[en] Purpose: Following increased interest in physical literacy (PL), development of appropriate tools for assessment has become an important next step for its operationalization. To forward the development of such tools, the objective of this study was to build the foundations of the Évaluation de la Littératie Physique (ELIP), designed to help reduce existing tensions in approaches to PL assessment that may be resulting in a low uptake into applied settings. Methods: We followed two steps: (1) the development of the first version of ELIP by deploying a Delphi method (n = 30); and (2) the modification of items through cognitive interviews with emerging adults (n = 32). Results: The expert consensus highlighted four dimensions of PL to be assessed—physical; affective; cognitive; and social—with new perspectives, including a preference for broad motor tests over fitness. Conclusion: Results offer new insights into the assessment of emerging adults’ PL, but ELIP still requires further work concerning validity, reliability, and sensitivity.
Disciplines :
Education & instruction
Author, co-author :
Gandrieau, Joseph
Schnitzler, Christophe
Cairney, John
Keegan, Richard
Roberts, Will
Barnett, Lisa
Bentsen, Peter
Dudley, Dean
Sum, Raymond
Venetsanou, Fotini
Button, Chris
Turcotte, Sylvain
Berrigan, Felix
Cloes, Marc
Rudd, James
Riga, Vassiliki
Mouton, Alexandre
Vasickova, Jana
Blanchard, Joël
Mekkaoui, Léa
Derigny, Thibaut
Franck, N
Repond, Rose-Marie
Markovic, M
SCHEUER, Claude ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Education and Social Work (DESW)
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.