Abstract :
[en] Manipulative design in user interfaces (conceptualized as dark pat- terns) has emerged as a significant impediment to the ethical design of technology and a threat to user agency and freedom of choice. While previous research focused on exploring these patterns in the context of graphical user interfaces, the impact of speech has largely been overlooked. We conducted a listening test (đ = 50) to elicit participantsâ preferences regarding different synthetic voices that varied in terms of synthesis method (concatenative vs. neu- ral) and prosodic qualities (speech pace and pitch variance), and then evaluated their impact in an online decision-making study (đ = 101). Our results indicate a significant effect of voice qualities on the participantâs choices, independently from the content of the available options. Our results also indicate that the voiceâs per- ceived engagement, ease of understanding, and domain fit directly translate to its impact on participantsâ behavior in decision-making tasks.
Funding text :
This work is supported by the Horizon 2020 FET program of the European Union through the ERA-NET Cofund funding (BANANA, grant CHIST-ERA-20-BCI-001) and Horizon Europeâs European Innovation Council through the Pathfinder program (SYMBIOTIK, grant 101071147). This work is also supported by the Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) Decepticon (grant no.IS/14717072).
Scopus citationsÂź
without self-citations
4