Research blog (E-prints, Working papers and Research blog)
Hunting for Knowledge? The Court invalidates Malta’s Scheme for live-capturing wild Birds: balancing legal Certainty and Proportionality in the Absence of scientific Expertise (C-23/23, Commission v. Malta)
BRUNO, Walter
2024
 

Files


Full Text
OP-ED_~4.PDF
Publisher postprint (219.96 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
EU Wild Birds Directive; Live Capture; Legal certainty; Proportionality; Scientific expertise; Commission; Court of Justice of the EU; CJEU
Abstract :
[en] On 19 September 2024 the First Chamber of the Court of Justice (the ‘Court’) delivered its judgment in the infringement action brought by the Commission against Malta. The case concerns the compatibility with EU law, in particular Directive 2009/147/EC (the ‘Directive’) on the Conservation of wild birds, with Malta’s ‘Finches Project’, a regulatory scheme for the live-capturing of seven species of wild migratory finches, in derogation to the mentioned Directive, as foreseen in its Article 9. Interestingly enough, Advocate General (‘AG’) Ćapeta and the First Chamber conducted a fundamentally different analysis.
Disciplines :
European & international law
Author, co-author :
BRUNO, Walter  ;  University of Luxembourg > Luxembourg Centre for European Law (LCEL) > LCEL Research
Language :
English
Title :
Hunting for Knowledge? The Court invalidates Malta’s Scheme for live-capturing wild Birds: balancing legal Certainty and Proportionality in the Absence of scientific Expertise (C-23/23, Commission v. Malta)
Publication date :
16 October 2024
Publisher :
EU Law Live
Focus Area :
Law / European Law
Available on ORBilu :
since 17 December 2024

Statistics


Number of views
87 (5 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
32 (1 by Unilu)

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu