Demander un accès

Texte intégral

• Bratman, M. (1981). Intention and means-end reasoning. The Philosophical Review, 90(2), 252–262. DOI: 10.2307/2184441
• Broome, J. (2013). Rationality through reasoning. Wiley Blackwell Publishing. DOI: 10.1002/9781118609088
• Christensen, D. (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philosophy and phenomenological research, 81(1), 185–215. DOI: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00366.x
• Christensen, D. (2020). Akratic (epistemic) modesty. Philosophical Studies, 178, 2191–2214. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-020-01536-6
• Coates, A. (2012). Rational epistemic akrasia. American Philosophical Quarterly, 49(2), 113–124.
• Friedman, J. (2013). Question-directed attitudes. Philosophical Perspectives, 27(1), 145–174. DOI: 10.1111/phpe.12026
• Kiesewetter, B. (2017). The normativity of rationality. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198754282.001.0001
• Knoks, A. (2021). Misleading higher-order evidence, conflicting ideals, and defeasible logic. Ergo, 8(6), 141–174.
• Kolodny, N. (2005). Why be rational? Mind, 114, 509–560. DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzi509
• Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (2014). Higher-order evidence and the limits of defeat. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(2), 314–345. DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12090
• Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (2020). Enkrasia or evidentialism? Learning to love mismatch. Philosophical Studies, 177, 597–632. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-018-1196-2
• Lord, E., & Sylvan, K. (2022). On suspending properly. In L. Oliveria & P. Silva (Eds.), Propositional and doxastic justification. Routledge.
• Pryor, J. (2018). The merits of incoherence. Analytic Philosophy, 59(1), 112–141. DOI: 10.1111/phib.12118
• Schmidt, E. (2023). Facts about incoherence as non-evidential epistemic reasons. Asian Journal of Philosophy, 2(22), 1–22.
• Schroeder, M. (2012). The ubiquity of state-given reasons. Ethics, 122, 457–488. DOI: 10.1086/664753
• Schroeder, M. (2021). Reasons first. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198868224.001.0001
• White, R. (2005). Epistemic permissiveness. Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1), 445–459. DOI: 10.1111/j.1520-8583.2005.00069.x
• White, R. (2014). Evidence cannot be permissive. In M. Steup, J. Turri, & E. Sosa (Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology (pp. 312–323). John Wiley and Sons.
• Williamson, T. (2002). Knowledge and its limits. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/019925656X.001.0001