European & international law Criminal law & procedure
Author, co-author :
VAVOULA, Niovi ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Law (DL) ; Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
Consultation of EU Immigration Databases for Law Enforcement Purposes: A Privacy and Data Protection Assessment
Mitsilegas, V. (2009). EU Criminal Law. Oxford and Portland: Hart.
Vavoula, N. (forthcoming 2020). Immigration and Privacy in the Law of the European Union: The Case of Databases. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
Mitsilegas, V. (2005). Controle des Etrangers, des Passagers, des Citoyens: Surveillance et Anti-Terrorisme. Cultures et Conflits 58, pp. 185-197.
Brouwer, E. (2008). Digital Borders and Real Rights: Effective Remedies for Third-Country Nationals in the Schengen Information System. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Mitsilegas, V. (2009). The Border Paradox: The Surveillance of Movement in a Union without Internal Frontiers, in: H. Lindahl (Ed.), A Right to Inclusion and Exclusion? Normative Fault Lines of the EU's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Oxford and Portland: Hart, pp. 33-63.
Baldaccini, A. (2008). Counter-Terrorism and the EU Strategy for Border Security: Framing Suspects with Biometric Documents and Databases. European Journal of Migration and Law 10(1), pp. 31-49.
Guild, E. (2007). Unreadable Papers? The EU's First Experiences with Biometrics: Examining Eurodac and the EU's Borders, in: J. Lodge (Ed.), Are You Who You Say You Are? The EU and Biometric Borders. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, pp. 31-43.
De Hert, P. and Gutwirth, S. (2006). Privacy, Data Protection and Law Enforcement: Opacity of the Individual and Transparency of Power' in: E. Claes, A. Duff and S. Gutwirth (Eds.), Privacy and the Criminal Law. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 61-104.
Gonzalez Fuster, G. 2015. Fighting For Your Right to What Exactly? The Convoluted Case Law of the EU Court of Justice on Privacy and/or Personal Data Protection. Birbeck Law Review 2(2), pp. 263-278.
Vavoula, N. (2015). The Recast Eurodac Regulation: Are Asylum Seekers Treated as Suspected Criminals?, in: C. Bauloz and others (Eds.), Seeking Asylum in the European Union: Selected Protection Issues Raised by the Second Phase of the Common European Asylum System. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, pp. 247-273.
Geddes, A. (2001). International Migration and State Sovereignty in an Integrating Europe. International Migration 39(6), pp. 21-42.
Bigo, D. (1996). Polices en Réseax. L' Éxperience Europeénne. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po;.
Bigo, D. (2002). Security and Immigration: Toward a Critique of the Governmentality of Unease. Alternatives 27, pp. 63-92.
Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. (2006). Filtering Out the Risk Migrant: Migration Control, Risk Theory and the EU. 52/2006, AMID Working Paper Series, Aalborg Universitet: Akademiet for Migrationsstudier i Danmark.
Beck, U. (2002). The Terrorist Threat: World Risk Society Revisited. Theory, Culture & Society 19(4), pp. 39-55.
UNHCR (2012). An Efficient and Protective Eurodac, Geneva: UNHCR, pp. 10-11.
Benedita Menezes Queiroz (2018) Illegally Staying in the EU-An Analysis of Illegality in EU Migration Law. Oxford and Portland: Hart, Chapter 4 III.
Amoore, A. and de Goede, M. (2008). (Eds.) Risk and the War on Terror, Abingdonon-Thames: Routledge.
Boehm, F. (2012). Information Sharing and Data Protection in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice-Towards Harmonised Data Protection Principles for Information Exchange at EU-level. New York: Springer, p. 352.
Vavoula, N. (2018). Prevention, Surveillance, and the Transformation of Citizenship in the 'Security Union': The Case of Foreign Terrorist Fighters, in: Alternative, Informal, and Transitional Types of Criminal Justice and the Legitimacy of New Sanction Models in the Global Risk Society. U. Sieber and others (Eds.) pp. 307-334, .
Peers, S. (2015). EU Immigration and Asylum Law. 2nd edn, Leiden: Brill, p. 437.
Quintel, T. (2018). Connecting Personal Data of Third Country Nationals: Interoperability of EU Databases in the Light of the CJEU's Case Law on Data Retention. University of Luxembourg Working Paper 2/2018, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=3132506 accessed 27 August 2019.
