[en] Co-design with communities interested in heritage has oriented itself towards designing for polyvocality to diversify the accepted knowledges, values and stories associated with heritage places. However, engagement with heritage theory has only recently been addressed in HCI design, resulting in some previous work reinforcing the same realities that designers set out to challenge. There is need for an approach that supports designers in heritage settings in working critically with polyvocality to capture values, knowledges, and authorised narratives and reflect on how these are negotiated and presented in the designs created. We contribute “Designing with Genius Loci” (DwGL)—our proposed approach to co-design for polyvocality. We conceptualised DwGL through long-term engagement with volunteers and staff at a UK heritage site. First, we used ongoing recruitment to incentivise participation. We held a series of making workshops to explore participants’ attitudes towards authorised narratives. We built participants’ commitments to collaboration by introducing the common goal of creating an interactive digital design. Finally, as we designed, we enacted our own commitments to the heritage research and to participants’ experiences. These four steps form the backbone of our proposed approach and serve as points of reflexivity. We applied DwGL to co-creating three designs: Un/Authorised View, SDH Palimpsest and Loci Stories, which we present in an annotated portfolio. Grounded in research through design, we reflect on working with the proposed approach and provide three lessons learned, guiding further research efforts in this design space: (1) creating a conversation between authorised and personal heritage stories; (2) designing using polyvocality negotiates voices; and (3) designs engender existing qualities and values. The proposed approach places polyvocality foremost in interactive heritage interpretation and facilitates valuable discussions between the designers and communities involved.
Centre de recherche :
- Luxembourg Centre for Contemporary and Digital History (C2DH) > Public History and Outreach (PHO)
Disciplines :
Ingénierie, informatique & technologie: Multidisciplinaire, généralités & autres
Auteur, co-auteur :
TSENOVA, Violeta ; University of Luxembourg > Luxembourg Centre for Contemporary and Digital History (C2DH) > Public History and Outreach
Wood, Gavin; Northumbria University > Computer and Information Sciences
Kirk, David; Newcastle University > Open Lab
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Designing with Genius Loci: An Approach to Polyvocality in Interactive Heritage Interpretation
Date de publication/diffusion :
24 mai 2022
Titre du périodique :
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
eISSN :
2414-4088
Maison d'édition :
MDPI, Suisse
Titre particulier du numéro :
Co-Design Within and Between Communities in Cultural Heritage
Smith, L. Uses of Heritage; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2006.
Waterton, E. Whose sense of place? Reconciling archaeological perspectives with community values: Cultural landscapes in England. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2005, 11, 309–325. [CrossRef]
Sitzia, E. The Many Faces of Knowledge Production in Art Museums: An Exploration of Exhibition Strategies. Muséologies 2018, 8, 141–156. [CrossRef]
Huws, S.; John, A.; Kidd, J. Traces—Olion National Museum Wales. In The Routledge International Handbook of New Digital Practices in Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums and Heritage Sites; Lewi, H., Smith, W., vom Lehn, D., Cooke, S., Eds.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 441–449.
Kidd, J. With New Eyes I See: Embodiment, empathy and silence in digital heritage interpretation. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2019, 25, 54–66. [CrossRef]
Petrelli, D.; Dulake, N.; Marshall, M.T.; Pisetti, A.; Not, E. Voices from the war: Design as a means of understanding the experience of visiting heritage. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 7–12 May 2016; pp. 1033–1044.
Petrelli, D. Tangible Interaction meets Material Culture: Reflections on the meSch Project. Interactions 2019, 26, 34–39. [CrossRef]
Claisse, C.; Petrelli, D.; Ciolfi, L.; Dulake, N.; Marshall, M.T.; Durrant, A.C. Crafting Critical Heritage Discourses into Interactive Exhibition Design. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 April 2020; pp. 1–13. [CrossRef]
Schofield, T.; Foster-Smith, D.; Bozoğlu, G.; Whitehead, C. Co-Producing Collections: Re-imagining a Polyvocal Past with Cultural Probes. Open Libr. Humanit. 2018, 4, 1–23. [CrossRef]
Whitehead, C.; Schofield, T.; Bozoğlu, G. Plural Heritages and Community Co-Production; Routledge: London, UK, 2021; ISBN 9780367486464.
Frayling, C. Research in Art and Design. R. Coll. Art Res. Pap. 1993, 1, 1–5.
Durrant, A.C.; Vines, J.; Wallace, J.; Yee, J.S.R. Research through Design: Twenty-first Century Makers and Materialities. Des. Issues 2017, 33, 3–10. [CrossRef]
Gaver, W. What should we expect from research through design? In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, TX, USA, 5–10 May 2012; pp. 937–946.
Mandler, P. The Fall and Rise of the Stately Home; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA; London, UK, 1997.
Cannadine, D.; Musson, J. The Country House: Past, Present, Future: Great Houses of the British Isles; Rizzoli International Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
Young, L. Is there a museum in the house? Historic houses as a species of museum. Mus. Manag. Curatorsh. 2007, 22, 59–77. [CrossRef]
Mårdh, H. Re-entering the house. Scenographic and artistic interventions and interactions in the historic house museum. Nord. Museol. 2015, 1, 25–39. [CrossRef]
Hems, A. Heritage Interpretation. In The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences; Varela, S.L., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1–5. [CrossRef]
Smith, L. Deference and Humility: The social Values of the country House. In Valuing Historic Envrionments; Gibson, L., Pendlebury, J.E.C., Eds.; Ashgate: Farnham, UK, 2009; pp. 33–50.
Mitchell, P. The National Trust Is under Attack Because It Cares about History, Not Fantasy. Available online: https://www.theg uardian.com/commentisfree/2020/nov/12/national-trust-history-slavery (accessed on 25 May 2021).
Dresser, M.; Hann, A. Slavery and the British Country House; Dresser, M., Hann, A., Eds.; English Heritage: Swindon, UK, 2013.
Waterton, E. Politics, Policy and the Discourses of Heritage in Britain; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2010. [CrossRef]
Adams, R. The V&A, The Destruction of the Country House and the Creation of ‘English Heritage’. Mus. Soc. 2013, 11, 1–18.
Halliday, J. National Trust Branded “Ridiculous” for Covering Up Paintings of Men|Northumberland|The Guardian. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/nov/06/national-trust-exhibition-margaret-armstrong-cra gside-northumberland-covering-up-artworks-men (accessed on 23 March 2021).
Butler, P. National Trust Report on Slavery Links Did Not Break Charity Law, Regulator Says. Available online: https://www.th eguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/11/national-trust-report-uk-slavery-links-did-not-break-charity-law-regulator-says (accessed on 25 May 2021).
Ryan, D.; Vagnone, F.; Carolina, N.; Carolina, N. Reorienting historic house museums: An anarchists guide. In Proceedings of the 2014 ARCC/EAAE Architectural Research Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA; 2014; pp. 97–106. [CrossRef]
Galani, A.; Mason, R.; Rex, B. Dialogues and Heritages in the Digital Public Sphere; Routledge: London, UK, 2019; ISBN 9780367148065.
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica Genius. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/topic/genius-Roman-religion/additional-info#history (accessed on 20 April 2022).
Norberg-Schulz, C. Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture; Rizzoli: New York, NY, USA, 1980.
Vecco, M. Genius loci as a meta-concept. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 41, 225–231. [CrossRef]
Behnisch, S. Genius Loci: Inspiring a New International Architecture|MIT Architecture. Available online: https://architecture.mit.edu/building-technology/lecture/genius-loci-inspiring-new-international-architecture (accessed on 14 September 2019).
Brook, I. Can ‘spirit of place’ be a guide to ethical building? In Ethics and the Built Environment; Fox, W., Ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2000; pp. 139–151, ISBN 0203130510.
Seamon, D. Dwelling, seeing, and design: An introduction. In Dwelling, Seeing, and Designing: Toward a Phenomenological Ecology; State University of New York Press: Albany, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 1–21.
Sime, J.D. Creating places or designing spaces? J. Environ. Psychol. 1986, 6, 49–63. [CrossRef]
Thompson, I. What use is the genius loci? In Constructing Place: Mind and Matter; Menin, S., Ed.; Routledge Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 66–76.
Thwaites, K. Experiential landscape place: An exploration of space and experience in neighbourhood landscape architecture. Landsc. Res. 2001, 26, 245–255. [CrossRef]
Erickson, T. From interface to interplace: The spatial environment as a medium for interaction. In Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, Proceedings of the A Theoretical Basis for GIS. European Conference, COSIT’93, Marciana Marina, Elba Island, Italy, 19–22 September 1993; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; Volume 716, p. 716. [CrossRef]
Hershock, P.D.; Ames, R.T. Philosophies of Place: An Intercultural Conversation; Hershock, P.D., Ames, R.T., Eds.; University of Hawaii Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2019.
Ciolfi, L.; Bannon, L.J. Designing hybrid places: Merging interaction design, ubiquitous technologies and geographies of the museum space. CoDesign 2007, 3, 159–180. [CrossRef]
Bidwell, N.J.; Browning, D. Pursuing genius loci: Interaction design and natural places. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2010, 14, 15–30. [CrossRef]
Jacquemin, C.; Caye, V.; De Luca, L.; Favre-Brun, A. Genius Loci: Digital heritage augmentation for immersive performance. Int. J. Arts Technol. 2014, 7, 223–246. [CrossRef]
Torsi, S.; Ardito, C.; Rebek, C. Genius Loci and Cultural Heritage: An Interactive Narrative for the Ruins of Egnatia. In Handbook of Research on Cultural Heritage and Its Impact on Territory Innovation and Development; Oliveira, L., Amaro, A.C., Melro, A., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2021; pp. 371–380.
Tsenova, V.; Wood, G.; Dolfini, A.; Tindley, A.; Kirk, D. Un-authorised View: Leveraging Volunteer Expertise in Heritage. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 April 2020; pp. 1–14.
ICOMOS. Quebec Declaration on the Preservation of the Spirit of Place; ICOMOS: Québec, QC, Canada, 2008.
Petzet, M. Genius loci—The spirit of monuments and sites. In Proceedings of the 16th General Assembly of ICOMOS, Québec City, QC, Canada, 29 September–4 October 2008.
Sanders, E.B.-N.; Stappers, P.J. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 2008, 4, 5–18. [CrossRef]
Scapp, R. A Question of Voice: Philisophy and the Search for Legitimacy; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2020.
Hertz, R. Introduction: Ethics, reflexivity and voice. Qual. Sociol. 1996, 19, 3–9. [CrossRef]
Wilson, C.; McNaney, R.; Roper, A.; Capel, T.; Scheepmaker, L.; Brereton, M.; Wilson, S.; Green, D.P.; Wallace, J. Rethinking notions of “giving voice” in design. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 April 2020; pp. 1–8.
Couldry, N. Rethinking the politics of voice. Continuum 2009, 23, 579–582. [CrossRef]
BBC News National Trust Volunteers Refuse to Wear LGBTQ Badges. Available online: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-engl and-norfolk-40825660?ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbc_england&ns_source=twitter&ns_linkname=english_regions (accessed on 11 January 2019).
Strahilov, I. „И ние сме oт тaзи oблaст“—Рoмскaтa сурвaкaрскa групa oт грaд Рaдoмир в кoнтекстa нa местнaтa и нaциoнaлнaтa културa. In Етнoлoгия: Нaциoнaлнa, Региoнaлнa и Лoкaлнa Културa; Πaунoвa, B., Любенoвa, М., Eds.; Издaтелствo нa БAН „Πрoф. Мaрин Дринoв“: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2019; pp. 41–66.
Mason, R.; Whitehead, C.; Graham, H. One Voice to Many Voices? Displaying Polyvocality in an Art Gallery. In Museums and Communities: Curators, Collections, and Collaboration; Golding, V., Modest, W., Eds.; Bloomsbury Academic: London, UK, 2013; ISBN 9781474215299.
Marshall, M.T.; Dulake, N.; Ciolfi, L.; Duranti, D.; Kockelkorn, H.; Petrelli, D.; Haag, D. Using Tangible Smart Replicas as Controls for an Interactive Museum Exhibition. In Proceedings of the TEI’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 14–17 February 2016; pp. 159–167. [CrossRef]
Jamieson, K.; Discepoli, M. Exploring Deaf heritage futures through critical design and ‘Public Things’. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2021, 27, 117–133. [CrossRef]
Tchen, J.K.W.; Ševčenko, L. The “Dialogic Museum” Revisited. A Collaborative Reflection. In Letting Go? Sharing Historical Authority in a User-Generated World; Adair, B., Filene, B., Koloski, L., Eds.; Pew Center for Arts: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2011; pp. 80–97.
Ashworth, G.J.; Graham, B.; Tunbridge, J.E. Pluralising Pasts: Heritage, Identity and Place in Multicultural Societies; Pluto Press: London, UK, 2007.
Schofield, T.; Foster-Smith, D.; Bozoğlu, G.; Whitehead, C. Design and Plural Heritages Composing Critical Futures. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK, 4–9 May 2019; pp. 1–15.
Ciolfi, L. Can Digital Interactions Support New Dialogue Around Heritage? Interactions 2018, 25, 24–25. [CrossRef]
Albert, M.-T.; Richon, M.; Viñals, M.J.; Witcomb, A. Community Development through World Heritage; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2012.
Lave, J.; Wenger, E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991.
Ciolfi, L.; Damala, A.; Hornecker, E.; Lechner, M.; Maye, L. Cultural Heritage Communities: Technologies and Challenges; Ciolfi, L., Damala, A., Hornecker, E., Lechner, M., Maye, L., Eds.; Routledge: Abington, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2017.
Graham, H.; Vergunst, J.L. Heritage as Community Research: Legacies of Co-Production; Graham, H., Vergunst, J.L., Eds.; Policy Press: Bristol, UK, 2019.
Ciolfi, L.; Petrelli, D. Studying a community of volunteers at a historic cemetery to inspire interaction concepts. In Proceedings of the ACM’s C&T’15: 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, Limerick, Ireland, 27–30 June 2015; pp. 139–148.
Ciolfi, L.; Petrelli, D. Walking and Designing with Cultural Heritage Volunteers. Interactions 2016, 23, 46–51. [CrossRef]
Franco, B. Decentralizing Culture: Public History and Communities. In The Oxford Handbook of Public History; Hamilton, P., Gardner, J.B., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; ISBN 9780199766024.
Jones, S.; Leech, S. Valuing the Historic Environment: A Critical Review of Existing Approaches to Social Value; AHRC Cultural Value Report: Manchester, UK, 2015.
Claisse, C.; Petrelli, D.; Dulake, N.; Marshall, M.T.; Ciolfi, L. Multisensory Interactive Storytelling to Augment the Visit of a Historical House Museum. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2018 Digital Heritage International Congress, San Francisco, CA, USA, 26–30 October 2018; pp. 1–8.
Taylor, N.; Rogers, J.; Clarke, L.; Skelly, M.; Wallace, J.; Thomas, P.; George, B.; Raj, R.; Shorter, M.; Thorne, M. Prototyping Things: Reflecting on Unreported Objects of Design Research for IoT. In Proceedings of the DIS’21: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, Virtual Event, USA, 28 June 2021–2 July 2021; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 1807–1816. [CrossRef]
National Trust Our History: 1884-Present. Available online: https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/features/our-history-1884-prese nt (accessed on 4 May 2021).
National Trust Our History: 2000s. Available online: https://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/lists/our-history-2000s (accessed on 4 May 2021).
Gaver, B.; Dunne, T.; Pacenti, E. Cultural Probes. Interactions 1999, 6, 21–29. [CrossRef]
Tsenova, V. Storybase: Towards Cultural Transformation Driven by Design. In Proceedings of the Emerging Technologies and the Digital Transformation of Museums and Heritage Sites, RISE IMET 2021, Nicosia, Cyprus, 2–4 June 2021; Shehade, M., Stylianou-Lambert, T., Eds.; Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 1432, pp. 235–253.
McCarthy, J.; Wright, P. Taking [a] Part: The Politics and Aesthetics of Participation in Experience-Centered Design; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015.
Bowen, S.; Durrant, A.; Nissen, B.; Bowers, J.; Wright, P. The Value of Designers’ Creative Practice within Complex Collaborations. Des. Stud. 2016, 46, 174–198. [CrossRef]
Scopigno, R. Mixing visual media for Cultural Heritage. In Proceedings of the Emerging Technologies and the Digital Transformation of Museums and Heritage Sites, RISE IMET 2021, Nicosia, Cyprus, 2–4 June 2021; Shehade, M., Stylianou-Lambert, T., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 297–315.
Taylor, R.; Schofield, G.; Shearer, J.; Wallace, J.; Wright, P.; Boulanger, P.; Olivier, P. Designing from within: Humanaquarium. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7–12 May 2011; pp. 1855–1864. [CrossRef]
Sykes, J. The Concise Oxford English Dictionary; Oxford University Press: London, UK, 1976.
Bowers, J. The Logic of Annotated Portfolios: Communicating the Value of “Research Through Design”. In Proceedings of the DIS’12—Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Newcastle, UK, 11–15 June 2012; pp. 68–77.
Culén, A.L.; Børsting, J.; Gaver, W. Strategies for annotating portfolios: Mapping designs for new domains. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 6–10 July 2020; pp. 1633–1645. [CrossRef]
Wallace, J.; Rogers, J.; Shorter, M.; Thomas, P.; Skelly, M.; Cook, R. The Self-Reflector: Design, IoT and the high street. In Proceedings of the Conference Human Factors Computers System, Montréal, QC, Canada, 21–26 April 2018; pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Petrelli, D.; Ciolfi, L.; van Dijk, D.; Hornecker, E.; Elena, N.; Schmidt, A. Integrating Material and Digital: A New Way for Cultural Heritage. Interactions 2013, 20, 58–63. [CrossRef]
Rogage, K.; Kirk, D.; Charlton, J.; Nally, C.; Swords, J.; Watson, R. Memoryscapes: Designing Situated Narratives of Place through Heritage Collections. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2021, 37, 1028–1048. [CrossRef]
Dourish, P. Responsibilities and implications. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing for User eXperiences—DUX ’07, Chicago, IL, USA, 5–7 November 2007; pp. 1–16.
Adams, G. Was the National Trust Wrong to Cover Up Objects Featuring Men at Cragside?—Museums Association. Available online: https://www.museumsassociation.org/museums-journal/news/2018/11/14112018-was-national-trust-wrong-to-cov er-up-male-objects/(accessed on 23 March 2021).
Pollock, V. Comment: Why Contemporary Art in Historic Settings Is Important. Available online: https://www.ncl.ac.uk/press/articles/archive/2018/11/commentwhycontemporaryartinhistoricsettings/(accessed on 14 April 2021).
Pillatt, T.; Maxwell, D.; Edwards, L. Making Future Folklore: Assembling heritage through design. In Proceedings of the 5th Association for Critical Heritage Studies Biannual Conference, London, UK, 26–30 August 2020.
Brookfield, K.; Callaghan, D.; Graham, H.; Fair, J.; Roberts, J.; Rowley, P. Do-it-yourself heritage: Heritage as a process (designing for the Stoke ’Ping’). In Heritage as Community Research: Legacies of Co-Production; Graham, H., Vergunst, J.L., Eds.; Policy Press, Imprint of Bristol Policy Press: Bristol, UK, 2019; pp. 149–170.
Moore, S.; Pell, S. Autonomous archives. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2010, 16, 255–268. [CrossRef]
Arrigoni, G.; Galani, A. Recasting witnessing in museums: Digital interactive displays for dialogic remembering. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2020, 27, 250–264. [CrossRef]
Wood, G.; Dylan, T.; Durrant, A.; Torres, P.E.; Ulrich, P.; Carr, A.; Cukurova, M.; Downey, D.; McGrath, P.; Balaam, M.; et al. Designing for digital playing out. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, UK, 4–9 May 2019; pp. 1–16.
