Admissibility of Evidence, Transnational E-Evidence and Fair-Trial Rights in Luxembourg
LIGETI, Katalin; TOSZA, Stanislaw
2024 • In Bachmaier Winter, Lorena; Salimi, Farsam (Eds.) Admissibility of Evidence in EU Cross-Border Criminal Proceedings. Electronic Evidence, Efficiency and Fair Trial Rights
F Giuffrida and K Ligeti (eds), Admissibility of OLAF Final Reports as Evidence in Criminal Proceedings (University of Luxembourg, 2019) 191 at https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/40141
K Ligeti and G Robinson, ‘The Handling of Digital Evidence in Luxembourg’ in M Caianiello and A Camon (eds), Digital Forensic Evidence. Towards Common European Standards in Antifraud Administrative and Criminal Investigations (Wolters Kluwer-CEDAM, 2021) 123.
V Covolo, ‘Luxembourg’ in S Allegrezza and V Covolo (eds), Effective Defence Rights in Criminal Proceedings (Wolters Kluwer-CEDAM, 2018) 329, 330–31.
M Petschko, M Schiltz and S Tosza, ‘Luxembourg’ in Katalin Ligeti (ed), Toward a Prosecutor for the European Union, vol 1 (Hart Publishing, 2013) 449, 452.
K Ligeti and G Robinson, ‘The Handling of Digital Evidence in Luxembourg’ in M Caianiello and A Camon (eds), Digital Forensic Evidence. Towards Common European Standards in Antifraud Administrative and Criminal Investigations (Wolters Kluwer-CEDAM, 2021) 123, 131.
M Braun, ‘La ratification de la Convention de Budapest sur la cybercriminalité par le Luxembourg’ (2014) 35 Journal des Tribunaux Luxembourg 121, 132.
S Tosza, ‘All evidence is equal, but electronic evidence is more equal than any other: The relationship between the European Investigation Order and the European Production Order’ (2020) 11 New Journal of European Criminal Law 161, 163–67.
S Tosza, ‘Cross-border gathering of electronic evidence: Mutual legal assistance, its shortcomings and remedies’ in D Flore and V Franssen (eds), Societe numerique et droit penal (Bruylant 2019) 269, 277.
K Ligeti and G Robinson, ‘Sword, Shield and Cloud: Toward a European System of Public-Private Orders for Electronic Evidence in Criminal Matters?’ in V Mitsilegas and N Vavoula (eds), Surveillance and Privacy in the Digital Age: European, Transatlantic and Global Perspectives (Hart Publishing 2021) 27.
V Bolard, ‘Preuve et vérité’ (2013) 23 Annales du droit luxembourgeois 37, 75.
M Marty, La legalite de la preuve dans l’espace penal europeen (Larcier Brussels, 2016) 274–313.
V Franssen, ‘The Belgian Internet Investigatory Powers Act – A Model to Pursue at European Level?’ (2017) 3 European Data Protection Law Review 534.
J Nies, ‘Detecting Economic and Financial Crime: A Special Toolkit of Investigation Techniques in Luxembourg’ in K Ligeti and V Franssen (eds), Challenges in the Field of Economic and Financial Crime in Europe and the US (Hart Publishing, 2017) 83, 88–89.
G Vogel, Lexique de procedure penale de droit luxembourgeois (Larcier, 2009) 125 with reference to Judgment of the District Court of 10 March 2003, n°588/2003.
F Giuffrida and K Ligeti, ‘Luxembourg’ in F Giuffrida and K Ligeti (eds), Admissibility of OLAF Final Reports as Evidence in Criminal Proceedings (University of Luxembourg, 2019) 191 at https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/40141 accessed 16 September 2022.
District Court of Luxembourg (Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg), 20 December 2017, n° 493/17 X.
G Vogel, Traite de procedure penale (Larcier, 2018) 314.
Labour Code (Code du Travail) as amended at https://data.legilux.public.lu/filestore/eli/etat/leg/code/travail/20220416/fr/pdf/eli-etat-leg-code-travail-20220416-fr-pdf.pdf
M Thewes, ‘La surveillance des salariés sur le lieu du travail et les nouvelles technologies de l’information au Grand-Duché du Luxembourg’ (2012) 21 Journal des Tribunaux Luxembourg 69, 72–73.
