Download

Full Text

See more details

X (1)

Mendeley (5)

0

CITATIONS

0 Total citations

0 Recent citations

0 Field Citation Ratio

n/a Relative Citation Ratio

publications

0

supporting

0

mentioning

0

contrasting

0

Smart Citations

0

0

0

0

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

• J. Auger, 2013. “Speculative design: Crafting the speculation,” Digital Creativity, volume 24, number 1, pp. 11-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276, accessed 5 May 2023.
• J. Bleecker, 2022. “Design fiction: A short essay on design, science, fact, and fiction,” In: S. Carta (editor). Machine learning and the city: Applications in architecture and urban design. Oxford: Wiley, pp. 561-578. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119815075.ch47, accessed 5 May 2023.
• M. Botes and A. Rossi, in press. “Storytelling as facilitation tool for inclusive ethics training,” In:E. Hildt, K. Laas, C. Miller and E. Brey (editors). Building inclusive ethical cultures in STEM. Berlin: Springer.
• E. Burton, J. Goldsmith and N. Mattei, 2018. “How to teach computer ethics through science fiction,” Communications of the ACM, volume 61, number 8, pp. 54-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3154485, accessed 5 May 2023.
• A. Cavoukian, 2011. Privacy by design in law, policy and practice: A white paper for regulators, decisionmakers and policy-makers. Toronto: Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario.
• A. Courmont, R. Chatellier and M. Biéri, 2021. “Protéger la vie privée en 2030. Une exploration prospective et spéculative,” Laboratoire d’Innovation Numérique de la CNIL, at https://linc.cnil.fr/sites/default/files/atoms/files/linc proteger la vie privee en 2030-, accessed 5 May 2023.
• A. Delgado, K. Rommetveit, M. Barceló and L. Lemkow, 2012. “Imagining high-tech bodies: Science fiction and the ethics of enhancement,” Science Communication, volume 34, number 2, pp. 200-240. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547011408928, accessed 5 May 2023.
• T. Durfee, 2018. “Aspirants to reality: Possible essays on the Made Up,” In: T. Durfee and M. Ziegler (editors). Made up: Design’s fictions. New York: Actar Art Center Graduate Press, pp. 10-15.
• European Commission, 2022. “European Commission digital strategy Next generation digital Commission,” C(2022) 4388 final, at https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2022-, accessed 5 May 2023.
• C. Fiesler, 2021. “Innovating like an optimist, preparing like a pessimist: Ethical speculation and the legal imagination,” Colorado Technology Law Journal, volume 19, number 1, pp. 1-18, and at https://ctlj.colorado.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Fiesler-1.20.21-Final-Draft.pdf, accessed 5 May 2023.
• C. Fiesler, N. Garrett and N. Beard, 2020. “What do we teach when we teach tech ethics? A syllabi analysis,” SIGCSE ’20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 289-295. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366825, accessed 5 May 2023.
• J.B. Robinson, 1990. “Futures under glass: A recipe for people who hate to predict,” Futures, volume 22, number 8, pp. 820-842. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(90)90018-D, accessed 5 May 2023.
• A. Rossi, R. Chatellier, S. Leucci, R. Ducato and E. Hary, 2022. “What if data protection embraced foresight and speculative design?” In: D. Lockton, S. Lenzi, P. Hekkert, A. Oak, J. Sádaba and P. Lloyd (editors). DRS2022: Bilbao. doi: https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.681, accessed 5 May 2023.
• B. M. Tharp and S.M. Tharp, 2019. Discursive design: Critical, speculative, and alternative things. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11192.001.0001, accessed 5 May 2023.