Loneliness; Social Isolation; Social Interactions; Covid-19; Lockdown
Résumé :
[en] Rationale: The coronavirus pandemic has forced governments to implement a variety of different dynamic lockdown-stringency strategies in the last two years. Extensive lockdown periods could have potential unintended consequences on mental health, at least for at-risk groups.
Objective: We present novel evidence on the heterogeneous direct and indirect effects of lockdown-stringency measures on individuals’ perception of social isolation (i.e. loneliness) using panel data from five European countries (Germany, France, Spain, Italy and Sweden), which tracks changes in both in-person and remote social interactions between May 2020 and March 2021.
Method: We combine data from the COME-HERE panel survey (University of Luxembourg) and the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker (OxCGRT). We implement a dynamic mixture model in order to estimate the loneliness sub-population classes based on the severity of loneliness, as well as the evolution of social interactions.
Results: While loneliness is remarkably persistent over time, we find substantial heterogeneity across individuals, identifying four latent groups by loneliness severity. Group membership probability varies with age, gender, education and cohabitation status. Moreover, we note significant differences in the impact of social interactions on loneliness by degree of severity. Older people are less likely to feel lonely, but were more affected by lockdown measures, partly due to a reduction in face-to-face interactions. On the contrary, the younger, especially those living alone, report high levels of loneliness that are largely unaffected by changes in the pandemic after lockdown measures were initially implemented.
Conclusions: Understanding the heterogeneity in loneliness is key for the identification of at-risk populations that can be severely affected by extended lockdown measures. As part of public-health crisis-response systems, it is critical to develop support measures for older individuals living alone, as well as promoting continuous remote communication for individuals more likely to experience high levels of loneliness.
Disciplines :
Domaines particuliers de l’économie (santé, travail, transport...)
Auteur, co-auteur :
Caro, Juan Carlos
Clark, Andrew; Paris School of Economics - CNRS and University of Luxembourg
d'Ambrosio, Conchita ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS)
Vögele, Claus ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS)
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
The impact of COVID-19 lockdown stringency on loneliness in five European countries
Beutel, M.E., et al. Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health. BMC Psychiatr., 17(1), 2017, 97, 10.1186/s12888-017-1262-x.
Bollen, K.A., Davis, W.R., Two rules of identification for structural equation models. Struct. Equ. Model.: A Multidiscip. J. 16:3 (2009), 523–536, 10.1080/10705510903008261.
Brodeur, A., Clark, A.E., Fleche, S., Powdthavee, N., COVID-19, lockdowns and well-being: evidence from Google trends. J. Publ. Econ., 193, 2021, 104346, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104346.
Bu, F., Steptoe, A., Fancourt, D., Loneliness during a strict lockdown: trajectories and predictors during the COVID-19 pandemic in 38,217 United Kingdom adults. Soc. Sci. Med., 265, 2020, 113521, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113521.
Bu, F., Steptoe, A., Fancourt, D., Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Publ. Health 186 (2020), 31–34, 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.036.
Cacioppo, J.T., Hawkley, L.C., Social isolation and health, with an emphasis on underlying mechanisms. Perspect. Biol. Med. 46:3 (2003), S39–S52.
Cacioppo, J.T., Cacioppo, S., Chapter three - loneliness in the modern age: an evolutionary theory of loneliness (ETL). Olson, J.M., (eds.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2018, Academic Press, 127–197, 10.1016/bs.aesp.2018.03.003.
Cohn-Schwartz, E., Vitman-Schorr, A., Khalaila, R., Physical distancing is related to fewer electronic and in-person contacts and to increased loneliness during the COVID-19 pandemic among older Europeans. Qual of Life Res [Preprint], 2021, 10.1007/s11136-021-02949-4.
Deb, P., Trivedi, P.K., Finite mixture for panels with fixed effects. J. Econom. Methods 2:1 (2013), 35–51, 10.1515/jem-2012-0018.
Donovan, N.J., et al. Loneliness, depression and cognitive function in older U.S. adults. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatr. 32:5 (2017), 564–573, 10.1002/gps.4495.
Hamaker, E.L., Muthén, B., The fixed versus random effects debate and how it relates to centering in multilevel modeling. Psychol. Methods 25:3 (2020), 365–379, 10.1037/met0000239.
Hawkley, L.C., Cacioppo, J.T., Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann. Behav. Med. 40:2 (2010), 218–227, 10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8.
Hays, R.D., DiMatteo, M.R., A short-form measure of loneliness. J. Pers. Assess. 51:1 (1987), 69–81, 10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_6.
Hu, Y., Gutman, L.M., The trajectory of loneliness in UK young adults during the summer to winter months of COVID-19. Psychiatr. Res., 303, 2021, 114064, 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114064.
Hudiyana, J., et al. How Universal Is a Construct of Loneliness? Measurement Invariance of the UCLA Loneliness Scale in Indonesia. Germany, and the United States, 2021, 10731911211034564, 10.1177/10731911211034564 Assessment.
Hussain, A.H.M.B., Stringency in Policy Responses to Covid-19 Pandemic and Social Distancing Behavior in Selected Countries. 2020, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, 10.2139/ssrn.3586319 SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3586319.
Killgore, W.D.S., et al. Three months of loneliness during the COVID-19 lockdown. Psychiatr. Res., 293, 2020, 113392, 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113392.
Lara, E., et al. Exploring the effect of loneliness on all-cause mortality: are there differences between older adults and younger and middle-aged adults?. Soc. Sci. Med., 258, 2020, 113087, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113087.
Liu, Y., et al. Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures. Psychol. Methods 22:3 (2017), 486–506, 10.1037/met0000075.
Losada-Baltar, A., et al. Longitudinal correlates of loneliness and psychological distress during the lockdown situation due to COVID-19. Effects of age and self-perceptions of aging. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., 2021, 10.1093/geronb/gbab012 gbab012.
Pinquart, M., Sörensen, S., Risk factors for loneliness in adulthood and old age–a meta-analysis. Advances in Psychology Research, vol. 19, 2003, Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, US 1590336526, 111–143.
Prati, G., Mancini, A.D., The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns: a review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies and natural experiments. Psychol. Med. 51:2 (2021), 1–11, 10.1017/S0033291721000015.
Richter, D., Riedel-Heller, S., Zürcher, S.J., Mental health problems in the general population during and after the first lockdown phase due to the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic: rapid review of multi-wave studies. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Sci., 30, 2021, e27, 10.1017/S2045796021000160.
Sun, R., Rieble, C., Liu, Y., Sauter, D., Connected despite lockdown: the role of social interactions and social media use in wellbeing. Preprint from PsyArXiv, 2020, 10.31234/osf.io/x5k8u.
Valtorta, N.K., et al. Loneliness and perceived social isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart 102:13 (2016), 1009–1016, 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308790.
Vögele, C., Lutz, A., Yin, R., D'Ambrosio, C., How Do Different Confinement Measures Affect People in Luxembourg. France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Sweden? First COME-HERE Report’ at: wwwen.uni.lu/research/fhse/dbcs/pandemic/research_publications, 2020.
Wooldridge, J.M., Inverse probability weighted estimation for general missing data problems. J. Econom. 141:2 (2007), 1281–1301, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.02.002.
