[en] Fitting with a common scheme across European democracies, the last election in Belgium led radical (left and right) parties to increase their vote share. One of the key drivers of the radical vote is political dissatisfaction (Droste 2011). Yet, the latter does not always translate into radical or protest voting behaviors. Using the 2019s RepResent Belgian Elections Study, we show the moderating effect of close social contacts in this relationship. For dissatisfied voters who believe that most contacts are similarly discontent, the probability to vote for radical parties (or, if not, to adopt other protest behaviors) is reinforced. However, the odds decrease the more they perceive their contacts different from themselves, i.e., as politically satisfied voters. Then, they become more likely to avoid protest/radical choices and to vote for institutionalized parties. Overall, our study yields findings showing that voting behaviors should be studied by considering also the voters’ social networks, which seem to exert a role in defining the acceptability of voting choices. What matters is not only how one perceives politics but also how one believes his close contacts perceive politics too.
Disciplines :
Sociologie & sciences sociales
Auteur, co-auteur :
PAULIS, Emilien ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Humanities (DHUM) > Philosophy ; Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
Ognibene, Marco; Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Satisfied unlike me? How the perceived difference with close network contacts prevents radical and protest voting
Akkerman, A., A. Zaslove, and B. Spruyt. 2017. ‘We the people’ or ‘we the peoples’? A comparison of support for the populist radical right and populist radical left in the Netherlands. Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 377–403.
Alexandre, C., F. Gonthier, and T. Guerra. 2019. Les classes populaires sont-elles (les plus) populistes? Attitudes populistes et vote radical lors de l’élection présidentielle de 2017. L’année Sociologique 69: 451–478.
Beck, P. 2002. Encouraging political defection: The role of personal discussion networks in partisan desertions to the opposition party and perot votes in 1992. Political Behavior 24 (4): 309–337.
Biard, B. 2019. L’extrême droite en Europe occidentale (2004–2019). Courrier Hebdomadaire Du CRISP 15–16 (2420–2421): 5–106.
Blais, A., C. Galais, and M. Coulombe. 2018. The effect of social pressure from family and friends on turnout. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 36 (9): 2824–2841.
Burgoon, B., S. van Noort, R. Rooduijn, and G. Underhill. 2019. Positional deprivation and support for radical right and radical left parties. Economic Policy 34 (97): 49–93.
Butters, R., and C. Hare. 2020. Polarized networks? New evidence on American voters’ political discussion networks. Political Behavior. 10.1007/s11109-020-09647-w. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-020-09647-w
Campus, D., L. Ceccarini, and C. Vaccari. 2015. What a difference a critical election makes: Social networks and political discussion in Italy between 2008 and 2013. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 27: 588–601.
Close, C., and E. Van Haute. 2020. Emotions and vote choice. Politics of the Low Countries 2 (3): 353–379.
Coffé, H., and M. Voorpostel. 2010. Young people, parents and radical right voting: The case of the Swiss people’s party. Electoral Studies 29 (3): 435–443.
de Jonge, L. 2019. The populist radical right and the media in the Benelux: Friend or foe? The International Journal of Press/politics 24 (2): 189–209.
Delwit, P. 2021. Les partis politiques en Belgique, 4th ed. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
Doležalová, J., V. Doležalová, V. Havlík, A. Havlík, and P. Slaný. 2017. Economic factors determining the electoral success of far-right and far-left parties in the EU countries. Society and Economy 39 (1): 1–22.
Droste, L. 2021. feeling left behind by political decisionmakers: Anti-establishment sentiment in contemporary democracies. Politics and Governance 9 (3): 288–300.
Esteban, I., and D. Stiers. 2021. Same problems, different solutions: Stealth democracy and the vote for a populist party. Scandinavian Political Studies 44 (3): 245–267.
Eveland, W., and M. Hively. 2009. Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication 59 (2): 205–224.
Fagerholm, A. 2021. How do they get in? Radical parties and government participation in European democracies. Government and Opposition 56 (2): 260–280.
Fieldhouse E. Cutts D. Bailey J. 2020. Who cares if you vote? partisan pressure and social norms of voting. Political Behavior. Open Access
Foa, R., A. Klassen, M. Slade, A. Rand, and R. Williams. 2020. The global satisfaction with democracy report 2020. Cambridge: Centre for the Future of Democracy.
Fredén, A., L. Rheault, and I. Indridason. 2020. Betting on the underdog: The influence of social networks on vote choice. Political Science Research and Methods first view: 1–8.
Gerbaudo, P. 2018. The digital party. Political organisation and online democracy. London: Pluto Press.
Gerber, A.S., D. Green, and C. Larimer. 2008. Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review 102 (1): 33–48.
Geurkink, B., A. Zaslove, R. Sluiter, and K. Jacobs. 2020. Populist attitudes, political trust, and external political efficacy: Old wine in new bottles? Political Studies 68 (1): 247–267.
Gherghina, S., and S. Soare. 2021. Electoral performance beyond leaders? The organization of populist parties in postcommunist Europe. Party Politics 27 (1): 58–68.
Goovaerts, I., A. Kern, E. Van Haute, and S. Marien. 2020. Drivers of support for the populist radical left and populist radical right in Belgium. An analysis of the VB and the PVDA-PTB vote at the 2019 elections. Politics of the Low Countries 3: 228–264.
Guidetti, M., N. Cavazza, and A. Graziani. 2016. Perceived disagreement and heterogeneity in social networks: distinct effects on political participation. The Journal of Social Phsychology 156 (2): 222–242.
Harteveld, E., S. Dahlberg, A. Kokkonen, and W. van der Brug. 2019. Social stigma and support for the populist radical right: An experimental study. Scandinavian Political Studies 42 (3–4): 296–307.
Halikiopoulou, D., K. Nanou, and S. Vasilopoulou. 2012. The paradox of nationalism: The common denominator of radical right and radical left euroscepticism. European Journal of Political Research 51 (4): 504–539.
Hooghe, M., S. Marien, and T. Pauwels. 2011. Where do distrusting voters turn if there is no viable exit or voice option? The impact of political trust on electoral behavior in the Belgian regional elections of June 2009. Government and Opposition 46 (2): 245–273.
Huckfeldt, R., P. Johnson, and J. Sprague. 2004. Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kalsnes, B. 2019. Examining the populist communication logic: Strategic use of social media in populist political parties in Norway and Sweden. Central European Journal of Communication 12 (2): 187–205.
Kemmers, R. 2017. Channeling discontent? Non-voters, populist party voters, and their meaningful political agency. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 4 (4): 381–406.
Kriesi, H. 2014. The populist challenge. West European Politics 37 (2): 361–378.
Kriesi, H., and J. Schulte-Cloos. 2020. Support for radical parties in Western Europe: Structural conflicts and political dynamics. Electoral Studies 65: 102–138.
Linde, J., and J. Ekman. 2003. Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics. European Journal of Political Research 42: 391–408.
Mancosu, M. 2016. Contexts, networks, and voting behavior: The social flow of political communication in Italy. Italian Political Science Review/rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica 46 (3): 335–354.
March, L., and C. Rommerskirchen. 2015. Out of left field? Explaining the variable electoral success of European radical left parties. Party Politics 21 (1): 40–53.
Michel, E., D. Garzia, F. Ferreira da Silva, and A. De Angelis. 2020. Leader effects and voting for the populist radical right in Western Europe. Swiss Political Science Review 26 (3): 273–295.
Mutz, D.C. 2002. Cross-cutting social networks: testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review 96: 111–126.
Nir, L. 2005. Ambivalent social network and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17 (4): 422–442.
Nickerson, D. 2008. Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments. American Political Science Review 102 (1): 49–57.
Önnudóttir, E., A. Helgason, Ó. Harðarson, and H. Thórisdóttir. 2021. Electoral politics in crisis after the great recession: Change, fluctuations and stability in Iceland. London: Routledge.
Paulis, E. 2021. La galaxie des petits partis politiques en Belgique. In Les partis politiques en Belgique, ed. P. Delwit and E. van Haute. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
Paulis, E., M. Ognibene, and A. Brennan. 2021. Les partis politiques belges et l’utilisation des réseaux sociaux en ligne. In Les partis politiques en Belgique, ed. P. Delwit and E. van Haute. Bruxelles: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
Pauwels, T. 2014. Populism in Western Europe: Comparing Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. London: Routledge.
Pattie, C., and R. Johnston. 2001. Talk as a political context: conVersation and electoral change in British elections. Electoral Studies 20: 17–40.
Perry B. Pescosolido B. Borgatti S. (2018) Egocentric Network Analysis. Foundations, Methods and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pilet, J.-B. 2020. Hard times for governing parties: The 2019 federal elections in Belgium. West European Politics 44 (2): 439–449.
Pilet, J.-B., P. Baudewyns, K. Deschouwer, A. Kern, and J. Lefevere. 2020. Les Belges Haussent leur Voix. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Pirro, L., and M. Portos. 2021. Populism between voting and non-electoral participation. West European Politics 44 (3): 558–584.
Ramiro, L. 2016. Support for radical left parties in Western Europe: Social background, ideology and political orientations. European Political Science Review 8 (1): 1–23.
Ramiro, L., and R. Gomez. 2020. The electoral effect of radical left parties leaders. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions held virtually 14–17 April. Panel: leadership in the European Radical Left 2020.
Rogers, T., D. Green, P. Ternovski, and G. Young C. F. 2017. Social pressure and voting: A field experiment conducted in a high-salience election. Electoral Studies 46: 87–100.
Rojon, S., and A. Rijken. 2020. Are radical right and radical left voters direct democrats? Explaining differences in referendum support between radical and moderate voters in Europe. European Societies 22 (5): 581–609.
Rolfe, M. 2012. Voter turnout: A social theory of political participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rooduijn, M., B. Burgoon, E. van Elsas, J. van de Werfhorst, and H. G. 2019. Radical distinction: Support for radical left and radical right parties in Europe. European Union Politics 18 (4): 536–559.
Rooduijn, M., and T. Akkerman. 2017. Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics 23 (3): 193–204.
Rydgren, J. 2007. The sociology of the radical right. Annual Review of Sociology 33 (1): 241–262.
Santana-Pereira, J., and J. Cancela. 2020. Demand without supply? Populist attitudes and voting behaviour in post-bailout Portugal. South European Society and Politics 25 (2): 205–228.
Santoro, L., and P. Beck. 2018. Social networks and vote choice. In The Oxford handbook of political networks, ed. J. Victor, A. Montgomery, and M. Lubell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schumann, S., D. Boer, K. Hanke, and J. Liu. 2021. Social media use and support for populist radical right parties: Assessing exposure and selection effects in a two-wave panel study. Information, Communication & Society 24 (7): 921–940.
Spierings, N., and A. Zaslove. 2017. Gender, populist attitudes, and voting: Explaining the gender gap in voting for populist radical right and populist radical left parties. West European Politics 40 (4): 821–847.
Stockemer, D., T. Lentz, and D. Mayer. 2018. Individual predictors of the radical right-wing vote in Europe: A meta-analysis of articles in peer-reviewed journals (1995–2016). Government and Opposition 53 (3): 569–593.
Sunstein C. (2007) Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Valentim, V. 2021. Parliamentary representation and the normalization of radical right support. Comparative Political Studies. Online First.
VanderWeele, T., and W. An. 2013. Social networks and causal inference. In Handbook of causal analysis for social research, ed. S. Morgan. Dordrecht: Springer.
Van Kessel, S. 2013. A matter of supply and demand: The electoral performance of populist parties in three European countries. Government and Opposition 48 (2): 175–199.
Vezzoni, C., and M. Mancosu. 2016. Diffusion processes and discussion networks: An analysis of the propensity to vote for the 5 star movement in the 2013 Italian election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 26 (1): 1–21.
Visser, M., M. Lubbers, G. Kraaykamp, and E. Jaspers. 2014. Support for radical left ideologies in Europe. European Journal of Political Research 53 (3): 541–558.
Voogd, R., and R. Dassonneville. 2020. Are the supporters of populist parties loyal voters? Dissatisfaction and stable voting for populist parties. Government and Opposition 55 (3): 349–370.
Wauters, B., and G. Pittoors. 2019. Populist party leaders in Belgium: An analysis of VB and PVDA-PTB. Polish Political Science Review 7 (1): 1–23.
Webb, P. 2013. Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research 52 (6): 747–772.
Zuckerman, A. 2005. Social logic of politics: Personal Networks as contexts. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Zou, J., R. Meir, and D. Parkes. 2015. Strategic voting behavior in doodle polls. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. pp. 464–472.
