[en] Job insecurity is one of the risks that workers face on the labour market. As with any risk, individuals can choose to insure against it, and we here consider marriage as one potential source of this insurance. The 1999 rise in the French Delalande tax, paid by larger private firms when they laid off workers aged 50 or over, led to an exogenous rise in job insecurity for the uncovered (younger workers) in these larger firms. A difference-in-differences analysis using French panel data reveals that this greater job insecurity for the under-50s led to a significant rise in their probability of marriage, and especially when the partner had greater job security, consistent with marriage providing insurance against labour-market risk.
Disciplines :
Economie sociale
Auteur, co-auteur :
Clark, Andrew; Paris School of Economics-CNRS and University of Luxembourg
d'Ambrosio, Conchita ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS)
LEPINTEUR, Anthony ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS)
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Marriage as insurance: job protection and job insecurity in France
Date de publication/diffusion :
2023
Titre du périodique :
Review of Economics of the Household
ISSN :
1569-5239
eISSN :
1573-7152
Maison d'édition :
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Pays-Bas
Volume/Tome :
21
Pagination :
1157-1190
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
Projet FnR :
FNR12677653 - Financial Strain And Economic Instability: Effects On Wellbeing And Behaviour Over The Life Course, 2018 (01/09/2019-31/08/2022) - Conchita D'ambrosio
Anderson, S., & Ray, D. (2019). Missing unmarried women. Journal of the European Economic Association, 17, 1585–1616. DOI: 10.1093/jeea/jvy027
Becker, G. S. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846. DOI: 10.1086/260084
Becker, G. S. (1981). Altruism in the family and selfishness in the market place. Economica, 48, 1–15. DOI: 10.2307/2552939
Behaghel, L., Crépon, B., & Colin-Sédillot, B. (2004). Contribution Delalande et transitions sur le marché du travail. Economie et Statistique, 372, 61–88. DOI: 10.3406/estat.2004.7267
Behaghel, L. (2007). La protection de l’emploi des travailleurs âgés en France: Une évaluation ex ante de la contribution Delalande. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, 85, 41–80. DOI: 10.2307/20079179
Bertocchi, G., Brunetti, M., & Torricelli, C. (2011). Marriage and other risky assets: A portfolio approach. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 2902–2915. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.03.019
Böckerman, P., Ilmakunnas, P., & Johansson, E. (2011). Job security and employee well-being: Evidence from matched survey and register data. Labour Economics, 18, 547–554. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2010.12.011
Bolano, D., & Vignoli, D. (2021). Union formation under conditions of uncertainty: The objective and subjective sides of employment uncertainty. Demographic Research, 45, 141–186. DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2021.45.5
Borenstein, S., & Courant, P. N. (1989). How to carve a medical degree: Human capital assets in divorce settlements. American Economic Review, 79, 992–1009.
Buffeteau, S., & Echevin, D. (2004). Fiscalité et mariage. Economie Publique, 13, 3–28.
Charles, K. K., & Stephens, M. (2004). Job displacement, disability, and divorce. Journal of Labor Economics, 22, 489–522. DOI: 10.1086/381258
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 83, 50–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007
Chevalier, A., & Marie, O. (2017). Economic uncertainty, parental selection, and children’s educational outcomes. Journal of Political Economy, 125, 393–430. DOI: 10.1086/690830
Chiappori, P. A. (1992). Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 437–467. DOI: 10.1086/261825
Clark, A. E. (2001). What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Economics, 8, 223–242. DOI: 10.1016/S0927-5371(01)00031-8
Clark, A. E., & Postel-Vinay, F. (2009). Job security and job protection. Oxford Economic Papers, 61, 207–239. DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpn017
Clark, A. E., & Lepinteur, A. (2022). A natural experiment on job insecurity and fertility in France. Review of Economics and Statistics, 104, 386–398. DOI: 10.1162/rest_a_00964
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 448–74. DOI: 10.1257/jel.47.2.448
De la Rica, S., & Iza, A. (2005). Career planning in Spain: Do fixed-term contracts delay marriage and parenthood? Review of Economics of the Household, 3, 49–73. DOI: 10.1007/s11150-004-0979-8
de Lange, M., Wolbers, M. H., Gesthuizen, M., & Ultee, W. C. (2014). The impact of macro-and micro-economic uncertainty on family formation in the Netherlands. European Journal of Population, 30, 161–185.
Échevin, D. (2003). L’individualisation de l’impôt sur le revenu: Equitable ou pas? Economie et Prévision, 4, 149–165.
Ekert-Jaffé, O., & Solaz, A. (2001). Unemployment, marriage, and cohabitation in France. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30, 75–98. DOI: 10.1016/S1053-5357(01)00088-9
Ekert-Jaffé, O., & Solaz, A. (2002). Couple formation in France: The changing importance of labor market early career path. Journal of Bioeconomics, 4, 223–239. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021741431509
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133, 1645–1692. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjy013
Fehr-Duda, H., De Gennaro, M., & Schubert, R. (2006). Gender, financial risk, and probability weights. Theory and Decision, 60, 283–313. DOI: 10.1007/s11238-005-4590-0
Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 1–17. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
Frémeaux, N., & Leturcq, M. (2013). Plus ou moins mariés: L'évolution du mariage et des régimes matrimoniaux en France. Économie et Statistique, 462, 125–151. DOI: 10.3406/estat.2013.10220
Garicano, L., Lelarge, C., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Firm size distortions and the productivity distribution: Evidence from France. American Economic Review, 106, 3439–3479. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20130232
Georgieff, A., & Lepinteur, A. (2018). Partial employment protection and perceived job security: evidence from France. Oxford Economic Papers, 70, 846–867. DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpy009
Görlitz, K., & Tamm, M. (2015). Parenthood and risk preferences. Ruhr Economics Papers No. 552.
Halla, M., & Scharler, J. (2012). Marriage, divorce, and interstate risk sharing. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 114, 55–78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2011.01673.x
Hartog, J., Ferrer‐i‐Carbonell, A., & Jonker, N. (2002). Linking measured risk aversion to individual characteristics. Kyklos, 55, 3–26. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6435.00175
Hess, G. D. (2004). Marriage and consumption insurance: What’s love got to do with it? Journal of Political Economy, 112, 290–318. DOI: 10.1086/381477
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92, 1644–1655. DOI: 10.1257/000282802762024700
Kalmijn, M. (2011). The influence of men’s income and employment on marriage and cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s theory in Europe. European Journal of Population, 27, 269–293. DOI: 10.1007/s10680-011-9238-x
Landaud, F. (2021). From employment to engagement? Stable jobs, temporary jobs, and cohabiting relationships. Labour Economics, 73, 102077. DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102077
Leturcq, M. (2012). Will you civil union me? Taxation and civil unions in France. Journal of Public Economics, 96, 541–552. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.02.008
Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 563–591. DOI: 10.1086/229030
Rosenzweig, M. R., & Stark, O. (1989). Consumption smoothing, migration, and marriage: Evidence from rural India. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 905–926. DOI: 10.1086/261633
Schaller, J. (2013). For richer, if not for poorer? Marriage and divorce over the business cycle. Journal of Population Economics, 26, 1007–1033. DOI: 10.1007/s00148-012-0413-0
Schneider, D., Harknett, K., & Stimpson, M. (2018). What explains the decline in first marriage in the United States? Evidence from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, 1969 to 2013. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 791–811. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12481
Schneider, D., & Reich, A. (2018). Marrying ain’t hard when you got a union card? Labor union membership and first marriage. Social Problems, 61, 625–643. DOI: 10.1525/sp.2014.12316
Shore, S. H. (2010). For better, for worse: Intrahousehold risk-sharing over the business cycle. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 536–548. DOI: 10.1162/REST_a_00009
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 27–52. DOI: 10.1257/jep.21.2.27
Sunden, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998). Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans. American Economic Review, 88, 207–211.
Van den Berg, G. J., & Gupta, S. (2015). The role of marriage in the causal pathway from economic conditions early in life to mortality. Journal of Health Economics, 40, 141–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.02.004
Van Klaveren, C., Van Praag, B., & Van den Brink, H. M. (2008). A public good version of the collective household model: An empirical approach with an application to British household data. Review of Economics of the Household, 6, 169–191. DOI: 10.1007/s11150-007-9028-8
Weiss, Y. (1997). The formation and dissolution of families. Why marry? Who marries whom? And what happens upon divorce. Handbook of Population and Family Economics, 1, 81–123. DOI: 10.1016/S1574-003X(97)80020-7
Xie, Y., Raymo, J., Goyette, K., & Thornton, A. (2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 40, 351–367. DOI: 10.1353/dem.2003.0019
Yu, J., & Xie, Y. (2015). Changes in the determinants of marriage entry in post-reform urban China. Demography, 52, 1869–1892. DOI: 10.1007/s13524-015-0432-z
