[en] In reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, the government of Luxembourg suspended in-school teaching and learning towards remote teaching. A survey conducted by the Ministry of Education after three weeks of confinement, showed that more than half of the parents faced difficulties when using remote teaching with their students. To tackle this new challenge, we adapted our research to the use of augmented reality, digital and physical mathematical modelling in remote mathematics education for elementary schools. The elementary school students (aged 5 to 12) created cultural artifacts (i.e., Easter egg cups) during the confinement. In this paper, we will describe mathematical modelling in remote teaching and further concentrate on parents’ perspectives, who played an essential role in assisting their children. Moreover, we will discuss different didactical principles that emerged from the task design during the study through parents’ eyes. Thus, understanding parents’ perspectives became highly important in enabling us to improve task designs and related pedagogical approaches in remote teaching. The data collected in this study included semi-structured interviews with students, parents, and teachers as well as questionnaires and field notes. We followed an exploratory stance with our data analyses, primarily utilizing grounded theory (Corbin & Strauss, 1990, 2014) approaches. Through the insights we gained from our findings, we aim to explain how the parents perceived teaching and learning mathematical modelling in our experiments, how they scaffolded the given tasks, and what support they required and would need in future remote teaching.
Disciplines :
Education & instruction
Author, co-author :
Haas, Ben; Johannes Keppler University Linz, Austria
Lavicza, Zsolt; Johannes Keppler University Linz, Austria
KREIS, Yves ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Education and Social Work (DESW)
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Parent’s experience in remote learning during COVID-19 with digital and physical mathematical modelling
Publication date :
18 February 2023
Journal title :
Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
eISSN :
1793-7078
Publisher :
Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Alkhateeb, H. M. (2014). Self-esteem and mathematics achievement of elementary Qatari students. Psychological Reports, 114(3), 971–973E. https://doi.org/10.2466/11.07.PR0.114k28w1
Aram, D. (2008). Parent–child interaction and early literacy development. Early Education and Development, 19(1), 1– 6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280701838421
Bacca Acosta, J. L., Baldiris Navarro, S. M., Fabregat Gesa, R., & Kinshuk, K. (2019). Framework for designing motivational augmented reality applications in vocational education and training. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4182
Bacca Acosta, J. L., Baldiris Navarro, S. M., Fabregat Gesa, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk, K. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Journal Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133–149.
Berdik, C. (2017). Kids code their own 3d creations with new blocks-based design program. Tech Directions, 76(9), 23– 24.
Billinghurst, M., & Duenser, A. (2012). Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer, 45(7), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.111
Blum, W. (2013). Mathematical modeling: How can students learn to model? Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, Proceedings: Conference on Mathematical Modeling, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.7916/jmetc.v0i0.662
Blum, W., & Leiß, D. (2007). How do students and teachers deal with modelling problems? In C. Haines, P. Galbraith, W. Blum & S. Khan (Eds.), Mathematical Modelling (ICTMA 12): Education, Engineering and Economics (pp. 222– 231). Woodhead Publishing.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1998). Scaffolding emergent writing in the zone of proximal development. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1–18.
Cai, S., Liu, E., Yang, Y., & Liang, J. (2019). Tablet‐based AR technology: Impacts on students’ conceptions and approaches to learning mathematics according to their self‐efficacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12718
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Zeitschrift für Soziologie: ZfS, 19, 418–427.
Craig, D. V. (2000). Technology, math, and the early learner: Models for learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 27(3), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694232
Crook, C. J. (1997). Cultural practices and socioeconomic attainment: The Australian experience. Greenwood Press.
Diego-Mantecón, J. M., Blanco, T. F., Chamoso, J. M., & Cáceres, M. J. (2019). An attempt to identify the issues underlying the lack of consistent conceptualisations in the field of student mathematics-related beliefs. PLoS ONE, 14(11), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224696
Dienes, Z. P. (1960). Building up mathematics. Hutchinson Educational. https://archive.org/details/buildingupmathem00dien
González, N. A. A. (2015). How to include augmented reality in descriptive geometry teaching. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.245
Haas, B., Kreis, Y., & Lavicza, Z. (2020). Connecting the real world to mathematical models in elementary schools in Luxemburg. In R. Marks (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics: Bd. 40 (2) (S. 1–6). British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics. https://bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/BSRLM-CP-40-2-06.pdf
Hall, A. L. (2006). The relationship between academic achievement, academic performance and self-esteem of high school juniors at a public high school in central Florida. Capella University.
Hirschland, D. (2008). Collaborative intervention in early childhood: Consulting with parents and teachers of 3-to 7-year-olds. Oxford University Press USA.
Hohenwarter, M., Borcherds, M., Ancsin, G., Bencze, B., Blossier, M., Elias, J., Frank, K., Gal, L., Hofstaetter, A., Jordan, F., Karacsony, B., Konecny, Z., Kovacs, Z., Kuellinger, W., Lettner, E., Lizelfelner, S., Parisse, B., Solyom-Gecse, C., & Tomaschko, M. (2020). GeoGebra 3D Graphing Calculator (6.0.636.0). International GeoGebra Institute.
Kermani, H., & Brenner, M. E. (2000). Maternal scaffolding in the child’s zone of proximal development across tasks: Cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 15(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540009594774
Lavicza, Z., Haas, B., & Kreis, Y. (2020). Discovering everyday mathematical situations outside the classroom with MathCityMap and GeoGebra 3D. In M. Ludwig, S. Jablonski, A. Caldeira & A. Moura (Eds.), Research on Outdoor STEM Education in the digiTal Age: Proceedings of the ROSETA Online Conference in June 2020 (Vol. 6, pp. 23–30). WTM.
Liao, C. C. Y., Cheng, H. N. H., Chang, W.-C., & Chan, T.-W. (2017). Supporting parental engagement in a BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) school. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(4), 107–125.
Lieban, D. (2019). Exploring opportunities for connecting physical and digital resources for mathematics teaching and learning [Dissertation (PhD), Johannes Kepler Universität Linz]. http://epub.jku.at/obvulihs/4555198
Lieban, D., & Lavicza, Z. (2019). Instrumental genesis and heuristic strategies as frameworks to geometric modeling in connecting physical and digital environments. Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME11), 1–8.
Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. In P. Liljedahl, M. Santos-Trigo, U. Malaspina & R. Bruder (Eds.), Problem solving in mathematics education (pp. 1–39). Springer.
Liu, E., Li, Y., Cai, S., & Li, X. (2019). The effect of augmented reality in solid geometry class on students’ learning performance and attitudes. In M. E. Auer & R. Langmann (Eds.), Smart industry & smart education (Vol. 47, pp. 549–558). Springer.
Means, B. (1994). Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise. Jossey-Bass.
MENFP. (2011). Plan d’études: École fondamentale. Ministère de l’Éducation nationale et de la Formation professionnelle. http://www.men.public.lu/catalogue-publications/themes-transversaux/cen/cens/plan-etudes/fr.pdf
Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Salkind, G., & Bolyard, J. J. (2008). Virtual manipulatives used by K-8 teachers for mathematics instruction: The influence of mathematical, cognitive, and pedagogical fidelity. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 202–218.
Murray, O. T., & Olcese, N. R. (2011). Teaching and learning with iPads, ready or not? TechTrends, 55(6), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0540-6
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 239–263). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8
NCTM. (1999). NCTM principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
Neumann, M. M. (2015). Young children and screen time: Creating a mindful approach to digital technology. Australian Educational Computing, 30(2). http://journal.acce.edu.au/index.php/AEC/article/view/67
Neumann, M. M. (2018). Parent scaffolding of young children’s use of touch screen tablets. Early Child Development and Care, 188(12), 1654–1664. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1278215
Neumann, M. M., & Neumann, D. L. (2014). Touch screen tablets and emergent literacy. Early Childhood Education Journal, 42(4), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-013-0608-3
Ng, O., & Chan, T. (2019). Learning as making: Using 3D computer‐aided design to enhance the learning of shape and space in STEM‐integrated ways. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12643
Pacifici, C., Delaney, R., White, L., Nelson, C., & Cummings, K. (2006). Web-based training for foster, adoptive, and kinship parents. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(11), 1329–1343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.02.003
Pressley, M., Hogan, K., Wharton McDonald, R., Mistretta, J., & Ettenberger, S. (1996). The challenges of instructional scaffolding: The challenges of instruction that supports student thinking. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11(3), 138–146.
Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
Rothbaum, F., Martland, N., & Jannsen, J. B. (2008). Parents’ reliance on the web to find information about children and families: Socio-economic differences in use, skills and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2007.12.002
Saçkes, M. (2013). Children’s competencies in process skills in kindergarten and their impact on academic achievement in third grade. Early Education and Development, 24(5), 704–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2012.715571
Selter, C., & Zannetin, E. (2018). Mathematik unterrichten in der Grundschule: Inhalte-Leitideen-Beispiele. Friedrich Verlag.
Shilling, V., Morris, C., Thompson-Coon, J., Ukoumunne, O., Rogers, M., & Logan, S. (2013). Peer support for parents of children with chronic disabling conditions: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 55(7), 602–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12091
Sinclair, N., & Bruce, C. D. (2015). New opportunities in geometry education at the primary school. ZDM, 47(3), 319– 329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0693-4
Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N., & Cai, J. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: New questions and directions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9478-2
Steen, K., Brooks, D. W., & Lyon, T. (2006). The impact of virtual manipulatives on first grade geometry instruction and learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(4), 373–391.
Sung, Y.-T., Shih, P.-C., & Chang, K.-E. (2015). The effects of 3D-representation instruction on composite-solid surface-area learning for elementary school students. Instructional Science, 43(1), 115–145.
Szucs, D., Devine, A., Soltesz, F., Nobes, A., & Gabriel, F. (2013). Developmental dyscalculia is related to visuo-spatial memory and inhibition impairment. Cortex, 49(10), 2674–2688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.007
Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. E. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 16–22.
Wood, E., Petkovski, M., De Pasquale, D., Gottardo, A., Evans, M. A., & Savage, R. S. (2016). Parent scaffolding of young children when engaged with mobile technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00690
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
