R Wilson QC, ‘Judicial review. An introduction to the Key Principles’ in P von Berg (ed), Criminal Judicial Review: A Practitioner’s Guide to Judicial Review in the Criminal Justice System and Related Areas (Hart Publishing 2014) 3.
P Craig, EU Administrative Law, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press 2012) chs 22 and 23.
A Scordamaglia-Tousis, EU Cartel Enforcement: Reconciling Effective Public Enforcement with Fundamental Rights (Wolters Kluwer 2013).
WPJ Wils, ‘The Compatibility with Fundamental Rights of the EU Antitrust Enforcement System in Which the European Commission Acts Both as Investigator and as First-Instance Decision Maker’ (2014) 37(1) World Competition 5, 7-8.
K Lenaerts, I Maselis and K Gutman, EU Procedural Law (Oxford European Union Library 2014) 277.
C Kerse and N Khan, EU Antitrust Procedure (Sweet & Maxwell 2012) 175 and 176.
JC Laguna da Paz, ‘Understanding the limits of judicial review in European competition law’ (2014) 2(1) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 203, 210-11.
L Wissink, T Duijkersloot and R Widdershoven, ‘Shifts in Competence between Member States and the EU in the Newsupervisory System for Credit Institutions and their Consequences for Judicial Protection’ (2014) 10(5) Utrecht Law Review 92, 105.
TMC Arons, ‘Judicial Protection of Supervised Credit Institutions in the European Banking Union’ in D Busch and G Ferrarini (eds), European Banking Union (Oxford University Press 2015) 433, 471.
TMC Arons, ‘Judicial Protection of Supervised Credit Institutions in the European Banking Union’ in D Busch and G Ferrarini (eds), European Banking Union (Oxford University Press 2015) 325.
JFH Inghelram, ‘Judicial review of investigative acts of the European anti-fraud Office (OLAF): A search for balance’ (2012) 49 CML Rev 601, 603-05.
JFH Inghelram, Legal and Institutional Aspects of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): An Analysis with a Look Forward to a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (Europa Law Publishing 2011) 203 and 225.
T Wahl, ‘OLAF’s New Amended Legal Framework’ eucrim 20 January 2021, available at https://eucrim.eu/news/olafs-newamended-legal-framework/(accessed 11 September 2021).
V Covolo, L’émergence d’un droit pénal en réseau: Analyse critique du système européen de lutte antifraude (Nomos 2015) 567 et seq.
V Covolo, L’émergence d’un droit pénal en réseau: Analyse critique du système européen de lutte antifraude (Nomos 2015) para. 80.
V Covolo, L’émergence d’un droit pénal en réseau: Analyse critique du système européen de lutte antifraude (Nomos 2015) paras 65 et seq.
V Covolo, L’émergence d’un droit pénal en réseau: Analyse critique du système européen de lutte antifraude (Nomos 2015) para 45.
V Covolo, L’émergence d’un droit pénal en réseau: Analyse critique du système européen de lutte antifraude (Nomos 2015) para 76.
V Covolo, L’émergence d’un droit pénal en réseau: Analyse critique du système européen de lutte antifraude (Nomos 2015) paras 69-72.
V Covolo, L’émergence d’un droit pénal en réseau: Analyse critique du système européen de lutte antifraude (Nomos 2015) para 73.
V Covolo, L’émergence d’un droit pénal en réseau: Analyse critique du système européen de lutte antifraude (Nomos 2015) para 77.
M Luchtman and M Wasmeier, ‘The political and judicial accountability of OLAF’ in M Scholten and M Luchtman (eds) Law Enforcement by EU Authorities: Implications for Political and Judicial Accountability (Edward Elgar 2017) 221, 230-232.
