Data science; Injury; Machine Learning; Prediction; Prevention; Sport; Surgery; Orthopedics and Sports Medicine; Rehabilitation
Abstract :
[en] Today, injury in sport represents a major problem for athletes and their entourage. Prevention measures are developed and are available to the sports community. Among them, the emergence of new technologies and data analysis approaches offer new opportunities. Given the fact that these prediction methods tend to develop, it seemed important to us that the actors around the athlete, and in particular health professionals, have notions to better understand these approaches and to be able to interpret the work presenting injury prediction (risk estimation) analyses. Through this article, based on a narrative review of the literature, we have presented Machine Learning (ML), as well as its applications and limitations. ML, or “machine learning”, is a tool derived from statistics, related to artificial intelligence, which makes it possible to build, from input data (predictive variables) and output data (variables to be predicted), models capable of predicting an event. Thus, like any analysis, ML can present certain limitations and risks that should be avoided, but also to know and detect when reading articles/works using ML, or when you want to use it. In conclusion, in sports traumatology, Machine Learning models offer the opportunity: 1) to help diagnose injuries or; 2) to optimize athletes’ training by estimating their risk of injury, both in a screening and monitoring context. However, this prediction tool cannot adapt to all situations without risk and can sometimes lead to false predictions. Thus, Machine Learning offers interesting perspectives with the possibility of having a decision support tool for field actors, but it is necessary to take into account the limits and risks of this approach in order to use them best and get the best benefits. Machine Learning is not a crystal ball that allows us to see the future, but a method of data analysis that relies on measured data and therefore depends on the quality of the latter.
Disciplines :
Orthopedics, rehabilitation & sports medicine Mathematics
Author, co-author :
Tondut, Jeanne; Université Jean-Monnet Saint-Étienne, Lyon 1, université Savoie Mont-Blanc, Laboratoire interuniversitaire de biologie de la motricité (EA 7424), université de Lyon, université Jean-Monnet, Saint-Étienne, France ; Inserm, Mines Saint-Étienne, U 1059 Sainbiose, centre CIS, université de Lyon, université Jean-Monnet, Saint-Étienne, France
Dandrieux, Pierre-Eddy; Université Jean-Monnet Saint-Étienne, Lyon 1, université Savoie Mont-Blanc, Laboratoire interuniversitaire de biologie de la motricité (EA 7424), université de Lyon, université Jean-Monnet, Saint-Étienne, France ; Inserm, Mines Saint-Étienne, U 1059 Sainbiose, centre CIS, université de Lyon, université Jean-Monnet, Saint-Étienne, France
Navarro, Laurent; Inserm, Mines Saint-Étienne, U 1059 Sainbiose, centre CIS, université de Lyon, université Jean-Monnet, Saint-Étienne, France
LEY, Christophe ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Mathematics (DMATH)
Édouard, Pascal; Université Jean-Monnet Saint-Étienne, Lyon 1, université Savoie Mont-Blanc, Laboratoire interuniversitaire de biologie de la motricité (EA 7424), université de Lyon, université Jean-Monnet, Saint-Étienne, France ; Unité de médecine du sport, Service de physiologie clinique et de l'exercice, CHU de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Étienne, France
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
French
Title :
La prédiction des blessures en sport : fiction ou réalité ?
Bishop, C.M., Nasrabadi, N.M., Pattern recognition and machine learning. 2006, Springer, New York.
Van Eetvelde, H., Mendonca, L., Ley, C., Seil, R., Tischer, T., Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: a systematic review. J Exp Orthop, 8(1), 2021.
Collins, G.S., Reitsma, J.B., Altman, D.G., Moons, K.G.M., Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Br J Cancer 112:2 (2015), 251–259.
Liu, Y., Chen, P.H.C., Krause, J., Peng, L., How to read articles that use machine learning: users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA, 322(18), 2019, 1806.
Karuc, J., Misigoj-Durakovic, M., Sarlija, M., Markovic, G., Hadzic, V., Trost-Bobic, T., et al. Can injuries be predicted by functional movement screen in adolescents? The application of machine learning. J Strength Cond Res 35:4 (2021), 910–919.
Bahr, R., Understanding injury mechanisms: a key component of preventing injuries in sport. Br J Sports Med 39:6 (2005), 324–329.
Meeuwisse, W.H., Tyreman, H., Hagel, B., Emery, C., A dynamic model of etiology in sport injury: the recursive nature of risk and causation. Clin J Sport Med 17:3 (2007), 215–219.
Rossi, A., Pappalardo, L., Cintia, P., Iaia, F., Fernandez, J., Medina, D., Effective injury forecasting in soccer with GPS training data and machine learning. PLOS ONE, 13(7), 2018.
Carey, D.L., Ong, K.L., Whiteley, R., Crossley, K.M., Crow, J., Morris, M.E., Predictive modelling of training loads and injury in Australian football. ArXiv Prepr, 2017 [ArXiv170604336].
Bullock, G.S., Hughes, T., Sergeant, J.C., Callaghan, M.J., Riley, R., Collins, G., Methods matter: clinical prediction models will benefit sports medicine practice, but only if they are properly developed and validated. Br J Sports Med 55:23 (2021), 1319–1321.
Bullock, G., Mylott, J., Hughes, T., Nicholson, K., Riley, R., Collins, G., Just how confident can we be in predicting sports injuries? A systematic review of the methodological conduct and performance of existing musculoskeletal injury prediction models in sport. Sports Med 52:10 (2022), 2469–2482.
Bittencourt, N.F.N., Meeuwisse, W.H., Mendonça, L.D., Nettel-Aguirre, A., Ocarino, J.M., Fonseca, S.T., Complex systems approach for sports injuries: moving from risk factor identification to injury pattern recognition – narrative review and new concept. Br J Sports Med 50:21 (2016), 1309–1314.