Data economy; Data marketplaces; Data sharing; Data sovereignty; Meta-platforms
Résumé :
[en] In the data economy, data sovereignty is often conceptualized as data providers’ ability to control their shared data. While control is essential, the current literature overlooks how this facet interrelates with other sovereignty facets and contextual conditions. Drawing from social contract theory and insights from 31 expert interviews, we propose a data sovereignty conceptual framework encompassing protection, participation, and provision facets. The protection facets establish data sharing foundations by emphasizing baseline rights, such as data ownership. Building on this foundation, the participation facet, through responsibility divisions, steers the provision facets. Provision comprises facets such as control, security, and compliance mechanisms, thus ensuring that foundational rights are preserved during and after data sharing. Contextual conditions (data type, organizational size, and business data sharing setting) determine the level of difficulty in realizing sovereignty facets. For instance, if personal data is shared, privacy becomes a relevant protection facet, leading to challenges of ownership between data providers and data subjects, compliance demands, and control enforcement. Our novel conceptualization paves the way for coherent and comprehensive theory development concerning data sovereignty as a complex, multi-faceted construct.
Centre de recherche :
Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT) > FINATRAX - Digital Financial Services and Cross-organizational Digital Transformations
Disciplines :
Gestion des systèmes d’information Sciences informatiques
Auteur, co-auteur :
ABBAS, Antragama Ewa ; University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > FINATRAX ; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
van Velzen, Thomas; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Ofe, Hosea; School of Information Technology, Department of Intelligent Systems and Digital Design, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
van de Kaa, Geerten; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Zuiderwijk, Anneke; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
de Reuver, Mark; Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Beyond control over data: Conceptualizing data sovereignty from a social contract perspective
Date de publication/diffusion :
mars 2024
Titre du périodique :
Electronic Markets
ISSN :
1019-6781
eISSN :
1422-8890
Maison d'édition :
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Titre particulier du numéro :
Data Economy in a Globalized World, Opportunities and Challenges for Public and Private Organizations
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme, under Grant Agreement no 871481 – Trusted Secure Data Sharing Space (TRUSTS), from the H2020-ICT-2018-20/H2020-ICT-2019-2 Call.
Aaltonen, A., Alaimo, C., & Kallinikos, J. (2021). The making of data commodities: Data analytics as an embedded process. Journal of Management Information Systems,38(2), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.1912928
Abbas, A. E., Agahari, W., van de Ven, M., Zuiderwijk, A., & de Reuver, M. (2021). Business data sharing through data marketplaces: A systematic literature review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research,16(7), 3321–3339. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070180
Abbas, A. E., Ofe, H., Zuiderwijk, A., de Reuver, M. (2022). Preparing future business data sharing via a meta-platform for data marketplaces: Exploring antecedents and consequences of data sovereignty. In 35th Bled eConference - Digital Restructuring and Human (Re-Action), Bled, Slovenia.
S.A. Azcoitia N. Laoutaris A Survey of Data Marketplaces and Their Business Models SIGMOD Record 2022 51 3 18 29 10.1145/3572751.3572755
Bodin, J. (1576). Les six livres de la Republique. Chez Iacques du Puys.
Brouthers, K. D. (2002). Institutional, cultural, and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491013
Coe, N. M., & Yang, C. (2022). Mobile gaming production networks, platform business groups, and the market power of China’s tencent. Annals of the American Association of Geographers,112(2), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1933887
Cook, K. S. (2015). Exchange: Social. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition) (pp. 482–488). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32056-6
C.J. Dahlman The Problem of Externality The Journal of Law and Economics 1979 22 1 141 162 10.1086/466936
De Filippi, P., McCarthy, S. (2012). Cloud computing: Centralization and data sovereignty. European Journal of Law and Technology, 3 (2), 1–23. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2167372
R. Dubin Theory Building 1978 Rev The Free Press
Duisberg, A. (2022). Legal aspects of IDS: Data sovereignty—what does it imply? In Designing Data Spaces: The Ecosystem Approach to Competitive Advantage (pp. 61–90). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93975-5_5
Edwards, R., Holland, J. (2013). What Is Qualitative Interviewing? A&C Black.
Ellis, E. (2006). Citizenship and property rights: A new look at social contract theory. The Journal of Politics,68(3), 544–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00444.x
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing,62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5 (1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Fassnacht, M., Benz, C., Heinz, D., Leimstoll, J., & Satzger, G. (2023). Barriers to data sharing among private sector organizations. In Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, the United States.
Floetgen, R. J., Strauss, J., Weking, J., Hein, A., Urmetzer, F., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2021). Introducing Platform Ecosystem Resilience: Leveraging Mobility Platforms and Their Ecosystems for the New Normal During COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 30 (3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2021.1884009
Friend, C. (2004). Social contract theory. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Fruhwirth, M., Rachinger, M., Prlja, E. (2020). Discovering business models of data marketplaces. In Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, the United States.
Furness, M., & Trautner, B. (2020). Reconstituting social contracts in conflict-affected mena countries: Whither Iraq and Libya? World Development, 135 (1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105085
Gantz, J., Reinsel, D. (2012). The Digital Universe in 2020: Big data, bigger digital shadows, and biggest growth in the Far East. https://datastorageasean.com/sites/default/files/idc-the-digital-universe-in-2020.pdf. Accessed 26 Nov 2023.
Gelhaar, J., & Otto, B. (2020). Challenges in the emergence of data ecosystems. PACIS 2020 Proceedings, Dubai, the United Arab Emirates.
Glennon, M., Kolding, M., Sundbland, M., Croce, C. L., Micheletti, G., Raczko, N., Freitas, L., Moise, C., Osimo, D. (2023). D2.4 second report on facts and figures (European DATA Market Study 2021–2023). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/results-new-european-data-market-study-2021-2023. Accessed 26 Nov 2023.
Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An Introduction (Fifth ed.). Pearson Boston.
Gregor, S., Kruse, L. C., & Seidel, S. (2020). The anatomy of a design principle. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21 (6), 1622–1652. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00649
Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30 (3), 611–642. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148742
Hellmeier, M., von Scherenberg, F. (2023). A delimitation of data sovereignty from digital and technological sovereignty. In European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2023) Research Papers, Kristiansand, Norway.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28 (1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
Hewage, U. (2018). Factors Influencing the Effective Information Sharing in Sri Lankan Export-Led Manufacturing Supply Chains. In 2018 International Conference on Production and Operations Management Society (POMS), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. https://doi.org/10.1109/poms.2018.8629440
Hickey, S. (2011). The politics of social protection: What do we get from a ‘social contract’ approach? Canadian Journal of Development Studies/revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement,32(4), 426–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2011.647447
Hinsley, F. H. (1986). Sovereignty (Second ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Penguin Books (reprint 1985).
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology,63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
Hummel, P., Braun, M., Tretter, M., & Dabrock, P. (2021). Data sovereignty: A review. Big Data & Society, 8 (1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720982012
Jussen, I., Schweihoff, J., Dahms, V., Möller, F., Otto, B. (2023). Data sharing fundamentals: characteristics and definition. In Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii, the United States.
Ke, W., & Wei, K. K. (2007). Factors affecting trading partners’ knowledge sharing: using the lens of transaction cost economics and socio-political theories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications,6(3), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2006.06.006
J. Kembro D. Näslund J. Olhager Information sharing across multiple supply chain tiers: A delphi study on antecedents International Journal of Production Economics 2017 193 77 86 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.032
Koch, K., Krenn, S., Pellegrino, D., Ramacher, S. (2021). Privacy-Preserving Analytics for Data Markets Using MPC. In M. Friedewald, S. Schiffner, & S. Krenn (Eds.), Privacy and Identity Management (Vol. 619, pp. 226–246). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72465-8_13
Kukutai, T., Taylor, J. (2016). Indigenous data sovereignty: Toward an agenda. ANU Press.
P. Lashmar No More Sources? Journalism Practice 2017 11 6 665 688 10.1080/17512786.2016.1179587
Lauf, F., Scheider, S., Bartsch, J., Herrmann, P., Radic, M., Rebbert, M., Nemat, A. T., Schlueter Langdon, C., Konrad, R., & Sunyaev, A. (2022). Linking data sovereignty and data economy: Arising areas of tension. Wirtschaftsinformatik 2022 Proceedings, Nuremberg, Germany.
Li, L., Fan, Y., Tse, M., & Lin, K.-Y. (2020). A Review of Applications in Federated Learning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 149 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106854
Locke, J. (1689). Two Treatises of Government. New Haven: Yale University Press (reprint 2003).
Loewe, M., Zintl, T., & Houdret, A. (2021). The social contract as a tool of analysis: introduction to the special issue on “Framing the Evolution of New Social Contracts in Middle Eastern and North African Countries”. World Development, 145 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104982
Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 1 (2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861
Mantelero, A., & Vaciago, G. (2015). Data protection in a big data society. Ideas for a future regulation. Digital Investigation, 15 (1), 104–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2015.09.006
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bisson, P., Woetzel, J., Dobbs, R., Bughin, J., Aharon, D. (2015). The internet of things: Mapping the value beyond the hype. https://globaltrends.thedialogue.org/publication/the-internet-of-things-mapping-the-value-beyond-the-hype/. Accessed 26 Nov 2023.
Martens, B., De Streel, A., Graef, I., Tombal, T., Duch-Brown, N. (2020). Business-to-business data sharing: An economic and legal analysis (JRC Digital Economy Working Paper 2020-05). https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/publications/business-business-data-sharing-economic-and-legal-analysis_en. Accessed 26 Nov 2023.
Martin, S., Gautier, P., Turki, S., & Kotsev, A. (2021). Establishment of Sustainable Data Ecosystems: Recommendations for the Evolution of Spatial Data Infrastructures. Accessed on November 26, 2023. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC124148
Moyano, J. P., Avital, M., Bühler, M., Schmedders, K. (2021). Fostering peer-to-peer blockchain-based data markets. In 25th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Dubai, the United Arab Emirates.
Munoz-Arcentales, A., López-Pernas, S., Pozo, A., Alonso, Á., Salvachúa, J., & Huecas, G. (2019). An architecture for providing data usage and access control in data sharing ecosystems. Procedia Computer Science, 160 (1), 590–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.042
Olufowobi, H., Engel, R., Baracaldo, N., Bathen, L. A. D., Tata, S., & Ludwig, H. (2017). Data provenance model for internet of things (IoT) systems. Banff, Canada: Service-Oriented Computing–ICSOC 2016 Workshops: ASOCA, ISyCC, BSCI, and Satellite Events.
Opriel, S., Fraunhofer, I., Skubowius, G. E., Fraunhofer, I., & Lamberjohann, M. (2021). How usage control fosters willingness to share sensitive data in inter-organizational processes of supply chain. Bremen, Germany: International Scientific Symposium on Logistics 2021.
Óskarsdóttir, M., Bravo, C., Sarraute, C., Vanthienen, J., & Baesens, B. (2019). The Value of Big Data for Credit Scoring: Enhancing Financial Inclusion Using Mobile Phone Data and Social Network Analytics. Applied Soft Computing, 74 (1), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.10.004
Otto, B. (2019). Interview with reinhold achatz on “Data Sovereignty and Data Ecosystems.” Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61 (5), 635–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00609-z
Otto, B., & Jarke, M. (2019). Designing a multi-sided data platform: Findings from the international data spaces case. Electronic Markets,29(4), 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00362-x
Pedreira, V., Barros, D., & Pinto, P. (2021). A review of attacks, vulnerabilities, and defenses in industry 4.0 with new challenges on data sovereignty ahead. Sensors, 21 (15), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21155189
Petersen, D. (2022). Automating Governance: Blockchain delivered governance for business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 102 (1), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.017
Richter, H., & Slowinski, P. R. (2019). The data sharing economy: On the emergence of new intermediaries. IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law,50(1), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-018-00777-7
Rossmannek, O., & Chen, M. (2023). Why people use the sharing economy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 387 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135824
Rousseau, J.-J. (1762). Du Contrat Social: Ou, Principes du Droit Politique. Chez Marc Michel Rey.
Ruohonen, J., & Mickelsson, S. (2023). Reflections on the data governance act. Digital Society, 2 (10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-023-00041-7
Scaria, E., Berghmans, A., Pont, M., Arnaut, C., Leconte, S. (2018). Study on data sharing between companies in Europe. (A study prepared for the European Commission Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology). https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8b8776ff-4834-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. Accessed 26 Nov 2023.
Scheider, S., Lauf, F., Möller, F., & Otto, B. (2023). A reference system architecture with data sovereignty for human-centric data ecosystems. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 65(1), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00816-9
Schinle, M., Erler, C., Stork, W. (2021). Data sovereignty in data donation cycles-requirements and enabling technologies for the data-driven development of health applications. In Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, Hawaii, the United State
Schmidt, K., Ullrich, A Eigelshoven, F. (2021). From exploitative structures towards data subject-inclusive personal data markets-a systematic literature review. In European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2021) Research Papers, Marrakesh, Morocco.
Schmidt, K., Munilla Garrido, G., Mühle, A., Meinel, C. (2022). Mitigating sovereign data exchange challenges: A mapping to apply privacy-and authenticity-enhancing technologies. In International Conference on Trust and Privacy in Digital Business, Vienna, Austria.
Schweihoff, J., Jussen, I., Möller, F. (2023). Trust me, I’m an intermediary! exploring data intermediation services. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Paderborn, Germany.
Sekaran, U., Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A Skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.
Sestino, A., Kahlawi, A., & De Mauro, A. (2023). Decoding the data economy: A literature review of its impact on business, society and digital transformation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1-26 https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2023-0078
Shah, N., Coathup, V., Teare, H., Forgie, I., Giordano, G. N., Hansen, T. H., Groeneveld, L., Hudson, M., Pearson, E., Ruetten, H., & Kaye, J. (2019). Motivations for data sharing—views of research participants from four European Countries: A DIRECT study. European Journal of Human Genetics,27(5), 721–729. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0344-2
Singh, A., Click, K., Parizi, R. M., Zhang, Q., Dehghantanha, A., & Choo, K.-K.R. (2020). Sidechain technologies in blockchain networks: An examination and state-of-the-art review. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 149 (1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2019.102471
Sobhy, H. (2021). The lived social contract in schools: From protection to the production of hegemony. World Development, 137 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104986
Spiekermann, M. (2019). Data marketplaces: Trends and monetisation of data goods. Intereconomics,54(4), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-019-0826-z
Spiekermann, S., Acquisti, A., Böhme, R., & Hui, K.-L. (2015). The challenges of personal data markets and privacy. Electronic Markets,25(2), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0191-0
Tao, Y., Yang, S., Ge, H. (2022). Comparative study on data sovereignty guarantee technology. In 2022 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms and Programming (PAAP), Beijing, China.
Touboulic, A., Chicksand, D., & Walker, H. (2014). Managing imbalanced supply chain relationships for sustainability: A power perspective. Decision Sciences,45(4), 577–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12087
van den Broek, T., van Veenstra, A. F. (2015). Modes of governance in inter-organizational data collaborations. In European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2015), Münster, Germany.
van Den Broek, T., & van Veenstra, A. F. (2018). Governance of big data collaborations: How to balance regulatory compliance and disruptive innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129 (1), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.09.040
van Velzen, T. (2022). Business-to-business data sharing via data marketplace meta-platforms: Exploring governance mechanisms to enhance data sovereignty. MSc thesis. Delft, the Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Virkar, S., Viale Pereira, G., Vignoli, M. (2019). Investigating the social, political, economic and cultural implications of data trading. In I. Lindgren, et al. (Ed.), Electronic Government. EGOV 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 215–229). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27325-5_17
Williamson, O. E. (1989). Chapter 3 transaction cost economics. In Handbook of Industrial Organization (Vol. 1, pp. 135–182). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-448X(89)01006-X
Young, S. (2013). Transaction cost economics. In S. O. Idowu, Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Gupta, A. D. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 2547–2552). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_221
Zhang, M. Y., & Williamson, P. (2021). The emergence of multiplatform ecosystems: Insights from China’s mobile payments system in overcoming bottlenecks to reach the mass market. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173 (1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121128
