Do learners need semantics to spell syntactic markers? Plural spellings in real vs. pseudowords in a French L2 setting

[en] Inaudible syntactic markers are especially difcult to spell. This paper examines how 455 fourth graders spell silent French plural markers in a dictation with real and pseudowords after one year of formal French instruction (L2). The Generalized Linear Mixed Model analysis shows frst that noun plural spelling (real and pseudo) is a strong predictor for verb and adjective plural spelling. Second, the performance on real verb plural is higher than the performance on real adjective plural. In con‑ trast, the performance on pseudoadjective plural is higher than on pseudoverb plural. Our fndings indicate the strong infuence of semantics and frequency in instruction input on plural spelling: noun plural is semantically grounded, and nouns are most frequent in the curriculum. Verbs and verb plural are also frequent, and infection is mostly taught by means of memorizing the verb infection paradigm. Adjectives are taught least frequently. The fndings are discussed in the context of French L2 instruction, as the extremely low results on adjectives and pseudoverbs seem to be a consequence of instruction methods.

Disciplines :

Education & instruction

Author, co-author :

KLASEN, Lisa ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Humanities (DHUM)

UGEN, Sonja ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > LUCET

DORDING, Carole ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Humanities (DHUM)

Fayol, Michel

WETH, Constanze ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Humanities (DHUM)

External co-authors :

yes

Language :

English

Title :

Do learners need semantics to spell syntactic markers? Plural spellings in real vs. pseudowords in a French L2 setting

Publication date :

2023

Journal title :

Reading and Writing

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Focus Area :

Educational Sciences

Name of the research project :

C18/SC/12675187/GRASP/WETH

Funders :

FNR - Fonds National de la Recherche

Available on ORBilu :

since 30 March 2023

Statistics

Number of views

121 (16 by Unilu)

Number of downloads

49 (3 by Unilu)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenAlex citations

WoS citations^™

Bibliography

Ågren, M. (2008). À la recherche de la morphologie silencieuse: Sur le développement du pluriel en français L2 écrit [Searching for silent morphology: On the development of the plural in French as a second language]. Doctoral Thesis (monograph), French Studies, Lund University).
Ågren, M. (2009). Morphological development in written L2 French: A processability perspective. In J. Keßler & D. Keatinge (Eds.), 2009 (pp. 121–151). Empirical evidence across languages. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ågren, M., & Van de Weijer, J. (2013a). Number problems in monolingual and bilingual French-speaking children. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 4(1), 25–50. 10.1075/lia.4.1.02agr DOI: 10.1075/lia.4.1.02agr
Ågren, M., & Van De Weijer, J. (2013b). Input frequency and the acquisition of subject-verb agreement in number in spoken and written French. Journal of French Language Studies, 23(3), 311–333. DOI: 10.1017/S0959269512000312
Arseneau, R., & Nadeau, M. (2018). Expérimentation des dictées métacognitives: Quels effets sur l’apprentissage de l’orthographe grammaticale en contexte francophone minoritaire ? [Experimentation of metacognitive dictation: Effects on syntactic spelling learning in French minority context?]. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 126–153. 10.7202/1058464ar DOI: 10.7202/1058464ar
Bahr, R. H., Silliman, E. R., Berninger, V. W., & Dow, M. (2012). Linguistic pattern analysis of misspellings of typically developing writers in grades 1–9. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 55(December), 1587–1599. 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0335) DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0335)
Bîlici, N., Ugen, S., Fayol, M., & Weth, C. (2018). The effect of morphosyntactic training on multilingual fifth graders’ spelling in French. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(6), 1319–1343. 10.1017/S0142716418000346 DOI: 10.1017/S0142716418000346
Bodé, S., Serres, J., & Ugen, S. (2009). Similarities and differences of Luxembourgish and Romanophone 12 year olds’ spelling strategies in German and French. Written Language and Literacy, 12(1), 82–96. 10.1075/wll.12.1.04bod DOI: 10.1075/wll.12.1.04bod
Bosse, M.-L., Brissaud, C., & Le Levier, H. (2021). French pupils’ lexical and grammatical spelling from sixth to ninth grade: A longitudinal study. Language and Speech., 64(1), 224–249. 10.1177/0023830920935558 DOI: 10.1177/0023830920935558
Bourdin, B., Leuwers, C., & Bourbon, C. (2011). Impact des contraintes linguistiques et cognitives sur l’acquisition de l’accord en genre de l’adjectif en français écrit [Impact of linguistic and cognitive factors in the production of adjectival gender agreement in written French]. Psychologie Française, 56(3), 133–143. 10.1016/j.psfr.2011.08.001 DOI: 10.1016/j.psfr.2011.08.001
Brissaud, C., & Cogis, D. (2011). Comment enseigner l’orthographe aujourd’hui? [How to teach spelling today?] Paris: Hatier.
Brissaud, C. & Fayol, M. (2018). Étude de la langue et production d'écrits [Language study and writing production] Cnesco. http://www.cnesco.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/VDEF-rapport-Brissaud-Fayol.pdf
Brooks, M.E., Kristensen, K., Van Benthem, K.J., Magnusson, A., Berg, C.W., Nielsen, A., Skaug, H.J., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B.M. (2017). glmmTMB Balances Speed and Flexibility Among Packages for Zero- inflated Generalized Linear Mixed Modeling. The R Journal, 9(2), 378–400. https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2017/RJ-2017-066/index.html
Cogis, D. (2004). Une approche active de la morphographie. L’exemple d’une séquence sur l’accord de l’adjectif. [An active approach to morphography. The example of a sequence on the agreement of the adjective.] Lidil, 30, 73–86.
Coulmas, F. (2003). Writing systems. An introduction to their linguistic analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Cousin, M.-P., Largy, P., & Fayol, M. (2002). Sometimes early learned instances interfere with the implementation of rules: The case of nominal number agreement. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain & Cognition, 2(8), 51–65. 10.4000/cpl.512 DOI: 10.4000/cpl.512
Duyck, W., Desmet, T., Verbeke, L., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). WordGen: A tool for word selection and non-word generation in Dutch, German, English, and French. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(3), 488–499. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195595
Fayol, M. (2003). L’acquisition/apprentissage de la morphologie du nombre. Bilan et perspectives. [The acquisition/learning of number morphology. Summary and perspectives]. Rééducation Orthophonique, 213, 151–166.
Fayol, M., Totereau, C., & Barrouillet, P. (2006). Disentangling the impact of semantic and formal factors in the acquisition of number inflections: Noun, adjective and verb agreement in written French. Reading and Writing, 19(7), 717–736. 10.1007/s11145-005-1371-7 DOI: 10.1007/s11145-005-1371-7
Granget, C. (2005). Développement de l’accord verbal avec un sujet pluriel dans les récits écrits d’apprenants germanophones scolarisés du français. [Development of verbal agreement with plural subject in compositions written by German learners of French]. In: Granfeldt, J. & Schlyter, S. (Eds.), Acquisition et production de la morphologie flexionnelle. Actes du Festival de la morphologie. PERLES, 20: petites études romanes de Lund, 111–124.
Kemp, N., & Bryant, P. (2003). Do Beez buzz? Rule-based and frequency-based knowledge in learning to spell plural-s. Child Development, 74(1), 63–74. 10.1111/1467-8624.00521 DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00521
Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behaviour Research Methods, 42, 627–633. 10.3758/BRM.42.3.627 DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.627
Largy, P., Cousin, M. P., Bryant, P., & Fayol, M. (2007). When memorized instances compete with rules: The case of number-noun agreement in written French. Journal of Child Language, 34(2), 425–437. 10.1017/S0305000906007914 DOI: 10.1017/S0305000906007914
Largy, P., Cousin, M.-P., & Fayol, M. (2004). Acquérir le pluriel des noms. Existe-t-il un effet de fréquence du nom? [Acquiring the plural of nouns. Is there a noun frequency effect?]. Lidil, 30, 39–54. 10.4000/lidil.663 DOI: 10.4000/lidil.663
Largy, P., & Fayol, M. (2001). Oral cues improve subject-verb agreement in written French. International Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 121–131. 10.1080/00207590143000009 DOI: 10.1080/00207590143000009
Largy, P., Fayol, M., & Lemaire, P. (1996). The homophone effect in written French: The case of verb–noun inflection errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(3), 217–255. 10.1080/016909696387178 DOI: 10.1080/016909696387178
Lecocq, P. (2013). L'É.co.s.se une épreuve de compréhension syntaxico-sémantique. [L'É.co.s.se a test of syntactic-semantic reception]. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.
Lété, B., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2008). Consistency and word-frequency effects on spelling among first- to fifth-grade French children: A regression-based Study. Journal of Memory & Language, 58, 952–977. 10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.001 DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.001
Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & Colé, P. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary-school readers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 156–166. DOI: 10.3758/BF03195560
Le Levier, H., & Brissaud, C. (2020). Marquer le nombre du nom et de l’adjectifâ€¯: une difficulté persistante dans deux corpus de dictées d’élèves avancés. [Marking the number of noun and adjective: a persistent difficulty in two corpora of dictations by advanced students]. SHS Web of Conferences, 78, 07012. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207807012
Lüdecke, D. (2018). ggeffects: Tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(26), 772. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00772
Martinet, C., Valdois, S., & Fayol, M. (2004). Lexical orthographic knowledge develops from the beginning of reading acquisition. Cognition, 91, B11–B22. 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.002 DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.002
MENJE (Ministère de l'Éducation nationale, de l’Enfance et de la Jeunesse). (2011). Plan d’études — Ecole fondamentale. [Study plan—elementary school]. Retrieved from: https://men.public.lu/fr/publications/courriers-education-nationale/numeros-speciaux/plan-etudes-ecoles-fondamentale.html
MENJE (Ministère de l'Éducation nationale, de l’Enfance et de la Jeunesse) and University of Luxembourg (2015): Bildungsbericht Luxembourg 2015. Band 1: Sonderausgabe der chiffres clés de l'éducation nationale 2013/2014. [Education Report Luxembourg 2015. Volume 1: key data on national education 2013/2014]. Retrieved from: https://men.public.lu/en/publications/statistiques-etudes/themes-transversaux/15-bildungsbericht-band-1.html
Morin, M. F., Alamargot, D., Diallo, T. M. O., & Fayol, M. (2018). Individual differences in lexical and grammar spelling across primary school. Learning and Individual Differences, 62(February), 128–140. 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.002 DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.02.002
Mousty, P. Leybaert, J., Alegria, J., Content, A., & Morais, J. (1994). BELEC. Batterie d’évaluation du langage écrit et de ses troubles. [BELEC. Written language and disorders assessment battery]. In: Grégoire, J. & Piérart, B. (1994). Évaluer les troubles de la lecture: Les nouveaux modèles théoriques et leurs implications diagnostiques. De Boeck Supérieur. https://doi.org/10.3917/dbu.grego.1994.01.0127
Mussar, R., Sénéchal, M., & Rey, V. (2020). The development of morphological knowledge and spelling in French. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 146 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00146
Nadeau, M. & Fisher, C. (2014). Expérimentation de pratiques innovantes, la dictée 0 faute et la phrase dictée du jour, et étude de leur impact sur la compétence orthographique des élèves en production de texte. Rapport de recherche FRQSC. [Experimentation of innovative practices, the zero error dictation and the dictated sentence of the day, and study of their impact on the spelling competence of pupils in text production. FRQSC research report] https://frq.gouv.qc.ca/app/uploads/2021/06/pt_nadeaum_rapport-2014_dictee-impact-orthographique.pdf
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997a). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 637–649. 10.1037//0012-1649.33.4.637 DOI: 10.1037//0012-1649.33.4.637
Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997b). Learning to spell regular and irregular verbs. Reading and Writing, 9, 427–449. 10.1023/A:1007951213624 DOI: 10.1023/A:1007951213624
Van Reybroeck, M., & Hupet, M. (2009). Acquisition of number agreement Effects of processing demands. Journal of Writing Research, 1(2), 153–172. 10.17239/jowr-2009.01.02.3
RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/
Sandra, D. (2011). Spelling strategies in alphabetic scripts: Insights gained and challenges ahead. The Mental Lexicon, 6(1), 110–140. 10.1075/ml.6.1.05san DOI: 10.1075/ml.6.1.05san
Sandra, D., & Van Abbenyen, L. (2009). Frequency and analogical effects in the spelling of full-form and sublexical homophonous patterns by 12 year-old children. The Mental Lexicon, 4(2), 239–275. 10.1075/ml.4.2.04san DOI: 10.1075/ml.4.2.04san
Schmettow, M. (2021). New statistics for design researchers. A Bayesian workflow in tidy R. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46380-9
Simoës-Perlant, A., Loury, F., Largy, P., Gunnarsson, C., & Soum-Favaro, C. (2013). L’effet de la liaison en production écrite chez l’enfant dyslexique et normo-scripteur. [The effect of liaison in written production in dyslexic and normally developing children]. ANAE - Approche Neuropsychologique Des Apprentissages chez L’enfant, 124, 327–333.
Thévenin, M.-G., Totereau, C., Fayol, M., & Jarousse, J.-P. (1999). L’apprentissage / enseignement de la morphologie écrite du nombre en français. [The learning/teaching of the written number morphology in French]. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 126, 39–52. https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfp_0556-7807_1999_num_126_1_1093
Totereau, C., Barrouillet, P., & Fayol, M. (1998). Overgeneralizations of number inflections in the learning of written French: The case of noun and verb. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 447–464. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1998.tb00764.x
Totereau, C., Brissaud, C., Reilhac, C., & Bosse, M. L. (2013). L’orthographe grammaticale au collège: Une approche sociodifférenciée. [Grammatical spelling in college: A socio-differentiated approach]. ANAE - Approche Neuropsychologique Des Apprentissages chez L’enfant, 123, 164–171.
Weth, C. (2020). Distinguishing syntactic markers from morphological markers. A cross-linguistic comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–11. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02082 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02082
Weth, C., Ugen, S., & Fayol & M., Bîlici, N. (2021). Spelling patterns of plural marking and learning trajectories in French taught as a foreign language. Written Language and Literacy, 24(1), 81–110. 10.1075/wll.00048.wet DOI: 10.1075/wll.00048.wet
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant data analysis. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4