Article (Scientific journals)
Energy storage operation and electricity market design: On the market power of monopolistic storage operators
Bjørndal, Endre; Bjørndal, Mette Helene; Coniglio, Stefano et al.
2023In European Journal of Operational Research, 307 (2), p. 887 - 909
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
1-s2.0-S037722172200724X-main.pdf
Author postprint (2.42 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Bidding behavior; Market design; Market power; OR in energy; Storage operations; Day ahead market; Market Power; Monopolistics; Storage systems; System costs; System operator; Computer Science (all); Modeling and Simulation; Management Science and Operations Research; Information Systems and Management; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering; General Computer Science
Abstract :
[en] The rapid growth of the share of energy generated via renewable sources highly challenges grid stability. Flexibility is key to balance the electricity supply and demand. As a relatively new player in the energy market, the Energy Storage System (ESS) is capable of providing such flexibility, acting as both a consumer and producer. Since the Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Union requires ESSs to be operated by an independent market player, ESSs are becoming an important player in different electricity markets. Crucially, it is difficult for, e.g., market-monitoring authorities, to compare the bid cost functions to the true opportunity costs of an ESS. Motivated by this, in this paper we elaborate on the potential of an ESS to exercise market power in a liberalized electricity market. In particular, we analyze how a monopolistic ESS operator may influence short-run market outcomes, e.g., prices and system costs, depending on different market designs including a nodal, a zonal, and a uniform pricing system. For this purpose, we propose a four-stage Stackelberg game where the monopolistic ESS operator first decides on its day-ahead market bids (level 1), followed by day-ahead market clearing (level 2), after which the ESS submits bids to the real-time balancing market (level 3), which is then cleared (level 4). Relying on a widely used case study, we illustrate that some market designs may be more favorable for the ESS operator, whereas other ones may be more attractive from the regulator's point of view of minimizing the overall system costs.
Research center :
Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT) > FINATRAX - Digital Financial Services and Cross-organizational Digital Transformations
Disciplines :
Computer science
Management information systems
Author, co-author :
Bjørndal, Endre;  NHH Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science, Bergen, Norway
Bjørndal, Mette Helene;  NHH Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science, Bergen, Norway
Coniglio, Stefano ;  University of Bergamo, Department of Economics, Bergamo, Italy
Körner, Marc-Fabian ;  FIM Research Center, Bayreuth, Germany ; Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of the Fraunhofer FIT, Germany ; University of Bayreuth, Germany
Leinauer, Christina;  FIM Research Center, Bayreuth, Germany ; Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of the Fraunhofer FIT, Germany ; University of Bayreuth, Germany
WEIBELZAHL, Martin   ;  University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > FINATRAX ; FIM Research Center, Bayreuth, Germany ; Branch Business & Information Systems Engineering of the Fraunhofer FIT, Germany ; University of Bayreuth, Germany
 These authors have contributed equally to this work.
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Energy storage operation and electricity market design: On the market power of monopolistic storage operators
Publication date :
June 2023
Journal title :
European Journal of Operational Research
ISSN :
0377-2217
eISSN :
1872-6860
Publisher :
Elsevier B.V.
Volume :
307
Issue :
2
Pages :
887 - 909
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Focus Area :
Security, Reliability and Trust
Development Goals :
9. Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Funders :
Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung Dienststelle Bonn
Funding text :
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the KopernikusProject “SynErgie” by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF) and the project supervision by the project management organization Projektträger Jülich (PtJ). The authors thank the Graduate School of the Bavarian Center for Battery Technology (BayBatt) for ongoing support. The authors are also grateful for the comments made by two anonymous reviewers, which helped them to improve the quality of the paper.The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the KopernikusProject “SynErgie” by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany (BMBF) and the project supervision by the project management organization Projektträger Jülich (PtJ). The authors thank the Graduate School of the Bavarian Center for Battery Technology (BayBatt) for ongoing support. The authors are also grateful for the comments made by two anonymous reviewers, which helped them to improve the quality of the paper.
Available on ORBilu :
since 23 November 2023

Statistics


Number of views
50 (0 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
33
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
29
OpenAlex citations
 
40
WoS citations
 
23

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu