[en] The focus of the present contribution is the role of European Union (EU) law in shaping the working
conditions of four groups of vulnerable workers. It assesses to what extent the impact of EU law favours,
on these particular groups, an increased risk of In-Work Poverty (IWP) and explores whether the recent
attention to IWP at EU level and the latest initiatives adopted may change the picture in the near future.
The purpose is, therefore, to contribute to the debate on the role of EU law and policy in structuring vulnerability
from the perspective of IWP. What is commonly known as EU labour law is a fragmentary legal
corpus that has grown in a rather patchwork fashion as part of a social dimension of the European project
that was, broadly speaking, functional to the logic of market integration. This originates in the early division
of competences between the EU and the Member States in the Treaty of Rome, which left labour law
and social protection outside the EU sphere of action. It partly explains why the protection of workers,
particularly those that do not engage in cross-border situations, does not seem to be the EU’s primary
goal, or at least it is not formulated as contrary to other potentially clashing rationales such as market
integration, flexibility, enhanced competitiveness and so on. The prevention of IWP was not, in any case,
one of the concerns of the original European project. Yet, EU law has produced several pieces of legislation
that directly or indirectly contribute to shaping the working conditions of European workers, including
those more exposed to IWP. The paper assesses the relevant EU legal framework and discusses its impact
on the working conditions of those more at risk of IWP. It concludes by estimating the potential of a series
of recent initiatives to enhance the protection of the most vulnerable workers, thus making a positive
change.
Disciplines :
Droit européen & international
Auteur, co-auteur :
RATTI, Luca ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Law (DL)
For a study of the legal meaning of 'precarious work' at EU and national level see I Florczak and M Otto, 'Precarious Work and Labour Regulation in the EU: Current Reality and Perspectives' in J Kenner, I Florczak and M Otto (eds), Precarious Work: The Challenges for Labour Law in Europe (Edward Elgar 2019) 3-7.
ILO, From Precarious Work to Decent Work. Outcome Document to the Workers' Symposium on Policies and Regulations to combat Precarious Employment (2012) last accessed 31 August 2022.
See eg, in the United Kingdom (UK), the definition of vulnerable workers as those who are at risk of having their entitlements denied, and who lack the capacity or means to secure them. HSE's list of most vulnerable workers includes new and expectant mothers, migrant workers, disabled workers, gig-economy, agency and temporary workers, older and younger workers, home workers, etc. See TUC, Hard Work, Hidden Lives. The Full Report of the Commission on Vulnerable Employment (2008) last accessed 31 August 2022.
See A Lo Faro, 'Contingent work: a conceptual framework' in E Ales, O Deinert, and J Kenner (eds), Core and Contingent Work in the European Union: A Comparative Analysis (Hart 2017), 9-10.
C Lang, I Schömann, and S Clauwaert, Atypical Forms of Employment Contracts in Times of Crisis (ETUI 2013) 5.
EPSR Principle 5: '::: Employment relationships that lead to precarious working conditions shall be prevented, including by prohibiting abuse of atypical contracts'. See also European Parliament, Resolution of 4 July 2017 on Working Conditions and Precarious Employment (2016/2221(INI)).
European Commission, The European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan (SWD 2021) 46 final.
S Giubboni, 'The Rise and Fall of EU Labour Law' 24 (2018) European Law Journal 7-20.
B Nolan, W Salverda, D Checchi, I Marx, A McKnight and IG Tóth et al (eds), Changing Inequalities and Societal Impacts in Rich Countries: Thirty Countries' Experiences (Oxford University Press 2014).
Eurofound, In-Work Poverty in the EU (Publications Office of the European Union 2017).
H Lohmann, 'The Concept and Measurement of In-Work Poverty' in H Lohmann, I Marx (eds), Handbook on In-Work Poverty (EE 2018) 7-25.
L Ratti, A Garcia-Muñoz and V Vergnat, 'The Challenge of Defining, Measuring, and Overcoming In-Work Poverty in Europe: An Introduction' in L Ratti (ed), In-Work Poverty in Europe. Vulnerable and Under-Represented Persons in a Comparative Perspective (Wolters Kluwer 2022) 7-8.
S Spasova et al, In-Work Poverty in Europe: A Study of National Policies (Publications Office of the European Union 2019) 10.
M Freedland and N Kountouris, The Legal Construction of Personal Work Relations (Oxford Uuniversity Press 2011).
C Hiessl, 'Working, Yet Poor: A Comparative Appraisal' in L Ratti (ed), In-Work Poverty in Europe. Vulnerable and Under-Represented Persons in a Comparative Perspective (Wolters Kluwer 2022) 355-6.
W Salverda, 'Low Earnings and Their Drivers in Relation to In-Work Poverty' in H Lohmann and I Marx (eds), Handbook on In-Work Poverty (Edward Elgar 2018) 26-49.
European Parliament, Precarious Employment in Europe. Part 1: Patterns, Trends and Policy Strategies (Publications Office of the European Union 2016) 29.
S Clauwaert and I Schömann, 'The Crisis and National Labour Law Reforms: A Mapping Exercise' (ETUI 2012); G Van Gyes and T Schulten (eds), Wage Bargaining Under the New European Economic Governance (ETUI 2015).
V Glassner, M Keune, and P Marginson, 'Collective Bargaining in a Time of Crisis: Developments in the Private Sector in Europe' 17 (2011) Transfer 303-21.
Eurofound, 'Working Conditions in the Retail Sector' (2013);
J Basedow et al (eds) Employee Participation and Collective Bargaining in Europe and China (Mohr Siebeck 2016).
N Countouris and W Njoya, '2001/23/EC Transfer of Undertakings' in M Schlachter (ed), EU Labour Law. A Commentary (Wolters Kluwer 2015) 423 and 438.
An analysis on the causes of 'downward' pressures in the labour market in D Weil, The Fissured Workplace: How Work Became So Bad for So Many and What Can Be Done to Improve It (Harvard University Press 2014).
M Schlachter, 'Transnational Temporary Agency Work: How Much Equality Does the Equal treatment Principle Provide?' (2012) International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, vol 28, issue 2, 190;
N Countouris and R Horton, 'The Temporary Agency Work Directive: Another Broken Promise?' 38 (2009) Industrial Law, vol 38, issue 3, Journal 333-338.
See eg N Kountouris, '“The Concept of 'Worker” in European Labour Law: Fragmentation, Autonomy and Scope' (2018) Industrial Law Journal, vol 47, issue 2, 192-225.
European Commission, Access to Social Protection for All Forms of Employment: Assessing the Options for a Possible EU Initiative (Brussels 2018).
D Mangan, E Gramano, and M Kullmann, 'An Unprecedented Social Solidarity Stress Test' (2020) European Labour Law Journal, vol 11, issue 3 247-275.
A Aranguiz and B Bednarowitz, 'Adapt or Perish: Recent Developments on Social Protection in the EU under a Gig Deal of Pressure' 9 (2018) European Labour Law Journal 345.
B Cantillon, Z Parolin and D Colleado, 'A Glass Ceiling on Poverty Reduction? An Empirical Investigation into the Structural Constraints on Minimum Income Protections' 30 (2020) Journal of European Social Policy 129-43.
E Brameshuber, '(A Fundamental Right to) Collective Bargaining for Economically Dependent, Employee-Like Workers' in JM Miranda Boto, E Brameshuber (eds), Collective Bargaining and the Gig Economy. A Traditional Tool for New Business Models (Hart 2022), 245-9.