[en] 'Cellular psychology' is a new field of inquiry that studies dendritic mechanisms for adapting mental events to the current context, thus increasing their coherence, flexibility, effectiveness, and comprehensibility. Apical dendrites of neocortical pyramidal cells have a crucial role in cognition - those dendrites receive input from diverse sources, including feedback, and can amplify the cell's feedforward transmission if relevant in that context. Specialized subsets of inhibitory interneurons regulate this cooperative context-sensitive processing by increasing or decreasing amplification. Apical input has different effects on cellular output depending on whether we are awake, deeply asleep, or dreaming. Furthermore, wakeful thought and imagery may depend on apical input. High-resolution neuroimaging in humans supports and complements evidence on these cellular mechanisms from other mammals.
Disciplines :
Neurosciences & comportement
Auteur, co-auteur :
Phillips, William A ; Psychology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK. Electronic address: wap1@stir.ac.uk
Bachmann, Talis; Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia. Electronic address: talis.bachmann@ut.ee
SPRATLING, Michael ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) > Cognitive Science and Assessment
Muckli, Lars; Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QB, UK, Imaging Centre of Excellence, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow and Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
Petro, Lucy S; Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QB, UK, Imaging Centre of Excellence, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow and Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
Zolnik, Timothy; Department of Biochemistry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany, Department of Biology, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10117, Germany
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Cellular psychology: relating cognition to context-sensitive pyramidal cells.
We acknowledge valuable discussions of cellular psychology with many colleagues in Stirling, Estonia, London, Glasgow, Berlin, and beyond. Many of those whose work we cite provided comments, all of which were useful, some crucial. Four anonymous reviewers made valuable contributions. L.M. and L.S.P. are funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under the Specific Grant Agreement No. 720270, 785907, and 945539 (Human Brain Project SGA1 SGA2, and SGA3), and from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, BBN010956/1) \u2018Layer-specific cortical feedback\u2019, awarded to L.M. and L.S.P. T.Z. is funded by Einstein Stiftung Berlin (EVF-2020-571). Fred Phillips helped generate Figure 1. No interests are declared.We acknowledge valuable discussions of cellular psychology with many colleagues in Stirling, Estonia, London, Glasgow, Berlin, and beyond. Many of those whose work we cite provided comments, all of which were useful, some crucial. Four anonymous reviewers made valuable contributions. L.M. and L.S.P. are funded by the European Union\u2019s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation under the Specific Grant Agreement No. 720270, 785907, and 945539 (Human Brain Project SGA1 SGA2, and SGA3), and from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, BBN010956/1) \u2018Layer-specific cortical feedback\u2019, awarded to L.M. and L.S.P. T.Z. is funded by Einstein Stiftung Berlin (EVF-2020-571). Fred Phillips helped generate Figure 1 .
Llinás, R., Ribary, U., Consciousness and the brain. The thalamocortical dialogue in health and disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 929 (2001), 166–175.
LaBerge, D., Apical dendrite activity in cognition and consciousness. Conscious. Cogn. 15 (2006), 235–257.
Muckli, L., et al. Contextual feedback to superficial layers of V1. Curr. Biol. 25 (2015), 2690–2695.
Takahashi, N., et al. Active cortical dendrites modulate perception. Science 354 (2016), 1587–1590.
Phillips, W.A., et al. The effects of arousal on apical amplification and conscious state. Neurosci. Conscious, 2016, 2016, niw015.
Aru, J., et al. Cellular mechanisms of conscious processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24 (2020), 814–825.
Bachmann, T., et al. Dendritic integration theory: a thalamo-cortical theory of state and content of consciousness. Philos. Mind Sci., 1, 2020 https://philosophymindscience.org/index.php/phimisci/article/view/8946.
Marvan, T., et al. Apical amplification—a cellular mechanism of conscious perception?. Neurosci. Conscious., 2021, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niab036.
Shine, J.M., The thalamus integrates the macrosystems of the brain to facilitate complex, adaptive brain network dynamics. Prog. Neurobiol., 199, 2021, 101951.
Munn, B.R., et al. Neuronal connected burst cascades bridge macroscale adaptive signatures across arousal states. Nat. Commun., 14, 2023, 6846.
Storm, J., et al. An integrative, multiscale view on neural theories of consciousness. Neuron 112 (2024), 1531–1552.
Palmer, L.M., Dendritic integration in pyramidal neurons during network activity and disease. Brain Res. Bull. 103 (2014), 2–10.
Phillips, W.A., et al. On the functions, mechanisms, and malfunctions of intracortical contextual modulation. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 52 (2015), 1–20.
Granato, A., Merighi, A., Dendrites of neocortical pyramidal neurons: the key to understand intellectual disability. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 42 (2022), 147–153.
Granato, A., et al. Dysfunctions of cellular context-sensitivity in neurodevelopmental learning disabilities. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 161, 2024, 105688.
Phillips, W.A., The Cooperative Neuron: Cellular Foundations of Mental Life. 2023, Oxford University Press.
Schuman, B., et al. Neocortical layer 1: an elegant solution to top-down and bottom-up integration. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 44 (2021), 221–252.
Larkum, M.E., A new cellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers. Nature 398 (1999), 338–341.
Aru, J., et al. Coupling the state and contents of consciousness. Front. Syst. Neurosci., 13, 2019, 43.
Poirazi, P., Papoutsi, A., Illuminating dendritic function with computational models. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 21 (2020), 303–321.
Adeel, A., et al. Unlocking the potential of two-point cells for energy-efficient and resilient training of deep nets. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Topics Comput. Intell. 7 (2023), 818–828.
Adeel, A., et al. Cooperation is all you need. arXiv, 2023 Published online May 16, 2023 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.10449.
Pagkalos, M., et al. Leveraging dendritic properties to advance machine learning and neuro-inspired computing. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 85, 2024, 102853.
Phillips, W., et al. The discovery of structure by multi-stream networks of local processors with contextual guidance. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 6 (1995), 225–246.
Kay, J.W., et al. Contextually guided unsupervised learning using local multivariate binary processors. Neural Netw. 11 (1998), 117–140.
Kay, J.W., et al. Partial and entropic information decompositions of a neuronal modulatory interaction. Entropy, 19, 2017, 560.
Kay, J.W., et al. A comparison of partial information decompositions using data from real and simulated layer 5b pyramidal cells. Entropy, 24, 2022, 1021.
Kay, J.W., Phillips, W.A., Coherent infomax as a computational goal for neural systems. Bull. Math. Biol. 73 (2011), 344–372.
Kay, J.W., Phillips, W.A., Contextual modulation in mammalian neocortex is asymmetric. Symmetry, 12, 2020, 815.
Mäki-Marttunen, T., et al. Computational modeling of genetic contributions to excitability and neural coding in layer V pyramidal cells: applications to schizophrenia pathology. Front. Comput. Neurosci., 13, 2019, 66.
Capone, C., et al. Beyond spiking networks: the computational advantages of dendritic amplification and input segregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 120, 2023, e2220743120.
Pastorelli, E., et al. Two-compartment neuronal spiking model expressing brain-state specific apical-amplification, -isolation and-drive regimes. arXiv, 2023 Published online November 10, 2023 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.06074.
Changeux, J.P., Climbing brain levels of organisation from genes to consciousness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21 (2017), 168–181.
Karnani, M.M., et al. A blanket of inhibition: functional inferences from dense inhibitory connectivity. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 26 (2014), 96–102.
van Versendaal, D., Levelt, C.N., Inhibitory interneurons in visual cortical plasticity. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73 (2016), 3677–3691.
Wang, X.J., Yang, G.R., A disinhibitory circuit motif and flexible information routing in the brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 49 (2018), 75–83.
Pfeffer, C.K., et al. Inhibition of inhibition in visual cortex: the logic of connections between molecularly distinct interneurons. Nat. Neurosci. 16 (2013), 1068–1076.
Fletcher, L.N., Williams, S.R., Neocortical topology governs the dendritic integrative capacity of layer 5 pyramidal neurons. Neuron 101 (2019), 76–90.
Kalmbach, B.E., et al. h-Channels contribute to divergent intrinsic membrane properties of supragranular pyramidal neurons in human versus mouse cerebral cortex. Neuron 100 (2018), 1194–1208.
Khan, A.G., Hofer, S.B., Contextual signals in visual cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 52 (2018), 131–138.
Doron, G., et al. Perirhinal input to neocortical layer 1 controls learning. Science, 370, 2020, eaaz3136.
Godenzini, L., et al. Dendritic compartmentalization of learning-related plasticity. Eneuro, 9, 2022 ENEURO.0060-22.2022.
Beaulieu-Laroche, L., et al. Enhanced dendritic compartmentalization in human cortical neurons. Cell 175 (2018), 643–651.
Larkum, M.E., et al. Synaptic integration in tuft dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons: a new unifying principle. Science 325 (2009), 756–760.
Major, G., et al. Active properties of neocortical pyramidal neuron dendrites. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 36 (2013), 1–24.
Larkum, M.E., A cellular mechanism for cortical associations: an organizing principle for the cerebral cortex. Trends Neurosci. 36 (2013), 141–151.
Graham, B.P., et al. Context-sensitive processing in a model neocortical pyramidal cell with two sites of input integration. bioRxiv, 2024 Published online August 19, 2024 https://10.1101/2024.01.16.575982.
Williams, P.L., Beer, R.D., Nonnegative decomposition of multivariate information. arXiv, 2010 Published online April 14, 2010 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1004.2515.
Bachmann, T., Hudetz, A.G., It is time to combine the two main traditions in the research on the neural correlates of consciousness: C= L× D. Front. Psychol., 5, 2014, 940.
Aru, J., et al. Apical drive-a cellular mechanism of dreaming?. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 119 (2020), 440–455.
Eckenstein, F.P., et al. An anatomical study of cholinergic innervation in rat cerebral cortex. Neuroscience 25 (1988), 457–474.
Honjoh, S., et al. Regulation of cortical activity and arousal by the matrix cells of the ventromedial thalamic nucleus. Nat. Commun., 9, 2018, 2100.
Krone, L.B., et al. A role for the cortex in sleep-wake regulation. Nat. Neurosci. 24 (2021), 1210–1215.
Zolnik, T.A., et al. Layer 6b controls brain state via apical dendrites and the higher-order thalamocortical system. Neuron 112 (2024), 805–820.
Zolnik, T.A., et al. Layer 6b is driven by intracortical long-range projection neurons. Cell Rep. 30 (2020), 3492–3505.e.
Wenger Combremont, A.L., et al. Slow bursting neurons of mouse cortical layer 6b are depolarized by hypocretin/orexin and major transmitters of arousal. Front. Neurol., 7, 2016, 88.
Simor, P., et al. Long-range alpha and beta and short-range gamma EEG synchronization distinguishes phasic and tonic REM periods. Sleep, 41, 2018, zsx210.
Shepherd, G.M.G., Yamawaki, N., Untangling the cortico-thalamo-cortical loop: cellular pieces of a knotty circuit puzzle. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 22 (2021), 389–406.
Oberauer, K., et al. Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory. Psychol. Bull. 144 (2018), 885–958.
Olson, C.R., Object-based vision and attention in primates. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11 (2001), 171–179.
Luck, S.J., et al. Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 77 (1997), 24–42.
McAdams, C.J., Maunsell, J.H.R., Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4. J. Neurophysiol. 83 (2000), 1751–1755.
Kastner, S., Ungerleider, L.G., Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23 (2000), 315–341.
Reynolds, J.H., et al. Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. J. Neurosci. 19 (1999), 1736–1753.
Treue, S., Neural correlates of attention in primate visual cortex. Trends Neurosci. 24 (2001), 295–300.
Mehta, A.D., et al. Intermodal selective attention in monkeys. II: physiological mechanisms of modulation. Cereb. Cortex 10 (2000), 359–370.
Desimone, R., Duncan, J., Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18 (1995), 193–222.
Siegel, M., et al. Integrating top-down and bottom-up sensory processing by somato-dendritic interactions. J. Comput. Neurosci. 8 (2000), 161–173.
Spratling, M.W., Johnson, M.H., A feedback model of visual attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16 (2004), 219–237.
De Meyer, K., Spratling, M.W., A model of non-linear interactions between cortical top-down and horizontal connections explains the attentional gating of collinear facilitation. Vis. Res. 49 (2009), 553–568.
Petousakis, K.-E., et al. Modeling apical and basal tree contribution to orientation selectivity in a mouse primary visual cortex layer 2/3 pyramidal cell. eLife, 12, 2023, e91627.
Schmid, D., Neumann, H., Thalamo-cortical interaction for incremental binding in mental contour-tracing. bioRxiv, 2023 Published online December 21, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.20.572705.
Spratling, M.W., Cortical region interactions and the functional role of apical dendrites. Behav. Cogn. Neurosci. Rev. 1 (2002), 219–228.
Gidon, A., et al. Dendritic action potentials and computation in human layer 2/3 cortical neurons. Science 367 (2020), 83–87.
Spratling, M.W., Predictive coding as a model of biased competition in visual attention. Vis. Res. 48 (2008), 1391–1408.
Spratling, M.W., Unsupervised learning of generative and discriminative weights encoding elementary image components in a predictive coding model of cortical function. Neural Comput. 24 (2012), 60–103.
Spratling, M.W., Predictive coding as a model of the V1 saliency map hypothesis. Neural Netw. 26 (2012), 7–28.
Rao, R.P.N., Ballard, D.H., Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nat. Neurosci. 2 (1999), 79–87.
Friston, K., The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13 (2009), 293–301.
Friston, K., Does predictive coding have a future?. Nat. Neurosci. 21 (2018), 1019–1021.
Abadi, A.K., et al. Excitatory versus inhibitory feedback in Bayesian formulations of scene construction. J. R. Soc. Interface, 16, 2019, 20180344.
Hohwy, J., New directions in predictive processing. Mind Lang. 35 (2020), 209–223.
Fişek, M., et al. Cortico-cortical feedback engages active dendrites in visual cortex. Nature 617 (2023), 769–776.
Bachmann, T., Aru, J., Conscious interpretation: a distinct aspect for the neural markers of the contents of consciousness. Conscious. Cogn., 108, 2023, 103471.
Takahashi, N., et al. Active dendritic currents gate descending cortical outputs in perception. Nat. Neurosci. 23 (2020), 1277–1285.
Lazarova, Y., et al. Perceptual priors add sensory detail to contextual feedback processing in V1. bioRxiv, 2023 Published online September 24, 2023 https://doi.org/10.1101/20L23.09.23.559098.
Powers, A.R., et al. Pavlovian conditioning–induced hallucinations result from overweighting of perceptual priors. Science 357 (2017), 596–600.
Aru, J., et al. It's all in your head: expectations create illusory perception in a dual-task setup. Conscious. Cogn. 65 (2018), 197–208.
Smith, F.W., Muckli, L., Nonstimulated early visual areas carry information about surrounding context. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107 (2010), 20099–20103.
Revina, Y., et al. Cortical feedback signals generalise across different spatial frequencies of feedforward inputs. Neuroimage 180 (2018), 280–290.
Morgan, A.T., et al. Scene representations conveyed by cortical feedback to early visual cortex can be described by line drawings. J. Neurosci. 39 (2019), 9410–9423.
Petro, L.S., et al. The spatial precision of contextual feedback signals in human V1. Biology, 12, 2023, 1022.
Papale, P., et al. The representation of occluded image regions in area V1 of monkeys and humans. Curr. Biol. 33 (2023), 3865–3871.
Muckli, L., et al. The cortical microcircuitry of predictions and context – a multi-scale perspective (v_0.1). Zenodo, 2023 Published online September 28, 2023 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8380094.
Vetter, P., et al. Decoding sound and imagery content in early visual cortex. Curr. Biol. 24 (2014), 1256–1262.
Vetter, P., et al. Decoding natural sounds in early “visual” cortex of congenitally blind individuals. Curr. Biol. 30 (2020), 3039–3044.
Yang, J., et al. Linking cortical circuit models to human cognition with laminar fMRI. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 128 (2021), 467–478.
Larkum, M.E., et al. A perspective on cortical layering and layer-spanning neuronal elements. Front. Neuroanat., 12, 2018, 56.
Lawrence, S.J., et al. Laminar organization of working memory signals in human visual cortex. Curr. Biol. 28 (2018), 3435–3440.
Lawrence, S.J., et al. Dissociable laminar profiles of concurrent bottom-up and top-down modulation in the human visual cortex. eLife, 8, 2019, e44422.
Klein, B.P., et al. Cortical depth dependent population receptive field attraction by spatial attention in human V1. NeuroImage 176 (2018), 301–312.
Gau, R., et al. Resolving multisensory and attentional influences across cortical depth in sensory cortices. eLife, 9, 2020, e46856.
Kok, P., et al. Selective activation of the deep layers of the human primary visual cortex by top-down feedback. Curr. Biol. 26 (2016), 371–376.
Bergmann, J., et al. Cortical depth profiles in primary visual cortex for illusory and imaginary experiences. Nat. Commun., 15, 2024, 1002.
Ortiz-Tudela, J., et al. Concurrent contextual and time-distant mnemonic information co-exist as feedback in the human visual cortex. NeuroImage, 265, 2023, 119778.
Marquardt, I., et al. Feedback contribution to surface motion perception in the human early visual cortex. eLife, 9, 2020, e50933.
Aitken, F., et al. Prior expectations evoke stimulus-specific activity in the deep layers of the primary visual cortex. PLoS Biol., 18, 2020, e3001023.
Anderson, K.M., et al. Transcriptional and imaging-genetic association of cortical interneurons, brain function, and schizophrenia risk. Nat. Commun., 11, 2020, 2889.
Almeida, V.N., The neural hierarchy of consciousness: a theoretical model and review on neurophysiology and NCCs. Neuropsychologia, 169, 2022, 108202.
Haarsma, J., et al. The promise of layer-specific neuroimaging for testing predictive coding theories of psychosis. Schizophr. Res. 245 (2022), 68–76.
Phillips, W.A., Silverstein, S., The coherent organization of mental life depends on mechanisms for context-sensitive gain-control that are impaired in schizophrenia. Front. Psychol., 4, 2013, 47435.
Sterzer, P., et al. The predictive coding account of psychosis. Biol. Psychiatry 84 (2018), 634–643.
Heeger, D.J., Mackey, W.E., Oscillatory recurrent gated neural integrator circuits (ORGaNICs), a unifying theoretical framework for neural dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116 (2019), 22783–22794.
Kaaronen, R.O., A theory of predictive dissonance: predictive processing presents a new take on cognitive dissonance. Front. Psychol., 9, 2018, 2218.
Vlaev, I., Local choices: rationality and the contextuality of decision-making. Brain Sci., 8, 2018, 8.
Karmiloff-Smith, A., Nativism vs neuroconstructivism: rethinking developmental disorders. Dev. Psychol. 45 (2009), 56–63.
Spratling, M.W., Johnson, M.H., A feedback model of perceptual learning and categorization. Vis. Cogn. 13 (2006), 129–165.
Quartz, S.R., Sejnowski, T.J., The neural basis of cognitive development: a constructivist manifesto. Behav. Brain Sci. 20 (1997), 537–556.
Emes, R.D., et al. Evolutionary expansion and anatomical specialization of synapse proteome complexity. Nat. Neurosci. 11 (2008), 799–806.
Phillips, W.A., et al. Size perception is less context-sensitive in males. Perception 33 (2004), 79–86.
Doherty, M.J., et al. The Ebbinghaus illusion deceives adults but not young children. Dev. Sci. 13 (2010), 714–721.
Doherty, M.J., et al. The context sensitivity of visual size perception varies across cultures. Perception 37 (2008), 1426–1433.
Lupyan, G., et al. Effects of language on visual perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24 (2020), 930–944.
Gori, M., et al. Disambiguating vision with sound. Curr. Biol. 34 (2024), R235–R236.
Zivony, A., Lamy, D., What processes are disrupted during the attentional blink? An integrative review of event-related potential research. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 29 (2022), 394–414.
