Biomechanical testbench; Physiological loading; Pelvic ring
Abstract :
[en] Biomechanical testbench emulating the physiological loading of the pelvis is crucial in developing reconstructive implants for fragility fractures of the pelvis. Additionally, it will help understand the influence of the common daily loading on the pelvic ring. However, most reported experimental studies were mainly comparative with simplified loading and boundary conditions. In (Part I - Computational Design of Experiments) of our study, we described the concept of the computational experiment design to design and construct a biomechanical testbench emulating the gait movement of the pelvis. The 57 muscles and joints' contact forces were reduced to four force actuators and one support, producing a similar stress distribution. The experimental setup is explained in this paper (Part II - Experimental Testing), and some experimental results are presented. In addition, a series of repeatability and reproducibility tests were conducted to assess the test stand capabilities of replicating the gait physiological loading. The calculated stresses and the experimentally recorded strains showed that the pelvic ring response to the loading always follows the loaded leg side during the gait cycle. Furthermore, the experimental results of the pelvis displacement and strain at selected locations match the numerical ones. The developed test stand and the concept of computational experiment design behind it provide guidelines on how to design biomechanical testing equipment with physiological relevance.
Disciplines :
Mechanical engineering
Author, co-author :
SOLIMAN, Ahmed ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
Ricci, Pierre-Louis; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
KEDZIORA, Slawomir ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
Kelm, Jens; Chirurgisch Orthopädisches Zentrum Illingen, Illingen, Deutschland
Gerich, Torsten; Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxemburg > Traumatology
MAAS, Stefan ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Developing A Biomechanical Testing Setup Of The Pelvis, Part II - Experimental Testing
Publication date :
23 May 2023
Journal title :
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
ISSN :
0148-0731
eISSN :
1528-8951
Publisher :
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), New-York, United States - New York
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
This research is funded by the Department of Engineering of the University of Luxembourg
Vigdorchik, J. M., Esquivel, A. O., Jin, X., Yang, K. H., Onwudiwe, N. A., and Vaidya, R., 2012, “Biomechanical Stability of a Supra-Acetabular Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation Device (INFIX) vs External Fixation and Plates for Vertically Unstable Pelvic Fractures,” J. Orthop. Surg. Res., 7(1), p. 31.
Osterhoff, G., Tiziani, S., Hafner, C., Ferguson, S. J., Simmen, H.-P., and Werner, C. M. L., 2016, “Symphyseal Internal Rod Fixation Versus Standard Plate Fixation for Open Book Pelvic Ring Injuries: A Biomechanical Study,” Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg., 42(2), pp. 197–202.
Acklin, Y. P., Zderic, I., Richards, R. G., Schmitz, P., Gueorguiev, B., and Grechenig, S., 2018, “Biomechanical Investigation of Four Different Fixation Techniques in Sacrum Denis Type II Fracture With Low Bone Mineral Density,” J. Orthop. Res., 36(6), pp. 1624–1629.
Gr€uneweller, N., Raschke, M. J., Zderic, I., Widmer, D., W€ahnert, D., Gueorguiev, B., Richards, R. G., Fuchs, T., and Windolf, M., 2017, “Biomechanical Comparison of Augmented Versus Non-Augmented Sacroiliac Screws in a Novel Hemi-Pelvis Test Model,” J. Orthop. Res., 35(7), pp. 1485–1493.
Lodde, M. F., Katthagen, J. C., Schopper, C. O., Zderic, I., Richards, G., Gueorguiev, B., Raschke, M. J., and Hartensuer, R., 2021, “Biomechanical Comparison of Five Fixation Techniques for Unstable Fragility Fractures of the Pelvic Ring,” J. Clin. Med., 10(11), p. 2326.
Agarwal, Y., Doebele, S., Windolf, M., Shiozawa, T., Gueorguiev, B., and Stuby, F. M., 2014, “Two-Leg Alternate Loading Model—A Different Approach to Biomechanical Investigations of Fixation Methods of the Injured Pelvic Ring With Focus on the Pubic Symphysis,” J. Biomech., 47(2), pp. 380–386.
Ramezani, M., Klima, S., de la Herverie, P. L. C., Campo, J., Le Joncour, J.-B., Rouquette, C., Scholze, M., and Hammer, N., 2019, “In Silico Pelvis and Sacroiliac Joint Motion: Refining a Model of the Human Osteoligamentous Pelvis for Assessing Physiological Load Deformation Using an Inverted Validation Approach,” BioMed Res. Int., 2019, pp. 1–12.
Wu, Y.-D., Cai, X.-H., Liu, X.-M., and Zhang, H.-X., 2013, “Biomechanical Analysis of the Acetabular Buttress-Plate: Are Complex Acetabular Fractures in the Quadrilateral Area Stable After Treatment With Anterior Construct Plate-1/3 Tube Buttress Plate Fixation?,” Clinics, 68(7), pp. 1028–1033.
Klima, S., Grunert, R., Ondruschka, B., Scholze, M., Seidel, T., Werner, M., and Hammer, N., 2018, “Pelvic Orthosis Effects on Posterior Pelvis Kinematics an In-Vitro Biomechanical Study,” Sci. Rep., 8(1), p. 15980.
Sawbones, 2021, “Sawbones Biomechanical Catalogue,” Sawbones, Vashon Island, WA, accessed May 7, 2021, https://www.sawbones.com/catalog/biomechanical.html
Hermann, S., 2015, “Virtual Strain Gauges and Virtual Calibration for the Correlation of Landing Gear Simulation Models,” ANSYS Conference & 33rd CADFEM Users’ Meeting, Bremen, Germany, June 25, p. 29.
Ricci, P.-L., 2019, “Numerical Analysis of Gait Load Distribution in the Human Pelvis and Design of a Biomechanical Testing Device: Experimental Assessment of Two Implants for Anterior Fragility Fractures,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Ricci, P.-L., Maas, S., Gerich, T., and Kelm, J., 2017, “An Advanced Approach to Design Experiments to Investigate the Biomechanics of the Pelvis,” Proceedings of the 23rd Congress of the European Society of Biomechanics, Seville, Spain, July 2–5.
Item, 2018,“Item,”Item,Solingen,Germany,accessed May 8,2019, https://www. item24.com/de-de/
Lee, C.-H., Hsu, C.-C., and Huang, P.-Y., 2017, “Biomechanical Study of Different Fixation Techniques for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Injuries Using Finite Element Analyses and Biomechanical Tests,” Comput. Biol. Med., 87, pp. 250–257.
Chaiyamongkol, W., Kritsaneephaiboon, A., Bintachitt, P., Suwannaphisit, S., and Tangtrakulwanich, B., 2018, “Biomechanical Study of Posterior Pelvic Fixations in Vertically Unstable Sacral Fractures: An Alternative to Triangular Osteosynthesis,” Asian Spine J., 12(6), pp. 967–972.
Liu, L., Zeng, D., Fan, S., Peng, Y., Song, H., Jin, D., and Zeng, L., 2021, “Biomechanical Study of Tile C3 Pelvic Fracture Fixation Using an Anterior Internal System Combined With Sacroiliac Screws,” J. Orthop. Surg. Res., 16(1), p. 225.
Berber, O., Amis, A. A., and Day, A. C., 2011, “Biomechanical Testing of a Concept of Posterior Pelvic Reconstruction in Rotationally and Vertically Unstable Fractures,” J. Bone Jt. Surg., Br. Vol., 93-B(2), pp. 237–244.
McLachlin, S., Lesieur, M., Stephen, D., Kreder, H., and Whyne, C., 2018, “Biomechanical Analysis of Anterior Ring Fixation of the Ramus in Type C Pelvis Fractures,” Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg., 44(2), pp. 185–190.
Becker, C. A., Kammerlander, C., Kußmaul, A. C., Woiczinski, M., Thorw€achter, C., Zeckey, C., Sommer, F., Linhart, C., Weidert, S., Suero, E. M., B€ocker, W., and Greiner, A., 2019, “Modified Less Invasive Anterior Subcutaneous Fixator for Unstable Tile-C-Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Biomechanical Study,” Biomed. Eng. Online, 18(1), p. 38.