VAVOULA, Niovi ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Law (DL) ; Queen Mary, University of London, United Kingdom
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
Databases for Non-EU nationals and the right to private life: Towards a system of generalised surveillance of movement?
Elspeth Guild, European Community Law from a Migrant’s Perspective (The Hague: Kluwer, 2001), chapters 7-8.
Monica den Boer, ed., Schengen, Judicial Cooperation and Policy Coordination (Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration, 1997).
Eckart Wagner, “The Integration of Schengen into the Framework of the European Union,” Legal Issues of European Integration 25, no. 2 (1998): 1-60.
Pieter Jan Kuijper, “Some Legal Problems Associated with the Communitarization of Policy on Visas, Asylum and Immigration under the Amsterdam Treaty and Incorporation of the Schengen Acquis,” Common Market Law Review 37, no. 2 (2000): 345-366.
Didier Bigo and Elspeth Guild, eds., Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement into and within Europe (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005).
Valsamis Mitsilegas, “Human Rights, Terrorism and the Quest for ‘Border Security’,” in Individual Guarantees in the European Judicial Area in Criminal Matters, eds. Marco Pedrazzi, Ilaria Viarengo, and Alessandra Lang (Brussels:Bruylant, 2011), 85-112.
Valsamis Mitsilegas, “Immigration Control in an Era of Globalisation:Deflecting Foreigners, Weakening Citizens, Strengthening the State,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 19, no. 1 (2012): 3-60.
Valsamis Mitsilegas, “The Law of the Border and the Borders of Law: Rethinking Border Control from the Perspective of the Individual,” in Rethinking Border Control for a Globalizing World, ed. Leanne Weber (Oxford: Routledge, 2015), 15-32.
Bernard Ryan and Valsamis Mitsilegas, eds., Extraterritorial Immigration Control (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010).
Communication from the Commission, The European Agenda on Security, COM (2015) 185 final (28 April 2015).
Philippe Bonditti, “From Territorial Spaces to Networks: A Foucaultian Approach to the Implementation of Biometry,” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 29, no. 4 (2004): 465-482.
Michiel Besters and Frans Brom, "‘Greedy’ Information Technology: The Digitalization of the European Migration Policy,” European Journal of Migration and Law 12, no. 4 (2010): 455-470.
Ben Hayes, “NeoConOpticon: The EU Security-Industrial Complex,” Transnational Institute/ Statewatch, 2009, 35.
Katja Lindskov Jacobsen, “Making Design Safe for Citizens:A Hidden History of Humanitarian Experimentation,” Citizenship Studies 14, no. 1 (2010): 89-103.
Els Kindt, Privacy and Data Protection Issues of Biometric Identifiers (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013).
Anil Jain, Ruud Bolle, and Sharath Pankanti, Biometrics. Personal Identification in Networked Society (New York: Springer, 2006).
European Commission, “Biometrics at the Frontiers: Assessing the Impact on Society,” 2005, www.statewatch.org/news/2005/mar/Report-IPTS-Biometrics-for-LIBE.pdf.
Elspeth Guild, Sergio Carrera and Alejandro Eggenschwiler, “Informing the Borders Debate,” CEPS, 2009, 3, www.ceps.eu/system/files/book/1843.pdf.
Annaliese Baldaccini, “Counter-Terrorism and the EU Strategy for Border Security: Framing Suspects with Biometric Documents and Databases,” European Journal of Migration and Law 10, no. 1 (2008): 31-49.
Valsamis Mitsilegas, “Border Security in the European Union: Towards Centralised Controls and Maximum Surveillance,” in Whose Freedom, Security and Justice? EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy, eds. Elspeth Guild, Helen Toner, and Annaliese Baldaccini (Portland: Hart, 2007), 359-394.
Valsamis Mitsilegas, “The Border Paradox: The Surveillance of Movement in a Union without Internal Frontiers,” in A Right to Inclusion and Exclusion? Normative Fault Lines of the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, ed. Hans Lindahl (Oxford: Hart, 2009), 33-64.
Roger Clarke, “Introduction to Dataveillance and Information Privacy, and Definitions of Terms,” Roger Clarke’s Website, 15 August 1997.
Dennis Broeders, “The New Digital Borders of Europe: EU Databases and the Surveillance of Irregular Migrants,” International Sociology 22, no. 1 (2007): 71-92.
Didier Bigo, “Globalized (In)Security: The Field and the Ban-Opticon,” in Terror, Insecurity and Liberty: Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes after 9/11, eds. Didier Bigo and Anastassia Tsoukala (Oxford: Routledge, 2008), 10-48.
Bernd Schattenberg, “SIS: Privacy and Legal Protection,” in Free Movement of Persons in Europe: Legal Problems and Experience, eds. Henry Schermers et al. (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993), 43.
Evelien Brouwer, Digital Borders and Real Rights: Effective Remedies for Third-Country Nationals in the Schengen Information System (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008), 47-57.
Elspeth Guild, “Moving the Borders of Europe,” Inaugural lecture, University of Nijmegen 2000, 24, http://cmr.jur.ru.nl/cmr/docs/oratie.eg.pdf.
Brouwer, Digital Borders and Real Rights, 66-68.
Schengen Joint Supervisory Authority, Final Report of the Schengen Joint Supervisory Authority on the Follow-Up of the Recommendations Concerning the Use of Article 96 Alerts in the Schengen Information System (26 November 2010).
Proposal for a Regulation Establishing the Criteria and Mechanisms for Determining the Member State Responsible for Examining an Application for International Protection Lodged in One of the Member States by a Third-Country National or a Stateless Person, COM (2016) 270 final (4 May 2016).
Jonathan Aus, “Eurodac: A Solution Looking for a Problem?" European Integration Online Papers 10 (2006): 1-26.
Steve Peers and Nicole Rogers, eds., EU Immigration and Asylum Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2006), 263-268.
Niovi Vavoula, Immigration and Privacy in the Law of the European Union: The Case of Databases (Leiden: Brill, 2019), chapter 4.
Elspeth Guild, “Unreadable Papers? The EU’s First Experiences with Biometrics: Examining Eurodac and the EU’s Borders,” in Are You Who You Say You Are? The EU and Biometric Borders, ed. Juliet Lodge (Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2007), 32.
Annalisa Meloni, “The Development of a Common Visa Policy under the Treaty of Amsterdam,” Common Market Law Review 42, no. 5 (2005): 1357-1381.
Valsamis Mitsilegas, “Borders, Security and the Transatlantic Cooperation in the Twenty-First Century: Identity and Privacy in an Era of Globalized Surveillance,” in Immigration Policy and Security, eds. Terri Givens, Gary Freeman, and David Leal (New York:Routledge, 2009), 148-166.
Louise Amoore and Marieke de Goede, eds., Risk and the War on Terror (Oxford: Routledge, 2008).
Joanna Parkin, “The Difficult Road to the Schengen Information System II - The Legacy of Laboratories and the Cost for Fundamental Rights and the Rule of Law,” CEPS, 2011.
Valsamis Mitsilegas, EU Criminal Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009), 241.
Evelien Brouwer, “The Use of Biometrics in EU Databases and Identity Documents: Keeping Track of Foreigners’ Movements and Rights,” in Are You Who You Say You Are? The EU and Biometric Borders, ed. Juliet Lodge (Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers, 2007), 45-66.
Ben Hayes, “From the Schengen Information System to the SIS II and the Visa Information System (VIS): The Proposals Explained,” Statewatch, February 2004, 4.
Baldaccini, “Counter-Terrorism and the EU Strategy for Border Security,” 38.
Report from the Commission, The Availability and Readiness of Technology to Identify a Person on the Basis of Fingerprints Held in the Second Generation Schengen Information System (SIS II), COM (2016) 93 final (29 February 2016), 7.
Communication from the Commission, Improved Effectiveness, Enhanced Interoperability and Synergies among European Databases in the Area of Justice and Home Affairs, COM (2005) 597 final (11 November 2005).
Brigitta Juster and Vassilis Tsianos, “Erase Them! Eurodac and Digital Deportability,” Transversal/EIPCP Multilingual Webjournal, February 2013, http://eipcp.net/transversal/0313/ kuster-tsianos/en.
Valsamis Mitsilegas and Niovi Vavoula, “The Normalisation of Surveillance in an Era of Global Mobility,” in Handbook of Migration and Security, ed. Philippe Bourbeau (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2017), 232-251.
Communication from the Commission, Stronger and Smarter Information Systems for Borders and Security, COM (2016) 205 final (6 April 2016).
Vavoula, Immigration and Privacy in the Law of the European Union, chapter 5.
Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to Register Entry and Exit Data of Third Country Nationals Crossing the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union, COM (2013) 95 final (28 February 2013).
Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Establishing a Registered Traveller Programme, COM (2013) 97 final (28 February 201.
Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as Regards the Use of the Entry/Exit System (EES) and the Registered Traveller Programme (RTP), COM (2013) 96 final (28 February 2013).
Communication from the Commission, Preparing the Next Steps in Border Management, COM (2008) 69 final (13 February 2008).
Communication from the Commission, Smart Borders - Options and the Way Ahead, COM (2011) 680 final (25 October 2011), 7.
Susie Alegre, Julien Jeandesboz, and Niovi Vavoula, European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS): Border Management, Fundamental Rights and Data Protection, Study for the European Parliament, PE 583.148, 2017, 23-26.
Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, COM (2016) 272 final (4 May 2016).
Commission Proposal, COM (2016) 272 final, art. 2(1).
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Establishment, Operation and Use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the Field of Border Checks, COM (2016) 882 final (12 December 2016).
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Establishment, Operation and Use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) in the Field of Police Cooperation and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters, COM (2016) 883 final (21 December 2016).
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Use of the Schengen Information System for the Return of Illegally Staying Third Country Nationals, COM (2016) 881 final (21 December 2016).
Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, COM (2018) 302 final (16 May 2018).
Paul De Hert and Serge Gutwirth, “Interoperability of Police Databases within the EU: An Accountable Political Choice?" International Review of Law Computers & Technology 20, no. 1-2 (2006): 21-22.
High Level Expert Group on Information Systems and Interoperability, Final Report (May 2017), http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetailDoc&id=32600&no=1.
Vavoula, Immigration and Privacy in the Law of the European Union, chapter 1.
Elspeth Guild et al., New Approaches, Alternative Avenues and Means of Access to Asylum Procedures for Persons Seeking International Protection, Doc. PE509.989, 2014.
Vavoula, Immigration Control and Privacy in the Law of the European Union, chapter 4.
Jesuit Refugee Service, “Protection Interrupted: The Dublin Regulation’s Impact on Asylum Seekers’ Protection The DIASP Project,” 2013, www.refworld.org/docid/51d152174.html.
Susan Fratzke, “Not Adding Up: The Fading Promise of Europe’s Dublin System,” Migration Policy Institute, 2015.
Guild, “Moving the Borders of Europe,” 9.
European Commission, Evaluation of the Implementation of Dublin III Regulation - Final Report, DG-Home (2016), 56-57.
Valsamis Mitsilegas, The Criminalisation of Irregular Migration in Europe: Challenges for Human Rights and the Rule of Law (London: Springer, 2015), 34.
Ben Hayes and Mathias Vermeulen, Borderline - The EU’s New Border Surveillance Initiatives (Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 2012), 41.
Alegre, Jeandesboz, and Vavoula, “European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS),” 27.
Stephen Kabera Karanja, Transparency and Proportionality in the Schengen Information System and Border Control Cooperation (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008), 216.
Brouwer, Digital Borders and Real Rights, 61-62.
Vavoula, Immigration and Privacy in the Law of the European Union, chapter 2.
European Migration Network, “Ad Hoc Query on Procedures for Entering Foreigner’s Data into the Schengen Information System,” 2014, http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-wedo/ networks/european_migration_network/reports/docs/ad-hoc-queries/border/505_emn_ahq_ procedures_entering_foreigners_data_into_the_sis__7jan2014_%wider_dissemination%29.pdf.
Commission Proposal, COM (2018) 302 final.
Kindt, Privacy and Data Protection Issues of Biometric Identifiers, 59.
Vavoula, Immigration and Privacy in the Law of the European Union, chapter 3.
Niovi Vavoula, “The Recast Eurodac Regulation: Are Asylum Seekers Treated as Suspected Criminals?" in Seeking Asylum in the European Union: Selected Protection Issues Raised by the Second Phase of the Common European Asylum System, eds. Céline Bauloz et al. (Leiden: Brill, 2015), 260.
Mitsilegas, “Human Rights, Terrorism and the Quest for ‘Border Security’,” 109.
Tony Bunyan, “The Point of No Return - Interoperability Morphs into the Creation of a Big Brother Centralised EU State Database Including All Existing and Future Justice and Home Affairs Databases,” Statewatch, May 2018, 10.
De Hert and Gutwirth, “Interoperability of Police Databases within the EU,” 27.
Teresa Quintel, “Connecting Personal Data of Third Country Nationals: Interoperability of EU Databases in the Light of the CJEU’s Case Law on Data Retention,” University of Luxembourg Law Working Papers, March 2018, 16.
David Lyon, Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life (Buckingham: Open University Press, 2001).
