Action Aid et al., Joint Response to ‘After the Storm: Voices from the Delta’ (Action Aid et al. 2009) accessed 6 December 2014.
Alborzi, M.R., Evaluating the Effectiveness of International Refugee Law: The Protection of Iraqi Refugees (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2006).
Allain, J., Slavery in International Law. Of Human Exploitation and Trafficking (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2013).
Allard, S.W., ‘Casualties of Disharmony: The Exclusion of Asylum Seekers under the Auspices of the Common European Asylum System’ (2010) 24 Emory Int’l L Rev 295.
Allen, C., ‘Warfare, Endemic Violence & State Collapse in Africa’ (1999) 26 roape 367.
Anderson, B., Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Verso 2006).
Anderson, B., Sharma N. and Wright C., ‘Editorial: Why No Borders?’ (2009) 26 Refuge 5.
Anker, D., ‘Refugee Law, Gender, and the Human Rights Paradigm’ (2002) 15 Harv Hum Rts J 133.
Anti Trafficking Legal Project (ATLeP), Call for Exception from Dublin II Procedures for Victims of Trafficking, Joint Submission with aire Centre, Asylum Aid, ecpat uk and Poppy Project (ATLeP 2008) accessed 6 December 2014.
Arenas, N., ‘Concept of Mass Influx of Displaced Persons in the European Directive Establishing the Temporary Protection Scheme’ (2005) 7 ejil 435.
Armstrong, N., ‘laspo, Immigration and Maaouia v United Kingdom’ (2013) 18(2) Judicial Rev 177.
Baldaccini, A., Guild, E. and Toner, H. (eds), Whose Freedom, Security and Justice? eu Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy (Hart Publishing 2007).
Barber, R., ‘The Responsibility to Protect the Survivors of Natural Disaster: Cyclone Nargis, a Case Study’ (2009) 14 J Conflict & Sec L 3.
Barbou Des Places, S. and Oger H., ‘Making the European Migration Regime: Decoding Member States’ Legal Strategies’ (2005) 6 ejml 353.
Bast, J., ‘Of General Principles and Trojan Horses – Procedural Due Process in Immigration Proceedings under eu Law’ (2010) 11 glj 1006.
———, ‘Subsidiary Protection and Other Alternative Forms of Protection’ in V. Chetail and C. Bauloz (eds), Research Handbook on International Law and Migration (Edward Elgar Publishing 2014) 541.
Bauloz, C. and Ruiz G., ‘Refugee Status and Subsidiary Protection: Towards a Uniform Content of International Protection?’ in V. Chetail, P. de Bruycker and F. Maiani (eds), Towards a Common European Asylum System: The AddedValue of the Legislative Package of Second Generation (Martinus Nijhoff forthcoming).
Betts, A., Loescher G. and Milner J., The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (unhcr): The Politics and Practice of Refugee Protection (Routledge 2013).
Bhabha, J., ‘Border Rights and Rites: Generalisations, Stereotypes and Gendered Migration’ in S. van Walsum and T. Spijkerboer (eds), Women and Immigration Law. New Variations on Classical Feminist Themes (Routledge 2007) 15.
Bjorge, E., ‘National Supreme Courts and the Development of echr Rights’ (2011) 9(1) Int’l J Const L 5.
Boccardi, I., Europe and Refugees – Towards an eu Asylum Policy (Kluwer Law International 2002).
Bratza, N., ‘Living Instrument or Dead Letter – The Future of the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2014) 2 ehrlr 116.
Bribosia, E. and Rorive I., Reasonable Accommodation beyond Disability in Europe? (eu Commission 2013) accessed 6 December 2014.
British Red Cross, Not Gone, but Forgotten: The Urgent Need for a More Humane Asylum System (British Red Cross 2010) accessed 6 December 2014.
Brouwer, E., ‘Effective Remedies for Third Country Nationals in eu Law: Justice Accessible to All?’ (2005) 7 ejml 219.
———, Digital Borders and Real Rights – Effective Remedies for Third-Country Nationals in the Schengen Information System (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2008).
———, ‘Legality and Data Protection Law: The Forgotten Purpose of Purpose Limitation’ in L. Besselink, F. Pennings and S. Prechal (eds), The Eclipse of the Legality Principle in the European Union (Kluwer Law International 2011) 273.
Bruch, E., ‘Models Wanted: The Search for an Effective Response to Human Trafficking’ (2004) 40(1) Stan J Int’l L 1.
Burnett, J., ‘No Access to Justice: Legal Aid and Destitute Asylum Seekers’ (2008) 3 pafras Brief Papers accessed 6 December 2014.
Carlier, J.-Y., ‘General Report’ in J.-Y. Carlier, D. Vanheule, K. Hullmann and C. Pena Galiano (eds), Who is a Refugee? A Comparative Case Law Study (Kluwer Law International 1997) 683.
Carlier, J.-Y. and de Bruycker P. (eds), Immigration and Asylum Law of the eu: Current Debates (Bruylant 2005).
Carrera, S., Guild E. Merlino M. and Parkin J., ‘A Race against Solidarity: The Schengen Regime and the Franco-Italian Affair’ (2011) ceps Liberty Secur Eur Working Papers.
Carrera, S., den Hertog L. and Parkin J., ‘eu Migration Policy in the Wake of the Arab Spring: What Prospects for EU-Southern Mediterranean Relations?’ (2012) 15 medpro Technical Report.
Chakrabarti, S., ‘Rights and Rhetoric: The Politics of Asylum and Human Rights Culture in the United Kingdom’ (2005) 31(1) J L & Soc’y 131.
Chandran, P., ‘The Identification of Victims of Trafficking’ in P. Chandran (ed), Human Trafficking Handbook: Recognizing Trafficking and Modern-Day Slavery in the uk (Lexis Nexis 2011) 27.
Chantler, K., ‘Gender, Asylum Seekers and Mental Distress: Challenges for Mental Health Social Work’ (2012) 42(2) Br J Soc Work 318.
Chetail, V., ‘Are Refugee Rights Human Rights? An Unorthodox Questioning on the Relations between Refugee Law and Human Rights Law’ in R. Rubio-Marín (ed), Human Rights and Immigration (oup 2014) 19.
———, ‘The Common European Asylum System: Bric-à-Brac or System?’, in V. Chetail, P. de Bruycker and F. Maiani (eds), Towards a Common European Asylum System: The Added Value of the Legislative Package of Second Generation (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers forthcoming).
Chetail, V. and Bauloz C., The European Union and the Challenges of Forced Migration: From Economic Crisis to Protection Crisis? (European University Institute 2011).
Chetail, V., de Bruycker P. and Maiani F. (eds), Towards a Common European Asylum System: The Added Value of the Legislative Package of Second Generation (Martinus Nijhoff forthcoming).
Clayton, R., ‘The Human Rights Act Six Years On: Where Are We Now?’ (2007) 12 ehrlr 11.
Crawley, H., Hemmings J. and Price N., Coping with Destitution: Survival and Livelihood Strategies of Refused Asylum Seekers Living in the uk (Oxfam 2011) accessed 6 December 2014.
Crock, M., Ernst C. and McCallum R., ‘Where Disability and Displacement Intersect: Asylum Seekers and Refugees with Disabilities’ (2012) 24 ijrl 735.
Dacey, J., ‘Tunisian Talks Held amid Growing Refugee Crisis’ Swissinfo (20 April 2011) accessed 6 December 2014.
Da Lomba, S., The Right to Seek Refugee Status in the European Union (Intersentia 2004).
Davidson, J. and Anderson B., ‘The Trouble with Trafficking’ in C. van den Anker and J. Doomernik (eds), Trafficking and Women’s Rights (Palgrave McMillan 2006) 11.
De Bauche, L., Vulnerability in European Law on Asylum: A Conceptualization under Construction (Bruylant 2012).
de Bruycker et al., Setting up a Common European Asylum System: Report on the Application of Existing Instruments and Proposals for the New System, Study (European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Doc. PE 425.622, 2010).
De Hert, P. and Gutwirth S., ‘Privacy, Data Protection and Law Enforcement. Opacity of the Individual and Transparency of Power’ in E. Claes, A. Duff and S. Gutwirth (eds), Privacy and the Criminal Law (Intersentia 2006) 61.
De Schutter, O., International Human Rights Law – Cases, Materials, Commentary (cup 2010).
de Weck, F., ‘Das Rückschiebungsverbot aus medizinischen Gründen nach Art. 3 emrk’ (2013) Jusletter.
den Hertog, L., Revolutions and their Immigrants: eu’s Response (uaces 2011) accessed6December2014.
Detention Action, Fast Track to Despair: The Unnecessary Detention of Asylum Seekers (Detention Action 2011) accessed 6 December 2014.
Devon Law Centre, ‘Asylum Appellate Project – Final Report’ (Devon Law Centre 2010) accessed 6 December 2014.
Dias Urbano de Sousa, C. and de Bruycker P. (eds), The Emergence of a European Asylum Policy (Bruylant 2004).
Doezema, J., Sex Slaves and Discourse Masters the Construction of Trafficking (Zed Books 2010).
Dowd, R., ‘Dissecting Discrimination in Refugee Law: An Analysis of its Meaning and its Cumulative Effect’ (2011) 23 ijrl 28.
Durieux, J.-F., ‘Of War, Flows, Laws and Flaws: A Reply to Hugo Storey’ (2012) 31 rsq 161.
Eaton, J., ‘The International Protection Alternative under European Union Law: Examining the Recast Qualification Directive’ (2012) 24(4) ijrl 765.
ecpat uk, The Trade in Human Beings: Human Trafficking in the uk, Memorandum (ecpat uk 2008) accessed 6 December 2014.
Eechaudt, V., Access to eurodac by Law Enforcement Authorities – An Assessment (University of Groningen 2011) accessed 6 December 2014.
Eide, A., The Right to Adequate Food as a Human Right, un Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/1983/25, 1983.
English, R., ‘eu Directive on Refugee Status Does Not Enhance Asylum Rights under Strasbourg Convention’ (2010) uk Human Rights Blog accessed 6 December 2014.
European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ecre), The Impact of the eu Qualification Directive on International Protection (ecre 2008a).
———, ecre Proposals for Revisions to the ec Directive on the Reception of Asylum Seekers (ecre 2008b).
———, Survey on Legal Aid for Asylum Seekers in Europe (ecre 2010a).
———, ecre Comments on the European Commission Proposal to Recast the Asylum Procedures Directive (ecre 2010b).
———, Comments from the European Council on Refugees and Exiles on the Amended Commission Proposal to Recast the Asylum Procedures Directive (COM(2011)319 Final) (ecre 2011).
———, ecre Information Note on the Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on Standards for the Qualification of Third-Country Nationals or Stateless Persons as Beneficiaries of International Protection, for a Uniform Status for Refugees or for Persons Eligible for Subsidiary Protection, and for the Content of the Protection Granted (Recast) (ecre 2013).
ecre, Amnesty International (ai) and Human Rights Watch (hrw), Refugee and Human Rights Organisations across Europe Express their Concern at the Expected Agreement on Asylum Measures on Breach of International Law (ECRE/AI/HRW 2004).
ecre, ilga Europe, ai, Pax Christi International, Quaker Council for European Affairs, hrw, CARITAS-Europe, Médecins Sans Frontières, Churches’ Commission for Migrants, and Save the Children in Europe, Call for Withdrawal of the Asylum Procedures Directive (2004) accessed 6 December 2014.
European Foundation Centre (efc), Study on Challenges and Good Practices in the Implementation of the un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities VC/2008/1214 (efc 2010).
European Migration Network (emn), The Different National Practices Concerning Granting of Non-EU Harmonised Protection Statuses (emn 2010).
———, Identification of Victims of Trafficking in International Protection and Forced Return Procedures (emn 2014).
Fargues, P. and Fandrich C., Migration after the Arab Spring (European University Institute 2012).
Farmer, P., Pathologies of Power: Health, Human Rights and the New War on the Poor (University of California Press 2005).
Feder, B., ‘A Credible Judge of Character? A Psycho-Legal Analysis of Credibility Assessments for Asylum Applicants with a History of Sexual Violence’ (2010) 24(4) jianl 295.
Fenwick, H., An Appeasement Approach in the European Court of Human Rights? (uk Constitutional Law Group 2012) accessed 6 December 2014.
Ferguson Sidorenko, O., The Common European Asylum System: Background, Current State of Affairs, Future Directions (tmc Asser Press 2007).
Fitzpatrick, J., ‘Temporary Protection of Refugees: Elements of a Formalized Regime’ (2000) 94(2) ajil 279.
Flóvenz, B.G., ‘The Implementation of the un Convention and the Development of Economic and Social Rights as Human Rights’ in O. Mjöll Arnardóttir and G. Quinn (eds), The un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009) 257.
Forbess, A., Reversing Inequalities (The Justice Gap 2012) accessed 6 December 2014.
Fortin, A., ‘The Meaning of “Protection” in the Refugee Definition’ (2000) 12 ijrl 548.
Free Movement, Legal Aid and Access to Justice (Free Movement 2013) accessed 6 December 2014.
Fullerton, M., ‘Asylum on the Eve of Accession: European Developments and Perspectives’ in Proceeding of the Ninety-Eight Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law (asil), Protection Control: Regulating the Movement of People in a Globalized World (asil 2004) 255.
———, ‘A Tale of Two Decades: War Refugees and Asylum Policy in the European Union’ (2010) 10 Wash U Global Stud L Rev 87.
Gallagher, A., The International Law of Human Trafficking (cup 2012).
Garlick, M., ‘Asylum Legislation in the European Community and the 1951 Convention: Key Concerns Regarding Asylum Instruments Adopted in the “First Phase” of Harmonization’ in T. Balzacq and S. Carrera (eds), Security versus Liberty? A Challenge for Europe’s Future (Ashgate 2006) 45.
Geertz, C., Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics (Princeton University Press 2000).
Gibbs, J., Justice at Risk: Quality and Value for Money in Asylum Legal Aid: Interim Report (Refugee and Migrant Justice 2010) accessed 6 December 2014.
Gil-Bazo, M., ‘The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the Right to be Granted Asylum in the Union’s Law’ (2008) 27(3) rsq 33.
Goudappel, F.A.N.J. and Raulus H.S.R. (eds), The Future of Asylum in the European Union: Problems, Proposals and Human Rights (tmc Asser Press 2011).
Griffin, A., ‘Justice Denied?’ (2012) 162(7519) nlj 8.
Griffith, M., ‘Observing Differences: Asylum Appeals in the uk’ The compas Blog (2013) accessed 6 December 2014.
Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (greta), Report ConcerningtheImplementationoftheCouncilofEuropeConventiononActionagainst TraffickinginHumanBeingsbyDenmark, GRETA(2011)21, 20 December 2011.
———, Report Concerning the Implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Norway, GRETA(2013)5, 7 May 2013a.
———, Report Concerning the Implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Belgium, GRETA(2013)14, 25 September 2013b.
———, Report Concerning the Implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Spain, GRETA(2013)16, 27 September 2013c.
———, Report Concerning the Implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by Bulgaria, GRETA(2011) 19, 11 December 2014.
Guild, E., ‘The Europeanisation of Europe’s Asylum Policy’ (2006) 18 ijrl 630.
———, ‘Unreadable Papers? The eu’s First Experiences with Biometrics: Examining eurodac and the eu’s Borders’ in J. Lodge (ed), Are You Who You Say You Are? The eu and Biometric Borders (Wolf Legal Publishers 2007) 31.
Guild, E. and Minderhoud P. (eds), The First Decade of eu Migration and Asylum Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2011).
Guild, E., Carrera S. and Eggenschwiler A. (eds), The Area of Freedom, Security and JusticeTenYearsOn:SuccessesandFutureChallengesundertheStockholmProgramme (ceps 2010).
Hailbronner, K. (ed), eu Immigration and Asylum Law Commentary on eu Regulations and Directives (Hart Publishing 2010).
Haines, Q.C.R., The Domestic Application of International Human Rights Standards in New Zealand: The Refugee Convention (University of Auckland 2004) accessed 6 December 2014.
Handmaker, J., ‘No Easy Walk: Advancing Refugee Protection in South Africa’ (2001) 48(3) Africa Today 91.
Harris, D.J., ‘Immigration and the European Convention on Human Rights’ (1969) mlr 102.
Harvey, C., ‘The Right to Seek Asylum in the European Union’ (2004) 1 ehrlr 17.
Hathaway, J.C., The Law of Refugee Status (1st edn Butterworths 1991).
———, ‘The Relationship between Human Rights and Refugee Law: What Refugee Law Judges Can Contribute’ in International Association of Refugee Law Judges (iarlj) (ed), The Realities of Refugee Determination on the Eve of a New Millennium: The Role of the Judiciary (iarlj 1998) 80.
———, The Rights of Refugees under International Law (cup 2005).
———, ‘The Human Rights Quagmire of “Human Trafficking”’ (2008) 49(1) Va J Int’l L 1.
———, ‘Food Deprivation: A Basis for Refugee Status?’ (2014) 81 Soc Res 327.
Hathaway, J.C. and Foster M., The Law of Refugee Status (2nd edn cup 2014).
Hathaway, J.C. and Neve R.A., ‘Making International Refugee Law Relevant Again: A Proposal for Collectivized and Solution-Oriented Protection’ (1997) 10 Harv Hum Rts J 115.
Hatton, T.J. and Williamson J.G., ‘Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Policy in Europe’ (2005) 5058 cepr Discussion Paper.
Hendriks, A. and Ventegodt Liisberg M., ‘Disability Rights – Overview’ in D.P. Forsythe (ed), Encyclopedia of Human Rights (vol 2 oup 2009) 34.
Hewitt, K. (ed), Interpretations of Calamity (Allen & Unwin 1983).
Hintjens, H., ‘“Like Leaves in the Wind”: Desperately Seeking Asylum in the uk’ (2006) 48(1) Race & Class 79.
Human Rights Watch (hrw), ‘Nobody Remembers Us’: Failure to Protect Women’s and Girls’ Right to Health and Security in Post-Earthquake Haiti (hrw 2011) accessed 6 December 2014.
Hutton, C. and Lukes S., An Interim External Evaluation of Refugee Action’s Access to Justice Project (Refugee Action 2013) accessed 6 December 2014.
Huysmans, J., The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the eu (Routledge 2006).
Immigrant Council of Ireland, Asylum Seeking Victims of Human Trafficking in Ireland: Legal and Practical Challenges (Immigrant Council of Ireland 2011) accessed 6 December 2014.
Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ilpa), Analysis and Critique of Council Directive on Minimum Standards on Procedures in Member States for Granting and Withdrawing Refugee Status (ilpa 2004).
———, Comments on Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and the Council on Minimum Standards on Procedures in Member States for Granting and Withdrawing International Protection (Recast) COM(2009)554 (ilpa 2009).
———, ilpa Note on the “Transformation” Legal Aid Consultation (ilpa 2013).
Ineli-Ciger, M., ‘Revisiting Temporary Protection as a Protection Option to Manage Mass Influx Situations’ in J.-P. Gauci, M. Giuffré and L. Tsourdi (eds), Exploring the Boundaries of Refugee Law, Current Protection Challenges (Brill forthcoming).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Managing the Risks of Extreme Events andDisasterstoAdvanceClimateChangeAdaptation(cup 2012).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Working Group I Contribution to the ipcc Fifth Assessment Report), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (cup 2013).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Working Group II Contribution to the ipcc Fifth Assessment Report), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability,TechnicalSummary(cup 2014).
International Coalition for the Responsibility to Protect (ICRtoP), ‘The Crisis in Burma’ (ICRtoP undated) accessed 6 December 2014.
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, Through Albino Eyes. The Plight of Albino People in Africa’s Great Lake’s Region and a Red Cross Response. Advocacy Report (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies 2009) accessed 6 December 2014.
Ippolito, F., ‘The Contribution of the European Courts to the Common European Asylum System and its Ongoing Recast Process’ (2013) 20(2) Maastricht J Eur & Comp L 261.
Ippolito, F. and Velluti S., ‘The Recast Process of the eu Asylum System: A Balancing Act between Efficiency and Fairness’ (2011) 30(3) rsq 24.
James, D. and Killick E., ‘Empathy and Expertise: Case Workers and Immigration/ Asylum Applicants in London’ (2012) 37(2) Law Soc Inq 430.
Jastram, K., ‘Economic Harm as a Basis for Refugee Status and the Application of Human Rights Law to the Interpretation of Economic Persecution’ in J.C. Simeon (ed), Critical Issues in International Refugee Law, Strategies Toward Interpretative Harmony (cup 2010) 143.
Jones, C., Analysis – 11 Years of Eurodac (Statewatch 2014).
Julien-Laferrière, F., Labayle H. and Edström Ö. (eds), The European Immigration and AsylumPolicy:CriticalAssessmentFiveYearsaftertheAmsterdamTreaty(Bruylant2005).
Juss, S.S., ‘Problematizing the Protection of ‘War Refugees’: A Rejoinder to Hugo Storey and Jean-François Durieux’ (2013) 32 rsq 122.
Justice (on behalf of the ngo Human Rights Forum), Review of the uk’s Reservations to International Human Rights Treaty Obligations (Justice 2002) accessed 6 December 2014.
Kälin, W., ‘Non-State Agents of Persecution and the Inability of the State to Protect’ (2000) 15 Geo Imm L J 415.
———, ‘Temporary Protection in the ec: Refugee Law, Human Rights and Temptations of Pragmatism’ (2001) 44 gyil 202.
———, ‘The Future of the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement’ (2008) fmr 5. Kälin, W. and Künzli J., The Law of International Human Rights Protection (oup 2009).
Kälin, W. and Schrepfer N., ‘Protecting People Crossing Borders in the Context of Climate Change: Normative Gaps and Possible Approaches’ (2012) unhcr Legal and Protection Policy Research Series.
Kelly, A., Asylum Aid Condemns Move to Limit Legal Aid (Third Sector 2003) accessed 6 December 2014.
Kempadoo, K., ‘From Modal Panic to Global Justice: Changing Perspectives on Trafficking’ in K. Kampadoo (ed), Trafficking and Prostitution Reconsidered New Perspectives on Migration, Sex Work, and Human Rights (Paradigm Publishers 2005) viii.
Kerber, K., ‘Temporary Protection in the European Union: A Chronology’ (1999–2000) 14 Geo Imm L J 193.
Kerr, B.F., The uk Supreme Court: The Modest Underworker of Strasbourg? (Clifford Chance Lecture 2012) accessed 6 December 2014.
Klug, A., ‘Harmonization of Asylum in the European Union – Emergence of an eu Refugee System?’ (2004) 47 gyil 594.
———, ‘Regional Developments: Europe’ in A. Zimmermann (ed), The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and Its 1967 Protocol: A Commentary (oup 2011) 117.
Klug, F. and Wildbore H., ‘Follow or Lead? The Human Rights Act and the European Court of Human Rights’ (2010) 6 ehrlr 621.
Koch, I.E., ‘Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as Components in Civil and Political Rights: A Hermeneutic Perspective’ (2006) 10 ijhr 405.
Kunz, E.F., ‘The Refugee in Flight: Kinetic Models and Forms of Displacement’ (1973) 7(2) imr 125.
Lambert, H., ‘The Conceptualisation of “Persecution” by the House of Lords: Horvath v. Secretary of State for the Home Department’ (2001) 13 ijrl 16.
———, ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and the Protection of Refugees: Limits and Opportunities’ (2005) 24(2) rsq 39.
———, ‘The eu Asylum Qualification Directive, Its Impact on the Jurisprudence of the United Kingdom and International Law’ (2006) 55 iclq 161.
———, ‘Transnational Judicial Dialogue, Harmonization and the Common European Asylum System’ (2009) 58 iclq 519.
———, ‘The Next Frontier: Expanding Protection in Europe for Victims of Armed Conflict and Indiscriminate Violence’ (2013) 25(2) ijrl 207.
Lavenex, S., The Europeanisation of Refugee Policies: Between Human Rights and Internal Security (Ashgate 2002).
Lawson, A., ‘The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: New Era or False Dawn?’ (2007) 34 Syracuse J Int’l L Com 563.
———, Disability and Equality Law in Britain: The Role of Reasonable Adjustment (Hart Publishing 2008).
———, ‘The un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and European Disability Law: A Catalyst for Cohesion?’ in O. Mjöll Arnardóttir and G. Quinn (eds), The un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009) 81.
Lenaerts, K., ‘Exploring the Limits of the eu Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 8(3) Eur Const L Rev 375.
Lester, A., East African Asians versus the United Kingdom: The Inside Story (2003) accessed 6 December 2014.
———, The European Court of Human Rights after 50 Years (2009) accessed 6 December 2014.
Lewis, J., ‘The European Ceiling on Human Rights’ (2007) pl 720.
MacIntyre, H., ‘Imposed Dependency: Client Perspectives of Legal Representation in Asylum Claims’ (2009) 23(2) jianl 188.
MacKay, ‘The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ (2007) 34 Syracuse J Int’l L & Com 323.
Malmström, C., Debate on Migration Flows (2011) accessed 6 December 2014.
———, ‘Responding to the Arab Spring and Rising Populism: The Challenges of Building a European Migration and Asylum Policy’ (2012) Lecture at Harvard University’s Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies accessed 6 December 2014.
Marx, R., ‘The Notion of Persecution by Non-State Agents in German Jurisprudence’ (2001) 15 Geo Imm L J 448.
Masterman, R., ‘Section 2(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998: Binding Domestic Courts to Strasbourg’ (2004) 12 pl 725.
Mathew, P., Hathaway J.C. and Foster M., ‘The Role of State Protection in Refugee Analysis’ (2003) 15 ijrl 444.
McAdam, J., ‘Seeking Asylum under the Convention on the Rights of the Child: A Case for Complementary Protection’ (2006) 14 Int’l J Children’s Rts 251.
McBain, S., ‘eu Immigration Policy is Contributing to Sahara Migrant Deaths’ NewStatesman (1 November 2013) accessed 6 December 2014.
McMahon, S., North African Migration and Europe’s Contextual Mediterranean Border in Light of Lampedusa Migrant Crisis of 2011 (European University Institute 2012).
Meyler, F. and Woodhouse, S., What Hope after laspo: Time to Re-visit Maaouia? (Freemovement 2013) accessed 6 December 2014.
Mitsilegas, V., ‘The Border Paradox: The Surveillance of Movement in a Union without Internal Frontiers’ in H. Lindahl (ed), A Right to Inclusion and Exclusion? Normative Faultlines of the eu’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (Hart Publishing 2009) 33.
———, ‘The Value of Privacy in an Era of Security: Embedding Constitutional Limits on Preemptive Surveillance’ (2014) 8 Int’l Pol Soc 100.
Mjöll Arnardóttir, O., ‘A Future of Multidimensional Disadvantage Equality?’ in O. Mjöll Arnardóttir and G. Quinn (eds), The un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009) 41.
Moore, J., ‘From Nation State to Failed State: International Protection from Human Rights Abuses by Non-State Agents’ (1999–2000) 31 Col Hum Rts L Rev 81.
———, ‘Whither the Accountability Theory: Second-Class Status for Third-Party Refugees as a Threat to International Refugee Protection’ (2001) 13 ijrl 32.
Morrison, J. and Crosland, B., ‘The Trafficking and Smuggling of Refugees: The End Game in European Asylum Policy?’ (2001) 39 unhcr N Issues Refugee Res Series.
Mullally, S., ‘Domestic Violence Asylum Claims and Recent Developments in International Human Rights Law: A Progress Narrative?’ (2011) 60 iclq 459.
Mulvey, G., ‘When Policy Creates Politics: The Problematizing of Immigration and the Consequences for Refugee Integration in the uk’ (2010) 23(4) jrs 437.
Munro, V., ‘A Tale of Two Servitudes: Defining and Implementing a Domestic Response to Trafficking of Women for Prostitution in the uk and Australia’ (2005) 14 Soc Leg Stud 91.
Nascimbene, B. and Di Pascale A., ‘The “Arab Spring” and the Extraordinary Influx of People Who Arrived in North Italy from North Africa’ (2011) 13 ejml 341.
Noll, G., ‘Risky Games? A Theoretical Approach to Burden-Sharing in the Asylum Field’ (2003) 16(3) jrs 236.
———, ‘The Insecurity of Trafficking in International Law’ in V. Chetail (ed), Mondialisation, migration et droits de l’homme: le droit international en question (Bruylant 2007) 356.
Nykänen, E., Fragmented State Power and Forced Migration – Study on Non-State Actors in Refugee Law (University of Turku 2012).
O’Cinneide, C., ‘Extracting Protection for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities from Human Rights Frameworks: Established Limits and New Possibilities’ in O. Mjöll Arnardóttir and G. Quinn (eds), The un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009) 168.
O’Nions, H., Asylum – A Right Denied: A Critical Analysis of European Asylum Policy (Ashgate 2014).
Peers, S., The Revised Directive on Refugee and Subsidiary Protection Status (Statewatch 2011).
———, The Second Phase of the Common European Asylum System: A Brave New World – or Lipstick on a Pig? (Statewatch 2013).
Phuong, C., ‘Persecution by Non-State Agents: Comparative Judicial Interpretations of the 1951 Refugee Convention’ (2003) 4 ejml 521.
Physsas, C., moj Cuts versus the Rule of Law (Freemovement 2013) accessed 6 December 2014.
Pirjola J, ‘European Asylum Policy – Inclusions and Exclusions under the Surface of Universal Human Rights Language’ (2009) 11 ejml 347.
Public Law Project (plp), Judicial Review: Proposals for Further Reform (plp 2013) accessed 6 December 2014.
Quinn, G. and Degener T., Human Rights and Disability: The Current Use and Future Potential of u.n. Human Rights Instruments in the Context of Disability, un Doc. HR/PUB/02/1, 2002.
Quinn, G. and Doyle S., ‘Taking the un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Seriously – The Past and Future of the eu Structural Funds as a Tool to Achieve Community Living’ (2012) 9 The Equal Rights Review 69.
Reneman, M., ‘Access to an Effective Remedy in European Asylum Procedures’ (2008–2009) 1 Amsterdam L F 65.
Renshaw, J., ‘O Brave New World’ (2013) N Law J accessed 6 December 2014.
Robins, J., ‘Comment: An Incentive to Dumb Down’ (2010) 24 June LS Gaz 8.
Rouvroy, A. and Poullet, Y., ‘The Right to Informational Self-Determination and the Value of Self-Development: Reassessing the Importance of Privacy for Democracy’ in S. Gutwirth, Y. Poullet, P. de Hert, C. de Terwangne and S. Nouwt (eds), Reinventing Data Protection? (Springer 2009) 45.
———, ‘Refugee Burden-Sharing: A Modest Proposal, Fifteen Years Later’ (2013) 480 Yale Law Econ Res Papers.
Scott, M., ‘Natural Disasters, Climate Change and Non-Refoulement: What Scope for Resisting Expulsion under Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights?’ (2014) 26(3) ijrl 404.
Shue, H., Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and u.s. Foreign Policy (2nd edn Princeton University Press 1996).
Simeon, J.C., Human Rights Nexus Working Party – Rapporteur’s Report (iarlj 2000).
Skordas A., ‘Council of the European Union, Council Directive 2001/55/EC of 20 July 2001 on Minimum Standards for Giving Temporary Protection in the Event of a Mass Influx of Displaced Persons and on Measures Promoting a Balance of Efforts between Member States in Receiving Such Persons and Bearing the Consequences Thereof’ in K. Hailbronner (ed), eu Immigration and Asylum Law Commentary on eu Regulations and Directives (Hart Publishing 2010) 803.
Smith, C., Identification and Assistance of Victims of Human Trafficking in Ireland: An Article 4 echr Analysis (Irish Refugee Council 2012).
Standing Committee of Experts on International Immigration, Refugee and Criminal Law (Meijers Committee), Note on the Proposal of the jha Council to Give Law Enforcement Authorities Access to Eurodac, CM0712-IV, 18 September 2007.
———, Note on the Proposal for a Regulation on the Establishment of Eurodac (COM(2012)254), CM1216, 10 October 2012.
Stefanelli, J.N., ‘Whose Rule of Law? An Analysis of the uk’s Decision Not to Opt-In to the eu Asylum Procedures and Reception Conditions Directives’ (2011) 60(4) iclq 1055.
Storey, H., ‘Armed Conflict in Asylum Law: The “War-Flaw”’ (2012) 31 rsq 1.
———, ‘Persecution: Towards a Working Definition’ in V. Chetail and C. Bauloz (eds), Research Handbook on Migration and International Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2014) 459.
Straimer, C., ‘Vulnerable or Invisible? Asylum Seekers with Disabilities in Europe’ (2010) 194 unhcr N Issues Refugee Res Series.
———, ‘Between Protection and Assistance: Is there Refuge for Asylum Seekers with Disabilities in Europe?’ (2011) 26 Disab Soc 537.
Symes, M. and Jorro P., Asylum Law and Practice (2nd edn Bloomsbury Professional 2010).
Teitgen-Colly, C., ‘The European Union and Asylum: An Illusion of Protection’ (2006) 43 Common Mkt L Rev 1503.
The Anti-Trafficking Monitoring Group, Hidden in Plain Sight – Three Years On: Updated Analysis of uk Measures to Protect Trafficked Persons (Anti-Slavery International 2013).
———, ‘The Common European Asylum System: In Need of a More Comprehensive Burden-Sharing Approach’ in A. Luedtke (ed), Migrants and Minorities: The European Response (Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2010) 82.
———, ‘How Effective are National and eu Policies in the Area of Forced Migration?’ (2012) 31(4) rsq 21.
Thielemann, E.R. and Armstrong C., ‘Understanding European Asylum Cooperation under the Schengen/Dublin System: A Public Goods Framework’ (2013) 22(2) Eur Secur 148.
Thomas, C., ‘Disability Theory: Key Ideas, Issues and Thinkers’ in N. Watson (ed), Disability: Major Themes in Health and Social Welfare (Routledge 2008) 360.
Thomas, R., ‘Evaluating Tribunal Adjudication: Administrative Justice and Asylum Appeals’ (2005) Legal Stud 462.
———, ‘Assessing the Credibility of Asylum Claims: eu and uk Approaches Examined’ (2006) 8(1) ejml 79.
———, Administrative Justice and Asylum Appeals: A Study of Tribunal Adjudication (Hart Publishing 2011).
Toscano, F., ‘The Second Phase of the Common European Asylum System: A Step Forward in the Protection of Asylum Seekers?’ (2013) 7 Inst Eur Stud Working Papers.
Trude, A. and Gibbs, J., Review of Quality Issues in Legal Advice: Measuring and Costing Asylum Work (icar 2010) accessed 6 December 2014.
Tzanou, M., The Added Value of Data Protection as a Fundamental Right in the eu Legal Order in the Context of Law Enforcement (Phd Thesis European University Institute 2012).
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (unhcr), Handbook and Guidelines on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (unhcr 1979, reprinted December 2011).
———, The Principle of Non-Refoulement as a Norm of Customary International Law, Response to the Questions Posed to unhcr by the Federal Constitutional Court of the Federal Republic of Germany in Cases 2 BvR 1938/93, 2 BvR 1953/93, 2 BvR 1954/93 (unhcr 31 January 1994).
———, Interpreting Article 1 of the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (unhcr 2001a).
———, unhcr’s Observations on the European Commission’s Proposal for a Council Directive on Minimum Standards for the Qualification and Status of Third Country Nationals and Stateless Persons as Refugees or as Persons Who Otherwise Need International Protection (Brussels, 12 September 2001, COM(2001)510 Final, 2001/0207 (cns)) (unhcr 2001b).
———, unhcr Guidelines on International Protection No. 2:“Membership of a Particular Social Group” within the Context of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or Its 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (unhcr 2002).
———, Sexual and Gender-Based Violence against Refugees, Returnees and Internally Displaced Persons. Guidelines for Prevention and Response (unhcr 2003).
———, Guidelines on International Protection No. 6: Religion-Based Refugee Claims under Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (unhcr 2004a).
———, ‘Lubbers Calls for eu Asylum Laws Not to Contravene International Law’ unhcr Press Release (29 March 2004b) accessed 6 December 2014.
———, ‘unhcr Regrets Missed Opportunity to Adopt High eu Asylum Standards’ unhcr Press Release (30 April 2004c) accessed 6 December 2014.
———, unhcr Annotated Comments on the ec Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on Minimum Standards for the Qualification and Status of Third Country Nationals or Stateless Persons as Refugees or as Persons Who Otherwise Need International Protection and the Content of the Protection Granted (OJ L 304/12 of 30.9.2004) (unhcr 2005).
———, Guidelines on International Protection No. 7: The Application of Article 1A(2) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees to Victims of Trafficking and Persons at Risk of Being Trafficked (unhcr 2006).
———, Guidelines on International Protection No. 8: Child Asylum Claims under Articles 1(A)2 and 1(F) of the 1951 Convention and/or 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (unhcr 2009).
———, Improving Asylum Procedures: Comparative Analysis and Recommendations for Law and Practice – Key Findings and Recommendations (unhcr 2010).
———, Definición ampliada de refugiado en América Latina [Extended Definition of the Refugee in Latin America] (unhcr America updated as of June 2011) accessed 6 December 2014.
———, An Efficient and Protective Eurodac. unhcr Comments on the Commission’s Amended Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Establishment of ‘eurodac’ for the Comparison of Fingerprints for the Effective Application of Regulation (eu) No […/…] (Establishing the Criteria and Mechanisms for Determining the Member State Responsible for Examining an Application for International Protection Lodged in One of the Member States by a Third-Country National or a Stateless Person) and to Request Comparisons with eurodac Data by Member States’ Law Enforcement Authorities and Europol for Law Enforcement Purposes andAmending Regulation (eu)No 1077/2011 Establishing a European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale it Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (Recast Version) (unhcr 2012).
———, ‘Philippines Passes Historic Bill to Protect Internally Displaced’ unhcr News Stories (8 February 2013) accessed 6 December 2014.
———, ‘High Seas Tragedies Leave More than 300 Dead on the Mediterranean in Past Week’ unhcr News Stories (26 August 2014a) accessed 6 December 2014.
———, 2014 Syria Regional Response Plan (unhcr 2014b).
United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (unisdr), unisdr TerminologyonDisasterRiskReduction(unisdr 2009).
van der Ploeg, I., ‘The Illegal Body: “Eurodac” and the Politics of Biometric Identification’ (1999) 1 Ethic Inform Technol 295.
van Selm, J., ‘European Refugee Policy: Is There Such a Thing?’ (2005) 115 unhcr N Issues Refugee Res Series.
Väyrynen, R., ‘Complex Humanitarian Emergencies: Concepts and Issues’ in E. Nafziger, F. Stewart and R. Väyrynen (eds), War, Hunger and Displacement: Volume 1 (oup 2000) 43.
Vedsted-Hansen, J., ‘Common eu Standards on Asylum – Optional Harmonization and Exclusive Procedures?’ (2005) 7 ejml 369.
Velluti, S., Reforming the Common European Asylum System – Legislative Developments and Judicial Activism of the European Courts (Springer 2014).
Vermeulen, B., Spijkerboer T. Zwaan K. and Fernhout R., Persecution by Third Parties (University of Nijmegen 1998).
Vernant, J., The Refugee in the Post-War World (George Allen and Unwin 1953).
Waddington, L., ‘Breaking New Ground: The Implications of Ratification of the un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for the European Community’ in O. Mjöll Arnardóttir and G. Quinn (eds), The un Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: European and Scandinavian Perspectives (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2009) 111.
Webber, F., ‘Borderline Justice’ (2012) 54(2) Race & Class 39.
Wilets, J.D., ‘The Demise of the Nation-State: Towards a New Theory of the State under International Law’ (1999) Berkeley J Int’l L 193.
Wilsher, D., ‘Non-State Actors and the Definition of a Refugee in the United Kingdom: Protection, Accountability or Culpability?’ (2003) 15 ijrl 68.
Wisner, B., Blaikie P. Cannon T. and Davis I., At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters (2nd edn Routledge 2003).
World Meteorological Organization (wmo), The Global Climate 2001–2010: A Decade of Weather Extremes – Summary Report (wmo 2013).
York, S., ‘The End of Legal Aid in Immigration – A Barrier to Access to Justice for Migrants and a Decline in the Rule of Law’ (2013) 27(2) jianl 106.
Zambelli, P., ‘Problematic Trends in the Analysis of State Protection and Article 1F(a) Exclusion in Canadian Refugee Law’ (2011) 23 ijrl 52.
