[en] Despite the interest in the MaaS system is growing fast within the scientific
community, it remains uncertain if MaaS could be a potential tool able to
reduce car ownership. This study aims to capture the impact of the total cost of
ownership (TCO) on MaaS demand by endogenizing the MaaS choice and the
TCO within the users’ travel choice in an agent-based model. We simulate different
TCO price range starting from a benchmark cost in the literature and embed
a specific type of MaaS plan which gives unlimited access to the services.
Results show a significant growth of MaaS demand when TCO rises, in particular
MaaS members are car users who shift their mode choice to public transport by
travelling within more trips but in a shorter time slot. In contrast, MaaS users
employ public transport for short trips while they still employ cars reducing their
travel time but employing the same number of trips when TCO decreases. Results
suggest that MaaS might become a more sustainable service by developing specific
subsidies to discourage car ownership and by increasing mobility accessibility.
Disciplines :
Ingénierie civile
Auteur, co-auteur :
CISTERNA, Carolina ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
VITI, Francesco ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
BIGI, Federico ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
The impact of total cost of ownership on MaaS system appeal using an agent-based approach
Date de publication/diffusion :
septembre 2022
Nom de la manifestation :
CSUM 6th conference on sustainable urban mobility
Date de la manifestation :
from 31-08-2022 to 02-10-2022
Titre de l'ouvrage principal :
The impact of total cost of ownership on MaaS system appeal using an agent-based approach
Heikkilä, S.: Mobility as a Service—A Proposal for Action for the Public Administration Case Helsinki, p. 94
Hietanen, S.: Mobility as a service The New Transport Paradigm, p. 18
Kamargianni, M., Matyas, M.: The Mobility-as-a-Service Business Ecosystem, p. 19 (2016)
Sochor, J., Arby, H., Karlsson, I.C.M., Sarasini, S.: A topological approach to Mobility as a Service: a proposed tool for understanding requirements and effects, and for aiding the integration of societal goals. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 27, 3–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.rtbm.2018.12.003
Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A.-M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., González, M.J.A., Narayan, J.: Mobility as a service: a critical review of definitions assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Plan 2(2), 13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i2.931
Becker, H., Balac, M., Ciari, F., Axhausen, K.W.: Assessing the welfare impacts of shared mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS). Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 131, 228–243 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.027
Hoerler, R., Stünzi, A., Patt, A., Del Duce, A.: What are the factors and needs promoting Mobility-as-a-Service? Findings from the swiss household energy demand survey (SHEDS). Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 12(1), 1–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-00412-y
Ho, C.Q., Hensher, D.A., Mulley, C., Wong, Y.Z.: Potential uptake and willingness-to-pay for Mobility as a Service (MaaS): a stated choice study. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 117, 302–318 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.025
Fioreze, T., de Gruijter, M., Geurs, K.: On the likelihood of using Mobility-as-a-Service: a case study on innovative mobility services among residents in the Netherlands. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 7(4), 790–801 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.08.002
Pickford, A., Chung, E.: The shape of MaaS: the potential for MaaS Lite. IATSS Res. 43(4), 219–225 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.11.006
Alonso-González, M.J., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., van Oort, N., Cats, O., Hoogendoorn, S.: Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS)—a latent class cluster analysis of attitudes. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 132, 378–401 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tra.2019.11.022
Sochor, J., Karlsson, I.C.M., Strömberg, H.: Trying out Mobility as a Service: experiences from a field trial and implications for understanding demand. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2542(1), 57–64 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3141/2542-07
Storme, T., De Vos, J., De Paepe, L., Witlox, F.: Limitations to the car-substitution effect of MaaS. Findings from a Belgian pilot study. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract., S0965856418312564 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.032
Strömberg, H., Karlsson, I.C.M., Sochor, J.: Inviting travelers to the smorgasbord of sustainable urban transport: evidence from a MaaS field trial. Transportation 45(6), 1655–1670 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9946-8
Tsouros, I., Tsirimpa, A., Pagoni, I., Polydoropoulou, A.: MaaS users: Who they are and how much they are willing-to-pay. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 148, 470–480 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.04.016
Vij, A., Ryan, S., Sampson, S., Harris, S.: Consumer preferences for Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) in Australia, p. 8 (2018)
Hensher, D.A., Ho, C.Q., Reck, D.J.: Mobility as a service and private car use: evidence from the Sydney MaaS trial. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 145, 17–33 (2021). https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.tra.2020.12.015
Eisenmann, C., Kuhnimhof, T.: Some pay much but many don’t: Vehicle TCO imputation in travel surveys. Transp. Res. Procedia 32, 421–435 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro. 2018.10.056
Caiati, V., Rasouli, S., Timmermans, H.: Bundling, pricing schemes and extra features preferences for mobility as a service: sequential portfolio choice experiment. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract., S0965856418309534 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.029
ETH Zürich, Horni, A., Nagel, K., Berlin, T.U., Axhausen, K.W., ETH Zürich.: Introducing MATSim. In: ETH Zürich, Horni, A., Nagel, K., Berlin, T.U. (eds.) The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim, pp. 3–8. Ubiquity Press (2016). https://doi.org/10.5334/baw.1
Ciari, F., Bock, B., Balmer, M.: Modeling station-based and free-floating car sharing demand: test case study for Berlin. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2416(1), 37–47 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3141/2416-05
Ziemke, D., Nagel, K.: Development of a fully synthetic and open scenario for agent-based transport simulations—The MATSim Open Berlin Scenario, p. 11
Giorgione, G., Ciari, F., Viti, F.: Dynamic pricing on round-trip carsharing services: travel behavior and equity impact analysis through an agent-based simulation. Sustainability 12(17), 6727 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176727
‘Stations—Stadtmobil Berlin’. Accessed: 06 March 2020. [Online]. Available: https://berlin. stadtmobil.de/privatkunden/stationen/
Giorgione, G., Ciari, F., Viti, F.: Availability-based dynamic pricing on a round-trip carsharing service: an explorative analysis using agent-based simulation. Procedia Comput. Sci. 151, 248–255 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.036
Le Vine, S., Polak, J.: The impact of free-floating carsharing on car ownership: early-stage findings from London. Transp. Pol. 75, 119–127 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol. 2017.02.004
Cisterna, C., Giorgione, G., Cipriani, E., Viti, F.: Supply characteristics and membership choice in round-trip and free-floating carsharing systems. In: 2019 6th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), pp. 1–7. Cracow, Poland. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTITS.2019.8883360
