Small States in EU Policy-Making Strategies, Challenges, Opportunities
Auteur, co-auteur :
HÖGENAUER, Anna-Lena ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Social Sciences (DSOC) > Political Science
Bailes, A. and Thorhallsson, B. (2013). Instrumentalizing the European Union in small state strategies. Journal of European Integration 35(2): 99-113.
Bjorkdahl, A. (2008). Norm advocacy: A small state strategy to influence the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 15(1): 135-154.
Cicchi, L. (2011). Party groups in the European parliament, cohesiveness and MEPs’ survey data: New evidence on voting behaviour from a new (simple) methodology? Interdisciplinary Political Studies 1(2): 137-147.
Eumatrix. (2023). Available at https://eumatrix.eu/en/blog/mep-influence-index-2023-top-100-most-politically-influential-meps (accessed 18 August 2023).
Eurostat. (2023). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tps00001/default/table?lang=en (accessed 18 August 2023).
Finke, D. (2015). Why do European political groups call the roll? Party Politics 21(5): 750-762.
Harmsen, R. and Hogenauer, A.L. (2021). Luxembourg and the European Union. In: F. Laurensen (ed.), Encyclopedia of European Union Politics (Oxford University Press: Oxford), pp. 1-26.
Haughton, T. (2010). Vulnerabilities, Accession Hangovers and the Presidency Role: Explaining New EU Member States’ Choices for Europe. Center for European Studies Central and Eastern Europe Working Paper Series 68.
Hogenauer, A.L. and Miak, M. (2024). Introduction: The challenges and opportunities of EU membership for small states. In: A.L. Hogenauer and M. Misik (eds.), Small States in EU Policy-Making: Strategies, Challenges, Opportunities (Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames).
Jakobsen, P.V. (2009). Small states, big influence: The overlooked Nordic influence on the civilian ESDP. Journal of Common Market Studies 47(1): 81-102.
Laffan, B. (2006). Managing Europe from home in Dublin, Athens and Helsinki: A comparative analysis. West European Politics 29(4): 687-708.
Mattila, M. (2004). Contested decisions: Empirical analysis of voting in the European Union council of ministers. European Journal of Political Research 43(1): 29-50.
Panke, D. (2010a): Small States in the European Union. Coping with Structural Disadvantages (Ashgate: Farnham).
Panke, D. (2010b). Small states in the European Union: Structural disadvantages in EU policy-making and counter-strategies. Journal of European Public Policy 17(6): 799-817.
Panke, D. (2011). Small states in EU negotiations: Political dwarfs or power-brokers? Cooperation and Conflict 46(2): 123-143.
Panke, D. and Gurol, J. (2018). Small states as agenda-setters? The council presidencies of Malta and Estonia. Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (S1): 142-151.
Slapin, J. (2011): Veto Power: Institutional Design in the European Union (University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor).
Slapin, J. and Proksch, S. (2010). Look who’s talking: Parliamentary debate in the European Union. European Union Politics 11(3): 333-357.
Soetendorp, B. and Hanf, K. (1998). Conclusion: The nature of national adaptation to European integration. In: K. Hanf and B. Soetendorp (eds.), Adapting to European Integration: Small States and the European Union (Longman: London), pp. 186-194.
Steinmetz, R. and Wivel, A. (2010): Small States in Europe. Challenges and Opportunities (Routledge: London).
Thorhallsson, B. and Wivel, A. (2006). Small states in the European Union: What do we know and what would we like to know? Cambridge Review of International Affairs 19(4): 651-668.
Wivel, A. (2010). From small state to smart state: Devising a strategy for influence in the European Union. In: R. Steinmetz and A. Wivel (eds.), Small States in Europe. Challenges and Opportunities (Routledge: London), pp. 15-30.
