Business model archetypes for data marketplaces in the automotive industry: Contrasting business models of data marketplaces with varying ownership and orientation structures
Data economy; Automotive industry; Business model; Data marketplaces
Résumé :
[en] Policymakers and analysts are heavily promoting data marketplaces to foster data trading between companies. Existing business model literature covers individually owned, multilateral data marketplaces. However, these particular types of data marketplaces hardly reach commercial exploitation. This paper develops business model archetypes for the full array of data marketplace types, ranging from private to independent ownership and from a hierarchical to a market orientation. Through exploratory interviews and case analyses, we create a business model taxonomy. Patterns in our taxonomy reveal four business model archetypes. We find that privately-owned data marketplaces with hierarchical orientation apply the aggregating data marketplace archetype. Consortium-owned data marketplaces apply the archetypes of aggregating data marketplace with additional brokering service and consulting data marketplace. Independently owned data marketplaces with market orientation apply the facilitating data marketplace archetype. Our results provide a basis for configurational theory that explains the performance of data marketplace business models. Our results also provide a basis for specifying boundary conditions for theory on data marketplace business models, as, for instance, the importance of network effects differs strongly between the archetypes.
Centre de recherche :
Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT) > FINATRAX - Digital Financial Services and Cross-organizational Digital Transformations
Disciplines :
Gestion des systèmes d’information Sciences informatiques
Auteur, co-auteur :
Bergman, Rômy; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
ABBAS, Antragama Ewa ; University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > FINATRAX ; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Jung, Sven; Institute of Technology Management (ITEM), University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
Werker, Claudia; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
de Reuver, Mark; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Business model archetypes for data marketplaces in the automotive industry: Contrasting business models of data marketplaces with varying ownership and orientation structures
Date de publication/diffusion :
mai 2022
Titre du périodique :
Electronic Markets
ISSN :
1019-6781
eISSN :
1422-8890
Maison d'édition :
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, under Grant Agreement no 871481 – Trusted Secure Data Sharing Space (TRUSTS), from the H2020-ICT-2018-20/H2020-ICT-2019-2 Call. This paper is partly based on the thesis work of Bergman ().
Abbas, A. E. (2021). Designing Data Governance Mechanisms for Data Marketplace Meta-Platforms. Proceedings 34th Bled eConference – Digital Support from Crisis to Progressive Change, Online.
Abbas, A. E., Agahari, W., van de Ven, M., Zuiderwijk, A., & de Reuver, M. (2021). Business Data Sharing through Data Marketplaces: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(7), 3321–3339. 10.3390/jtaer16070180
Agahari, W., Dolci, R., & de Reuver, M. (2021). Business model implications of privacy-preserving technologies in data marketplaces: The case of multi-party computation. ECIS 2021 Research Papers, Marrakesh, Morocco.
Alt, R. (2021). Electronic Markets on digital platforms and AI. Electronic Markets, 31(2), 233–241. 10.1007/s12525-021-00489-w DOI: 10.1007/s12525-021-00489-w
Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6‐7), 493–520. 10.1002/smj.187 DOI: 10.1002/smj.187
Avyukt, A., Ramachandran, G., & Krishnamachari, B. (2021). A Decentralized Review System for Data Marketplaces. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC), Sydney, Australia.
Bergman, R. (2020). A Business Model Taxonomy for Data Marketplaces: Data Trade in Various Trading Structures. MSc thesis. Delft University of Technology. 10.1177/1094428116641191
Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., & de Reuver, M. (2019). Digitalization, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalizing SMEs? Telecommunications Policy, 43(9), 101828. 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101828 DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101828
Busse, C., Kach, A. P., & Wagner, S. M. (2017). Boundary conditions: What they are, how to explore them, why we need them, and when to consider them. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 574–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116641191 DOI: 10.1177/1094428116641191
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 354–363. 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010
Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555. 10.1093/icc/11.3.529 DOI: 10.1093/icc/11.3.529
Christiaanse, E., & Markus, M. L. (2002). Business-to-business electronic marketplaces and the structure of channel relationships. ICIS 2002 Proceedings, Barcelona, Spain.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
Curry, E. (2016). The big data value chain: definitions, concepts, and theoretical approaches. New horizons for a data-driven economy (pp. 29–37). Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-21569-3_3
De Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018). The digital platform: a research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135. 10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3 DOI: 10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
Demchenko, Y., Los, W., & de Laat, C. (2018). Data as economic goods: Definitions, properties, challenges, enabling technologies for future data markets.ITUJournal-ICT Discoveries, 1(2). https://hdl.handle.net/11245.1/097197d2-8084-47e3-b140-2996919a60d9
Drees, H., Kubitza, D. O., Lipp, J., Pretzsch, S., & Langdon, C. S. (2021). Mobility Data Space–First Implementation and Business Opportunities. 27 th ITS World Congress. Hamburg, Germany.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/258557
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 25–32. 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 DOI: 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
European Commission (2020a). The European Data Market Monitoring Tool. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9fb0599f-c18f-11ea-b3a4-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
European Commission (2020b). A European Strategy for Data. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0066
European Commission (2020c). Work stream on Data. https://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae/document.cfm?doc_id=68354
Fernandez, R. C., Subramaniam, P., & Franklin, M. J. (2020). Data market platforms. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, Online.
Fruhwirth, M., Rachinger, M., & Prlja, E. (2020). Discovering Business Models of Data Marketplaces. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, the United States.
Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. New York University Press.
Gregor, S. (2006). The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148742
Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., & Kyriakou, H. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence and data network effects for creating user value. Academy of management review, 46(3), 534–551. 10.5465/amr.2019.0178 DOI: 10.5465/amr.2019.0178
Haftor, D. M., Climent, C., R., & Lundström, J. E. (2021). How machine learning activates data network effects in business models: Theory advancement through an industrial case of promoting ecological sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 131, 196–205. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.015 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.015
Hartmann, P. M., Zaki, M., Feldmann, N., & Neely, A. (2014). Big data for big business? A taxonomy of data-driven business models used by start-up firms.Cambridge Service Alliance,1–29.
Kaiser, C., Stocker, A., Viscusi, G., Fellmann, M., & Richter, A. (2021). Conceptualising value creation in data-driven services: The case of vehicle data. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102335. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102335
Keller, R., & König, C. (2014). A Reference Model to Support Risk Identification in Cloud Networks. ICIS 2014 Proceedings.
Koutroumpis, P., Leiponen, A., & Thomas, L. D. (2017). The (unfulfilled) potential of data marketplaces (No. 53). ETLA working papers.
Koutroumpis, P., Leiponen, A., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2020). Markets for data. Industrial and Corporate Change, 29(3), 645–660. 10.1093/icc/dtaa002 DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtaa002
Langley, D. J., van Doorn, J., Ng, I. C., Stieglitz, S., Lazovik, A., & Boonstra, A. (2021). The Internet of Everything: Smart things and their impact on business models. Journal of Business Research. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.035 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.035
Lawrenz, S., & Rausch, A. (2021). Dont buy a pig in a poke a framework for checking consumer requirements in a data marketplace. Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, the United States.
Lis, D., & Otto, B. (2020). Data Governance in Data Ecosystems–Insights from Organizations. AMCIS 2020 Proceedings, Online.
Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., Brandimarte, L., Diefenbach, S., Kroschke, M., & Wirtz, J. (2021). Corporate digital responsibility. Journal of Business Research, 122, 875–888. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006
Mao, W., Zheng, Z., & Wu, F. (2019). Pricing for Revenue Maximization in IoT Data Markets: An Information Design Perspective. IEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Paris, France.
Martens, B., & Mueller-Langer, F. (2018). Access to digital car data and competition in aftersales services. Available at SSRN3262807.
Muschalle, A., Stahl, F., Löser, A., & Vossen, G. (2012). Pricing approaches for data markets. International workshop on business intelligence for the real-time enterprise, Berlin, Germany.
MyAutoData (2020). Generate money and benefits with your own vehicle data. Retrieved 20/09/2021 from https://news.cision.com/de/myautodata-presse/r/generate-money-and-benefits-with-your-own-vehicle-data,c3222215
Nickerson, R. C., Varshney, U., & Muntermann, J. (2013). A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(3), 336–359. 10.1057/ejis.2012.26 DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2012.26
Nicolaou, A. I., & McKnight, D. H. (2006). Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 332–351 DOI: 10.1287/isre.1060.0103
Niu, C., Zheng, Z., Wu, F., Tang, S., & Chen, G. (2020). Online Pricing with Reserve Price Constraint for Personal Data Markets. 2020 IEEE 36th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Texas, the United States.
Oberländer, A. M., Lösser, B., & Rau, D. (2019). Taxonomy research in information systems: A systematic assessment. Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
Park, J. S., Youn, T. Y., Kim, H. B., Rhee, K. H., & Shin, S. U. (2018). Smart Contract-Based Review System for an IoT Data Marketplace. Sensors, 18(10), 3577. 10.3390/s18103577 DOI: 10.3390/s18103577
Pavlov, P. (2002). Institutional trust in interorganizational exchange relationships: the role of electronic B2B marketplaces. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 105–143.
Perera, C., Wakenshaw, S. Y., Baarslag, T., Haddadi, H., Bandara, A. K., Mortier, R., Crabtree, A., Ng, I. C. L., McAuley, D., & Crowcroft, J. (2017). Valorising the IoT databox: creating value for everyone. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 28(1), e3125. DOI: 10.1002/ett.3125
Pillmann, J., Wietfeld, C., Zarcula, A., Raugust, T., & Alonso, D. C. (2017). Novel common vehicle information model (CVIM) for future automotive vehicle big data marketplaces. 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), California, the United States.
Powell, W. (1990). Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.
Scaria, E., Berghmans, A., Pont, M., Arnaut, C., & Leconte, S. (2018). Study on data sharing between companies in Europe (A study prepared for the European Commission Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology, Issue). https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8b8776ff-4834-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
Schmid, B. (2020). What kind of electronic markets do we deserve? Electronic Markets, 30(1), 53–54. 10.1007/s12525-020-00400-z DOI: 10.1007/s12525-020-00400-z
Schomakers, EM., Lidynia, C. & Ziefle, M. (2020) All of me? Users’ preferences for privacy-preserving data markets and the importance of anonymity. Electronic Markets, 30(3), 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00404-9
Schomm, F., Stahl, F., & Vossen, G. (2013). Marketplaces for data: an initial survey. ACM SIGMOD Record, 42(1), 15–26. 10.1145/2481528.2481532 DOI: 10.1145/2481528.2481532
Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 20–24. 10.5465/amj.2007.24160882 DOI: 10.5465/amj.2007.24160882
Spiekermann, M. (2019). Data Marketplaces: Trends and Monetisation of Data Goods. Intereconomics, 54(4), 208–216. 10.1007/s10272-019-0826-z DOI: 10.1007/s10272-019-0826-z
Spiekermann, S., Acquisti, A., Böhme, R., & Hui, K. L. (2015). The challenges of personal data markets and privacy. Electronic Markets, 25(2), 161–167. 10.1007/s12525-015-0191-0 DOI: 10.1007/s12525-015-0191-0
Stahl, F., Schomm, F., Vossen, G., & Vomfell, L. (2016). A classification framework for data marketplaces. Vietnam Journal of Computer Science, 3(3), 137–143. 10.1007/s40595-016-0064-2 DOI: 10.1007/s40595-016-0064-2
Staub, N., Haki, K., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2021). Taxonomy of digital platforms: A business model perspective. Proceddings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 54), Hawaii, the United States.
Szopinski, D., Schoormann, T., & Kundisch, D. (2019). Because your taxonomy is worth it: Towards a framework for taxonomy evaluation. Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden.
Täuscher, K., & Laudien, S. M. (2018). Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces. European Management Journal, 36(3), 319–329. 10.1016/j.emj.2017.06.005 DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2017.06.005
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003 DOI: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
Thomson, S. B., & SB. (2010). Sample size and grounded theory. Journal of Administration and Governance, 5(1), 45–52.
TomTom (2021). We are mapmakers, providing location technology for drivers, carmakers, enterprises and developers. Retrieved 16/09/2021 from https://www.tomtom.com/
Tönnissen, S., Beinke, J. H., & Teuteberg, F. (2020). Understanding token-based ecosystems–a taxonomy of blockchain-based business models of start-ups. Electronic Markets, 30(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00396-6 DOI: 10.1007/s12525-020-00396-6
Travizano, M., Sarraute, C., Dolata, M., French, A. M., & Treiblmaier, H. (2020). Wibson: A Case Study of a Decentralized, Privacy-Preserving Data Marketplace. In (pp. 149–170). In: Treiblmaier, H., Clohessy, T. (eds) Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology Use Cases. Progress in IS. Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978-3-030-44337-5_8
van de Ven, M., Abbas, A. E., Kwee, Z., & de Reuver, M. (2021). Creating a Taxonomy of Business Models for Data Marketplaces. 34th Bled eConference - Digital Support from Crisis to Progressive Change, Online.
Virkar, S., Pereira, V., G., & Vignoli, M. (2019). Investigating the Social, Political, Economic and Cultural Implications of Data Trading. In Electronic Government. EGOV 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 215–229), vol 11685. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27325-5_17
Weking, J., Mandalenakis, M., Hein, A., Hermes, S., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). The impact of blockchain technology on business models–a taxonomy and archetypal patterns. Electronic Markets, 30(2), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00386-3 DOI: 10.1007/s12525-019-00386-3
Williamson, O. E. (1973). Markets and hierarchies: some elementary considerations. The American economic review, 63(2), 316–325.
Williamson, O. E. (1989). Transaction cost economics. Handbook of industrial organization, 1, 135–182. DOI: 10.1016/S1573-448X(89)01006-X
Zheng, Z., Peng, Y., Wu, F., Tang, S., & Chen, G. (2020). ARETE: On Designing Joint Online Pricing and Reward Sharing Mechanisms for Mobile Data Markets. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 19(4), 769–787. 10.1109/tmc.2019.2900243 DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2019.2900243
