Discrete choice experiment; Minimum range; Range anxiety; Representative online survey; Vehicle-to-grid (V2G); Willingness of vehicle users; CO 2 emission; Discrete choice experiments; Online surveys; Range anxieties; Vehicle to Grid (V2G); Vehicle users; Willingness of vehicle user; Energy (all); Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law; General Energy
Résumé :
[en] The predominant strategy to reduce CO2 emissions in the transport sector is its renewable based electrification. It implies mobile storages that could – during long phases of immobility – provide services for the electricity sector. However, this technical option – called vehicle-to-grid (V2G) – requires the vehicle users to temporarily abstain from the usage of their batteries for V2G. A reasonable estimate of the potential of V2G thus considers which individual, technical and economic parameters are decisive for the willingness of vehicle users to participate. To answer these questions a representative sample of vehicle users in Germany has been surveyed – including a discrete choice experiment. 'Range anxiety' and the 'minimum range' proved most important determinants of the willingness of vehicle users to participate in V2G. If these concerns are smoothed out, even without remuneration, high participation rates might be achieved. To increase the participation in the V2G technology, the transition from ‘tank control’ to ‘mobility demand articulation’ should be facilitated for vehicle users. Therefore, companies could tailor the V2G design to customers’ needs and policy could improve information about V2G. Remuneration, however, cannot be expected to be very supportive.
Disciplines :
Domaines particuliers de l’économie (santé, travail, transport...)
Auteur, co-auteur :
GESKE, Joachim ; University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > FINATRAX ; Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Schumann, Diana; Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Energy and Climate Research - Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE), Jülich, Germany
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Willing to participate in vehicle-to-grid (V2G)? Why not!
This research is part of the project ‘grid integration of mobile energy storage: test based evaluation, technical potentials and willingness of vehicle user (NET-INES)’. Project partners included The Technische Universität Berlin, Institute for Energy and Automation Technology, Sustainable Electric Networks and Sources of Energy (SENSE), The Centre for Solar Energy and Hydrogen Research, Baden-Württemberg (ZSW), Department Electrochemical Accumulators (ECA), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, and the Institute of Energy and Climate Research, Systems Analysis and Technology Evaluation (IEK-STE). The project was funded by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy FKZ 03ET4005 (A-C) (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie, BMWI) from July 2012 to June 2015.
Axsen, Jonn, Mountain, Dean, C., Jaccard, Mark, Combining stated and revealed choices research to simulate the neighbor effect: the case if hybrid-electric vehicles. Resour. Energy Econ. 31 (2009), 221–238.
Brooks, A.N., Vehicle-to-Grid Demonstration Project: Grid Regulation Ancillary Service with a Battery Electric Vehicle, 2002, AC Propulsion, Inc., 441 Borrego Ct., San Dimas, CA 91773, USA.
Damiano, A., Gatto, G., Marongiu, I., Porru, M., Serpi, A., Vehicle-to-grid technology: state-of-the-art and future scenarios. J. Energy Power Eng. 8 (2014), 152–165.
Greene, W.H., Hensher, D.A., A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 37 (2003), 681–698.
Guenther, C., Schott, B., Hennings, W., Waldowski, P., Danzer, M.A., Model-based investigation of electric vehicle battery aging by means of vehicle-to-grid scenario simulations. J. Power Sources 239 (2013), 604–610.
Haidar, A.M.A., Muttaqi, K.M., Sutanto, D., Technical challenges for electric power industries due to grid-integrated electric vehicles in low voltage distributions: a review. Energy Convers. Manag. 86 (2014), 689–700.
Hackbarth, A., Madleiner, R., Consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles: A discrete choice analysis. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 25 (2013), 5–17.
Hidrue, M., Parsons, G., Kempton, W., Gardner, M., Willingness to pay for electric vehicles and their attributes. Resour. Energy Econ. 33:2011 (2011), 686–705.
Horne, Matt, Jaccard, Mark, Tiedemann, Ken, Improving behavioral realism in hybrid energy-economy models using discrete choice studies of personal transportation decisions. Energy Econ. 27 (2005), 59–77.
IPCC, Summary for policymakers. Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C., (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY, USA.
Jonuschat, H., Wölk, M., Handke, V., Untersuchung zur Akzeptanz von Elektromobilität als Stellglied im Stromnetz. 2012, IZT – Institut für Zukunftsstudien und Technologiebewertung, B.A.U.M. Consult GmbH, Berlin.
Kamboj, S., Kempton, W., Decker, K.S., 2011. Deploying power grid-integrated electric vehicles as a multi-agent system. In: Tumer, Yolum, Sonenberg, Stone (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Innovative Applications Track (AAMAS 2011). Taipei, Taiwan, pp. XXX-XXX.
Kempton, W., Letendre, S.E., Electric vehicles as a new power source for electric utilities. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2 (1997), 157–175.
Kempton, W., Tomić, J., Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: calculating capacity and net revenue. J. Power Sources 144 (2005), 268–279.
Kempton, W., Tomić, J., Vehicle-to-grid power implementation: from stabilizing the grid to supporting large-scale renewable energy. J. Power Sources 144 (2005), 280–294.
Linssen, J., Schulz, A., Mischinger, S., Maas, H., Günther, C., Weinmann, O., Abbasi, E., Bickert, S., Danzer, M., Hennings, W., Lindwedel, E., Marker, S., Schindler, V., Schmidt, A., Schmitz, P., Schott, B., Strunz, K., Waldowski, P., Netzintegration von Fahrzeugen mit elektrifizierten Antriebssystemen in bestehende und zukünftige Energieversorgungsstrukturen. Advances in Systems Analyses, 1, 2012, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich.
Louviere, J.J., Flynn, T.N., Carson, R.T., Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis. J. Choice Modelling 3:3 (2010), 57–72.
Marris, C., Langford, I.H., O'Riordan, T., A quantitative test of the cultural theory of risk perceptions: Comparison with the psychometric paradigm. Risk Analysis 18:5 (1998), 635–647, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00376.x.
Mau, Paulus, Eyzaguirre, Jimena, Jaccard, Mark, Collins-Dodd, Colleen, Tiedemann, Kenneth, The ‘neighbor effect’: simulating dynamics in consumer preference for new vehicle technologies. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2008), 504–516.
Mwasilu, F., Justo, J.J., Kim, E.-K., Do, T.D., Jung, J.-W., Electric vehicles and smart grid interaction: a review on vehicle to grid and renewable energy sources integration. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 34 (2014), 501–516.
Parsons, G.R., Hidrue, M.K., Kempton, W., Gardner, M.P., Willingness to pay for vehicle-to-grid (V2G) electric vehicles and their contract terms. Energy Econ. 42 (2014), 313–324.
Richardson, D.B., Electric vehicles and the electric grid: a review of modeling approaches, Impacts, and renewable energy integration. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 19 (2013), 247–254.
Schendera, C., 2014. Regressionsanalyse mit SPSS. De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
Shen, J., Latent class model or mixed logit model? A comparison by transport mode choice data. Appl. Econ. 2009:41 (2009), 2915–2924 (and The latent class model provided better fit than the mixed logit model).
Sovacool, B.K., Hirsh, R.F., Beyond batteries: an examination of the benefits and barriers to plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) transition. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 1095–1103.
Steg, L., Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Practice 39:2–3 (2005), 147–162.
Tan, K.M., Ramachandaramurthy, V.K., Yong, J.Y., Integration of electric vehicles in smart grid: a review on vehicle to grid technologies and optimization techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 53 (2016), 720–732.
Thompson, M., Ellis, R.J., Wildavsky, A.B., Political cultures. Cultural theory. 1990, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, US.
Tomić, J., Kempton, W., Using fleets of electric-drive vehicles for grid support. J. Power Sources 168 (2007), 459–468.
Train, Kenneth, Discount rates in consumers' energy related decisions: a review of the literature. Energy 10:12 (1985), 1243–1253.
Vattenfall Europe Innovation GmbH, BMW AG, TU Berlin, Chemnitz, T., Ilmenau, T.U., 2011. Gesteuertes Laden V2.0.
Yilmaz, M., Krein, P.T., 2012. Review of benefits and challenges of vehicle-to-grid technology. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), pp. 3082–3089.
Ziegler, A., Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: a discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 46:8 (2012), 1372–1385.
Johnson, F.R., Lancsar, E., Marshall, D., Kilambi, V., Mühlbacher, A., Regier, D.A., Bresnahan, B.W., Kanninen, B., Bridges, J.F.P., ISPOR task force report – constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis experimental design good research practices task force. Value Health 16:1 (2013), 3–13.
