Article (Périodiques scientifiques)
Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: a systematic review.
Van Eetvelde, Hans; Mendonça, Luciana D; LEY, Christophe et al.
2021In Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 8 (1), p. 27
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
 

Documents


Texte intégral
s40634-021-00346-x.pdf
Postprint Auteur (1.33 MB)
Télécharger

Tous les documents dans ORBilu sont protégés par une licence d'utilisation.

Envoyer vers



Détails



Mots-clés :
Injury prediction; Injury prevention; Machine Learning; Sport injury; Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Résumé :
[en] [en] PURPOSE: Injuries are common in sports and can have significant physical, psychological and financial consequences. Machine learning (ML) methods could be used to improve injury prediction and allow proper approaches to injury prevention. The aim of our study was therefore to perform a systematic review of ML methods in sport injury prediction and prevention. METHODS: A search of the PubMed database was performed on March 24th 2020. Eligible articles included original studies investigating the role of ML for sport injury prediction and prevention. Two independent reviewers screened articles, assessed eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. Methodological quality and risk of bias were determined by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study quality was evaluated using the GRADE working group methodology. RESULTS: Eleven out of 249 studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Different ML methods were used (tree-based ensemble methods (n = 9), Support Vector Machines (n = 4), Artificial Neural Networks (n = 2)). The classification methods were facilitated by preprocessing steps (n = 5) and optimized using over- and undersampling methods (n = 6), hyperparameter tuning (n = 4), feature selection (n = 3) and dimensionality reduction (n = 1). Injury predictive performance ranged from poor (Accuracy = 52%, AUC = 0.52) to strong (AUC = 0.87, f1-score = 85%). CONCLUSIONS: Current ML methods can be used to identify athletes at high injury risk and be helpful to detect the most important injury risk factors. Methodological quality of the analyses was sufficient in general, but could be further improved. More effort should be put in the interpretation of the ML models.
Disciplines :
Mathématiques
Orthopédie, rééducation & médecine sportive
Auteur, co-auteur :
Van Eetvelde, Hans ;  Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S9, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Hans.VanEetvelde@UGent.be
Mendonça, Luciana D ;  Graduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Universidade Federal Dos Vales Do Jequitinhonha E Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil ; Department of Physical Therapy and Motor Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium ; Ministry of Education of Brazil, CAPES Foundation, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
LEY, Christophe  ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Mathematics (DMATH) ; Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S9, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
Seil, Romain ;  Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg and Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Tischer, Thomas ;  Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: a systematic review.
Date de publication/diffusion :
14 avril 2021
Titre du périodique :
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
eISSN :
2197-1153
Maison d'édition :
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, Allemagne
Volume/Tome :
8
Fascicule/Saison :
1
Pagination :
27
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
Disponible sur ORBilu :
depuis le 25 novembre 2023

Statistiques


Nombre de vues
129 (dont 1 Unilu)
Nombre de téléchargements
58 (dont 0 Unilu)

citations Scopus®
 
236
citations Scopus®
sans auto-citations
226
OpenCitations
 
55
citations OpenAlex
 
255
citations WoS
 
154

Bibliographie


Publications similaires



Contacter ORBilu