Murphy. “Measuring Epistemic Deliberation on Polarized Issues: The Case of Abortion Provision in Ireland.” Political Studies Review20, no. 4 (2022): 630–647.
Suiter, Jane, Lala, Muradova, John, Gastil, and David M., Farrell. “Scaling up Deliberation: Testing the Potential of Mini-Publics to Enhance the Deliberative Capacity of Citizens.” Swiss Political Science Review26, no. 3 (2020): 253–272.
Sunstein, Cass R., “The Law of Group Polarization.” In Debating Deliberative Democracy, edited by James S., Fishkin, and Peter, Laslett, 80–101. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.
Ufel, Wojciech., “I Wrocławski Panel Obywatelski jako przykład zastosowania praktyki deliberacyjnej.” Studia z Polityki Publicznej9 (2022): 95–114.
V-Dem. Varieties of Democracy. Democracy at Dusk? V-Dem Annual Report 2017.
V-Dem. Varieties of Democracy. Democracy for All? V-Dem Annual Democracy Report 2018.
V-Dem. Varieties of Democracy. Democracy Facing Global Challenges. V-Dem Annual Democracy Report 2019.
van Dijk, Lisa, Thomas, Legein, Jean-Benoit, Pilet, and Sofie, Marien. “Voters of Populist Parties and Support for Reforms of Representative Democracy in Belgium.” Politics of the Low Countries2 (2020): 289–318.
van der Does, R., and V., Jacquet. “Small-Scale Deliberation and Mass Democracy: A Systematic Review of the Spillover Effects of Deliberative Minipublics.” Political Studies71, no. 1 (2023): 218–237.
Walsh, C. D., and J. A., Elkink. “The Dissatisfied and the Engaged: Citizen Support for Citizens’ Assemblies and Their Willingness to Participate.” Irish Political Studies36 (2021): 647–666.
Walsh, Colm D., and Johan A., Elkink. “The Dissatisfied and the Engaged: Citizen Support for Citizens’ Assemblies and Their Willingness to Participate.” Irish Political Studies36, no. 4 (2021): 647–666.
Warren, Mark, and Hilary, Pearse, eds. Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
