Trademarks and how they relate to the sustainability and economic outcomes of social startups

Hirschmann, Mirko; Block, Jörn

doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134320

Request a copy

Article (Scientific journals)

Trademarks and how they relate to the sustainability and economic outcomes of social startups

Hirschmann, Mirko; Block, Jörn

2022 • In Journal of Cleaner Production

Peer reviewed

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10993/52251

DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134320

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

2022_Hirschmann & Block_Trademarks and how they relate to the sustainability and economic outcomes of social startups.pdf

Publisher postprint (1.66 MB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Sustainable entrepreneurship; Social startups; Trademarks; Sustainability outcomes; Economic outcomes; Intellectual property

Abstract :

[en] Prior research shows that trademarks positively relate to startups' growth and survival. However, empirical evidence on the impact of intellectual property rights (IPRs), especially trademarks, on the development of social startups' hybrid outcomes is limited. Our study aims to fill this gap by investigating how early trademarking relates to the sustainability and economic outcomes of social startups. Based on a sample of 485 social startups from Germany, we find that social startups that register a trademark within the first three years of their existence have both significantly higher sustainability and economic outcomes. Additionally, we identify that the geographical scope of a trademark relates differently to social startups' outcomes. Our results contribute to the emerging literature on startups’ role to achieve sustainability outcomes and to IPR research that lacks an understanding of the importance of trademarks for sustainable entrepreneurship. We provide several practical implications for social startups, impact investors, and policy-makers.

Research center :

- Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT) > Other

Disciplines :

Strategy & innovation

Author, co-author :

Hirschmann, Mirko ; University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and New Technology (EINT)

Block, Jörn

External co-authors :

yes

Language :

English

Title :

Trademarks and how they relate to the sustainability and economic outcomes of social startups

Publication date :

2022

Journal title :

Journal of Cleaner Production

ISSN :

0959-6526

Publisher :

Elsevier, Oxford, Netherlands

Special issue title :

Assessing and forecasting the sustainability impact of new ventures: Theories, methods and empirical evidence

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Focus Area :

Entrepreneurship and Innovation / Audit

Additional URL :

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652622038926?via%3Dihub

Available on ORBilu :

since 27 September 2022

Statistics

Number of views

64 (4 by Unilu)

Number of downloads

2 (0 by Unilu)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

WoS citations^™

Bibliography

Agarwal, S., Lenka, U., Singh, K., Agrawal, V., Agrawal, A.M., A qualitative approach towards crucial factors for sustainable development of women social entrepreneurship: Indian cases. J. Clean. Prod., 274, 2020, 123135.
Anand, A., Argade, P., Barkemeyer, R., Salignac, F., Trends and patterns in sustainable entrepreneurship research: a bibliometric review and research agenda. J. Bus. Ventur., 36(3), 2021, 106092.
Appel, I., Farre-Mensa, J., Simintzi, E., Patent trolls and startup employment. J. Financ. Econ. 133:3 (2019), 708–725.
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., Wei–Skillern, J., Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both?. Enterpren. Theor. Pract. 30:1 (2006), 1–22.
Bacq, S., Eddleston, K.A., A resource-based view of social entrepreneurship: how stewardship culture benefits scale of social impact. J. Bus. Ethics 152:3 (2018), 589–611.
Battilana, J., Lee, M., Advancing research on hybrid organizing–Insights from the study of social enterprises. Acad. Manag. Ann. 8:1 (2014), 397–441.
Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A.C., Model, J., Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: the case of work integration social enterprises. Acad. Manag. J. 58:6 (2015), 1658–1685.
Block, J.H., De Vries, G., Schumann, J.H., Sandner, P., Trademarks and venture capital valuation. J. Bus. Ventur. 29:4 (2014), 525–542.
Block, J.H., Fisch, C.O., Hahn, A., Sandner, P.G., Why do SMEs file trademarks? Insights from firms in innovative industries. Res. Pol. 44:10 (2015), 1915–1930.
Block, J.H., Hirschmann, M., Fisch, C., Which criteria matter when impact investors screen social enterprises?. J. Corp. Finance, 66, 2021, 101813.
Buerger, M., Broekel, T., Coad, A., Regional dynamics of innovation: investigating the co-evolution of patents, research and development (R&D), and employment. Reg. Stud. 46:5 (2012), 565–582.
Cacciolatti, L., Rosli, A., Ruiz-Alba, J.L., Chang, J., Strategic alliances and firm performance in startups with a social mission. J. Bus. Res. 106 (2020), 106–117.
Candelin-Palmqvist, H., Sandberg, B., Mylly, U.M., Intellectual property rights in innovation management research: a review. Technovation 32:9–10 (2012), 502–512.
Castaldi, C., To trademark or not to trademark: the case of the creative and cultural industries. Res. Pol. 47:3 (2018), 606–616.
Castaldi, C., Block, J., Flikkema, M.J., Why and when do firms trademark? Bridging perspectives from industrial organisation, innovation and entrepreneurship. Ind. Innovat. 27:1–2 (2020), 1–10.
Castaldi, C., Giarratana, M.S., Diversification, branding, and performance of professional service firms. J. Serv. Res. 21:3 (2018), 353–364.
Castaldi, C., Mendonça, S., Regions and trademarks: research opportunities and policy insights from leveraging trademarks in regional innovation studies. Reg. Stud., 1–13, 2022.
Cheah, J., Amran, A., Yahya, S., External oriented resources and social enterprises' performance: the dominant mediating role of formal business planning. J. Clean. Prod., 236, 2019, 117693.
Cheah, J., Amran, A., Yahya, S., Internal oriented resources and social enterprises' performance: how can social enterprises help themselves before helping others?. J. Clean. Prod. 211 (2019), 607–619.
Cockburn, I.M., MacGarvie, M.J., Patents, thickets and the financing of early-stage firms: evidence from the software industry. J. Econ. Manag. Strat. 18:3 (2009), 729–773.
Cohen, W.M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States. Res. Pol. 31:8–9 (2002), 1349–1367.
Crass, D., Which firms use trademarks? Firm-level evidence from Germany on the role of distance, product quality and innovation. Ind. Innovat. 27:7 (2020), 730–755.
Davister, C., Defourny, J., Grégoire, O., Work integration social enterprises in the European Union: an overview of existing models. Rev. Int.Econ Soc.: Recma 293 (2004), 24–50.
Dees, J.G., Emerson, J., Economy, P., Enterprising Nonprofits: A Toolkit for Social Entrepreneurs, vol. 186, 2002, John Wiley & Sons.
Defourny, J., Nyssens, M., Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: convergences and divergences. J. Soc. Enterpren. 1:1 (2010), 32–53.
Delmar, F., Wiklund, J., The effect of small business managers' growth motivation on firm growth: a longitudinal study. Enterpren. Theor. Pract. 32:3 (2008), 437–457.
Dinopoulos, E., Segerstrom, P., Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growth. J. Dev. Econ. 92:1 (2010), 13–27.
Economides, N.S., The economics of trademarks. Trademark Report., 78, 1988, 523.
Eicher, T., García-Peñalosa, C., Endogenous strength of intellectual property rights: implications for economic development and growth. Eur. Econ. Rev. 52:2 (2008), 237–258.
Engel, D., Keilbach, M., Firm-level implications of early stage venture capital investment—an empirical investigation. J. Empir. Finance 14:2 (2007), 150–167.
EUIPO. Green EU Trade Marks Analysis of Goods and Services Specifications, 1996–2020., 2021 Report by the European Intellectual Property Office.
Farre-Mensa, J., Hegde, D., Ljungqvist, A., What is a patent worth? Evidence from the US patent “lottery”. J. Finance 75:2 (2020), 639–682.
Fichter, K., Tiemann, I., Factors influencing university support for sustainable entrepreneurship: insights from explorative case studies. J. Clean. Prod. 175 (2018), 512–524.
Flikkema, M., Castaldi, C., de Man, A.P., Seip, M., Trademarks' relatedness to product and service innovation: a branding strategy approach. Res. Pol. 48:6 (2019), 1340–1353.
Flikkema, M., De Man, A.P., Castaldi, C., Are trademark counts a valid indicator of innovation? Results of an in-depth study of new benelux trademarks filed by SMEs. Ind. Innovat. 21:4 (2014), 310–331.
Gagliardi, L., Marin, G., Miriello, C., The greener the better? Job creation effects of environmentally-friendly technological change. Ind. Corp. Change 25:5 (2016), 779–807.
Galindo-Martín, M.A., Castaño-Martínez, M.S., Méndez-Picazo, M.T., The relationship between green innovation, social entrepreneurship, and sustainable development. Sustainability, 12(11), 2020, 4467.
Gans, J.S., Hsu, D.H., Stern, S., The impact of uncertain intellectual property rights on the market for ideas: evidence from patent grant delays. Manag. Sci. 54:5 (2008), 982–997.
Gaulé, P., Patents and the success of venture-capital backed startups: using examiner assignment to estimate causal effects. J. Ind. Econ. 66:2 (2018), 350–376.
George, G., Merrill, R.K., Schillebeeckx, S.J., Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: how digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Enterpren. Theor. Pract. 45:5 (2021), 999–1027.
Giarratana, M.S., Torrisi, S., Foreign entry and survival in a knowledge-intensive market: emerging economy countries' international linkages, technology competences, and firm experience. Strateg. Entrep. J. 4:1 (2010), 85–104.
Greenhalgh, C., Rogers, M., Trade marks and performance in services and manufacturing firms: evidence of Schumpeterian competition through innovation. Aust. Econ. Rev. 45:1 (2012), 50–76.
Günzel-Jensen, F., Siebold, N., Kroeger, A., Korsgaard, S., Do the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals matter for social entrepreneurial ventures? A bottom-up perspective. J.Bus.Ventur.Insights, 13, 2020, e00162.
Hanel, P., Intellectual property rights business management practices: a survey of the literature. Technovation 26:8 (2006), 895–931.
Häussler, C., Harhoff, D., Müller, E., To be financed or not…-The role of patents for venture capital-financing. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, (09–003), 2012.
Haugh, H., Robson, P., Hagedoorn, J., Sugar, K., The nascent ecology of social enterprise. Small Bus. Econ., 2020, 1–20.
Helmers, C., Rogers, M., Innovation and the survival of new firms in the UK. Rev. Ind. Organ. 36:3 (2010), 227–248.
Helmers, C., Rogers, M., Does patenting help high-tech start-ups?. Res. Pol. 40:7 (2011), 1016–1027.
Henderson, J., Building the rural economy with high-growth entrepreneurs. Econ. Rev. Fed. Reserv. Bank Kans. City 87:3 (2002), 45–75.
Hilmersson, M., Johanson, M., Speed of SME internationalization and performance. Manag. Int. Rev. 56:1 (2016), 67–94.
Hirschmann, M., Moritz, A., Block, J.H., Motives, Supporting Activities, and Selection Criteria of Social Impact Incubators: an Experimental Conjoint Study. 2021, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 08997640211057402.
Hockerts, K., Wüstenhagen, R., Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids—theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 25:5 (2010), 481–492.
Horne, J., Recker, M., Michelfelder, I., Jay, J., Kratzer, J., Exploring entrepreneurship related to the sustainable development goals-mapping new venture activities with semi-automated content analysis. J. Clean. Prod., 242, 2020, 118052.
Hsu, P.H., Li, D., Li, Q., Teoh, S.H., Tseng, K., Valuation of New Trademarks. 2021, Management Science.
Izzo, D., Aligning interests in impact investing. Stanford social innovation review. Available at: http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/aligning_interests_in_impact_investing, 2013.
Jiang, W., Chai, H., Shao, J., Feng, T., Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: a dynamic capability perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 198 (2018), 1311–1323.
Jiao, J.L., Zhang, X.L., Tang, Y.S., What factors determine the survival of green innovative enterprises in China?–A method based on fsQCA. Technol. Soc., 62, 2020, 101314.
Johnson, M.P., Schaltegger, S., Entrepreneurship for sustainable development: a review and multilevel causal mechanism framework. Enterpren. Theor. Pract. 44:6 (2020), 1141–1173.
Kachlami, H., Davidsson, P., Obschonka, M., Yazdanfar, D., Lundström, A., The regional employment effects of new social firm entry. Small Bus. Econ., 2020, 1–21.
Kerlin, J.A., Social enterprise in the United States and Europe: understanding and learning from the differences. Voluntas Int. J. Voluntary Nonprofit Organ., 17(3), 2006, 246.
Keskin, D., Wever, R., Brezet, H., Product innovation processes in sustainability-oriented ventures: a study of effectuation and causation. J. Clean. Prod., 263, 2020, 121210.
Kuckertz, A., Berger, E.S., Gaudig, A., Responding to the greatest challenges? Value creation in ecological startups. J. Clean. Prod. 230 (2019), 1138–1147.
Kwon, O., A study on how startups approach sustainable development through intellectual property. Sustain. Dev. 28:4 (2020), 613–625.
Lall, S.A., Park, J., How Social Ventures Grow: Understanding the Role of Philanthropic Grants in Scaling Social Entrepreneurship. 2020, Business & Society, 0007650320973434.
Li, Q., Deng, P., From international new ventures to MNCs: crossing the chasm effect on internationalization paths. J. Bus. Res. 70 (2017), 92–100.
Littlewood, D., Holt, D., How social enterprises can contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)–A conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship and the Sustainable Development Goals, 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited.
Lyon, F., Fernandez, H., Strategies for scaling up social enterprise: lessons from early years providers. Social Enterprise Journal 8:1 (2012), 66–77.
Majid, I.A., Koe, W.L., Sustainable entrepreneurship (SE): a revised model based on triple bottom line (TBL). Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., 2(6), 2012, 293.
Malmberg, C., Trademark statistics as innovation indicator? A micro study. Centre for Innovation, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy, 2005 Working Paper No 2005/17 https://portal.research.lu.se/portal/files/4643553/4407256.pdf Available at:.
Mann, R.J., Sager, T.W., Patents, venture capital, and software start-ups. Res. Pol. 36:2 (2007), 193–208.
Marie-Vivien, D., Garcia, C.A., Kushalappa, C.G., Vaast, P., Trademarks, geographical indications and environmental labelling to promote biodiversity: the case of agroforestry coffee in India. Dev. Pol. Rev. 32:4 (2014), 379–398.
Maskus, K.E., Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. 2000, Peterson Institute.
Mejri, K., Umemoto, K., Small-and medium-sized enterprise internationalization: towards the knowledge-based model. J. Int. Enterpren. 8:2 (2010), 156–167.
Mendonça, S., Pereira, T.S., Godinho, M.M., Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change. Res. Pol. 33:9 (2004), 1385–1404.
Mensah, C.N., Long, X., Dauda, L., Boamah, K.B., Salman, M., Innovation and CO2 emissions: the complimentary role of eco-patent and trademark in the OECD economies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser. 26:22 (2019), 22878–22891.
Miller, T.L., Wesley, C.L., Assessing mission and resources for social change: an organizational identity perspective on social venture capitalists ‘decision criteria. Enterpren. Theor. Pract. 34:4 (2010), 705–733.
Muñoz, P., Cohen, B., Sustainable entrepreneurship research: taking stock and looking ahead. Bus. Strat. Environ. 27:3 (2018), 300–322.
Neumann, T., Does it pay for new firms to be green? An empirical analysis of when and how different greening strategies affect the performance of new firms. J. Clean. Prod., 317, 2021, 128403.
Pacheco, D.F., Dean, T.J., Payne, D.S., Escaping the green prison: entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. J. Bus. Ventur. 25:5 (2010), 464–480.
Pisano, G., Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Res. Pol. 35:8 (2006), 1122–1130.
Rawhouser, H., Cummings, M., Newbert, S.L., Social impact measurement: current approaches and future directions for social entrepreneurship research. Enterpren. Theor. Pract. 43:1 (2019), 82–115.
Renko, M., Early challenges of nascent social entrepreneurs. Enterpren. Theor. Pract. 37:5 (2013), 1045–1069.
Rey-Martí, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., Sánchez-García, J.L., Giving back to society: job creation through social entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Res. 69:6 (2016), 2067–2072.
Sadma, O., The role of environmental-based “Green Startup” in reducing waste problem and its implication to environmental resilience. Res. Horiz. 1:3 (2021), 106–114.
Sandner, P., The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks. The Valuation of Intangible Assets, 2009, Gabler, 35–72.
Sandner, P.G., Block, J., The market value of R&D, patents, and trademarks. Res. Pol. 40:7 (2011), 969–985.
Schaltegger, S., Beckmann, M., Hockerts, K., Collaborative entrepreneurship for sustainability. Creating solutions in light of the UN sustainable development goals. Int. J. Entrepreneurial Ventur. 10:2 (2018), 131–152.
Schmoch, U., Gauch, S., Service marks as indicators for innovation in knowledge-based services. Res. Eval. 18:4 (2009), 323–335.
Shepherd, D.A., Patzelt, H., A Call for Research on the Scaling of Organizations and the Scaling of Social Impact. 2020.
Sher, A., Abbas, A., Mazhar, S., Azadi, H., Lin, G., Fostering sustainable ventures: drivers of sustainable start-up intentions among aspiring entrepreneurs in Pakistan. J. Clean. Prod., 262, 2020, 121269.
Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G.L., Rangaswamy, A., Survival of high tech firms: the effects of diversity of product–market portfolios, patents, and trademarks. Int. J. Res. Market. 25:2 (2008), 119–128.
Staessens, M., Kerstens, P.J., Bruneel, J., Cherchye, L., Data envelopment analysis and social enterprises: analysing performance, strategic orientation and mission drift. J. Bus. Ethics 159:2 (2019), 325–341.
Surana, K., Singh, A., Sagar, A.D., Strengthening science, technology, and innovation-based incubators to help achieve Sustainable Development Goals: lessons from India. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 157, 2020, 120057.
Sweet, C.M., Maggio, D.S.E., Do stronger intellectual property rights increase innovation?. World Dev. 66 (2015), 665–677.
Tabares, S., Do hybrid organizations contribute to sustainable development goals? Evidence from B Corps in Colombia. J. Clean. Prod., 280, 2021, 124615.
Tan, W.L., Williams, J., Tan, T.M., Defining the ‘social’ in ‘social entrepreneurship’: altruism and entrepreneurship. Int. Enterpren. Manag. J. 1:3 (2005), 353–365.
Tiba, S., van Rijnsoever, F.J., Hekkert, M.P., Sustainability startups and where to find them: investigating the share of sustainability startups across entrepreneurial ecosystems and the causal drivers of differences. J. Clean. Prod., 306, 2021, 127054.
Tracey, P., Jarvis, O., Toward a theory of social venture franchising. Enterpren. Theor. Pract. 31:5 (2007), 667–685.
Ullah, S., Ozturk, I., Majeed, M.T., Ahmad, W., Do technological innovations have symmetric or asymmetric effects on environmental quality? Evidence from Pakistan. J. Clean. Prod., 316, 2021, 128239.
Van Rijnsoever, F.J., Intermediaries for the greater good: how entrepreneurial support organizations can embed constrained sustainable development startups in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Res. Pol., 51(2), 2022, 104438.
Van Roy, V., Vértesy, D., Vivarelli, M., Technology and employment: mass unemployment or job creation? Empirical evidence from European patenting firms. Res. Pol. 47:9 (2018), 1762–1776.
Volkmann, C., Fichter, K., Klofsten, M., Audretsch, D.B., Sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an emerging field of research. Small Bus. Econ. 56:3 (2021), 1047–1055.
WIPO. World intellectual property report 2013: brands – Reputation and image in the global marketplace. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=384&plang=EN, 2013.
WIPO. Trademarks – what is a trademark?. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/trademarks/en/, 2021.
Wood, L., Brands and brand equity: definition and management. Manag. Decis. 38:9 (2000), 662–669.
Xiong, G., Bharadwaj, S., Social capital of young technology firms and their IPO values: the complementary role of relevant absorptive capacity. J. Market. 75:6 (2011), 87–104.
Yang, S., Kher, R., Newbert, S.L., What signals matter for social startups? It depends: the influence of gender role congruity on social impact accelerator selection decisions. J. Bus. Ventur., 35(2), 2020, 105932.
Yusliza, M.Y., Yong, J.Y., Tanveer, M.I., Ramayah, T., Faezah, J.N., Muhammad, Z., A structural model of the impact of green intellectual capital on sustainable performance. J. Clean. Prod., 249, 2020, 119334.
Zahra, S.A., Rawhouser, H.N., Bhawe, N., Neubaum, D.O., Hayton, J.C., Globalization of social entrepreneurship opportunities. Strateg. Entrep. J. 2:2 (2008), 117–131.
Zhao, M., Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Manag. Sci. 52:8 (2006), 1185–1199.