[en] I study the importance of alpha decay for the measurement of realized and conditional expected returns in asset pricing studies. Alpha decay refers to the reduction in abnormal expected returns (relative to an asset pricing model) in response to an anomaly becoming widely known among market participants. As decreases in alpha are associated (ceteris paribus) with positive realized returns, the econometrician may misinterpret these repricing returns as evidence that the anomaly will persist in the future. Because alpha decay is generally a nonstationary phenomenon, asset pricing tests that impose stationarity may lead to biased inference. I illustrate the importance of alpha decay using the most commonly studied anomalies in the asset pricing literature and find that the measured alpha differs from the true alpha by about 1.4% per year. I provide a simple formula to correct for this bias and show how to incorporate alpha decay tests into the standard asset pricing toolkit.
Disciplines :
Finance
Auteur, co-auteur :
PENASSE, Julien ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Finance (DF)
Banz RW (1981) The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. J. Financial Econom. 9(1):3–18.
Black F, Jensen MC, Scholes M (1972) The capital asset pricing model: Some empirical tests. Jensen MC, ed. Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets (Praeger, New York), 79–121.
Blanchard OJ (1993) Movements in the equity premium. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity 2:75–138.
Brav A, Heaton JB (2008) Competing theories of financial anomalies. Rev. Financial Stud. 15(2):575–606.
Brav A, Lehavy R, Michaely R (2005) Using expectations to test asset pricing models. Financial Management 34(3):31–64.
Campbell JY (1987) Stock returns and the term structure. J. Financial Econom. 18(2):373–399.
Campbell JY, Shiller RJ (1988) The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Rev. Financial Stud. 1(3):195–228.
Campello M, Chen L, Zhang L (2008) Expected returns, yield spreads, and asset pricing tests. Rev. Financial Stud. 21(3):1297–1338.
Cho T (2020) Turning alphas into betas: Arbitrage and endogenous risk. J. Financial Econom. 137(2):550–570.
Chordia T, Subrahmanyam A, Tong Q (2014) Have capital market anomalies attenuated in the recent era of high liquidity and trading activity? J. Accounting Econom. 58(1):41–58.
Cochrane JH (2011) Presidential address: Discount rates. J. Finance 66(4):1047–1108.
Cohen RB, Polk C, Vuolteenaho T (2003) The value spread. J. Finance 58(2):609–641.
Dimson E, Marsh P (1999) Murphy’s law and market anomalies. J. Portfolio Management 25(2):53–69.
Dong X, Liu Q, Lu L, Sun B, Yan H (2018) Anomaly discovery and arbitrage trading.
Elton EJ (1999) Expected return, realized return, and asset pricing tests. J. Finance 54:1199–1220.
Fama EF, French KR (1993) Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financial Econom. 33(1):3–56.
Fama EF, MacBeth JD (1973) Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. J. Political Econom. 81(3):607–636.
Hamilton JD (1994) Time Series Analysis (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
Harvey CR (2001) The specification of conditional expectations. J. Empirical Finance 8(5):573–637.
Harvey CR, Liu Y (2019) A census of the factor zoo.
Harvey CR, Liu Y, Zhu H (2016) … and the cross-section of expected returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 29(1):5–68.
Jones CS, Pomorski L (2016) Investing in disappearing anomalies. Rev. Finance 21(1):237–267.
Lewellen J, Shanken J (2002) Learning, asset-pricing tests, and market efficiency. J. Finance 57(3):1113–1145.
Lewellen J, Nagel S, Shanken J (2010) A skeptical appraisal of asset pricing tests. J. Financial Econom. 96(2):175–194.
Linnainmaa JT, Roberts MR (2018) The history of the cross-section of stock returns. Rev. Financial Stud. 31(7):2606–2649.
McLean RD, Pontiff J (2016) Does academic research destroy stock return predictability? J. Finance 71(1):5–32.
Pastor L, Sinha M, Swaminathan B (2008) Estimating the intertemporal risk-return tradeoff using the implied cost of capital. J. Finance 63(6):2859–2897.
Reinganum MR (1981) Misspecification of capital asset pricing: Empirical anomalies based on earnings’ yields and market values. J. Financial Econom. 9(1):19–46.
Schwert GW (2003) Anomalies and market efficiency. Constantinides G, Harris M, Stulz R, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Elsevier, North-Holland, Amsterdam), 937–972.
van Binsbergen JH, Opp CC (2019) Real anomalies. J. Finance 74(4): 1659–1706.
